Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cape Palliser.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Cape Palliser
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The Cape Palliser experience has a total of 69 reviews. There are 65 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 31 |
|
48% |
| 9/10 | 21 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
14% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Palliser valid reviews is 92.00% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.83% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Palliser face-to-face reviews is 85.83% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
95.74%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| TK | 10/10 | 260 days | 100% |
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 322 days | 98% |
| matt | 10/10 | 717 days | 73% |
| Terry | 10/10 | 1022 days | 43% |
| Ae Marika | 10/10 | 1022 days | 43% |
| Davespg | 9/10 | 1053 days | 40% |
| Jan | 9/10 | 1053 days | 40% |
| Adel | 8/10 | 1114 days | 34% |
| @saltyskin | 10/10 | 1236 days | 26% |
| Mechthild Wilkowski | 9/10 | 1328 days | 20% |
| Nicola Tuschwitz | 9/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 1509 days | 11% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 1844 days | 5% |
| Ae Marika | 10/10 | 1874 days | 5% |
| Stubby | 10/10 | 2058 days | 5% |
| AMR | 10/10 | 2117 days | 5% |
| Mark Dalgety | 9/10 | 2117 days | 4% |
| Marine | 10/10 | 2117 days | 5% |
| Rob | 10/10 | 2117 days | 5% |
| Finlay | 10/10 | 2239 days | 4% |
| Zae | 8/10 | 2270 days | 4% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 8/10 | 2452 days | 4% |
| Traveler | 10/10 | 2575 days | 4% |
| Andy and Julia | 9/10 | 2758 days | 3% |
| BER&GENE | 9/10 | 2817 days | 3% |
| Kevin | 10/10 | 2817 days | 3% |
| Niven | 8/10 | 2817 days | 3% |
| Maë | 10/10 | 2879 days | 3% |
| Thomas Mende | 9/10 | 2909 days | 3% |
| Brian Warburton | 10/10 | 2970 days | 3% |
| Phil | 8/10 | 3093 days | 2% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 3123 days | 2% |
| Becky | 10/10 | 3123 days | 2% |
| Boguslaw MAKIELLO | 9/10 | 3137 days | 2% |
| Simon Springett | 10/10 | 3177 days | 2% |
| Look Out | 9/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
| Ronald Daigneault | 10/10 | 3237 days | 2% |
| Lukas and Katka | 9/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| Leonie Scholten | 10/10 | 3354 days | 2% |
| Lizzy Cobeldick | 9/10 | 3365 days | 2% |
| Mara Schneider | 10/10 | 3582 days | 2% |
| Saskia Ruttor | 10/10 | 3625 days | 1% |
| Craig Workman | 9/10 | 3653 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 7/10 | 3839 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 9/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Geordie Zimmermanster | 10/10 | 3955 days | 1% |
| Marianne Leclerco | 8/10 | 3979 days | 0% |
| Reinout Schrijver | 8/10 | 4210 days | 0% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 8/10 | 4297 days | 0% |
| Radek Ouhel | 10/10 | 4308 days | 0% |
| Graeme | 10/10 | 4308 days | 0% |
| Cherie Marshall | 10/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
| Antoine Lerin | 7/10 | 4332 days | 0% |
| Lois Moreland | 10/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
| Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 4505 days | 1% |
| Pavel Macek | 8/10 | 4586 days | 1% |
| Zuzana Holubova | 7/10 | 4586 days | 1% |
| Christopher Buch Madsen | 10/10 | 4610 days | 1% |
| Stephen Revah | 10/10 | 4612 days | 1% |
| Arnaud Memay | 6/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
| David Restell | 10/10 | 4858 days | 1% |
| Mike and Caroline | 9/10 | 4949 days | 1% |
| Johann Maier | 10/10 | 5358 days | 1% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 9/10 | 5527 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cape Palliser does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.36% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.