Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Gertrude Saddle Route.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Gertrude Saddle Route
Valid Reviews
40 Valid Reviews
The Gertrude Saddle Route experience has a total of 40 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 40 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 20 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 7 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Gertrude Saddle Route valid reviews is 91.50% and is based on 40 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
34 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 40 valid reviews, the experience has 34 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 34 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
47% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.88% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Gertrude Saddle Route face-to-face reviews is 90.88% and is based on 34 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
93.19%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lennard | 10/10 | 2243 days | 100% |
| Simon Zenzen | 10/10 | 2622 days | 80% |
| Sampo Uravirta | 10/10 | 2632 days | 80% |
| Nivault | 10/10 | 2919 days | 64% |
| Daniel Gheczy | 9/10 | 2958 days | 62% |
| Nicole Joersen | 8/10 | 3043 days | 56% |
| Matthus Groem | 8/10 | 3043 days | 56% |
| Wolfgang Ellenrieder | 10/10 | 3284 days | 45% |
| Floriane Desnoyer | 10/10 | 3292 days | 45% |
| Dominique | 8/10 | 3301 days | 43% |
| Derick Trotter | 9/10 | 3301 days | 44% |
| Leon Schotter | 10/10 | 3311 days | 44% |
| Ellie Doughty | 9/10 | 3312 days | 43% |
| Maxim Reim | 10/10 | 3362 days | 41% |
| Emma Rochester | 9/10 | 3444 days | 36% |
| Kristina Farkas | 10/10 | 3691 days | 24% |
| Frederic Wachter | 10/10 | 3701 days | 23% |
| Karolina Gren | 9/10 | 4010 days | 7% |
| Julian Kuemme | 7/10 | 4016 days | 5% |
| Mandy Reich | 4/10 | 4017 days | 0% |
| Adriana | 10/10 | 4018 days | 7% |
| Pavel Jarolimek | 10/10 | 4018 days | 7% |
| Henrik Bours | 10/10 | 4025 days | 6% |
| Frederieke | 9/10 | 4025 days | 6% |
| Ruud Biemans | 8/10 | 4041 days | 5% |
| Karel | 10/10 | 4057 days | 5% |
| Marius Hoffmann | 9/10 | 4058 days | 4% |
| Jitka Krejcova | 10/10 | 4392 days | 14% |
| Michal Sturma | 10/10 | 4392 days | 14% |
| Rob Cadmus | 9/10 | 4409 days | 14% |
| Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4465 days | 14% |
| Martin Guillaume | 10/10 | 4767 days | 14% |
| Loic | 8/10 | 4794 days | 14% |
| Fasto Maserati | 10/10 | 5127 days | 14% |
| Paul Nickson | 10/10 | 5129 days | 14% |
| Javier Munoz | 10/10 | 5130 days | 14% |
| Lenore Dejong | 9/10 | 5139 days | 14% |
| Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 9/10 | 5158 days | 14% |
| Wallet | 8/10 | 5164 days | 14% |
| Bowness | 9/10 | 5489 days | 14% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Gertrude Saddle Route does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.62% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.