Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

77.69%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 708 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1165 days 37%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2657 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3288 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3308 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3325 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 3335 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 3337 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3341 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 3370 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3472 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3574 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3577 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3585 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3587 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3587 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3596 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3596 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3599 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3604 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3610 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3619 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3622 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3638 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3638 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3643 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3677 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3691 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3693 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3736 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3814 days 2%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3831 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 3933 days 1%
Carmen 8/10 3957 days 1%
Robin Sommer 10/10 3993 days 1%
Isabelle 9/10 4013 days 1%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 4026 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4048 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4302 days 0%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4303 days 0%
Laure Cops 9/10 4316 days 0%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4347 days 0%
Viola 8/10 4359 days 0%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4360 days 0%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4367 days 0%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4367 days 0%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4374 days 0%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4392 days 1%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4401 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4422 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4452 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4682 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4682 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4756 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4787 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4794 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4794 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5049 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5051 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5059 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5066 days 1%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5071 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5074 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5076 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5076 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5076 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5077 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5088 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5159 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5163 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5275 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5367 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5387 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5397 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5418 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5422 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5422 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5426 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5433 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5433 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5444 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5453 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5454 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5455 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5579 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5780 days 1%
Main 9/10 5794 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5802 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5806 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5806 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5814 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5821 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5867 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5883 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5895 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5895 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6036 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6115 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6122 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6139 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.69% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

81%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.