Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Kauwhata Domain.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Te Kauwhata Domain
Valid Reviews
72 Valid Reviews
The Te Kauwhata Domain experience has a total of 78 reviews. There are 72 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 31 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
88.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Kauwhata Domain valid reviews is 88.33% and is based on 72 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
89.29%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Borrmaschine | 9/10 | 71 days | 99% |
| Anita Day | 10/10 | 71 days | 100% |
| Martin | 10/10 | 130 days | 99% |
| Marie | 10/10 | 191 days | 98% |
| Ella | 10/10 | 222 days | 97% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 252 days | 97% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 495 days | 86% |
| Angie Johnson | 9/10 | 495 days | 85% |
| Cam an | 5/10 | 526 days | 64% |
| Ro | 7/10 | 526 days | 78% |
| rae | 9/10 | 556 days | 81% |
| Krys | 9/10 | 556 days | 81% |
| Cucamest | 10/10 | 587 days | 80% |
| Millie | 9/10 | 617 days | 77% |
| Jill | 8/10 | 740 days | 67% |
| Guest | 9/10 | 770 days | 65% |
| Nadja | 10/10 | 861 days | 57% |
| Dee | 7/10 | 892 days | 50% |
| Brie | 6/10 | 892 days | 46% |
| Ruta | 1/10 | 922 days | 20% |
| Malcolm Greenhalgh | 8/10 | 953 days | 47% |
| Jan | 8/10 | 953 days | 47% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 1014 days | 41% |
| Bobbie | 10/10 | 1045 days | 39% |
| Christa | 10/10 | 1106 days | 33% |
| wvdbos | 8/10 | 1136 days | 30% |
| sarah penney | 9/10 | 1136 days | 31% |
| Steve Hawes | 10/10 | 1167 days | 29% |
| Camila | 10/10 | 1167 days | 29% |
| Joakim | 8/10 | 1195 days | 26% |
| Anya | 10/10 | 1195 days | 26% |
| Odette | 10/10 | 1195 days | 26% |
| Caroline | 9/10 | 1195 days | 26% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1226 days | 24% |
| Adrian | 10/10 | 1226 days | 24% |
| Geri Ng | 10/10 | 1257 days | 22% |
| Emily | 8/10 | 1287 days | 20% |
| Dave | 10/10 | 1318 days | 18% |
| Laura Jarry | 8/10 | 1318 days | 18% |
| Chloe | 8/10 | 1410 days | 13% |
| Eyisha | 7/10 | 1440 days | 11% |
| Jose | 10/10 | 1532 days | 8% |
| Emma | 9/10 | 1532 days | 8% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1591 days | 7% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 1591 days | 7% |
| Roque | 10/10 | 1925 days | 3% |
| Aj | 10/10 | 2017 days | 3% |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 2048 days | 3% |
| Karen | 9/10 | 2078 days | 3% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 10/10 | 2262 days | 2% |
| Merche | 9/10 | 2291 days | 2% |
| Silly American | 10/10 | 2322 days | 2% |
| Gap year | 10/10 | 2353 days | 2% |
| Christina | 8/10 | 2353 days | 2% |
| Jun | 9/10 | 2383 days | 2% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 2383 days | 2% |
| Bartezz | 8/10 | 2383 days | 2% |
| Ancient Uncle | 10/10 | 2414 days | 2% |
| Marty | 8/10 | 2444 days | 2% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 2628 days | 2% |
| Georgia Trompf | 9/10 | 2687 days | 2% |
| Trudy Worboys | 10/10 | 2687 days | 2% |
| Liv | 10/10 | 2718 days | 2% |
| The Flip Flop Family | 10/10 | 2809 days | 1% |
| CHA LEMAY | 9/10 | 2962 days | 1% |
| Fivetogether | 9/10 | 2993 days | 1% |
| Muhammad fayadh Mad jamil | 8/10 | 3021 days | 1% |
| Flavia Confalonieri | 7/10 | 3095 days | 1% |
| Lucy Winfield | 5/10 | 3219 days | 0% |
| Nathan Lal | 8/10 | 3225 days | 0% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3315 days | 0% |
| Christine Allgaier | 10/10 | 3368 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Te Kauwhata Domain does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.10% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.