Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

78.61%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 830 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1287 days 31%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2779 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3410 days 2%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3430 days 2%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3447 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 3457 days 2%
Maarten 5/10 3459 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3463 days 2%
Ulrich K 5/10 3492 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3594 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3696 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3699 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3707 days 1%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3709 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3709 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3718 days 1%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3718 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3721 days 1%
Liwen 5/10 3726 days 1%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3732 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3741 days 1%
Sandrine 5/10 3744 days 1%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3760 days 1%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3760 days 1%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3765 days 1%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3799 days 1%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3813 days 1%
Evie Sel 7/10 3815 days 1%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3858 days 1%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3936 days 1%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3953 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 4055 days 0%
Carmen 8/10 4079 days 0%
Robin Sommer 10/10 4115 days 0%
Isabelle 9/10 4135 days 0%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 4148 days 0%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4170 days 0%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4424 days 1%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4425 days 1%
Laure Cops 9/10 4438 days 1%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4469 days 1%
Viola 8/10 4481 days 1%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4482 days 1%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4489 days 1%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4489 days 1%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4496 days 1%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4514 days 1%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4523 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4544 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4574 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4804 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4804 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4878 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4909 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4916 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4916 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5171 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5173 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5181 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5188 days 0%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5193 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5196 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5198 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5198 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5198 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5199 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5210 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5281 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5285 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5397 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5489 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5509 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5519 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5540 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5544 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5544 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5548 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5555 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5555 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5566 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5575 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5576 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5577 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5701 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5902 days 1%
Main 9/10 5916 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5924 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5928 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5928 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5936 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5943 days 0%
middendorp 10/10 5989 days 1%
Anna 10/10 6005 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 6017 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 6017 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6158 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6237 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6244 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6261 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.40% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

82%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.