Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Curio Bay Penguin Watch.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Curio Bay Penguin Watch
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The Curio Bay Penguin Watch experience has a total of 66 reviews. There are 65 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
46% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
35% |
| 8/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.54% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Curio Bay Penguin Watch valid reviews is 91.54% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
60 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 60 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 60 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 27 |
|
45% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
38% |
| 8/10 | 7 |
|
12% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Curio Bay Penguin Watch face-to-face reviews is 92.17% and is based on 60 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
92.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joost van Noorloos | 10/10 | 1388 days | 100% |
| Justin White | 4/10 | 2149 days | 17% |
| Melinda Pyke | 10/10 | 2910 days | 17% |
| Patrick | 10/10 | 3550 days | 9% |
| Sandra | 10/10 | 3834 days | 5% |
| Lindsay Dell | 10/10 | 3847 days | 5% |
| Martina | 9/10 | 3861 days | 5% |
| Konstantin Bücheler | 10/10 | 3901 days | 5% |
| Regula Hammer | 9/10 | 4177 days | 1% |
| Sue Strebe | 9/10 | 4208 days | 1% |
| Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 4263 days | 0% |
| Jakub Stastny | 10/10 | 4525 days | 5% |
| Hadar | 9/10 | 4559 days | 5% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4567 days | 5% |
| Max Stein | 8/10 | 4574 days | 5% |
| Anouck Roudet | 10/10 | 4576 days | 5% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4606 days | 5% |
| Sarah Strong | 10/10 | 4607 days | 5% |
| Daniel McAlpine | 10/10 | 4619 days | 5% |
| Kellie | 8/10 | 4619 days | 5% |
| Omri Ifrsh | 10/10 | 4895 days | 5% |
| Trine Ellegaard | 10/10 | 4903 days | 5% |
| Stientje van den Heuvel | 9/10 | 4906 days | 5% |
| Tom Somers | 8/10 | 4906 days | 5% |
| Engelstatter | 9/10 | 4923 days | 5% |
| Renate | 10/10 | 4923 days | 5% |
| Enna Keet | 9/10 | 4932 days | 5% |
| Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4979 days | 5% |
| Frans Derks | 10/10 | 5003 days | 5% |
| Lucie | 10/10 | 5015 days | 5% |
| Manuela and Thomas | 8/10 | 5016 days | 5% |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 5270 days | 5% |
| Alan Brady | 9/10 | 5282 days | 5% |
| Fritschi | 9/10 | 5287 days | 5% |
| Dieter Mangold | 9/10 | 5297 days | 5% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5297 days | 5% |
| Rebecca Doehl | 9/10 | 5298 days | 5% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 10/10 | 5299 days | 5% |
| John A Jerome | 10/10 | 5300 days | 5% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 5632 days | 5% |
| Leroy Dimitri | 10/10 | 5633 days | 5% |
| Ian & Gill Johnson | 9/10 | 5635 days | 5% |
| Stefanie | 7/10 | 5636 days | 4% |
| Mel | 10/10 | 5637 days | 5% |
| Jacob | 9/10 | 5638 days | 5% |
| Oppenoorth | 9/10 | 5639 days | 5% |
| Malcolm McLean | 9/10 | 5641 days | 5% |
| Gary Koehler | 10/10 | 5642 days | 5% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5652 days | 5% |
| Nicolas | 9/10 | 5652 days | 5% |
| Bucher Weruer | 10/10 | 5655 days | 5% |
| Paul Smith | 8/10 | 5657 days | 5% |
| Hartmut Vogt | 10/10 | 5667 days | 5% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5667 days | 5% |
| Andy Martin | 10/10 | 5668 days | 5% |
| Einar | 9/10 | 6004 days | 5% |
| John Mathers | 6/10 | 6025 days | 4% |
| Marsden | 10/10 | 6025 days | 5% |
| Lehmann | 10/10 | 6026 days | 5% |
| J Kempeneers | 8/10 | 6030 days | 5% |
| Elizabeth E | 7/10 | 6060 days | 4% |
| Yvonne German | 10/10 | 6061 days | 5% |
| kay and colin | 9/10 | 6075 days | 5% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6104 days | 5% |
| Andrea and Craig Swinson | 10/10 | 6130 days | 5% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Curio Bay Penguin Watch does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.72% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.