Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for KJet Queenstown.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

KJet Queenstown

Valid Reviews

63 Valid Reviews

The KJet Queenstown experience has a total of 63 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 22
35%
9/10 13
21%
8/10 12
19%
7/10 9
14%
6/10 3
5%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 2
3%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
2%

83.49% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the KJet Queenstown valid reviews is 83.49% and is based on 63 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

47 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 63 valid reviews, the experience has 47 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 12
26%
9/10 12
26%
8/10 11
23%
7/10 7
15%
6/10 2
4%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 2
4%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

82.55% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the KJet Queenstown face-to-face reviews is 82.55% and is based on 47 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

67.13%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
JW 1/10 662 days 100%
Jenna Neivandt 7/10 1501 days 14%
Patz 10/10 1605 days 15%
Rachael Sleege 9/10 1727 days 14%
David Horley 8/10 1743 days 13%
Saskia Irblich 6/10 1772 days 11%
Adam Pullinger 3/10 1774 days 10%
Rebecca Holmes 8/10 1778 days 13%
Andy Howard 7/10 1829 days 12%
Sharron 8/10 1829 days 13%
Robertoi 10/10 1831 days 13%
Lucy Murray 9/10 2062 days 12%
Steve Elliott 10/10 2062 days 12%
Markus Spitzmueller 7/10 2829 days 5%
Andrew Cattanach 10/10 2853 days 5%
Ryan J 10/10 3340 days 2%
Jeltje 9/10 3533 days 0%
Beeny 8/10 3534 days 0%
Richard Spandonk 9/10 3541 days 0%
Julie 10/10 3872 days 3%
Leroy Dimitri 9/10 3872 days 3%
Geoff Andrew 7/10 3873 days 3%
Richard Broughton 9/10 3884 days 3%
Matthys Kikke 7/10 3894 days 3%
Jill 10/10 4010 days 3%
Montys 7/10 4041 days 3%
OMPA 10/10 4243 days 3%
Jana Steve 5/10 4249 days 2%
dring 10/10 4258 days 3%
Sally Hall 9/10 4303 days 3%
joevw 10/10 4544 days 3%
Linsey Evans 10/10 4559 days 3%
StephaineFrance 10/10 4586 days 3%
Rory 10/10 4589 days 3%
Sandra Eschbaumer 10/10 4589 days 3%
Elise Thomson 10/10 4589 days 3%
brendar 8/10 4589 days 3%
Steve Budd 3/10 4607 days 2%
JensM 7/10 4624 days 3%
Christian 9/10 4653 days 3%
Jessy 8/10 4653 days 3%
Ray 10/10 4679 days 3%
Maria 10/10 4701 days 3%
Ellen 10/10 4702 days 3%
jonathan 10/10 4710 days 3%
Michelle 9/10 4763 days 3%
P&L Mooney 9/10 4763 days 3%
Paul 7/10 4766 days 3%
Arnaud Dionisio 8/10 4804 days 3%
Sanne 10/10 4982 days 3%
Matt Walker 6/10 5003 days 2%
Dan Adamson 7/10 5008 days 3%
Jo 8/10 5031 days 3%
Thomas Hartseiker 10/10 5035 days 3%
Davinia 9/10 5064 days 3%
Archie Murdoch 8/10 5078 days 3%
johnb1 6/10 5088 days 2%
Jo 9/10 5191 days 3%
Kate 8/10 5315 days 3%
Martjn 8/10 5317 days 3%
Stevenson 8/10 5324 days 3%
Jennifer 10/10 5343 days 3%
Helle 9/10 5354 days 3%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The KJet Queenstown experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.73% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 54 days. However the KJet Queenstown experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The KJet Queenstown experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.67%
198 -3.69%
199 -3.71%
200 -3.73%
201 -3.75%
202 -3.77%
203 -3.78%

Final Ranking Score

63%

The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.