Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cape Kidnappers Walking Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Cape Kidnappers Walking Track
Valid Reviews
58 Valid Reviews
The Cape Kidnappers Walking Track experience has a total of 58 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 58 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
40% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Kidnappers Walking Track valid reviews is 87.76% and is based on 58 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
56 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 58 valid reviews, the experience has 56 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 56 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
41% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.32% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Kidnappers Walking Track face-to-face reviews is 87.32% and is based on 56 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
85.95%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddie F | 7/10 | 932 days |  |
8.38 | 100% |
| Lizzie Edmonds | 8/10 | 1053 days | |
5.02 | 60% |
| Andrea Mueller | 9/10 | 1299 days | |
4.6 | 55% |
| Simon Briens | 7/10 | 1343 days | |
4.11 | 49% |
| Kolar | 8/10 | 1351 days | |
4.27 | 51% |
| Riccardo | 9/10 | 1351 days | |
4.5 | 54% |
| Helna Saumanova | 10/10 | 1351 days | |
4.5 | 54% |
| Sylvain Schiber | 10/10 | 1422 days | 4.36 | 52% | |
| Benjamin Schyler | 7/10 | 1634 days | |
3.59 | 43% |
| Laura Constans | 9/10 | 1634 days | |
3.95 | 47% |
| Yoomm | 8/10 | 1661 days | |
3.7 | 44% |
| Paul Larauze | 8/10 | 1664 days | |
3.69 | 44% |
| Adam Pulkrabek | 9/10 | 1671 days | |
3.87 | 46% |
| Simone De Angiou | 9/10 | 1686 days | |
3.84 | 46% |
| Tatiana Racheneau | 10/10 | 1710 days | |
3.8 | 45% |
| Annika Locker | 8/10 | 1712 days | |
3.6 | 43% |
| Valerie Balcom | 9/10 | 1723 days | |
3.77 | 45% |
| Linda and Gunther | 9/10 | 1741 days | |
3.74 | 45% |
| Elsa Caniato | 7/10 | 1758 days | |
3.37 | 40% |
| Sarah Boettcher | 8/10 | 1802 days | |
3.44 | 41% |
| Eva Marsikova | 9/10 | 2024 days | |
3.18 | 38% |
| Jurgen Moors | 10/10 | 2127 days | 2.98 | 36% | |
| Zuzana Holubova | 10/10 | 2369 days | |
2.51 | 30% |
| Christopher Buch Madsen | 9/10 | 2393 days | |
2.46 | 29% |
| Miriam Grund | 9/10 | 2402 days | |
2.44 | 29% |
| Pierre Gentile | 8/10 | 2409 days | |
2.31 | 28% |
| Sophia | 9/10 | 2415 days | |
2.42 | 29% |
| Fraule-Emmanuelle De Rouqmout | 8/10 | 2421 days | |
2.28 | 27% |
| Pier Durand | 9/10 | 2421 days | |
2.41 | 29% |
| Serena Poggioli | 9/10 | 2421 days | |
2.41 | 29% |
| Luca Willensrock | 8/10 | 2442 days | |
2.25 | 27% |
| Nelle Dutilleur | 9/10 | 2444 days | |
2.36 | 28% |
| Reinhard Boettcher | 10/10 | 2463 days | |
2.32 | 28% |
| Angelika Bottcher | 8/10 | 2463 days | |
2.21 | 26% |
| Ramon Keller | 9/10 | 2843 days | |
1.58 | 19% |
| Vitek | 10/10 | 3132 days | |
1.01 | 12% |
| Russell Eames | 10/10 | 3140 days | |
1.0 | 12% |
| Dominique | 7/10 | 3141 days | |
0.91 | 11% |
| Marjolein Hartsuiker | 10/10 | 3143 days | |
0.99 | 12% |
| Magda Savels | 9/10 | 3150 days | |
0.98 | 12% |
| Soren Storeboerg | 8/10 | 3154 days | |
0.92 | 11% |
| Hans Bos | 8/10 | 3220 days | |
0.8 | 10% |
| Ute Janich | 10/10 | 3446 days | |
0.4 | 5% |
| Christoph & Maria | 10/10 | 3484 days | |
0.32 | 4% |
| Janey Chamberlain | 8/10 | 3485 days | |
0.31 | 4% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 3488 days | |
0.32 | 4% |
| Barnhoorh | 8/10 | 3494 days | |
0.29 | 3% |
| M Holierhoek | 7/10 | 3496 days | |
0.27 | 3% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 3836 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| George Lepple | 10/10 | 3852 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Phil Bruce | 9/10 | 3865 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wetzel | 9/10 | 3866 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Roos | 10/10 | 3873 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Eva | 9/10 | 3885 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Chris Kevin | 9/10 | 3896 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| selinab | 9/10 | 3942 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Solveig Mosinski | 10/10 | 3961 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| StijnH | 9/10 | 4210 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cape Kidnappers Walking Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.