Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kerosene Creek.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Kerosene Creek
Valid Reviews
84 Valid Reviews
The Kerosene Creek experience has a total of 85 reviews. There are 84 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kerosene Creek valid reviews is 89.76% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
67 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 67 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 67 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 32 |
|
48% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.49% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kerosene Creek face-to-face reviews is 91.49% and is based on 67 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
72.62%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laurel | 4/10 | 688 days | 100% |
| Sam | 8/10 | 1723 days | 11% |
| Haefele Lilja | 3/10 | 2880 days | 3% |
| Melanie | 9/10 | 3517 days | 3% |
| Philip Sheridan | 9/10 | 3545 days | 3% |
| Tina Mlinarevic | 9/10 | 3545 days | 3% |
| Sam Staines | 9/10 | 3576 days | 2% |
| Evan Lloyd | 10/10 | 3576 days | 3% |
| Eline-Jessica van der Hoeven | 9/10 | 3578 days | 2% |
| Sylvain Schiber | 10/10 | 3579 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3585 days | 2% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 9/10 | 3645 days | 2% |
| Taryn Thompson | 8/10 | 3735 days | 2% |
| Lisa Haedrich | 8/10 | 3800 days | 2% |
| Valerie Bernardini | 10/10 | 3813 days | 2% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 3836 days | 1% |
| Michaela Bartotini | 8/10 | 3839 days | 1% |
| Natasha Harbinson | 9/10 | 3842 days | 1% |
| magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3850 days | 1% |
| Martina Cervenkova | 10/10 | 3859 days | 1% |
| Tilman | 10/10 | 3864 days | 1% |
| Florian Mueller | 9/10 | 3870 days | 1% |
| Chalie Dotesek | 10/10 | 3903 days | 1% |
| Selma Krap | 10/10 | 3917 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3944 days | 1% |
| Emma Keegan | 9/10 | 4158 days | 0% |
| Naelan Le Borgue | 9/10 | 4180 days | 0% |
| Michael Stibor | 9/10 | 4181 days | 0% |
| Lagarde | 9/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| Pelletier | 8/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| James Russell | 9/10 | 4531 days | 1% |
| Hannah Watt | 10/10 | 4531 days | 1% |
| Bea Westkam | 10/10 | 4539 days | 1% |
| Christopher Berkhahn | 10/10 | 4539 days | 1% |
| Romina De Hill | 7/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| Tom Hill | 8/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| thibaut vernelle | 8/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| Ian Garner | 10/10 | 4568 days | 1% |
| Karel | 6/10 | 4571 days | 1% |
| Junior Pugieux | 10/10 | 4577 days | 1% |
| Gassat | 10/10 | 4577 days | 1% |
| Melissa Hermansson | 10/10 | 4582 days | 1% |
| Laura Pleumeekers | 8/10 | 4600 days | 1% |
| Nelle Dutilleur | 10/10 | 4601 days | 1% |
| Claire Dann | 10/10 | 4614 days | 1% |
| Thi Baut | 8/10 | 4619 days | 1% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 4913 days | 1% |
| Jeremy Eng | 10/10 | 4920 days | 1% |
| Melanie Pretzel | 10/10 | 4922 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 10/10 | 4922 days | 1% |
| Erik Muchembled | 10/10 | 4924 days | 1% |
| Tony and Helene | 9/10 | 4928 days | 1% |
| Rouquette | 10/10 | 4930 days | 1% |
| Kristine and William | 7/10 | 4933 days | 1% |
| N smith | 8/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
| Anne Rodofsen | 9/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
| Neil Beckett | 8/10 | 5254 days | 1% |
| Mark Bogton | 9/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
| Kimberley Mills | 9/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
| Annette May | 8/10 | 5306 days | 1% |
| Colin Philpott | 10/10 | 5307 days | 1% |
| Lindblom | 7/10 | 5311 days | 1% |
| Lilja Bjork Hermannsdottir | 10/10 | 5313 days | 1% |
| Remy van Heugten | 10/10 | 5313 days | 1% |
| Peter W. | 10/10 | 5376 days | 1% |
| Natascha & Greg | 8/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
| Alberto Redner | 10/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
| Johanna & Mark | 10/10 | 5633 days | 1% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 5634 days | 1% |
| Rachel Kent-Lawton | 10/10 | 5651 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 9/10 | 5654 days | 1% |
| Mike | 8/10 | 5667 days | 1% |
| Luise Jaeger | 9/10 | 5669 days | 1% |
| Bekema | 8/10 | 5677 days | 1% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 5954 days | 1% |
| Herrmann | 9/10 | 6019 days | 1% |
| Will Jemma | 10/10 | 6029 days | 1% |
| Don Morgan | 10/10 | 6057 days | 1% |
| Jakob Jurgen | 10/10 | 6058 days | 1% |
| EA Anders | 8/10 | 6061 days | 1% |
| Karen Raven | 8/10 | 6113 days | 1% |
| Chris Leach | 10/10 | 6113 days | 1% |
| JanneP | 10/10 | 6348 days | 1% |
| SannaS | 10/10 | 6348 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kerosene Creek does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
5.66% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.