G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse Walk.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse Walk

Valid Reviews

47 Valid Reviews

The Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse Walk experience has a total of 47 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 26
55%
9/10 13
28%
8/10 7
15%
7/10 1
2%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

93.62% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse Walk valid reviews is 93.62% and is based on 47 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

38 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 47 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
47%
9/10 12
32%
8/10 7
18%
7/10 1
3%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.37% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse Walk face-to-face reviews is 92.37% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.25%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nicolas Perrot 10/10 2687 days 100%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2929 days 85%
Chris Arnold 8/10 3514 days 47%
Dan Schmidt 9/10 3520 days 48%
Lucie Revay 10/10 3543 days 47%
David 9/10 3555 days 45%
Belinda Ziswiler 10/10 3563 days 45%
Jade Williams 10/10 3594 days 44%
Miroslav Bazala 10/10 3802 days 31%
Sophie Rosenberg 10/10 3813 days 30%
Clara Guinard 9/10 3840 days 28%
Adam Pulkrabek 10/10 3847 days 28%
Olga Barathova 10/10 3847 days 28%
Luisa Birkel 8/10 3848 days 27%
Lili Souris 9/10 3852 days 27%
Andy Burfoot 10/10 3866 days 27%
Sophia Harnisch 8/10 3875 days 25%
Pierre Mattes 9/10 3875 days 26%
Martina Cervenkova 10/10 3878 days 26%
Sabina Roubickova 10/10 3882 days 26%
Anna 8/10 3883 days 25%
Grischa Rodust 9/10 3921 days 23%
Iwona 10/10 3923 days 23%
Isabella 10/10 3928 days 23%
Gessica 9/10 3967 days 20%
Richard Thompson 10/10 3995 days 19%
Michal Kamradek 9/10 4278 days 1%
Vanessa Leverrier 9/10 4293 days 0%
Camille Bellay 8/10 4545 days 26%
Christopher Buch Madsen 10/10 4569 days 26%
Stephen Revah 10/10 4571 days 26%
Julie Ledanois 10/10 4585 days 26%
Toke Frederiksen 8/10 4597 days 26%
Dan Lawson 10/10 4614 days 26%
Hendrik Schanz 10/10 4626 days 26%
Jeremy 10/10 4664 days 26%
David Restell 10/10 4817 days 26%
Mike and Caroline 10/10 4908 days 26%
Ton Martens 10/10 4930 days 26%
Sebastian and Peter Beate 10/10 4962 days 26%
Bene 8/10 5015 days 26%
Woggywoo 9/10 5273 days 26%
Darina Kvasnicova 9/10 5306 days 26%
De Blaeij 9/10 5696 days 26%
Annie 7/10 6057 days 24%
Wagner 10/10 6060 days 26%
carolineder 9/10 6125 days 26%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.51% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

95%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.