Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Shotover Jet.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
269 Valid Reviews
The Shotover Jet experience has a total of 271 reviews. There are 269 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 269 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 86 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 66 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 50 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 35 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 18 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 8 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
84.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Shotover Jet valid reviews is 84.13% and is based on 269 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
234 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 269 valid reviews, the experience has 234 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 234 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 70 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 55 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 46 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 33 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 18 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
83.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Shotover Jet face-to-face reviews is 83.42% and is based on 234 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
85.36%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paul from USA | 1/10 | 2463 days | 43% |
| Andrew Hammond | 9/10 | 2585 days | 100% |
| Josh Mills | 9/10 | 3498 days | 48% |
| Alex Hah | 9/10 | 3540 days | 46% |
| Nicola | 6/10 | 3546 days | 39% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3568 days | 45% |
| Louise Walker | 10/10 | 3588 days | 44% |
| Hazel Norman | 10/10 | 3629 days | 41% |
| Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3840 days | 27% |
| Jeeyoung Kim | 10/10 | 3850 days | 29% |
| Kim Rasun | 10/10 | 3850 days | 29% |
| Anke Vater | 7/10 | 3854 days | 26% |
| Joerg | 7/10 | 3855 days | 26% |
| George Bellwood | 10/10 | 3855 days | 28% |
| Katrina | 8/10 | 3871 days | 27% |
| Leonie Prendeville | 6/10 | 3900 days | 22% |
| Ivan Dupont | 9/10 | 3905 days | 25% |
| Madita and Lisann | 9/10 | 3939 days | 23% |
| Andy Jobst | 6/10 | 4320 days | 1% |
| Antoine Vernay | 3/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
| Andrew Kermode | 9/10 | 4473 days | 27% |
| Patricia Erni | 10/10 | 4573 days | 28% |
| Robert Erni | 10/10 | 4573 days | 28% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 9/10 | 4573 days | 27% |
| Laura Metz | 10/10 | 4608 days | 28% |
| Hubertus Thost | 9/10 | 4608 days | 27% |
| Emma Wallace | 10/10 | 4629 days | 28% |
| Michael Sheridan | 10/10 | 4635 days | 28% |
| Ben Sheridan | 8/10 | 4635 days | 27% |
| Ruben Garcia Raiuiro | 8/10 | 4644 days | 27% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 9/10 | 4646 days | 27% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 7/10 | 4655 days | 26% |
| hendrik king | 8/10 | 4868 days | 27% |
| Andy Cummins | 10/10 | 4947 days | 28% |
| Sharyn Crosby | 10/10 | 4960 days | 28% |
| Guillot | 8/10 | 4967 days | 27% |
| Michal Maly | 9/10 | 4986 days | 27% |
| Karin Genyn | 10/10 | 5036 days | 28% |
| Michael Kretzschmar | 9/10 | 5036 days | 27% |
| Tom and Jemima Rawlings | 8/10 | 5041 days | 27% |
| Franz Schueler | 10/10 | 5042 days | 28% |
| Meryem Buchwitz | 10/10 | 5063 days | 28% |
| Karsten Meyer | 8/10 | 5065 days | 27% |
| Michel Vourbraak | 5/10 | 5066 days | 21% |
| TheHoon | 9/10 | 5294 days | 27% |
| Simon Rawlinson | 10/10 | 5306 days | 28% |
| Norman UK | 10/10 | 5317 days | 28% |
| Larry Curtiss | 10/10 | 5322 days | 28% |
| Madeleine Mueller | 10/10 | 5330 days | 28% |
| Jaap & Susanne | 8/10 | 5334 days | 27% |
| Anne King | 6/10 | 5334 days | 23% |
| Fleming Lauridsen | 9/10 | 5334 days | 27% |
| Robert & Bridget Holden | 9/10 | 5334 days | 27% |
| Howell Davies | 10/10 | 5334 days | 28% |
| Linda Kosters | 10/10 | 5334 days | 28% |
| Aridne Giraud | 9/10 | 5337 days | 27% |
| Kolen | 10/10 | 5337 days | 28% |
| Helen Chilton | 8/10 | 5342 days | 27% |
| Tim Gamblen | 10/10 | 5342 days | 28% |
| Jonathan Philp | 7/10 | 5346 days | 26% |
| Clemens | 6/10 | 5347 days | 23% |
| Heike | 10/10 | 5349 days | 28% |
| Frank & Julia | 7/10 | 5353 days | 26% |
| FlyKiwiFly | 7/10 | 5354 days | 26% |
| joerem | 5/10 | 5354 days | 21% |
| Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 5365 days | 27% |
| deJong | 8/10 | 5420 days | 27% |
| Gerard Crothers | 10/10 | 5423 days | 28% |
| Christoph | 7/10 | 5425 days | 26% |
| Steve | 9/10 | 5430 days | 27% |
| Helle Thomsen | 10/10 | 5432 days | 28% |
| Wendy Ashmore | 10/10 | 5432 days | 28% |
| James McColl | 6/10 | 5446 days | 23% |
| katel86 | 10/10 | 5507 days | 28% |
| Kimberly St Louis | 10/10 | 5630 days | 28% |
| Sam papworth | 10/10 | 5659 days | 28% |
| Josephine Hartley | 1/10 | 5659 days | 10% |
| Nicola Young | 5/10 | 5659 days | 21% |
| Schury | 10/10 | 5662 days | 28% |
| Rob O'Neill | 9/10 | 5662 days | 27% |
| Katarina Bokor | 10/10 | 5668 days | 28% |
| Sue Carren | 8/10 | 5668 days | 27% |
| Mark Franklin | 8/10 | 5668 days | 27% |
| Emma Cross | 9/10 | 5670 days | 27% |
| John & Lorraine | 8/10 | 5670 days | 27% |
| Hanggi | 9/10 | 5671 days | 27% |
| Julie and Russ Charles | 10/10 | 5673 days | 28% |
| Berger | 10/10 | 5675 days | 28% |
| Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5681 days | 28% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 5681 days | 28% |
| Siggi Wick | 10/10 | 5682 days | 28% |
| Birga | 9/10 | 5688 days | 27% |
| Cameron and Kim | 10/10 | 5690 days | 28% |
| Ebi & Beate | 8/10 | 5691 days | 27% |
| taniadeanryanbrittany | 8/10 | 5691 days | 27% |
| Alice Galley | 8/10 | 5694 days | 27% |
| Alice | 9/10 | 5695 days | 27% |
| Alexander & Stephanie | 8/10 | 5696 days | 27% |
| Lauren Pestell | 8/10 | 5698 days | 27% |
| Bob Warne | 9/10 | 5702 days | 27% |
| Jol Balder | 4/10 | 5707 days | 17% |
| Irene and Thib Schneider | 9/10 | 5707 days | 27% |
| Doris Schollenberger | 9/10 | 5709 days | 27% |
| Roger Lows | 9/10 | 5710 days | 27% |
| Glenn | 9/10 | 5710 days | 27% |
| Ryan Tull | 7/10 | 5714 days | 26% |
| Hull | 10/10 | 5714 days | 28% |
| Brandt | 10/10 | 5716 days | 28% |
| Emma Wilkinson | 6/10 | 5718 days | 23% |
| Lyndell | 9/10 | 5781 days | 27% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5842 days | 28% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 5842 days | 28% |
| kristy | 9/10 | 5872 days | 27% |
| Behrenot | 8/10 | 5973 days | 27% |
| M Schram | 7/10 | 5974 days | 26% |
| garfield | 9/10 | 5995 days | 27% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 6003 days | 28% |
| nuwee | 9/10 | 6025 days | 27% |
| Hana Vokata | 10/10 | 6030 days | 28% |
| Wyss A | 10/10 | 6037 days | 28% |
| katrina Marshall | 9/10 | 6042 days | 27% |
| Pam & Norman | 9/10 | 6049 days | 27% |
| Chris Bil | 10/10 | 6051 days | 28% |
| Sue S | 8/10 | 6051 days | 27% |
| Rod C | 10/10 | 6054 days | 28% |
| Richard | 5/10 | 6060 days | 21% |
| Doris Resch | 10/10 | 6062 days | 28% |
| Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 6063 days | 27% |
| Ed & Pat Mitchell | 9/10 | 6064 days | 27% |
| Jenny | 8/10 | 6064 days | 27% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6069 days | 28% |
| Yona | 7/10 | 6070 days | 26% |
| Mathias | 10/10 | 6071 days | 28% |
| Jamie | 10/10 | 6076 days | 28% |
| Lewis | 10/10 | 6077 days | 28% |
| kararina Kosten | 9/10 | 6078 days | 27% |
| Vincente Garrido | 7/10 | 6079 days | 26% |
| Ingrid Overes | 9/10 | 6083 days | 27% |
| S Luis Van Oler | 9/10 | 6089 days | 27% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 6090 days | 27% |
| Dale W | 8/10 | 6093 days | 27% |
| Omar Frenchy | 9/10 | 6093 days | 27% |
| Marons | 7/10 | 6135 days | 26% |
| Sena | 7/10 | 6156 days | 26% |
| Kyle Riseley | 8/10 | 6157 days | 27% |
| Rebecca Jenner | 8/10 | 6157 days | 27% |
| Carl and Angela Rapihana | 6/10 | 6169 days | 23% |
| nancyburns | 10/10 | 6176 days | 28% |
| marleen451 | 9/10 | 6207 days | 27% |
| Jackie Anderson | 10/10 | 6237 days | 28% |
| bogaard | 8/10 | 6272 days | 27% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6329 days | 28% |
| Charles Lyne | 10/10 | 6360 days | 28% |
| TillE412 | 10/10 | 6375 days | 28% |
| ElleGermany | 9/10 | 6378 days | 27% |
| JonK | 10/10 | 6378 days | 28% |
| BeckieM | 9/10 | 6380 days | 27% |
| Anji Sprinks | 9/10 | 6387 days | 27% |
| SteveB | 10/10 | 6390 days | 28% |
| annysp | 10/10 | 6390 days | 28% |
| davidne | 6/10 | 6390 days | 23% |
| Jeremy | 9/10 | 6390 days | 27% |
| Daniel | 9/10 | 6396 days | 27% |
| Richard | 9/10 | 6399 days | 27% |
| MichaelS1 | 9/10 | 6406 days | 27% |
| ChrisD | 10/10 | 6406 days | 28% |
| AstridVG | 8/10 | 6406 days | 27% |
| Lucas | 9/10 | 6406 days | 27% |
| StijnH | 7/10 | 6407 days | 26% |
| TobiasK | 8/10 | 6409 days | 27% |
| Michael | 9/10 | 6414 days | 27% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6421 days | 27% |
| Linda | 6/10 | 6421 days | 23% |
| Kelly | 10/10 | 6422 days | 28% |
| CarleyJ | 7/10 | 6424 days | 26% |
| VictoriaH | 9/10 | 6425 days | 27% |
| RobC1 | 7/10 | 6425 days | 26% |
| JoT | 8/10 | 6425 days | 27% |
| RobH | 7/10 | 6426 days | 26% |
| Eileen Harris | 9/10 | 6428 days | 27% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 6429 days | 28% |
| Amanda Williams | 10/10 | 6430 days | 28% |
| CarinnaGermany | 7/10 | 6432 days | 26% |
| Trevor | 10/10 | 6433 days | 28% |
| David | 7/10 | 6438 days | 26% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6440 days | 27% |
| Ralf | 9/10 | 6442 days | 27% |
| Christina | 10/10 | 6454 days | 28% |
| John | 10/10 | 6459 days | 28% |
| Jon | 8/10 | 6461 days | 27% |
| Karen | 8/10 | 6461 days | 27% |
| Bernd | 6/10 | 6463 days | 23% |
| Kori | 8/10 | 6502 days | 27% |
| David | 7/10 | 6503 days | 26% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 6521 days | 27% |
| Nicole | 6/10 | 6524 days | 23% |
| Stephanie Schikora | 10/10 | 6532 days | 28% |
| Gaurav M | 7/10 | 6552 days | 26% |
| Kate | 7/10 | 6576 days | 26% |
| Robin | 10/10 | 6579 days | 28% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 6585 days | 27% |
| Felicity | 8/10 | 6587 days | 27% |
| Suyin | 10/10 | 6587 days | 28% |
| Fothergill | 7/10 | 6596 days | 26% |
| Christopher | 8/10 | 6600 days | 27% |
| James | 9/10 | 6600 days | 27% |
| jillian | 6/10 | 6609 days | 23% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 6622 days | 26% |
| loumac | 8/10 | 6625 days | 27% |
| Gray | 10/10 | 6625 days | 28% |
| Lucchi | 3/10 | 6642 days | 14% |
| Ashlee Roberts | 10/10 | 6687 days | 28% |
| L1z4rd | 10/10 | 6720 days | 28% |
| Kori Barton | 7/10 | 6732 days | 26% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 6761 days | 27% |
| Daniela | 6/10 | 6766 days | 23% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6770 days | 28% |
| Wendy | 6/10 | 6774 days | 23% |
| Mikel | 6/10 | 6774 days | 23% |
| Dunet | 9/10 | 6774 days | 27% |
| Jeanette | 8/10 | 6776 days | 27% |
| Christian | 7/10 | 6777 days | 26% |
| Neil | 6/10 | 6781 days | 23% |
| Marian Mckinney | 8/10 | 6783 days | 27% |
| Stephanie Grisel | 9/10 | 6783 days | 27% |
| Dirk | 10/10 | 6789 days | 28% |
| Jurg Meister | 5/10 | 6790 days | 21% |
| Lisa Tame | 7/10 | 6791 days | 26% |
| Steven | 10/10 | 6791 days | 28% |
| Ian and Judy | 10/10 | 6791 days | 28% |
| Erwin de Kleijn | 8/10 | 6795 days | 27% |
| Reina Lohaye | 8/10 | 6805 days | 27% |
| Marc Hertogs | 7/10 | 6806 days | 26% |
| V Wood | 5/10 | 6806 days | 21% |
| paulonline | 8/10 | 6807 days | 27% |
| Pauline Thai | 10/10 | 6809 days | 28% |
| Bex | 9/10 | 6817 days | 27% |
| Stephen Brightman | 9/10 | 6818 days | 27% |
| Madeleine Rowland | 10/10 | 6818 days | 28% |
| Swen Schroder | 8/10 | 6830 days | 27% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 6830 days | 28% |
| Bronwyn Gaby | 8/10 | 6836 days | 27% |
| Ard | 7/10 | 6865 days | 26% |
| Patricia Leighton | 10/10 | 6992 days | 28% |
| Andy Chapman | 8/10 | 6992 days | 27% |
| Tanja | 4/10 | 7096 days | 17% |
| Alan | 7/10 | 7101 days | 26% |
| Svenja | 6/10 | 7106 days | 23% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 7108 days | 27% |
| Akiko&Shibotsu | 9/10 | 7108 days | 27% |
| Roger&Shirley | 8/10 | 7114 days | 27% |
| Fred | 9/10 | 7120 days | 27% |
| Kathryn | 7/10 | 7123 days | 26% |
| Michaela | 8/10 | 7144 days | 27% |
| Ian | 7/10 | 7144 days | 26% |
| Pete | 8/10 | 7144 days | 27% |
| Anne | 9/10 | 7144 days | 27% |
| Malon | 7/10 | 7146 days | 26% |
| Vibeke | 8/10 | 7155 days | 27% |
| beesom | 10/10 | 7156 days | 28% |
| Hirsh | 9/10 | 7160 days | 27% |
| Kerry | 5/10 | 7165 days | 21% |
| Alison | 8/10 | 7165 days | 27% |
| Jim | 10/10 | 7166 days | 28% |
| Peter&Amy | 7/10 | 7166 days | 26% |
| Franz-Josef | 10/10 | 7172 days | 28% |
| Marc | 5/10 | 7173 days | 21% |
| JuanPablo | 9/10 | 7179 days | 27% |
| Moritz | 10/10 | 8552 days | 28% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Shotover Jet experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.23% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 68 days. However the Shotover Jet experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Shotover Jet experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.18% |
| 198 | -3.20% |
| 199 | -3.21% |
| 200 | -3.23% |
| 201 | -3.25% |
| 202 | -3.26% |
| 203 | -3.28% |
| … | … |
2.45% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.