Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Brighton Domain.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
71 Valid Reviews
The Brighton Domain experience has a total of 73 reviews. There are 71 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 71 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 29 |
|
41% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Brighton Domain valid reviews is 82.82% and is based on 71 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
5 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 71 valid reviews, the experience has 5 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 5 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
80% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
20% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
78.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Brighton Domain face-to-face reviews is 78.00% and is based on 5 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.39%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capucine | 10/10 | 100 days | 100% |
| Jacqueline | 10/10 | 190 days | 98% |
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 190 days | 98% |
| Charlotte F | 8/10 | 221 days | 96% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 251 days | 97% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 282 days | 94% |
| Nicolas | 9/10 | 647 days | 76% |
| Phoebe | 10/10 | 830 days | 61% |
| Hugo | 8/10 | 861 days | 57% |
| Nina S. Larsen | 9/10 | 890 days | 54% |
| Cholly | 8/10 | 1013 days | 42% |
| Marie Perret | 8/10 | 1043 days | 39% |
| Lea | 3/10 | 1196 days | 14% |
| Kelsey Fisher | 9/10 | 1227 days | 25% |
| Gt | 9/10 | 1255 days | 23% |
| Meaghan | 8/10 | 1317 days | 19% |
| Colin | 9/10 | 1378 days | 16% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1439 days | 13% |
| Jrod | 7/10 | 1561 days | 8% |
| Alex Geraghty | 10/10 | 1926 days | 4% |
| Alydia | 8/10 | 1985 days | 4% |
| Jase | 8/10 | 2016 days | 4% |
| Brendon | 6/10 | 2108 days | 3% |
| Linda | 6/10 | 2351 days | 3% |
| Javier Williams | 8/10 | 2443 days | 3% |
| Elaine | 8/10 | 2504 days | 3% |
| Alice Anderson | 10/10 | 2535 days | 3% |
| Hannah Barnes | 8/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
| Pat Burns | 8/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Dirk Taubner | 10/10 | 2747 days | 2% |
| Babyinplug | 8/10 | 2747 days | 2% |
| Allie | 5/10 | 2747 days | 2% |
| Mazz | 9/10 | 2778 days | 2% |
| Martin | 10/10 | 2778 days | 2% |
| Ave | 8/10 | 2839 days | 2% |
| Sue | 8/10 | 2931 days | 2% |
| Stephen Lindsay | 7/10 | 2992 days | 2% |
| Owen | 9/10 | 3022 days | 2% |
| Julie Crawshaw | 8/10 | 3022 days | 2% |
| Steve Warndahl | 10/10 | 3053 days | 2% |
| Katherine | 9/10 | 3053 days | 2% |
| Rikke Hessellund, Denmark | 8/10 | 3053 days | 2% |
| Marken Marike | 10/10 | 3058 days | 2% |
| Sophie Keltie | 5/10 | 3079 days | 1% |
| Michael Jayaranjan | 8/10 | 3093 days | 2% |
| Andrew Furphy | 2/10 | 3128 days | 0% |
| Sophie Nightingale | 8/10 | 3171 days | 2% |
| corinne bossat | 8/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 3191 days | 2% |
| Suzanne Halfpenny | 10/10 | 3204 days | 2% |
| Jayraj Rau | 9/10 | 3264 days | 1% |
| Chloe Watson | 8/10 | 3299 days | 1% |
| Jo Dawson | 9/10 | 3312 days | 1% |
| Greg | 10/10 | 3353 days | 1% |
| Bruce Graham | 9/10 | 3361 days | 1% |
| Jo Gittins | 9/10 | 3415 days | 1% |
| Josephine Ayvadian | 8/10 | 3418 days | 1% |
| Rogina de Jong | 9/10 | 3467 days | 1% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3467 days | 1% |
| Jos Tolboom | 9/10 | 3480 days | 1% |
| Marina | 8/10 | 3809 days | 0% |
| Sarah Gurney | 5/10 | 3882 days | 0% |
| Steve Warren | 8/10 | 3965 days | 0% |
| Sheila Galpin | 8/10 | 4512 days | 0% |
| Ann Barrett | 7/10 | 4513 days | 0% |
| Malcolm & Susan | 9/10 | 4514 days | 0% |
| tracey aylmer | 8/10 | 4514 days | 0% |
| Michael Uebe | 8/10 | 4545 days | 0% |
| Andrea Hiemer | 8/10 | 4549 days | 0% |
| Jean Batiste Le meur | 8/10 | 4562 days | 0% |
| Karen Bailey | 10/10 | 4573 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Brighton Domain does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.09% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.