Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours
Valid Reviews
70 Valid Reviews
The Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience has a total of 70 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 61 |
|
87% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
11% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
98.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours valid reviews is 98.57% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
98.38%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minesh Govenji | 10/10 | 540 days | 100% |
| Srikant | 10/10 | 540 days | 100% |
| Meir Boukris | 9/10 | 601 days | 81% |
| Shravan Shetty | 10/10 | 632 days | 72% |
| Mariano | 10/10 | 724 days | 50% |
| Océane | 10/10 | 785 days | 37% |
| Elyce Rotella | 10/10 | 846 days | 27% |
| Nir | 10/10 | 874 days | 23% |
| Lisa Hanline | 10/10 | 966 days | 14% |
| Jaime G. del Rosario | 10/10 | 997 days | 12% |
| Bob and Joyce Kroencke, USA | 10/10 | 1211 days | 9% |
| John M | 10/10 | 1270 days | 8% |
| Vivien Kalvaria | 9/10 | 1301 days | 8% |
| Stephen Forte | 10/10 | 1331 days | 8% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 1941 days | 6% |
| gloria tseng | 10/10 | 2641 days | 3% |
| Steven Hucik | 10/10 | 2700 days | 3% |
| Brid Devlin | 9/10 | 2700 days | 3% |
| David McLemore | 10/10 | 2700 days | 3% |
| Carrie | 10/10 | 2700 days | 3% |
| Ed | 10/10 | 2731 days | 3% |
| reviewer | 10/10 | 2762 days | 3% |
| Felicia Ng | 10/10 | 2792 days | 3% |
| Timmy & Megan | 10/10 | 2792 days | 3% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 2792 days | 3% |
| anton prawira | 9/10 | 2884 days | 3% |
| june isono | 9/10 | 2915 days | 2% |
| Cynthia Nardelli | 10/10 | 2915 days | 2% |
| angeline_ang | 9/10 | 2945 days | 2% |
| Alex London | 8/10 | 3037 days | 2% |
| Sharon K | 10/10 | 3037 days | 2% |
| Terry Bryk | 10/10 | 3065 days | 2% |
| Philips | 10/10 | 3096 days | 2% |
| scott | 10/10 | 3127 days | 2% |
| Courtney1 | 10/10 | 3188 days | 1% |
| aurbanes | 10/10 | 3249 days | 1% |
| joanhsieh | 10/10 | 3280 days | 1% |
| Varda Mehta | 10/10 | 3280 days | 1% |
| raminderrayar | 10/10 | 3341 days | 1% |
| PegTraveller | 10/10 | 3341 days | 1% |
| Shaunhk | 10/10 | 3371 days | 1% |
| arlenemattera | 10/10 | 3371 days | 1% |
| MBaum735 | 10/10 | 3402 days | 1% |
| terig | 10/10 | 3431 days | 1% |
| tfeng | 9/10 | 3431 days | 1% |
| james09173 | 10/10 | 3523 days | 0% |
| Lei | 10/10 | 3584 days | 0% |
| shlomo iager | 10/10 | 3584 days | 0% |
| gigirup | 10/10 | 3584 days | 0% |
| pinecliffs | 10/10 | 3796 days | 2% |
| GiancarloB | 10/10 | 3796 days | 2% |
| Maria_in_HongKong | 10/10 | 3796 days | 2% |
| gtspencer | 10/10 | 3827 days | 2% |
| dgreddy | 10/10 | 3858 days | 2% |
| nancy33 | 10/10 | 3919 days | 2% |
| PrettyPrincess | 10/10 | 3949 days | 2% |
| NawshirMirza | 10/10 | 4041 days | 2% |
| barbarakburtb | 10/10 | 4102 days | 2% |
| clive903 | 10/10 | 4223 days | 2% |
| Carlos | 10/10 | 4223 days | 2% |
| Jody | 10/10 | 4284 days | 2% |
| Holdenluvr | 10/10 | 4498 days | 2% |
| Irina | 10/10 | 4557 days | 2% |
| franz_renate | 10/10 | 4618 days | 2% |
| harpal | 10/10 | 4802 days | 2% |
| enngee | 10/10 | 4984 days | 2% |
| shivaniagarwala | 10/10 | 5076 days | 2% |
| primarosa | 10/10 | 5319 days | 2% |
| gilluncles | 9/10 | 5380 days | 2% |
| Mohan_Leela_KamnaKrishnan | 10/10 | 5563 days | 2% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.11% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 120 days. However the Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Aroha Luxury New Zealand Tours experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.07% |
| 198 | -2.08% |
| 199 | -2.10% |
| 200 | -2.11% |
| 201 | -2.12% |
| 202 | -2.13% |
| 203 | -2.14% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
96%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.