Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
67 Valid Reviews
The Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground experience has a total of 68 reviews. There are 67 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 67 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.25% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground valid reviews is 89.25% and is based on 67 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
13 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 67 valid reviews, the experience has 13 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 13 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
54% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
15% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 90.77% and is based on 13 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
84.68%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marit | 9/10 | 317 days | 100% |
| Toni | 8/10 | 408 days | 95% |
| @saltyskin | 7/10 | 1262 days | 23% |
| Emmy | 6/10 | 1382 days | 15% |
| Peter menzies | 9/10 | 1382 days | 17% |
| ElizabethE | 7/10 | 1382 days | 16% |
| Daniel | 9/10 | 1443 days | 14% |
| Jak | 10/10 | 1627 days | 8% |
| Paul Costelloe | 9/10 | 1747 days | 6% |
| Loaf | 10/10 | 1931 days | 5% |
| Wendy. | 10/10 | 2053 days | 5% |
| Kyje | 8/10 | 2053 days | 5% |
| Bonbons | 10/10 | 2081 days | 5% |
| Danielle Pegge | 9/10 | 2081 days | 5% |
| Rob | 10/10 | 2112 days | 5% |
| Clara | 5/10 | 2112 days | 3% |
| Vicky | 8/10 | 2204 days | 4% |
| Amy Larkin | 9/10 | 2447 days | 4% |
| Eloïse Cook | 10/10 | 2447 days | 4% |
| Javier Williams | 9/10 | 2539 days | 4% |
| Richard and Anne Amphlett | 8/10 | 2570 days | 4% |
| Charlotte | 8/10 | 2662 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 2812 days | 3% |
| Ralph Gleek | 7/10 | 2812 days | 3% |
| Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2812 days | 3% |
| MaryCC | 9/10 | 2874 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 6/10 | 3118 days | 2% |
| Jakub Horner | 9/10 | 3139 days | 2% |
| Robin Heels | 10/10 | 3170 days | 2% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 3184 days | 2% |
| Gordon Otte | 9/10 | 3198 days | 2% |
| Annina Jarvinen | 5/10 | 3227 days | 1% |
| Lukas Kuratko | 10/10 | 3266 days | 2% |
| Haley Everitt | 8/10 | 3436 days | 2% |
| Martin Badley | 9/10 | 3445 days | 2% |
| carter Kedzlie | 10/10 | 3453 days | 2% |
| Rian Talen | 8/10 | 3462 days | 2% |
| Ally Rowe | 10/10 | 3534 days | 2% |
| Lizzy Cobeldick | 10/10 | 3573 days | 2% |
| Emanresu | 10/10 | 3634 days | 1% |
| midlife crisis | 10/10 | 3665 days | 1% |
| Philippa and Adam | 9/10 | 3894 days | 1% |
| Linda Frank | 10/10 | 3920 days | 1% |
| Lucilo Del Castillo | 10/10 | 3926 days | 1% |
| Kiria Logtenberg | 9/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3942 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 10/10 | 4122 days | 0% |
| Christian Jenny | 9/10 | 4192 days | 0% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 4245 days | 0% |
| Felix Holm | 9/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 8/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
| tim winders | 10/10 | 4518 days | 1% |
| Leeann Newton | 10/10 | 4636 days | 1% |
| Jason MacLeod | 9/10 | 4669 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4700 days | 1% |
| Helene & Peter | 10/10 | 4730 days | 1% |
| GN100 | 9/10 | 4761 days | 1% |
| David Restell | 10/10 | 4853 days | 1% |
| Cloarec Guillaume | 10/10 | 4970 days | 1% |
| Clodec | 8/10 | 4970 days | 1% |
| Phil & Laura | 7/10 | 5003 days | 1% |
| Morayfm | 10/10 | 5003 days | 1% |
| Danish_family | 8/10 | 5003 days | 1% |
| Jennifer | 10/10 | 5351 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 10/10 | 5354 days | 1% |
| Susannah Eduart | 10/10 | 5686 days | 1% |
| Craig | 8/10 | 6447 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.89% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.