Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Ōkāreka Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Lake Ōkāreka Campsite
Valid Reviews
69 Valid Reviews
The Lake Ōkāreka Campsite experience has a total of 70 reviews. There are 69 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 20 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
80.87% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Ōkāreka Campsite valid reviews is 80.87% and is based on 69 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
26 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 69 valid reviews, the experience has 26 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 26 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
31% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.54% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Ōkāreka Campsite face-to-face reviews is 86.54% and is based on 26 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
78.00%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEV | 7/10 | 48 days | 95% |
| Thomas Williams | 8/10 | 109 days | 100% |
| Toni | 8/10 | 109 days | 100% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 293 days | 98% |
| Ike | 8/10 | 413 days | 91% |
| Christopher | 10/10 | 474 days | 90% |
| Ruby | 8/10 | 474 days | 88% |
| Marijng | 1/10 | 687 days | 30% |
| Jakub Matyszczak | 5/10 | 687 days | 57% |
| Morgane | 7/10 | 749 days | 65% |
| Broos | 7/10 | 1083 days | 35% |
| Brigit Pratt | 1/10 | 1662 days | 3% |
| Emer | 9/10 | 1813 days | 5% |
| Josiah | 9/10 | 2179 days | 4% |
| Izzy | 7/10 | 2240 days | 4% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 2240 days | 4% |
| Julianne McKie | 8/10 | 2271 days | 4% |
| Loretta | 10/10 | 2332 days | 4% |
| Andrea | 1/10 | 2605 days | 1% |
| Matt MacD | 3/10 | 2789 days | 2% |
| Thomas Syesha | 10/10 | 2914 days | 3% |
| Alisa Makkaveeva | 7/10 | 2921 days | 3% |
| deborah cooper | 7/10 | 3215 days | 2% |
| Fabio Flepp | 10/10 | 3221 days | 2% |
| Laura David | 9/10 | 3292 days | 2% |
| Nic | 10/10 | 3458 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3458 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 10/10 | 3515 days | 2% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3521 days | 2% |
| Russell Opland | 8/10 | 3528 days | 2% |
| S Scott | 9/10 | 3630 days | 1% |
| Bryant Faaola | 8/10 | 3640 days | 1% |
| Jan B | 10/10 | 3680 days | 1% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 3705 days | 1% |
| Carsten Philipp | 10/10 | 3725 days | 1% |
| Ben Apellido | 8/10 | 3762 days | 1% |
| Christina L | 10/10 | 3862 days | 1% |
| K C Costonis | 10/10 | 3884 days | 1% |
| Michael Stibor | 9/10 | 3937 days | 1% |
| Dene | 9/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
| Ines | 7/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 8/10 | 4127 days | 0% |
| Mattias | 8/10 | 4282 days | 0% |
| Guillaume Yedoux | 8/10 | 4282 days | 0% |
| Janek Belcher | 8/10 | 4288 days | 0% |
| Christoph Betten | 6/10 | 4289 days | 0% |
| Elena Goschia | 7/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
| Philipp Kluseuer | 7/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
| David Haines-Hanham | 7/10 | 4345 days | 0% |
| Sally Haines | 8/10 | 4345 days | 0% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Alexia Greasbaum | 10/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| David Esner | 9/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
| Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4370 days | 0% |
| Thi Baut | 7/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
| Steffi and Phil | 6/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| Sam Garret | 5/10 | 4554 days | 1% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4584 days | 1% |
| Anton Thisted | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
| Josefine Sjodin | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
| Katie Fleck | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
| Thomas | 10/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
| Neele & Philipp | 10/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
| Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4699 days | 1% |
| nl | 9/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
| Lars | 8/10 | 5050 days | 1% |
| Briulier | 10/10 | 5054 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 8/10 | 5063 days | 1% |
| Johanna & Mark | 10/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Ōkāreka Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
3.59% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.