Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Ōkāreka Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
69 Valid Reviews
The Lake Ōkāreka Campsite experience has a total of 70 reviews. There are 69 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 20 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
80.87% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Ōkāreka Campsite valid reviews is 80.87% and is based on 69 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
26 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 69 valid reviews, the experience has 26 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 26 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
31% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.54% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Ōkāreka Campsite face-to-face reviews is 86.54% and is based on 26 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
78.61%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEV | 7/10 | 211 days | 97% |
| Thomas Williams | 8/10 | 272 days | 100% |
| Toni | 8/10 | 272 days | 100% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 456 days | 94% |
| Ike | 8/10 | 576 days | 85% |
| Christopher | 10/10 | 637 days | 82% |
| Ruby | 8/10 | 637 days | 80% |
| Marijng | 1/10 | 850 days | 25% |
| Jakub Matyszczak | 5/10 | 850 days | 48% |
| Morgane | 7/10 | 912 days | 52% |
| Broos | 7/10 | 1246 days | 24% |
| Brigit Pratt | 1/10 | 1825 days | 2% |
| Emer | 9/10 | 1976 days | 5% |
| Josiah | 9/10 | 2342 days | 4% |
| Izzy | 7/10 | 2403 days | 4% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 2403 days | 4% |
| Julianne McKie | 8/10 | 2434 days | 4% |
| Loretta | 10/10 | 2495 days | 4% |
| Andrea | 1/10 | 2768 days | 1% |
| Matt MacD | 3/10 | 2952 days | 1% |
| Thomas Syesha | 10/10 | 3077 days | 3% |
| Alisa Makkaveeva | 7/10 | 3084 days | 2% |
| deborah cooper | 7/10 | 3378 days | 2% |
| Fabio Flepp | 10/10 | 3384 days | 2% |
| Laura David | 9/10 | 3455 days | 2% |
| Nic | 10/10 | 3621 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3621 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 10/10 | 3678 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3684 days | 1% |
| Russell Opland | 8/10 | 3691 days | 1% |
| S Scott | 9/10 | 3793 days | 1% |
| Bryant Faaola | 8/10 | 3803 days | 1% |
| Jan B | 10/10 | 3843 days | 1% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 3868 days | 1% |
| Carsten Philipp | 10/10 | 3888 days | 1% |
| Ben Apellido | 8/10 | 3925 days | 1% |
| Christina L | 10/10 | 4025 days | 1% |
| K C Costonis | 10/10 | 4047 days | 1% |
| Michael Stibor | 9/10 | 4100 days | 0% |
| Dene | 9/10 | 4109 days | 0% |
| Ines | 7/10 | 4140 days | 0% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 8/10 | 4290 days | 0% |
| Mattias | 8/10 | 4445 days | 1% |
| Guillaume Yedoux | 8/10 | 4445 days | 1% |
| Janek Belcher | 8/10 | 4451 days | 1% |
| Christoph Betten | 6/10 | 4452 days | 1% |
| Elena Goschia | 7/10 | 4500 days | 1% |
| Philipp Kluseuer | 7/10 | 4500 days | 1% |
| David Haines-Hanham | 7/10 | 4508 days | 1% |
| Sally Haines | 8/10 | 4508 days | 1% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 4521 days | 1% |
| Alexia Greasbaum | 10/10 | 4521 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 9/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4533 days | 1% |
| Thi Baut | 7/10 | 4538 days | 1% |
| Steffi and Phil | 6/10 | 4564 days | 1% |
| Sam Garret | 5/10 | 4717 days | 1% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4747 days | 1% |
| Anton Thisted | 9/10 | 4806 days | 1% |
| Josefine Sjodin | 9/10 | 4806 days | 1% |
| Katie Fleck | 9/10 | 4806 days | 1% |
| Thomas | 10/10 | 4837 days | 1% |
| Neele & Philipp | 10/10 | 4849 days | 1% |
| Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4862 days | 1% |
| nl | 9/10 | 4941 days | 1% |
| Lars | 8/10 | 5213 days | 1% |
| Briulier | 10/10 | 5217 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 8/10 | 5226 days | 1% |
| Johanna & Mark | 10/10 | 5552 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Ōkāreka Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.40% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.