Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

75.81%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 310 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 767 days 62%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2259 days 4%
Sebasitian 7/10 2890 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 2910 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 2927 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 2937 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 2939 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 2943 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 2972 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3074 days 3%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3176 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3179 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3187 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3189 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3189 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3198 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3198 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3201 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3206 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3212 days 2%
Chris 6/10 3221 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3224 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3240 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3240 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3245 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3279 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3293 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3295 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3338 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3416 days 2%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3433 days 2%
James Webster 9/10 3535 days 2%
Carmen 8/10 3559 days 2%
Robin Sommer 10/10 3595 days 2%
Isabelle 9/10 3615 days 2%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 3628 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 3650 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 3904 days 1%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 3905 days 1%
Laure Cops 9/10 3918 days 1%
Julie Robinson 8/10 3949 days 1%
Viola 8/10 3961 days 1%
Terry Seaman 9/10 3962 days 1%
Lena Jensen 8/10 3969 days 1%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 3969 days 1%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 3976 days 1%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 3994 days 1%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4003 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4024 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4054 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4284 days 0%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4284 days 0%
Hanneke P 8/10 4358 days 0%
Loesje 6/10 4389 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4396 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4396 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 4651 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 4653 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 4661 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 4668 days 0%
Karin Laurev 7/10 4673 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 4676 days 1%
Russell 9/10 4678 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 4678 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 4678 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 4679 days 1%
Carel 7/10 4690 days 1%
Kai 10/10 4761 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 4765 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 4877 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 4969 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 4989 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 4999 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5020 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5024 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5024 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5028 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5035 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5035 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5046 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5055 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5056 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5057 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5181 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5382 days 1%
Main 9/10 5396 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5404 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5408 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5408 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5416 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5423 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5469 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5485 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5497 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5497 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 5638 days 1%
JonK 9/10 5717 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 5724 days 1%
JanW 3/10 5741 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

4.34% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

80%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.