Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

78.22%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 769 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1226 days 34%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2718 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3349 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3369 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3386 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 3396 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 3398 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3402 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 3431 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3533 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3635 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3638 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3646 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3648 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3648 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3657 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3657 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3660 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3665 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3671 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3680 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3683 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3699 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3699 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3704 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3738 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3752 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3754 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3797 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3875 days 2%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3892 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 3994 days 1%
Carmen 8/10 4018 days 1%
Robin Sommer 10/10 4054 days 1%
Isabelle 9/10 4074 days 1%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 4087 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4109 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4363 days 0%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4364 days 0%
Laure Cops 9/10 4377 days 0%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4408 days 2%
Viola 8/10 4420 days 2%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4421 days 2%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4428 days 2%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4428 days 2%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4435 days 2%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4453 days 2%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4462 days 2%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4483 days 2%
Brian 9/10 4513 days 2%
Stefan 9/10 4743 days 2%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4743 days 2%
Hanneke P 8/10 4817 days 2%
Loesje 6/10 4848 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4855 days 2%
Auger 9/10 4855 days 2%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5110 days 2%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5112 days 2%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5120 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5127 days 1%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5132 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5135 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5137 days 2%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5137 days 2%
Diane Moss 8/10 5137 days 2%
John A Jerome 9/10 5138 days 2%
Carel 7/10 5149 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5220 days 2%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5224 days 2%
cruisysue 8/10 5336 days 2%
Phill2517 9/10 5428 days 2%
Marcus 9/10 5448 days 2%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5458 days 2%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5479 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5483 days 2%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5483 days 2%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5487 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5494 days 2%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5494 days 2%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5505 days 2%
Jensen 8/10 5514 days 2%
Jochen 8/10 5515 days 2%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5516 days 2%
Montys 9/10 5640 days 2%
Bowness 9/10 5841 days 2%
Main 9/10 5855 days 2%
Krause 10/10 5863 days 2%
Neal 10/10 5867 days 2%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5867 days 2%
John Helle 7/10 5875 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5882 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5928 days 2%
Anna 10/10 5944 days 2%
Ann Riley 8/10 5956 days 2%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5956 days 2%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6097 days 2%
JonK 9/10 6176 days 2%
SophieC 9/10 6183 days 2%
JanW 3/10 6200 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.52% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

82%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.