Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Kauwhata Domain.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Te Kauwhata Domain
Valid Reviews
70 Valid Reviews
The Te Kauwhata Domain experience has a total of 76 reviews. There are 70 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
88.14% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Kauwhata Domain valid reviews is 88.14% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
88.63%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin | 10/10 | 69 days | 100% |
| Marie | 10/10 | 130 days | 99% |
| Ella | 10/10 | 161 days | 99% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 191 days | 98% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 434 days | 89% |
| Angie Johnson | 9/10 | 434 days | 88% |
| Cam an | 5/10 | 465 days | 66% |
| Ro | 7/10 | 465 days | 81% |
| rae | 9/10 | 495 days | 85% |
| Krys | 9/10 | 495 days | 85% |
| Cucamest | 10/10 | 526 days | 84% |
| Millie | 9/10 | 556 days | 81% |
| Jill | 8/10 | 679 days | 72% |
| Guest | 9/10 | 709 days | 70% |
| Nadja | 10/10 | 800 days | 63% |
| Dee | 7/10 | 831 days | 56% |
| Brie | 6/10 | 831 days | 51% |
| Ruta | 1/10 | 861 days | 22% |
| Malcolm Greenhalgh | 8/10 | 892 days | 53% |
| Jan | 8/10 | 892 days | 53% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 953 days | 47% |
| Bobbie | 10/10 | 984 days | 44% |
| Christa | 10/10 | 1045 days | 39% |
| wvdbos | 8/10 | 1075 days | 35% |
| sarah penney | 9/10 | 1075 days | 36% |
| Steve Hawes | 10/10 | 1106 days | 33% |
| Camila | 10/10 | 1106 days | 33% |
| Joakim | 8/10 | 1134 days | 30% |
| Anya | 10/10 | 1134 days | 31% |
| Odette | 10/10 | 1134 days | 31% |
| Caroline | 9/10 | 1134 days | 31% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1165 days | 28% |
| Adrian | 10/10 | 1165 days | 29% |
| Geri Ng | 10/10 | 1196 days | 26% |
| Emily | 8/10 | 1226 days | 24% |
| Dave | 10/10 | 1257 days | 22% |
| Laura Jarry | 8/10 | 1257 days | 22% |
| Chloe | 8/10 | 1349 days | 16% |
| Eyisha | 7/10 | 1379 days | 14% |
| Jose | 10/10 | 1471 days | 11% |
| Emma | 9/10 | 1471 days | 10% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1530 days | 8% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 1530 days | 8% |
| Roque | 10/10 | 1864 days | 3% |
| Aj | 10/10 | 1956 days | 3% |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 1987 days | 3% |
| Karen | 9/10 | 2017 days | 3% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 10/10 | 2201 days | 2% |
| Merche | 9/10 | 2230 days | 2% |
| Silly American | 10/10 | 2261 days | 2% |
| Gap year | 10/10 | 2292 days | 2% |
| Christina | 8/10 | 2292 days | 2% |
| Jun | 9/10 | 2322 days | 2% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 2322 days | 2% |
| Bartezz | 8/10 | 2322 days | 2% |
| Ancient Uncle | 10/10 | 2353 days | 2% |
| Marty | 8/10 | 2383 days | 2% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 2567 days | 2% |
| Georgia Trompf | 9/10 | 2626 days | 2% |
| Trudy Worboys | 10/10 | 2626 days | 2% |
| Liv | 10/10 | 2657 days | 2% |
| The Flip Flop Family | 10/10 | 2747 days | 1% |
| CHA LEMAY | 9/10 | 2901 days | 1% |
| Fivetogether | 9/10 | 2932 days | 1% |
| Muhammad fayadh Mad jamil | 8/10 | 2959 days | 1% |
| Flavia Confalonieri | 7/10 | 3034 days | 1% |
| Lucy Winfield | 5/10 | 3158 days | 0% |
| Nathan Lal | 8/10 | 3164 days | 1% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3254 days | 0% |
| Christine Allgaier | 10/10 | 3307 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Te Kauwhata Domain does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.20% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.