G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Kauwhata Domain.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Te Kauwhata Domain
Valid Reviews
72 Valid Reviews
The Te Kauwhata Domain experience has a total of 78 reviews. There are 72 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 31 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
88.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Kauwhata Domain valid reviews is 88.33% and is based on 72 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
89.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Borrmaschine | 9/10 | 191 days | 99% |
| Anita Day | 10/10 | 191 days | 100% |
| Martin | 10/10 | 250 days | 98% |
| Marie | 10/10 | 311 days | 96% |
| Ella | 10/10 | 342 days | 95% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 372 days | 94% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 615 days | 80% |
| Angie Johnson | 9/10 | 615 days | 79% |
| Cam an | 5/10 | 646 days | 59% |
| Ro | 7/10 | 646 days | 72% |
| rae | 9/10 | 676 days | 74% |
| Krys | 9/10 | 676 days | 74% |
| Cucamest | 10/10 | 707 days | 73% |
| Millie | 9/10 | 737 days | 69% |
| Jill | 8/10 | 860 days | 57% |
| Guest | 9/10 | 890 days | 55% |
| Nadja | 10/10 | 981 days | 46% |
| Dee | 7/10 | 1012 days | 40% |
| Brie | 6/10 | 1012 days | 37% |
| Ruta | 1/10 | 1042 days | 15% |
| Malcolm Greenhalgh | 8/10 | 1073 days | 36% |
| Jan | 8/10 | 1073 days | 36% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 1134 days | 31% |
| Bobbie | 10/10 | 1165 days | 29% |
| Christa | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| wvdbos | 8/10 | 1256 days | 22% |
| sarah penney | 9/10 | 1256 days | 23% |
| Steve Hawes | 10/10 | 1287 days | 21% |
| Camila | 10/10 | 1287 days | 21% |
| Joakim | 8/10 | 1315 days | 19% |
| Anya | 10/10 | 1315 days | 19% |
| Odette | 10/10 | 1315 days | 19% |
| Caroline | 9/10 | 1315 days | 19% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1346 days | 17% |
| Adrian | 10/10 | 1346 days | 17% |
| Geri Ng | 10/10 | 1377 days | 15% |
| Emily | 8/10 | 1407 days | 14% |
| Dave | 10/10 | 1438 days | 12% |
| Laura Jarry | 8/10 | 1438 days | 12% |
| Chloe | 8/10 | 1530 days | 9% |
| Eyisha | 7/10 | 1560 days | 7% |
| Jose | 10/10 | 1652 days | 5% |
| Emma | 9/10 | 1652 days | 5% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1711 days | 4% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 1711 days | 4% |
| Roque | 10/10 | 2045 days | 3% |
| Aj | 10/10 | 2137 days | 3% |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 2168 days | 3% |
| Karen | 9/10 | 2198 days | 3% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 10/10 | 2382 days | 2% |
| Merche | 9/10 | 2411 days | 2% |
| Silly American | 10/10 | 2442 days | 2% |
| Gap year | 10/10 | 2473 days | 2% |
| Christina | 8/10 | 2473 days | 2% |
| Jun | 9/10 | 2503 days | 2% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 2503 days | 2% |
| Bartezz | 8/10 | 2503 days | 2% |
| Ancient Uncle | 10/10 | 2534 days | 2% |
| Marty | 8/10 | 2564 days | 2% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 2748 days | 2% |
| Georgia Trompf | 9/10 | 2807 days | 2% |
| Trudy Worboys | 10/10 | 2807 days | 2% |
| Liv | 10/10 | 2838 days | 2% |
| The Flip Flop Family | 10/10 | 2929 days | 1% |
| CHA LEMAY | 9/10 | 3082 days | 1% |
| Fivetogether | 9/10 | 3113 days | 1% |
| Muhammad fayadh Mad jamil | 8/10 | 3141 days | 1% |
| Flavia Confalonieri | 7/10 | 3215 days | 1% |
| Lucy Winfield | 5/10 | 3339 days | 0% |
| Nathan Lal | 8/10 | 3345 days | 0% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3435 days | 0% |
| Christine Allgaier | 10/10 | 3488 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Te Kauwhata Domain does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.05% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.