Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

78.11%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 749 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1206 days 35%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2698 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3329 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3349 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3366 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 3376 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 3378 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3382 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 3411 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3513 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3615 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3618 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3626 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3628 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3628 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3637 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3637 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3640 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3645 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3651 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3660 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3663 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3679 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3679 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3684 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3718 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3732 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3734 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3777 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3855 days 1%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3872 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 3974 days 1%
Carmen 8/10 3998 days 1%
Robin Sommer 10/10 4034 days 1%
Isabelle 9/10 4054 days 1%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 4067 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4089 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4343 days 0%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4344 days 0%
Laure Cops 9/10 4357 days 0%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4388 days 1%
Viola 8/10 4400 days 1%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4401 days 1%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4408 days 1%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4408 days 1%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4415 days 1%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4433 days 1%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4442 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4463 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4493 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4723 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4723 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4797 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4828 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4835 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4835 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5090 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5092 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5100 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5107 days 1%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5112 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5115 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5117 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5117 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5117 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5118 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5129 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5200 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5204 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5316 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5408 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5428 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5438 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5459 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5463 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5463 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5467 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5474 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5474 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5485 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5494 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5495 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5496 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5620 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5821 days 1%
Main 9/10 5835 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5843 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5847 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5847 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5855 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5862 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5908 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5924 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5936 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5936 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6077 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6156 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6163 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6180 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.56% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

82%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.