Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

78.50%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 810 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1267 days 32%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2759 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3390 days 2%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3410 days 2%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3427 days 2%
Sophie 8/10 3437 days 2%
Maarten 5/10 3439 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3443 days 2%
Ulrich K 5/10 3472 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3574 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3676 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3679 days 1%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3687 days 1%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3689 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3689 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3698 days 1%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3698 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3701 days 1%
Liwen 5/10 3706 days 1%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3712 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3721 days 1%
Sandrine 5/10 3724 days 1%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3740 days 1%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3740 days 1%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3745 days 1%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3779 days 1%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3793 days 1%
Evie Sel 7/10 3795 days 1%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3838 days 1%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3915 days 1%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3933 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 4035 days 0%
Carmen 8/10 4059 days 0%
Robin Sommer 10/10 4095 days 0%
Isabelle 9/10 4115 days 0%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 4127 days 0%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4150 days 0%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4404 days 1%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4405 days 1%
Laure Cops 9/10 4418 days 1%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4449 days 1%
Viola 8/10 4461 days 1%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4462 days 1%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4469 days 1%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4469 days 1%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4476 days 1%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4494 days 1%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4503 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4524 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4554 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4784 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4784 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4858 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4889 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4896 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4896 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5151 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5153 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5161 days 0%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5168 days 0%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5173 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5176 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5178 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5178 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5178 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5179 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5190 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5261 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5265 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5377 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5469 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5489 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5499 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5520 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5524 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5524 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5528 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5535 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5535 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5546 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5555 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5556 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5557 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5681 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5882 days 1%
Main 9/10 5896 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5904 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5908 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5908 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5916 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5923 days 0%
middendorp 10/10 5969 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5985 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5997 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5997 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6138 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6217 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6224 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6241 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.44% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

82%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.