Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Clifton Road Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Clifton Road Reserve
Valid Reviews
59 Valid Reviews
The Clifton Road Reserve experience has a total of 59 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 28 |
|
47% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.49% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Clifton Road Reserve valid reviews is 89.49% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
6 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 59 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
33% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Clifton Road Reserve face-to-face reviews is 80.00% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.82%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruby | 10/10 | 21 days | 99.93 | 100% | |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 205 days | 93.34 | 93% | |
| Glen Marshall UK | 9/10 | 233 days | 91.4 | 91% | |
| Andy Bond | 8/10 | 300 days | 81.45 | 81% | |
| jcastl | 9/10 | 325 days | 83.26 | 83% | |
| The 2 Joes | 8/10 | 356 days | 75.92 | 76% | |
| Dave | 6/10 | 509 days | 48.92 | 49% | |
| Peter | 10/10 | 509 days | 58.95 | 59% | |
| ascotandanaussie | 10/10 | 539 days | 53.96 | 54% | |
| Becky | 10/10 | 539 days | 53.96 | 54% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 570 days | 48.68 | 48% | |
| Isabel van Megen | 10/10 | 570 days | 48.68 | 48% | |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 570 days | 48.68 | 48% | |
| Aaron Brose | 8/10 | 660 days | 33.24 | 33% | |
| Andrea Harvey | 5/10 | 688 days | 25.31 | 25% | |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 692 days | 30.74 | 30% | |
| Catherine Storey | 10/10 | 719 days | 27.4 | 27% | |
| Jo Dawson | 10/10 | 813 days | 17.6 | 17% | |
| Jerry Bart | 9/10 | 901 days | 10.96 | 10% | |
| Julia Kurtz | 9/10 | 906 days | 10.66 | 10% | |
| Gary Carleton | 8/10 | 941 days | 8.32 | 8% | |
| Harry Wright | 10/10 | 1003 days | 6.34 | 6% | |
| Lawrence Bowen | 10/10 | 1036 days | 5.55 | 5% | |
| Mr and Mrs B | 9/10 | 1060 days | 5.19 | 5% | |
| Nic | 9/10 | 1178 days | 4.86 | 4% | |
| Jeremy Wienert | 9/10 | 1263 days | 4.71 | 4% | |
| Phillippa McLernon | 8/10 | 1312 days | 4.4 | 4% | |
| Joel Papak | 7/10 | 1321 days |  |
4.2 | 4% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 1340 days | 4.35 | 4% | |
| Debbie | 9/10 | 1360 days | 4.55 | 4% | |
| Dennis Page | 10/10 | 1360 days | 4.55 | 4% | |
| Antonio BENITEZ | 6/10 | 1360 days | 3.77 | 3% | |
| Penny Mercer | 10/10 | 1363 days | 4.54 | 4% | |
| Birgitta Schuelke | 9/10 | 1396 days | 4.48 | 4% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 10/10 | 1426 days | 4.43 | 4% | |
| Rogier K | 8/10 | 1453 days | 4.17 | 3% | |
| Felsen Kind | 9/10 | 1499 days | 4.31 | 4% | |
| John Bylsma | 10/10 | 1579 days | 4.17 | 3% | |
| Stephanie | 10/10 | 1610 days | 4.12 | 3% | |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1666 days | 4.02 | 3% | |
| Michael Ricketts | 10/10 | 1675 days | 4.01 | 3% | |
| Ed Hill | 8/10 | 1713 days | 3.74 | 3% | |
| Bjorn Privat | 10/10 | 1728 days | 3.92 | 3% | |
| Ian Harris | 10/10 | 1756 days | 3.87 | 3% | |
| Neville Smith | 10/10 | 1817 days | 3.76 | 3% | |
| Jakub Stastny | 8/10 | 2001 days | |
3.28 | 3% |
| Jean Curry | 7/10 | 2009 days | |
3.13 | 2% |
| Reinhard Boettcher | 10/10 | 2096 days | |
3.29 | 3% |
| W & K Boyd | 10/10 | 2212 days | 3.09 | 2% | |
| Patricia Busbach | 10/10 | 2396 days | 2.77 | 2% | |
| Mette, Bo, Viktor & Olivia Seligmann | 10/10 | 2396 days | 2.77 | 2% | |
| Evyatar Tulipman | 10/10 | 2409 days | |
2.75 | 2% |
| auré bis | 6/10 | 2424 days | 2.26 | 2% | |
| David Restell | 8/10 | 2424 days | 2.59 | 2% | |
| Puma17 | 10/10 | 2486 days | 2.62 | 2% | |
| Graeme | 8/10 | 2790 days | 1.99 | 1% | |
| josshaw | 9/10 | 3155 days | 1.47 | 1% | |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 3186 days | 1.42 | 1% | |
| Charlotte | 6/10 | 3519 days | |
0.7 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Clifton Road Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.