Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Haka Snow Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
76 Valid Reviews
The Haka Snow Tours experience has a total of 76 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 76 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Haka Snow Tours valid reviews is 99.34% and is based on 76 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Jeremiah Blanch||10/10||1639 days||100%|
|Jill Hayes||10/10||1639 days||100%|
|Tiina R||10/10||1974 days||82%|
|Josh S||10/10||2005 days||80%|
|Aidan Potter||10/10||2005 days||80%|
|Michael Woods||10/10||2036 days||79%|
|Ruth Tan||10/10||2036 days||79%|
|martin ramsey||10/10||2036 days||79%|
|steve mcelroy||10/10||2037 days||79%|
|Ery K||10/10||2066 days||77%|
|Stavros Mouslopoulos||10/10||2067 days||77%|
|T D||10/10||2339 days||62%|
|Gin Di Francesco||10/10||2339 days||62%|
|Lisa Bransby||10/10||2340 days||62%|
|Kylie O||10/10||2340 days||62%|
|Mercedes Zacuto||8/10||2370 days||57%|
|Jessica Thomas||10/10||2371 days||61%|
|perina drummond||10/10||2371 days||61%|
|Jonathan Barnes||10/10||2371 days||61%|
|Henk Mulder||9/10||2401 days||59%|
|Andrew Cheney||9/10||2583 days||49%|
|Sarah Mitchell||10/10||2583 days||49%|
|Nathan Douglas||10/10||2767 days||39%|
|Hefin Llewellyn-Evans||10/10||2767 days||39%|
|Scott Andersen||10/10||2767 days||39%|
|Gillian B||10/10||2797 days||38%|
|john rowbottom||10/10||4166 days||19%|
|Edward Bugg||10/10||4166 days||19%|
|Cassia Ferguson||10/10||4197 days||19%|
|Aaron Jones||10/10||4197 days||19%|
|vanessa koop||10/10||4197 days||19%|
|Robert Aquadro||10/10||4197 days||19%|
|Philip Parle||10/10||4228 days||19%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Haka Snow Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 48 days. However the Haka Snow Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Haka Snow Tours experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.