Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Pororari River Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Pororari River Track
Valid Reviews
42 Valid Reviews
The Pororari River Track experience has a total of 42 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 42 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.81% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pororari River Track valid reviews is 88.81% and is based on 42 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
40 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 42 valid reviews, the experience has 40 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 40 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
35% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pororari River Track face-to-face reviews is 89.00% and is based on 40 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
88.92%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Struessmann | 10/10 | 3517 days | 100% |
| Loic Besson | 8/10 | 3590 days | 89% |
| Jerome Cluzel | 8/10 | 3590 days | 89% |
| Richard Fox | 8/10 | 3622 days | 85% |
| Cyril | 7/10 | 3623 days | 80% |
| Gabriela | 10/10 | 3958 days | 44% |
| Laura and Marie | 7/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Patricia Revel | 10/10 | 4584 days | 55% |
| Jacques Revel | 9/10 | 4584 days | 55% |
| Douglas Dean | 9/10 | 4614 days | 55% |
| Laura Metz | 8/10 | 4627 days | 54% |
| Hubertus Thost | 9/10 | 4627 days | 55% |
| Bella Danaher | 9/10 | 4651 days | 55% |
| Daniel Danamer | 9/10 | 4651 days | 55% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4979 days | 54% |
| Frederick Dean | 9/10 | 4979 days | 55% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4979 days | 55% |
| Dave Mertzig | 10/10 | 4979 days | 55% |
| Joey Mertzig | 10/10 | 4996 days | 55% |
| Charliepot | 8/10 | 5069 days | 54% |
| Loesje | 9/10 | 5160 days | 55% |
| Peter Kent | 8/10 | 5331 days | 54% |
| Jurg Pfaendler | 9/10 | 5361 days | 55% |
| Andreas & Leonie Fehr | 8/10 | 5365 days | 54% |
| Thorsten Grocholl | 10/10 | 5697 days | 55% |
| Stephen Jones | 10/10 | 5710 days | 55% |
| Carolin Moberg | 9/10 | 5715 days | 55% |
| Rachel Gerrand | 7/10 | 5715 days | 51% |
| Rian Bach | 9/10 | 5716 days | 55% |
| Celia Murphy | 10/10 | 5728 days | 55% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 5993 days | 55% |
| paulag | 9/10 | 6014 days | 55% |
| Bert Meuleuorijks | 9/10 | 6071 days | 55% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 6085 days | 55% |
| Susan Hitchins | 10/10 | 6099 days | 55% |
| Brenda | 8/10 | 6100 days | 54% |
| Supa Simpson | 8/10 | 6108 days | 54% |
| Julia May | 10/10 | 6176 days | 55% |
| MiepS | 8/10 | 6397 days | 54% |
| Raewyn | 8/10 | 6406 days | 54% |
| JanetM | 10/10 | 6421 days | 55% |
| BrunoG | 8/10 | 6427 days | 54% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Pororari River Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.15% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.