Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
100 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
79.51%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nina S. Larsen | 8/10 | 992 days | 100% |
| Sarah | 6/10 | 1449 days | 26% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2941 days | 6% |
| Sebasitian | 7/10 | 3572 days | 3% |
| Jerome Cluzel | 7/10 | 3592 days | 3% |
| Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 3609 days | 3% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 3619 days | 3% |
| Maarten | 5/10 | 3621 days | 2% |
| Jean Charlies Coudray | 8/10 | 3625 days | 3% |
| Ulrich K | 5/10 | 3654 days | 2% |
| Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3756 days | 3% |
| Nele Foerske | 8/10 | 3858 days | 2% |
| Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3861 days | 2% |
| Benedikt Maus | 7/10 | 3869 days | 2% |
| Laura Munguira Vadillo | 9/10 | 3871 days | 2% |
| Alvaro Rodriguez | 10/10 | 3871 days | 2% |
| Radim Halasz | 7/10 | 3880 days | 2% |
| Katerina Vobecka | 8/10 | 3880 days | 2% |
| Michael Menrath | 5/10 | 3883 days | 1% |
| Liwen | 5/10 | 3888 days | 1% |
| Laura Harmon | 4/10 | 3894 days | 1% |
| Chris | 6/10 | 3903 days | 2% |
| Sandrine | 5/10 | 3906 days | 1% |
| Simon Striegel | 7/10 | 3922 days | 2% |
| Sophia Zaenglo | 7/10 | 3922 days | 2% |
| Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3927 days | 2% |
| Dan Wilson | 7/10 | 3961 days | 2% |
| Nicole and Elliott | 8/10 | 3975 days | 2% |
| Evie Sel | 7/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 4020 days | 1% |
| Annabelle deMontignie | 10/10 | 4097 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 6/10 | 4115 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 9/10 | 4217 days | 1% |
| Carmen | 8/10 | 4241 days | 0% |
| Robin Sommer | 10/10 | 4277 days | 0% |
| Isabelle | 9/10 | 4297 days | 0% |
| Matthias Thorn | 5/10 | 4309 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Privat | 9/10 | 4332 days | 0% |
| Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 4586 days | 2% |
| Martin Sajdok | 5/10 | 4587 days | 2% |
| Laure Cops | 9/10 | 4600 days | 2% |
| Julie Robinson | 8/10 | 4631 days | 2% |
| Viola | 8/10 | 4643 days | 2% |
| Terry Seaman | 9/10 | 4644 days | 2% |
| Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 4651 days | 2% |
| Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 4651 days | 2% |
| Jacqui Knight | 10/10 | 4658 days | 2% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 9/10 | 4676 days | 2% |
| Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 4685 days | 2% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4706 days | 2% |
| Brian | 9/10 | 4736 days | 2% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 4966 days | 2% |
| Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4966 days | 2% |
| Hanneke P | 8/10 | 5040 days | 2% |
| Loesje | 6/10 | 5071 days | 2% |
| Auger | 9/10 | 5078 days | 2% |
| Auger | 9/10 | 5078 days | 2% |
| Sally Gordie | 10/10 | 5333 days | 2% |
| Oliver Hardt | 8/10 | 5335 days | 2% |
| Tinne Cis | 4/10 | 5343 days | 1% |
| Indra t Jolle | 2/10 | 5350 days | 1% |
| Karin Laurev | 7/10 | 5355 days | 2% |
| Ed & Katie Riches | 6/10 | 5358 days | 2% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 5360 days | 2% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 9/10 | 5360 days | 2% |
| Diane Moss | 8/10 | 5360 days | 2% |
| John A Jerome | 9/10 | 5361 days | 2% |
| Carel | 7/10 | 5372 days | 2% |
| Kai | 10/10 | 5443 days | 2% |
| Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 5447 days | 2% |
| cruisysue | 8/10 | 5559 days | 2% |
| Phill2517 | 9/10 | 5651 days | 2% |
| Marcus | 9/10 | 5671 days | 2% |
| Andrew Newark | 8/10 | 5681 days | 2% |
| Fasto Maserati | 7/10 | 5702 days | 2% |
| Hendrik Behrens | 9/10 | 5706 days | 2% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 8/10 | 5706 days | 2% |
| Kai Eppink | 6/10 | 5710 days | 2% |
| Marcus | 8/10 | 5717 days | 2% |
| Manu & Gabi | 10/10 | 5717 days | 2% |
| Marieke and Bert-Jan | 8/10 | 5728 days | 2% |
| Jensen | 8/10 | 5737 days | 2% |
| Jochen | 8/10 | 5738 days | 2% |
| Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5739 days | 2% |
| Montys | 9/10 | 5863 days | 2% |
| Bowness | 9/10 | 6064 days | 2% |
| Main | 9/10 | 6078 days | 2% |
| Krause | 10/10 | 6086 days | 2% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6090 days | 2% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 6090 days | 2% |
| John Helle | 7/10 | 6098 days | 2% |
| Mathias | 3/10 | 6105 days | 1% |
| middendorp | 10/10 | 6151 days | 2% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6167 days | 2% |
| Ann Riley | 8/10 | 6179 days | 2% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 6179 days | 2% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6320 days | 2% |
| JonK | 9/10 | 6399 days | 2% |
| SophieC | 9/10 | 6406 days | 2% |
| JanW | 3/10 | 6423 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.14% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.