Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
100 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 21 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
8/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
8/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
17% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
76.73%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Nina S. Larsen | 8/10 | 532 days | 100% |
Sarah | 6/10 | 989 days | 47% |
Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2481 days | 4% |
Sebasitian | 7/10 | 3112 days | 3% |
Jerome Cluzel | 7/10 | 3132 days | 3% |
Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 3149 days | 3% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 3159 days | 3% |
Maarten | 5/10 | 3161 days | 2% |
Jean Charlies Coudray | 8/10 | 3165 days | 3% |
Ulrich K | 5/10 | 3194 days | 2% |
Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
Nele Foerske | 8/10 | 3398 days | 2% |
Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3401 days | 2% |
Benedikt Maus | 7/10 | 3409 days | 2% |
Laura Munguira Vadillo | 9/10 | 3411 days | 2% |
Alvaro Rodriguez | 10/10 | 3411 days | 2% |
Radim Halasz | 7/10 | 3420 days | 2% |
Katerina Vobecka | 8/10 | 3420 days | 2% |
Michael Menrath | 5/10 | 3423 days | 1% |
Liwen | 5/10 | 3428 days | 1% |
Laura Harmon | 4/10 | 3434 days | 1% |
Chris | 6/10 | 3443 days | 2% |
Sandrine | 5/10 | 3446 days | 1% |
Simon Striegel | 7/10 | 3462 days | 2% |
Sophia Zaenglo | 7/10 | 3462 days | 2% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3467 days | 2% |
Dan Wilson | 7/10 | 3501 days | 2% |
Nicole and Elliott | 8/10 | 3515 days | 2% |
Evie Sel | 7/10 | 3517 days | 2% |
Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3560 days | 2% |
Annabelle deMontignie | 10/10 | 3637 days | 2% |
Dianne van der Wal | 6/10 | 3655 days | 1% |
James Webster | 9/10 | 3757 days | 1% |
Carmen | 8/10 | 3781 days | 1% |
Robin Sommer | 10/10 | 3817 days | 1% |
Isabelle | 9/10 | 3837 days | 1% |
Matthias Thorn | 5/10 | 3849 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 9/10 | 3872 days | 1% |
Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 4126 days | 0% |
Martin Sajdok | 5/10 | 4127 days | 0% |
Laure Cops | 9/10 | 4140 days | 0% |
Julie Robinson | 8/10 | 4171 days | 0% |
Viola | 8/10 | 4183 days | 0% |
Terry Seaman | 9/10 | 4184 days | 0% |
Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 4191 days | 0% |
Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 4191 days | 0% |
Jacqui Knight | 10/10 | 4198 days | 0% |
Nicolas Trezeguet | 9/10 | 4216 days | 0% |
Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 4225 days | 0% |
FlyingKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4246 days | 0% |
Brian | 9/10 | 4276 days | 0% |
Stefan | 9/10 | 4506 days | 1% |
Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4506 days | 1% |
Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4580 days | 1% |
Loesje | 6/10 | 4611 days | 1% |
Auger | 9/10 | 4618 days | 1% |
Auger | 9/10 | 4618 days | 1% |
Sally Gordie | 10/10 | 4873 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 8/10 | 4875 days | 1% |
Tinne Cis | 4/10 | 4883 days | 1% |
Indra t Jolle | 2/10 | 4890 days | 0% |
Karin Laurev | 7/10 | 4895 days | 1% |
Ed & Katie Riches | 6/10 | 4898 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4900 days | 1% |
Tadej Ferjan | 9/10 | 4900 days | 1% |
Diane Moss | 8/10 | 4900 days | 1% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4901 days | 1% |
Carel | 7/10 | 4912 days | 1% |
Kai | 10/10 | 4983 days | 1% |
Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 4987 days | 1% |
cruisysue | 8/10 | 5099 days | 1% |
Phill2517 | 9/10 | 5191 days | 1% |
Marcus | 9/10 | 5211 days | 1% |
Andrew Newark | 8/10 | 5221 days | 1% |
Fasto Maserati | 7/10 | 5242 days | 1% |
Hendrik Behrens | 9/10 | 5246 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 8/10 | 5246 days | 1% |
Kai Eppink | 6/10 | 5250 days | 1% |
Marcus | 8/10 | 5257 days | 1% |
Manu & Gabi | 10/10 | 5257 days | 1% |
Marieke and Bert-Jan | 8/10 | 5268 days | 1% |
Jensen | 8/10 | 5277 days | 1% |
Jochen | 8/10 | 5278 days | 1% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5279 days | 1% |
Montys | 9/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
Bowness | 9/10 | 5604 days | 1% |
Main | 9/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
Krause | 10/10 | 5626 days | 1% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5630 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5630 days | 1% |
John Helle | 7/10 | 5638 days | 1% |
Mathias | 3/10 | 5645 days | 0% |
middendorp | 10/10 | 5691 days | 1% |
Anna | 10/10 | 5707 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 8/10 | 5719 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5719 days | 1% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5860 days | 1% |
JonK | 9/10 | 5939 days | 1% |
SophieC | 9/10 | 5946 days | 1% |
JanW | 3/10 | 5963 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
4.01% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.