Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
100 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
77.54%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nina S. Larsen | 8/10 | 688 days | 100% |
| Sarah | 6/10 | 1145 days | 38% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2637 days | 5% |
| Sebasitian | 7/10 | 3268 days | 3% |
| Jerome Cluzel | 7/10 | 3288 days | 3% |
| Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 3305 days | 3% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 3315 days | 3% |
| Maarten | 5/10 | 3317 days | 2% |
| Jean Charlies Coudray | 8/10 | 3321 days | 3% |
| Ulrich K | 5/10 | 3350 days | 2% |
| Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3452 days | 2% |
| Nele Foerske | 8/10 | 3554 days | 2% |
| Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3557 days | 2% |
| Benedikt Maus | 7/10 | 3565 days | 2% |
| Laura Munguira Vadillo | 9/10 | 3567 days | 2% |
| Alvaro Rodriguez | 10/10 | 3567 days | 2% |
| Radim Halasz | 7/10 | 3576 days | 2% |
| Katerina Vobecka | 8/10 | 3576 days | 2% |
| Michael Menrath | 5/10 | 3579 days | 2% |
| Liwen | 5/10 | 3584 days | 2% |
| Laura Harmon | 4/10 | 3590 days | 1% |
| Chris | 6/10 | 3599 days | 2% |
| Sandrine | 5/10 | 3602 days | 2% |
| Simon Striegel | 7/10 | 3618 days | 2% |
| Sophia Zaenglo | 7/10 | 3618 days | 2% |
| Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3623 days | 2% |
| Dan Wilson | 7/10 | 3657 days | 2% |
| Nicole and Elliott | 8/10 | 3671 days | 2% |
| Evie Sel | 7/10 | 3673 days | 2% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3716 days | 2% |
| Annabelle deMontignie | 10/10 | 3794 days | 2% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 6/10 | 3811 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 9/10 | 3913 days | 1% |
| Carmen | 8/10 | 3937 days | 1% |
| Robin Sommer | 10/10 | 3973 days | 1% |
| Isabelle | 9/10 | 3993 days | 1% |
| Matthias Thorn | 5/10 | 4006 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Privat | 9/10 | 4028 days | 1% |
| Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 4282 days | 0% |
| Martin Sajdok | 5/10 | 4283 days | 0% |
| Laure Cops | 9/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
| Julie Robinson | 8/10 | 4327 days | 0% |
| Viola | 8/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
| Terry Seaman | 9/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 4347 days | 0% |
| Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 4347 days | 0% |
| Jacqui Knight | 10/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 9/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
| Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
| Brian | 9/10 | 4432 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4736 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 6/10 | 4767 days | 1% |
| Auger | 9/10 | 4774 days | 1% |
| Auger | 9/10 | 4774 days | 1% |
| Sally Gordie | 10/10 | 5029 days | 1% |
| Oliver Hardt | 8/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
| Tinne Cis | 4/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Indra t Jolle | 2/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
| Karin Laurev | 7/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Ed & Katie Riches | 6/10 | 5054 days | 1% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 9/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
| Diane Moss | 8/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
| John A Jerome | 9/10 | 5057 days | 1% |
| Carel | 7/10 | 5068 days | 1% |
| Kai | 10/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
| Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 5143 days | 1% |
| cruisysue | 8/10 | 5255 days | 1% |
| Phill2517 | 9/10 | 5347 days | 1% |
| Marcus | 9/10 | 5367 days | 1% |
| Andrew Newark | 8/10 | 5377 days | 1% |
| Fasto Maserati | 7/10 | 5398 days | 1% |
| Hendrik Behrens | 9/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 8/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
| Kai Eppink | 6/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| Marcus | 8/10 | 5413 days | 1% |
| Manu & Gabi | 10/10 | 5413 days | 1% |
| Marieke and Bert-Jan | 8/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
| Jensen | 8/10 | 5433 days | 1% |
| Jochen | 8/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
| Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5435 days | 1% |
| Montys | 9/10 | 5559 days | 1% |
| Bowness | 9/10 | 5760 days | 1% |
| Main | 9/10 | 5774 days | 1% |
| Krause | 10/10 | 5782 days | 1% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
| John Helle | 7/10 | 5794 days | 1% |
| Mathias | 3/10 | 5801 days | 1% |
| middendorp | 10/10 | 5847 days | 1% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| Ann Riley | 8/10 | 5875 days | 1% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5875 days | 1% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6016 days | 1% |
| JonK | 9/10 | 6095 days | 1% |
| SophieC | 9/10 | 6102 days | 1% |
| JanW | 3/10 | 6119 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.