Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
70 Valid Reviews
The Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground experience has a total of 71 reviews. There are 70 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground valid reviews is 84.43% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
16 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 70 valid reviews, the experience has 16 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 16 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
69.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 69.38% and is based on 16 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.74%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viktoria | 10/10 | 233 days | 100% |
| Duncan Mitchell | 10/10 | 294 days | 98% |
| jolly | 6/10 | 353 days | 83% |
| Emily | 8/10 | 414 days | 91% |
| Dalton | 10/10 | 475 days | 90% |
| Jorian | 10/10 | 659 days | 78% |
| Gabija Baugirdaite | 10/10 | 659 days | 78% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 688 days | 75% |
| Michael | 9/10 | 811 days | 64% |
| gazza | 7/10 | 841 days | 57% |
| Max | 9/10 | 994 days | 45% |
| Jess Cullen | 8/10 | 1025 days | 42% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1084 days | 37% |
| Josie | 10/10 | 1176 days | 30% |
| gazza | 5/10 | 1268 days | 18% |
| Vicki | 10/10 | 1328 days | 20% |
| Emer | 9/10 | 1329 days | 19% |
| Rach | 10/10 | 1359 days | 18% |
| Kbee | 10/10 | 1541 days | 10% |
| Amber | 10/10 | 1783 days | 5% |
| Mel | 10/10 | 1814 days | 5% |
| Teesh K | 10/10 | 1845 days | 5% |
| Nadia | 10/10 | 1845 days | 5% |
| Kim | 10/10 | 1845 days | 5% |
| Jo | 10/10 | 1906 days | 5% |
| Jenna | 10/10 | 1936 days | 5% |
| Ian & Wendy | 10/10 | 2149 days | 4% |
| Emma Guthrie | 9/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
| Martin Hansen | 10/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
| Mystery van | 10/10 | 2364 days | 4% |
| Juleen and Gareth | 10/10 | 2394 days | 4% |
| Emma & Tom | 10/10 | 2455 days | 4% |
| Ceri | 9/10 | 2514 days | 4% |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 2514 days | 4% |
| Doug | 10/10 | 2544 days | 4% |
| Renske | 8/10 | 2545 days | 4% |
| Sally | 10/10 | 2576 days | 4% |
| Jakob Simons | 8/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Kenza | 8/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Kim | 7/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| Anna | 7/10 | 2851 days | 3% |
| Alyson Reid | 10/10 | 2889 days | 3% |
| Fedor Bezrukov | 10/10 | 2911 days | 3% |
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 3154 days | 2% |
| Kaisu | 9/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
| Brandon | 9/10 | 3205 days | 2% |
| Gruet Titaina | 9/10 | 3353 days | 2% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 7/10 | 3610 days | 1% |
| Steffen Paul | 9/10 | 3896 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 9/10 | 3924 days | 1% |
| Katherine Britten | 9/10 | 3939 days | 1% |
| Miguel | 7/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
| Kamil Benes | 9/10 | 3981 days | 1% |
| Jiri Blecha | 9/10 | 3981 days | 1% |
| Lisa Quayle | 6/10 | 4024 days | 1% |
| margaret rose | 3/10 | 4097 days | 0% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 4127 days | 0% |
| Helen Olsson | 10/10 | 4288 days | 0% |
| Igor | 9/10 | 4312 days | 0% |
| Alexis Redor | 4/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Jesse Flynn | 10/10 | 4347 days | 0% |
| Ngaire Davies | 2/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Paul Davies | 4/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Danica Vrsljko | 8/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| Clodec | 8/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
| Amiot Cyriane | 5/10 | 4681 days | 1% |
| Lea Bulle | 8/10 | 4681 days | 1% |
| Mary Neustroski | 2/10 | 4691 days | 0% |
| Ann Sinclair | 5/10 | 4695 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.90% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.