Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

78.39%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 790 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1247 days 32%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2739 days 4%
Sebasitian 7/10 3370 days 2%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3390 days 2%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3407 days 2%
Sophie 8/10 3417 days 2%
Maarten 5/10 3419 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3423 days 2%
Ulrich K 5/10 3452 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3553 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3656 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3659 days 1%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3667 days 1%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3669 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3669 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3678 days 1%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3678 days 1%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3681 days 1%
Liwen 5/10 3686 days 1%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3692 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3701 days 1%
Sandrine 5/10 3704 days 1%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3720 days 1%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3720 days 1%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3725 days 1%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3759 days 1%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3773 days 1%
Evie Sel 7/10 3775 days 1%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3818 days 1%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3895 days 1%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3912 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 4015 days 0%
Carmen 8/10 4039 days 0%
Robin Sommer 10/10 4075 days 0%
Isabelle 9/10 4095 days 0%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 4107 days 0%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4130 days 0%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4384 days 1%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4385 days 1%
Laure Cops 9/10 4398 days 1%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4429 days 1%
Viola 8/10 4441 days 1%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4442 days 1%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4449 days 1%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4449 days 1%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4456 days 1%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4474 days 1%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4483 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4504 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4534 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4764 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4764 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4838 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4869 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4876 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4876 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5131 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5133 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5141 days 0%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5148 days 0%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5153 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5156 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5158 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5158 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5158 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5159 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5170 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5241 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5245 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5356 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5448 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5468 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5479 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5500 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5504 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5504 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5508 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5515 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5515 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5526 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5535 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5536 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5537 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5661 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5862 days 1%
Main 9/10 5876 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5884 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5888 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5888 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5896 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5903 days 0%
middendorp 10/10 5949 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5965 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5977 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5977 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6117 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6196 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6203 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6221 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.47% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

82%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.