Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours
Valid Reviews
70 Valid Reviews
The Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience has a total of 70 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 61 |
|
87% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
11% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
98.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours valid reviews is 98.57% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
98.45%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minesh Govenji | 10/10 | 389 days | 100% |
| Srikant | 10/10 | 389 days | 100% |
| Meir Boukris | 9/10 | 450 days | 89% |
| Shravan Shetty | 10/10 | 481 days | 83% |
| Mariano | 10/10 | 573 days | 63% |
| Océane | 10/10 | 634 days | 51% |
| Elyce Rotella | 10/10 | 695 days | 40% |
| Nir | 10/10 | 723 days | 35% |
| Lisa Hanline | 10/10 | 815 days | 23% |
| Jaime G. del Rosario | 10/10 | 846 days | 19% |
| Bob and Joyce Kroencke, USA | 10/10 | 1060 days | 7% |
| John M | 10/10 | 1119 days | 7% |
| Vivien Kalvaria | 9/10 | 1150 days | 6% |
| Stephen Forte | 10/10 | 1180 days | 6% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 1790 days | 5% |
| gloria tseng | 10/10 | 2490 days | 3% |
| Steven Hucik | 10/10 | 2549 days | 3% |
| Brid Devlin | 9/10 | 2549 days | 3% |
| David McLemore | 10/10 | 2549 days | 3% |
| Carrie | 10/10 | 2549 days | 3% |
| Ed | 10/10 | 2580 days | 3% |
| reviewer | 10/10 | 2611 days | 3% |
| Felicia Ng | 10/10 | 2641 days | 3% |
| Timmy & Megan | 10/10 | 2641 days | 3% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 2641 days | 3% |
| anton prawira | 9/10 | 2733 days | 2% |
| june isono | 9/10 | 2764 days | 2% |
| Cynthia Nardelli | 10/10 | 2764 days | 2% |
| angeline_ang | 9/10 | 2794 days | 2% |
| Alex London | 8/10 | 2886 days | 2% |
| Sharon K | 10/10 | 2886 days | 2% |
| Terry Bryk | 10/10 | 2914 days | 2% |
| Philips | 10/10 | 2945 days | 2% |
| scott | 10/10 | 2976 days | 2% |
| Courtney1 | 10/10 | 3037 days | 2% |
| aurbanes | 10/10 | 3098 days | 1% |
| joanhsieh | 10/10 | 3129 days | 1% |
| Varda Mehta | 10/10 | 3129 days | 1% |
| raminderrayar | 10/10 | 3190 days | 1% |
| PegTraveller | 10/10 | 3190 days | 1% |
| Shaunhk | 10/10 | 3220 days | 1% |
| arlenemattera | 10/10 | 3220 days | 1% |
| MBaum735 | 10/10 | 3251 days | 1% |
| terig | 10/10 | 3280 days | 1% |
| tfeng | 9/10 | 3280 days | 1% |
| james09173 | 10/10 | 3372 days | 1% |
| Lei | 10/10 | 3433 days | 1% |
| shlomo iager | 10/10 | 3433 days | 1% |
| gigirup | 10/10 | 3433 days | 1% |
| pinecliffs | 10/10 | 3645 days | 0% |
| GiancarloB | 10/10 | 3645 days | 0% |
| Maria_in_HongKong | 10/10 | 3645 days | 0% |
| gtspencer | 10/10 | 3676 days | 1% |
| dgreddy | 10/10 | 3707 days | 1% |
| nancy33 | 10/10 | 3768 days | 1% |
| PrettyPrincess | 10/10 | 3798 days | 1% |
| NawshirMirza | 10/10 | 3890 days | 1% |
| barbarakburtb | 10/10 | 3951 days | 1% |
| clive903 | 10/10 | 4072 days | 1% |
| Carlos | 10/10 | 4072 days | 1% |
| Jody | 10/10 | 4133 days | 1% |
| Holdenluvr | 10/10 | 4347 days | 1% |
| Irina | 10/10 | 4406 days | 1% |
| franz_renate | 10/10 | 4467 days | 1% |
| harpal | 10/10 | 4651 days | 1% |
| enngee | 10/10 | 4833 days | 1% |
| shivaniagarwala | 10/10 | 4925 days | 1% |
| primarosa | 10/10 | 5168 days | 1% |
| gilluncles | 9/10 | 5229 days | 1% |
| Mohan_Leela_KamnaKrishnan | 10/10 | 5412 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.12% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 48 days. However the Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.06% |
| 198 | -4.08% |
| 199 | -4.10% |
| 200 | -4.12% |
| 201 | -4.14% |
| 202 | -4.16% |
| 203 | -4.18% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.