Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cape Foulwind Walkway.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Cape Foulwind Walkway
Valid Reviews
84 Valid Reviews
The Cape Foulwind Walkway experience has a total of 84 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
38% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Foulwind Walkway valid reviews is 88.45% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 23 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 30 |
|
39% |
| 8/10 | 21 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.96% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Foulwind Walkway face-to-face reviews is 88.96% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
88.71%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Becky Fox | 8/10 | 3388 days | 100% |
| Emma Millett | 8/10 | 3388 days | 100% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 10/10 | 3433 days | 96% |
| Daphne Andrey | 8/10 | 3435 days | 93% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 3442 days | 93% |
| Rocco | 10/10 | 3685 days | 57% |
| Sylvain Blanchet | 8/10 | 3736 days | 47% |
| Ronja and Lena | 8/10 | 3786 days | 39% |
| Brian Lexmond | 6/10 | 4406 days | 17% |
| Julian Kuemme | 9/10 | 4409 days | 27% |
| Max Backelandt | 9/10 | 4413 days | 27% |
| Austin Johns | 9/10 | 4436 days | 27% |
| Johanna Kofler | 8/10 | 4437 days | 26% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 9/10 | 4439 days | 27% |
| Helen McKevitt | 9/10 | 4440 days | 27% |
| Marion Busch | 9/10 | 4449 days | 27% |
| M K | 10/10 | 4475 days | 28% |
| Cornelia Stark | 10/10 | 4490 days | 28% |
| Azteca | 6/10 | 4677 days | 17% |
| hendrik king | 6/10 | 4707 days | 17% |
| Stefan AuRich | 9/10 | 4807 days | 27% |
| John and Chris Creese | 10/10 | 4822 days | 28% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 4892 days | 28% |
| Fries | 10/10 | 5173 days | 28% |
| Les Barnes | 9/10 | 5173 days | 27% |
| Rick Moth | 9/10 | 5173 days | 27% |
| Josef | 9/10 | 5174 days | 27% |
| Seth & Carla | 9/10 | 5178 days | 27% |
| Butz | 8/10 | 5179 days | 26% |
| Steve Goodyear | 9/10 | 5185 days | 27% |
| Frank Krivauek | 8/10 | 5187 days | 26% |
| Brian Frost | 10/10 | 5187 days | 28% |
| Volker Neumeyer | 9/10 | 5188 days | 27% |
| Tom Connis | 8/10 | 5192 days | 26% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5193 days | 28% |
| Dirk Faupel | 9/10 | 5259 days | 27% |
| Dirk Faupel | 9/10 | 5259 days | 27% |
| damaca | 9/10 | 5346 days | 27% |
| John Wekking | 8/10 | 5469 days | 26% |
| Karin Kueng | 10/10 | 5518 days | 28% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 5520 days | 28% |
| Juerg & Denise Zuesli | 10/10 | 5523 days | 28% |
| Chris & Anne Pearson | 10/10 | 5524 days | 28% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5530 days | 26% |
| Matthys Kikke | 9/10 | 5534 days | 27% |
| Edwards | 9/10 | 5537 days | 27% |
| Jennie McIver | 9/10 | 5545 days | 27% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5546 days | 28% |
| Robert Cox | 9/10 | 5549 days | 27% |
| Mike and Alice Powner | 8/10 | 5549 days | 26% |
| Webster | 10/10 | 5551 days | 28% |
| Gordon Daniels | 4/10 | 5553 days | 0% |
| Niels Van Welsenes | 8/10 | 5558 days | 26% |
| Risch & Seybold | 10/10 | 5877 days | 28% |
| Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5883 days | 27% |
| Evans | 7/10 | 5883 days | 22% |
| Jana Steve | 10/10 | 5889 days | 28% |
| Tom Bos | 8/10 | 5890 days | 26% |
| Giaque | 9/10 | 5901 days | 27% |
| Armand | 8/10 | 5909 days | 26% |
| Eva | 9/10 | 5912 days | 27% |
| kararina Kosten | 10/10 | 5917 days | 28% |
| Birgit Haver | 10/10 | 5917 days | 28% |
| Hugli | 9/10 | 5928 days | 27% |
| Chris Kevin | 10/10 | 5932 days | 28% |
| Omar Frenchy | 9/10 | 5932 days | 27% |
| Catherine Clavel | 9/10 | 5932 days | 27% |
| Bo Moenstead | 9/10 | 5932 days | 27% |
| Nigel Armstrong | 10/10 | 5934 days | 28% |
| Colin Morbey | 8/10 | 5937 days | 26% |
| Johan Vaartjes | 8/10 | 5939 days | 26% |
| Connie Graae | 9/10 | 5940 days | 27% |
| Greg Kennedy | 10/10 | 5942 days | 28% |
| Heinrich Hax | 10/10 | 5943 days | 28% |
| Heino keyssler | 10/10 | 5943 days | 28% |
| Decuq | 8/10 | 5996 days | 26% |
| Simon Bartholomew | 8/10 | 5997 days | 26% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 6012 days | 27% |
| Ruth Kinder | 9/10 | 6015 days | 27% |
| HansH1 | 10/10 | 6224 days | 28% |
| StephaineFrance | 8/10 | 6229 days | 26% |
| Enno Brehm | 8/10 | 6241 days | 26% |
| AndrewW | 8/10 | 6241 days | 26% |
| Rissmann | 9/10 | 6245 days | 27% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cape Foulwind Walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.18% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.