Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Shotover Jet.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
269 Valid Reviews
The Shotover Jet experience has a total of 271 reviews. There are 269 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 269 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 86 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 66 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 50 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 35 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 18 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 8 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
84.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Shotover Jet valid reviews is 84.13% and is based on 269 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
234 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 269 valid reviews, the experience has 234 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 234 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 70 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 55 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 46 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 33 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 18 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
83.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Shotover Jet face-to-face reviews is 83.42% and is based on 234 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
85.38%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paul from USA | 1/10 | 2505 days | 44% |
| Andrew Hammond | 9/10 | 2627 days | 100% |
| Josh Mills | 9/10 | 3540 days | 48% |
| Alex Hah | 9/10 | 3582 days | 45% |
| Nicola | 6/10 | 3588 days | 39% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3610 days | 44% |
| Louise Walker | 10/10 | 3630 days | 43% |
| Hazel Norman | 10/10 | 3671 days | 41% |
| Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3882 days | 26% |
| Jeeyoung Kim | 10/10 | 3892 days | 28% |
| Kim Rasun | 10/10 | 3892 days | 28% |
| Anke Vater | 7/10 | 3896 days | 26% |
| Joerg | 7/10 | 3897 days | 26% |
| George Bellwood | 10/10 | 3897 days | 28% |
| Katrina | 8/10 | 3913 days | 26% |
| Leonie Prendeville | 6/10 | 3942 days | 21% |
| Ivan Dupont | 9/10 | 3947 days | 24% |
| Madita and Lisann | 9/10 | 3981 days | 22% |
| Andy Jobst | 6/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| Antoine Vernay | 3/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
| Andrew Kermode | 9/10 | 4515 days | 29% |
| Patricia Erni | 10/10 | 4615 days | 29% |
| Robert Erni | 10/10 | 4615 days | 29% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 9/10 | 4615 days | 29% |
| Laura Metz | 10/10 | 4650 days | 29% |
| Hubertus Thost | 9/10 | 4650 days | 29% |
| Emma Wallace | 10/10 | 4671 days | 29% |
| Michael Sheridan | 10/10 | 4677 days | 29% |
| Ben Sheridan | 8/10 | 4677 days | 29% |
| Ruben Garcia Raiuiro | 8/10 | 4686 days | 29% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 9/10 | 4688 days | 29% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 7/10 | 4697 days | 27% |
| hendrik king | 8/10 | 4910 days | 29% |
| Andy Cummins | 10/10 | 4989 days | 29% |
| Sharyn Crosby | 10/10 | 5002 days | 29% |
| Guillot | 8/10 | 5009 days | 29% |
| Michal Maly | 9/10 | 5028 days | 29% |
| Karin Genyn | 10/10 | 5078 days | 29% |
| Michael Kretzschmar | 9/10 | 5078 days | 29% |
| Tom and Jemima Rawlings | 8/10 | 5083 days | 29% |
| Franz Schueler | 10/10 | 5084 days | 29% |
| Meryem Buchwitz | 10/10 | 5105 days | 29% |
| Karsten Meyer | 8/10 | 5107 days | 29% |
| Michel Vourbraak | 5/10 | 5108 days | 22% |
| TheHoon | 9/10 | 5336 days | 29% |
| Simon Rawlinson | 10/10 | 5348 days | 29% |
| Norman UK | 10/10 | 5359 days | 29% |
| Larry Curtiss | 10/10 | 5364 days | 29% |
| Madeleine Mueller | 10/10 | 5372 days | 29% |
| Jaap & Susanne | 8/10 | 5376 days | 29% |
| Anne King | 6/10 | 5376 days | 25% |
| Fleming Lauridsen | 9/10 | 5376 days | 29% |
| Robert & Bridget Holden | 9/10 | 5376 days | 29% |
| Howell Davies | 10/10 | 5376 days | 29% |
| Linda Kosters | 10/10 | 5376 days | 29% |
| Aridne Giraud | 9/10 | 5379 days | 29% |
| Kolen | 10/10 | 5379 days | 29% |
| Helen Chilton | 8/10 | 5384 days | 29% |
| Tim Gamblen | 10/10 | 5384 days | 29% |
| Jonathan Philp | 7/10 | 5388 days | 27% |
| Clemens | 6/10 | 5389 days | 25% |
| Heike | 10/10 | 5391 days | 29% |
| Frank & Julia | 7/10 | 5395 days | 27% |
| FlyKiwiFly | 7/10 | 5396 days | 27% |
| joerem | 5/10 | 5396 days | 22% |
| Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 5407 days | 29% |
| deJong | 8/10 | 5462 days | 29% |
| Gerard Crothers | 10/10 | 5465 days | 29% |
| Christoph | 7/10 | 5467 days | 27% |
| Steve | 9/10 | 5472 days | 29% |
| Helle Thomsen | 10/10 | 5474 days | 29% |
| Wendy Ashmore | 10/10 | 5474 days | 29% |
| James McColl | 6/10 | 5488 days | 25% |
| katel86 | 10/10 | 5549 days | 29% |
| Kimberly St Louis | 10/10 | 5672 days | 29% |
| Sam papworth | 10/10 | 5701 days | 29% |
| Josephine Hartley | 1/10 | 5701 days | 12% |
| Nicola Young | 5/10 | 5701 days | 22% |
| Schury | 10/10 | 5704 days | 29% |
| Rob O'Neill | 9/10 | 5704 days | 29% |
| Katarina Bokor | 10/10 | 5710 days | 29% |
| Sue Carren | 8/10 | 5710 days | 29% |
| Mark Franklin | 8/10 | 5710 days | 29% |
| Emma Cross | 9/10 | 5712 days | 29% |
| John & Lorraine | 8/10 | 5712 days | 29% |
| Hanggi | 9/10 | 5713 days | 29% |
| Julie and Russ Charles | 10/10 | 5715 days | 29% |
| Berger | 10/10 | 5717 days | 29% |
| Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5723 days | 29% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 5723 days | 29% |
| Siggi Wick | 10/10 | 5724 days | 29% |
| Birga | 9/10 | 5730 days | 29% |
| Cameron and Kim | 10/10 | 5732 days | 29% |
| Ebi & Beate | 8/10 | 5733 days | 29% |
| taniadeanryanbrittany | 8/10 | 5733 days | 29% |
| Alice Galley | 8/10 | 5736 days | 29% |
| Alice | 9/10 | 5737 days | 29% |
| Alexander & Stephanie | 8/10 | 5738 days | 29% |
| Lauren Pestell | 8/10 | 5740 days | 29% |
| Bob Warne | 9/10 | 5744 days | 29% |
| Jol Balder | 4/10 | 5749 days | 19% |
| Irene and Thib Schneider | 9/10 | 5749 days | 29% |
| Doris Schollenberger | 9/10 | 5751 days | 29% |
| Roger Lows | 9/10 | 5752 days | 29% |
| Glenn | 9/10 | 5752 days | 29% |
| Ryan Tull | 7/10 | 5756 days | 27% |
| Hull | 10/10 | 5756 days | 29% |
| Brandt | 10/10 | 5758 days | 29% |
| Emma Wilkinson | 6/10 | 5760 days | 25% |
| Lyndell | 9/10 | 5823 days | 29% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5884 days | 29% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 5884 days | 29% |
| kristy | 9/10 | 5914 days | 29% |
| Behrenot | 8/10 | 6015 days | 29% |
| M Schram | 7/10 | 6016 days | 27% |
| garfield | 9/10 | 6037 days | 29% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 6045 days | 29% |
| nuwee | 9/10 | 6067 days | 29% |
| Hana Vokata | 10/10 | 6072 days | 29% |
| Wyss A | 10/10 | 6079 days | 29% |
| katrina Marshall | 9/10 | 6084 days | 29% |
| Pam & Norman | 9/10 | 6091 days | 29% |
| Chris Bil | 10/10 | 6093 days | 29% |
| Sue S | 8/10 | 6093 days | 29% |
| Rod C | 10/10 | 6096 days | 29% |
| Richard | 5/10 | 6102 days | 22% |
| Doris Resch | 10/10 | 6104 days | 29% |
| Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 6105 days | 29% |
| Ed & Pat Mitchell | 9/10 | 6106 days | 29% |
| Jenny | 8/10 | 6106 days | 29% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6111 days | 29% |
| Yona | 7/10 | 6112 days | 27% |
| Mathias | 10/10 | 6113 days | 29% |
| Jamie | 10/10 | 6118 days | 29% |
| Lewis | 10/10 | 6119 days | 29% |
| kararina Kosten | 9/10 | 6120 days | 29% |
| Vincente Garrido | 7/10 | 6121 days | 27% |
| Ingrid Overes | 9/10 | 6125 days | 29% |
| S Luis Van Oler | 9/10 | 6131 days | 29% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 6132 days | 29% |
| Dale W | 8/10 | 6135 days | 29% |
| Omar Frenchy | 9/10 | 6135 days | 29% |
| Marons | 7/10 | 6177 days | 27% |
| Sena | 7/10 | 6198 days | 27% |
| Kyle Riseley | 8/10 | 6199 days | 29% |
| Rebecca Jenner | 8/10 | 6199 days | 29% |
| Carl and Angela Rapihana | 6/10 | 6211 days | 25% |
| nancyburns | 10/10 | 6218 days | 29% |
| marleen451 | 9/10 | 6249 days | 29% |
| Jackie Anderson | 10/10 | 6279 days | 29% |
| bogaard | 8/10 | 6314 days | 29% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6371 days | 29% |
| Charles Lyne | 10/10 | 6402 days | 29% |
| TillE412 | 10/10 | 6417 days | 29% |
| ElleGermany | 9/10 | 6420 days | 29% |
| JonK | 10/10 | 6420 days | 29% |
| BeckieM | 9/10 | 6422 days | 29% |
| Anji Sprinks | 9/10 | 6429 days | 29% |
| SteveB | 10/10 | 6432 days | 29% |
| annysp | 10/10 | 6432 days | 29% |
| davidne | 6/10 | 6432 days | 25% |
| Jeremy | 9/10 | 6432 days | 29% |
| Daniel | 9/10 | 6438 days | 29% |
| Richard | 9/10 | 6441 days | 29% |
| MichaelS1 | 9/10 | 6448 days | 29% |
| ChrisD | 10/10 | 6448 days | 29% |
| AstridVG | 8/10 | 6448 days | 29% |
| Lucas | 9/10 | 6448 days | 29% |
| StijnH | 7/10 | 6449 days | 27% |
| TobiasK | 8/10 | 6451 days | 29% |
| Michael | 9/10 | 6456 days | 29% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6463 days | 29% |
| Linda | 6/10 | 6463 days | 25% |
| Kelly | 10/10 | 6464 days | 29% |
| CarleyJ | 7/10 | 6466 days | 27% |
| VictoriaH | 9/10 | 6467 days | 29% |
| RobC1 | 7/10 | 6467 days | 27% |
| JoT | 8/10 | 6467 days | 29% |
| RobH | 7/10 | 6468 days | 27% |
| Eileen Harris | 9/10 | 6470 days | 29% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 6471 days | 29% |
| Amanda Williams | 10/10 | 6472 days | 29% |
| CarinnaGermany | 7/10 | 6474 days | 27% |
| Trevor | 10/10 | 6475 days | 29% |
| David | 7/10 | 6480 days | 27% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6482 days | 29% |
| Ralf | 9/10 | 6484 days | 29% |
| Christina | 10/10 | 6496 days | 29% |
| John | 10/10 | 6501 days | 29% |
| Jon | 8/10 | 6503 days | 29% |
| Karen | 8/10 | 6503 days | 29% |
| Bernd | 6/10 | 6505 days | 25% |
| Kori | 8/10 | 6544 days | 29% |
| David | 7/10 | 6545 days | 27% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 6563 days | 29% |
| Nicole | 6/10 | 6566 days | 25% |
| Stephanie Schikora | 10/10 | 6575 days | 29% |
| Gaurav M | 7/10 | 6594 days | 27% |
| Kate | 7/10 | 6618 days | 27% |
| Robin | 10/10 | 6621 days | 29% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 6627 days | 29% |
| Felicity | 8/10 | 6629 days | 29% |
| Suyin | 10/10 | 6629 days | 29% |
| Fothergill | 7/10 | 6638 days | 27% |
| Christopher | 8/10 | 6642 days | 29% |
| James | 9/10 | 6642 days | 29% |
| jillian | 6/10 | 6651 days | 25% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 6664 days | 27% |
| loumac | 8/10 | 6667 days | 29% |
| Gray | 10/10 | 6667 days | 29% |
| Lucchi | 3/10 | 6684 days | 16% |
| Ashlee Roberts | 10/10 | 6729 days | 29% |
| L1z4rd | 10/10 | 6762 days | 29% |
| Kori Barton | 7/10 | 6774 days | 27% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 6803 days | 29% |
| Daniela | 6/10 | 6808 days | 25% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6812 days | 29% |
| Wendy | 6/10 | 6816 days | 25% |
| Mikel | 6/10 | 6816 days | 25% |
| Dunet | 9/10 | 6816 days | 29% |
| Jeanette | 8/10 | 6818 days | 29% |
| Christian | 7/10 | 6819 days | 27% |
| Neil | 6/10 | 6823 days | 25% |
| Marian Mckinney | 8/10 | 6825 days | 29% |
| Stephanie Grisel | 9/10 | 6825 days | 29% |
| Dirk | 10/10 | 6831 days | 29% |
| Jurg Meister | 5/10 | 6832 days | 22% |
| Lisa Tame | 7/10 | 6833 days | 27% |
| Steven | 10/10 | 6833 days | 29% |
| Ian and Judy | 10/10 | 6833 days | 29% |
| Erwin de Kleijn | 8/10 | 6837 days | 29% |
| Reina Lohaye | 8/10 | 6847 days | 29% |
| Marc Hertogs | 7/10 | 6848 days | 27% |
| V Wood | 5/10 | 6848 days | 22% |
| paulonline | 8/10 | 6850 days | 29% |
| Pauline Thai | 10/10 | 6851 days | 29% |
| Bex | 9/10 | 6859 days | 29% |
| Stephen Brightman | 9/10 | 6860 days | 29% |
| Madeleine Rowland | 10/10 | 6860 days | 29% |
| Swen Schroder | 8/10 | 6872 days | 29% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 6872 days | 29% |
| Bronwyn Gaby | 8/10 | 6878 days | 29% |
| Ard | 7/10 | 6907 days | 27% |
| Patricia Leighton | 10/10 | 7034 days | 29% |
| Andy Chapman | 8/10 | 7034 days | 29% |
| Tanja | 4/10 | 7138 days | 19% |
| Alan | 7/10 | 7143 days | 27% |
| Svenja | 6/10 | 7148 days | 25% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 7150 days | 29% |
| Akiko&Shibotsu | 9/10 | 7150 days | 29% |
| Roger&Shirley | 8/10 | 7156 days | 29% |
| Fred | 9/10 | 7162 days | 29% |
| Kathryn | 7/10 | 7165 days | 27% |
| Michaela | 8/10 | 7186 days | 29% |
| Ian | 7/10 | 7186 days | 27% |
| Pete | 8/10 | 7186 days | 29% |
| Anne | 9/10 | 7186 days | 29% |
| Malon | 7/10 | 7188 days | 27% |
| Vibeke | 8/10 | 7197 days | 29% |
| beesom | 10/10 | 7198 days | 29% |
| Hirsh | 9/10 | 7202 days | 29% |
| Kerry | 5/10 | 7207 days | 22% |
| Alison | 8/10 | 7207 days | 29% |
| Jim | 10/10 | 7208 days | 29% |
| Peter&Amy | 7/10 | 7208 days | 27% |
| Franz-Josef | 10/10 | 7214 days | 29% |
| Marc | 5/10 | 7215 days | 22% |
| JuanPablo | 9/10 | 7221 days | 29% |
| Moritz | 10/10 | 8594 days | 29% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Shotover Jet experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.96% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 46 days. However the Shotover Jet experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Shotover Jet experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.90% |
| 198 | -3.92% |
| 199 | -3.94% |
| 200 | -3.96% |
| 201 | -3.98% |
| 202 | -4.00% |
| 203 | -4.02% |
| … | … |
2.63% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.