Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Port Motueka Beach Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Port Motueka Beach Reserve

Valid Reviews

106 Valid Reviews

The Port Motueka Beach Reserve experience has a total of 111 reviews. There are 106 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 106 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 27
25%
9/10 24
23%
8/10 26
25%
7/10 10
9%
6/10 7
7%
5/10 2
2%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 7
7%

78.49% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Port Motueka Beach Reserve valid reviews is 78.49% and is based on 106 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

9 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 106 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 1
11%
9/10 2
22%
8/10 2
22%
7/10 1
11%
6/10 3
33%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

76.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Port Motueka Beach Reserve face-to-face reviews is 76.67% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

84.74%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Clement 9/10 41 days 100%
Kirsty 1/10 41 days 41%
Sol 8/10 103 days 98%
Julie 7/10 133 days 93%
Melanie Franssens 4/10 164 days 65%
Claire 1/10 164 days 40%
Christina 10/10 285 days 96%
Jas 9/10 378 days 92%
James 8/10 406 days 90%
Morgane 9/10 437 days 89%
Wohoo 9/10 468 days 88%
Mladen Savov 10/10 468 days 88%
Nancy Campbell 8/10 498 days 85%
Ellen 9/10 498 days 86%
Morgane 9/10 529 days 84%
Mike Fricker 10/10 681 days 74%
Sabrina K 10/10 712 days 72%
Jorian 9/10 743 days 69%
Pauline 10/10 772 days 67%
Ann 10/10 772 days 67%
Britta 8/10 772 days 65%
Eva 1/10 803 days 26%
Sam H 10/10 834 days 61%
Nina 10/10 864 days 58%
Cholly 9/10 895 days 54%
Marie Perret 10/10 924 days 52%
Henry 7/10 955 days 45%
Christa 9/10 1016 days 42%
Zuzana 10/10 1016 days 43%
Matthew 9/10 1016 days 42%
Basil 9/10 1047 days 40%
Dani 8/10 1078 days 36%
Julierose19 10/10 1109 days 35%
Chantel 9/10 1109 days 34%
Willow 10/10 1137 days 32%
Alex 8/10 1168 days 29%
Blandine 8/10 1168 days 29%
Lara 8/10 1260 days 23%
Har 6/10 1474 days 10%
Alanna 10/10 1502 days 11%
AC 9/10 1533 days 10%
Jenna 8/10 1594 days 8%
Soul 10/10 1625 days 7%
La Vie 1/10 1839 days 2%
Britt 7/10 1867 days 5%
Kathryn 10/10 1867 days 5%
Leon 10/10 1867 days 5%
Rebecca 10/10 1959 days 5%
Felix 8/10 2050 days 5%
Katie 1/10 2081 days 2%
Ian & Wendy 2/10 2233 days 2%
Lærke 10/10 2233 days 4%
JACKIE EHRHARDT 9/10 2295 days 4%
Ritravel 9/10 2325 days 4%
Lua 10/10 2325 days 4%
Piluki 9/10 2356 days 4%
Benjamin Wegenstein 7/10 2356 days 4%
Geoff Walker 9/10 2356 days 4%
Ambs 9/10 2385 days 4%
Becca 8/10 2477 days 4%
Andy and Julia 10/10 2538 days 4%
Lena 10/10 2629 days 3%
Ymke Huisman 10/10 2660 days 3%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2721 days 3%
Harriet Kelly 1/10 2721 days 1%
Lance 5/10 2721 days 2%
Stephen Lindsay 8/10 2873 days 3%
Mike 8/10 2904 days 3%
Nathalie 1/10 2935 days 1%
Jean 8/10 2935 days 3%
Mallory 8/10 2935 days 3%
The Farrs 6/10 2935 days 2%
S Weslake 6/10 2935 days 2%
Oceane Imber 10/10 2989 days 3%
Axel Kite 7/10 3000 days 3%
Michael Pitman 9/10 3007 days 3%
Silvia 8/10 3031 days 3%
Rogier Kavelaars 8/10 3041 days 3%
Vander Plancke Julien 10/10 3047 days 3%
Jacki Janetzki 5/10 3086 days 2%
Jo Dawson 8/10 3187 days 2%
Grace White 3/10 3255 days 1%
Duncan 7/10 3279 days 2%
deborah cooper 7/10 3299 days 2%
Johanna Dorner 8/10 3314 days 2%
Rogina de Jong 9/10 3349 days 2%
Trent O'Keeffe 8/10 3349 days 2%
Irene 8/10 3633 days 1%
Marina 8/10 3691 days 1%
Ron Web 10/10 3786 days 1%
Kate Voss 9/10 3945 days 1%
Sarrob Sarrob 7/10 4031 days 1%
Manuela 9/10 4117 days 0%
Alexandre Moleiro 8/10 4120 days 0%
Benoit Fricaudet 9/10 4129 days 0%
Moudry Vojtech 10/10 4136 days 0%
rachaelandryan 9/10 4181 days 0%
Daniel Jarrett 6/10 4211 days 0%
Mike Fricker 8/10 4365 days 0%
Garry Renton 6/10 4372 days 0%
Susan 8/10 4421 days 1%
Dan Lawson 6/10 4436 days 0%
Sina Sacranie 6/10 4436 days 0%
Kellie 7/10 4460 days 1%
K S 7/10 4761 days 1%
Aurelie Morin 8/10 4842 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Port Motueka Beach Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.88% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

87%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.