Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
67 Valid Reviews
The Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground experience has a total of 68 reviews. There are 67 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 67 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.25% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground valid reviews is 89.25% and is based on 67 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
13 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 67 valid reviews, the experience has 13 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 13 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
54% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
15% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 90.77% and is based on 13 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
84.03%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marit | 9/10 | 121 days | 100% |
| Toni | 8/10 | 212 days | 97% |
| @saltyskin | 7/10 | 1066 days | 36% |
| Emmy | 6/10 | 1186 days | 25% |
| Peter menzies | 9/10 | 1186 days | 28% |
| ElizabethE | 7/10 | 1186 days | 27% |
| Daniel | 9/10 | 1247 days | 24% |
| Jak | 10/10 | 1431 days | 14% |
| Paul Costelloe | 9/10 | 1551 days | 9% |
| Loaf | 10/10 | 1735 days | 5% |
| Wendy. | 10/10 | 1857 days | 5% |
| Kyje | 8/10 | 1857 days | 5% |
| Bonbons | 10/10 | 1885 days | 5% |
| Danielle Pegge | 9/10 | 1885 days | 5% |
| Rob | 10/10 | 1916 days | 5% |
| Clara | 5/10 | 1916 days | 4% |
| Vicky | 8/10 | 2008 days | 5% |
| Amy | 9/10 | 2251 days | 4% |
| Eloïse Cook | 10/10 | 2251 days | 4% |
| Javier Williams | 9/10 | 2343 days | 4% |
| Richard and Anne Amphlett | 8/10 | 2374 days | 4% |
| Charlotte | 8/10 | 2466 days | 4% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 2616 days | 3% |
| Ralph Gleek | 7/10 | 2616 days | 3% |
| Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2616 days | 3% |
| MaryCC | 9/10 | 2678 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 6/10 | 2922 days | 2% |
| Jakub Horner | 9/10 | 2943 days | 3% |
| Robin Heels | 10/10 | 2974 days | 2% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 2988 days | 2% |
| Gordon Otte | 9/10 | 3002 days | 2% |
| Annina Jarvinen | 5/10 | 3031 days | 1% |
| Lukas Kuratko | 10/10 | 3070 days | 2% |
| Haley Everitt | 8/10 | 3240 days | 2% |
| Martin Badley | 9/10 | 3249 days | 2% |
| carter Kedzlie | 10/10 | 3256 days | 2% |
| Rian Talen | 8/10 | 3266 days | 2% |
| Ally Rowe | 10/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
| Lizzy Cobeldick | 10/10 | 3376 days | 2% |
| Emanresu | 10/10 | 3437 days | 2% |
| midlife crisis | 10/10 | 3468 days | 2% |
| Philippa and Adam | 9/10 | 3698 days | 1% |
| Linda Frank | 10/10 | 3724 days | 1% |
| Lucilo Del Castillo | 10/10 | 3730 days | 1% |
| Kiria Logtenberg | 9/10 | 3745 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3746 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 10/10 | 3926 days | 1% |
| Christian Jenny | 9/10 | 3996 days | 1% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 4048 days | 1% |
| Felix Holm | 9/10 | 4120 days | 0% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 8/10 | 4199 days | 0% |
| tim winders | 10/10 | 4322 days | 0% |
| Leeann Newton | 10/10 | 4440 days | 1% |
| Jason MacLeod | 9/10 | 4473 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4504 days | 1% |
| Helene & Peter | 10/10 | 4534 days | 1% |
| GN100 | 9/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| David Restell | 10/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
| Cloarec Guillaume | 10/10 | 4774 days | 1% |
| Clodec | 8/10 | 4774 days | 1% |
| Phil & Laura | 7/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
| Morayfm | 10/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
| Danish_family | 8/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
| Jennifer | 10/10 | 5155 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 10/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
| Susannah Eduart | 10/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
| Craig | 8/10 | 6251 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kaitoke Regional Park Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.02% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.