G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kerosene Creek.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Kerosene Creek
Valid Reviews
84 Valid Reviews
The Kerosene Creek experience has a total of 85 reviews. There are 84 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kerosene Creek valid reviews is 89.76% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
67 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 67 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 67 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 32 |
|
48% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.49% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kerosene Creek face-to-face reviews is 91.49% and is based on 67 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
70.51%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laurel | 4/10 | 466 days | 100% |
| Sam | 8/10 | 1501 days | 19% |
| Haefele Lilja | 3/10 | 2658 days | 3% |
| Melanie | 9/10 | 3295 days | 4% |
| Philip Sheridan | 9/10 | 3323 days | 4% |
| Tina Mlinarevic | 9/10 | 3323 days | 4% |
| Sam Staines | 9/10 | 3354 days | 3% |
| Evan Lloyd | 10/10 | 3354 days | 4% |
| Eline-Jessica van der Hoeven | 9/10 | 3356 days | 3% |
| Sylvain Schiber | 10/10 | 3357 days | 3% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3363 days | 3% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 9/10 | 3424 days | 3% |
| Taryn Thompson | 8/10 | 3514 days | 3% |
| Lisa Haedrich | 8/10 | 3578 days | 3% |
| Valerie Bernardini | 10/10 | 3591 days | 3% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 3614 days | 3% |
| Michaela Bartotini | 8/10 | 3617 days | 3% |
| Natasha Harbinson | 9/10 | 3620 days | 3% |
| magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3628 days | 3% |
| Martina Cervenkova | 10/10 | 3637 days | 3% |
| Tilman | 10/10 | 3642 days | 3% |
| Florian Mueller | 9/10 | 3648 days | 2% |
| Chalie Dotesek | 10/10 | 3681 days | 2% |
| Selma Krap | 10/10 | 3695 days | 2% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3722 days | 2% |
| Emma Keegan | 9/10 | 3936 days | 1% |
| Naelan Le Borgue | 9/10 | 3958 days | 1% |
| Michael Stibor | 9/10 | 3959 days | 1% |
| Lagarde | 9/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Pelletier | 8/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| James Russell | 9/10 | 4309 days | 0% |
| Hannah Watt | 10/10 | 4309 days | 0% |
| Bea Westkam | 10/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Christopher Berkhahn | 10/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Romina De Hill | 7/10 | 4331 days | 0% |
| Tom Hill | 8/10 | 4331 days | 0% |
| thibaut vernelle | 8/10 | 4331 days | 0% |
| Ian Garner | 10/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
| Karel | 6/10 | 4349 days | 0% |
| Junior Pugieux | 10/10 | 4355 days | 0% |
| Gassat | 10/10 | 4355 days | 0% |
| Melissa Hermansson | 10/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
| Laura Pleumeekers | 8/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
| Nelle Dutilleur | 10/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
| Claire Dann | 10/10 | 4392 days | 2% |
| Thi Baut | 8/10 | 4397 days | 2% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 4691 days | 2% |
| Jeremy Eng | 10/10 | 4698 days | 2% |
| Melanie Pretzel | 10/10 | 4700 days | 2% |
| Frederic Birke | 10/10 | 4700 days | 2% |
| Erik Muchembled | 10/10 | 4702 days | 2% |
| Tony and Helene | 9/10 | 4706 days | 2% |
| Rouquette | 10/10 | 4708 days | 2% |
| Kristine and William | 7/10 | 4711 days | 2% |
| N smith | 8/10 | 4757 days | 2% |
| Anne Rodofsen | 9/10 | 4778 days | 2% |
| Neil Beckett | 8/10 | 5032 days | 2% |
| Mark Bogton | 9/10 | 5072 days | 2% |
| Kimberley Mills | 9/10 | 5079 days | 2% |
| Annette May | 8/10 | 5084 days | 2% |
| Colin Philpott | 10/10 | 5085 days | 2% |
| Lindblom | 7/10 | 5089 days | 2% |
| Lilja Bjork Hermannsdottir | 10/10 | 5091 days | 2% |
| Remy van Heugten | 10/10 | 5091 days | 2% |
| Peter W. | 10/10 | 5154 days | 2% |
| Natascha & Greg | 8/10 | 5166 days | 2% |
| Alberto Redner | 10/10 | 5170 days | 2% |
| Johanna & Mark | 10/10 | 5411 days | 2% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 5412 days | 2% |
| Rachel Kent-Lawton | 10/10 | 5429 days | 2% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 9/10 | 5432 days | 2% |
| Mike | 8/10 | 5445 days | 2% |
| Luise Jaeger | 9/10 | 5447 days | 2% |
| Bekema | 8/10 | 5455 days | 2% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 5733 days | 2% |
| Herrmann | 9/10 | 5797 days | 2% |
| Will Jemma | 10/10 | 5807 days | 2% |
| Don Morgan | 10/10 | 5835 days | 2% |
| Jakob Jurgen | 10/10 | 5836 days | 2% |
| EA Anders | 8/10 | 5839 days | 2% |
| Karen Raven | 8/10 | 5891 days | 2% |
| Chris Leach | 10/10 | 5891 days | 2% |
| JanneP | 10/10 | 6126 days | 2% |
| SannaS | 10/10 | 6126 days | 2% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kerosene Creek does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
6.72% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.