Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
44 Valid Reviews
The Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground experience has a total of 44 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground valid reviews is 79.55% and is based on 44 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
16 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 44 valid reviews, the experience has 16 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 16 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 69.38% and is based on 16 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Ian & Wendy||10/10||118 days||97.79||100%|
|Emma Guthrie||9/10||180 days||94.87||97%|
|Martin Hansen||10/10||241 days||90.8||93%|
|Mystery van||10/10||333 days||82.43||84%|
|Juleen and Gareth||10/10||363 days||79.12||81%|
|Emma & Tom||10/10||424 days||71.51||73%|
|Tash & Laura||8/10||483 days||59.88||61%|
|Jakob Simons||8/10||575 days||45.46||46%|
|Alyson Reid||10/10||858 days||13.9||13%|
|Fedor Bezrukov||10/10||880 days||12.32||11%|
|Susan Boyton||8/10||1124 days||4.7||3%|
|Gruet Titaina||9/10||1322 days||4.56||3%|
|Tatiana Rochereau||7/10||1579 days||3.69||2%|
|Steffen Paul||9/10||1865 days||3.49||2%|
|James Webster||9/10||1893 days||3.44||2%|
|Katherine Britten||9/10||1908 days||3.41||2%|
|Kamil Benes||9/10||1950 days||3.33||2%|
|Jiri Blecha||9/10||1950 days||3.33||2%|
|Lisa Quayle||6/10||1993 days||2.69||1%|
|margaret rose||3/10||2067 days||2.39||1%|
|Helen Olsson||10/10||2257 days||2.73||1%|
|Alexis Redor||4/10||2312 days||2.07||1%|
|Jesse Flynn||10/10||2316 days||2.61||1%|
|Ngaire Davies||2/10||2323 days||1.95||1%|
|Paul Davies||4/10||2323 days||2.05||1%|
|Danica Vrsljko||8/10||2338 days||2.44||1%|
|Amiot Cyriane||5/10||2650 days||1.59||0%|
|Lea Bulle||8/10||2650 days||1.86||0%|
|Mary Neustroski||2/10||2660 days||1.45||0%|
|Ann Sinclair||5/10||2664 days||1.56||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.