Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Curio Bay Dolphin Watch.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Curio Bay Dolphin Watch
Valid Reviews
52 Valid Reviews
The Curio Bay Dolphin Watch experience has a total of 52 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 31 |
|
60% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
94.62% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Curio Bay Dolphin Watch valid reviews is 94.62% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
47 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 52 valid reviews, the experience has 47 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 28 |
|
60% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
94.47% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Curio Bay Dolphin Watch face-to-face reviews is 94.47% and is based on 47 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
92.74%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecka | 9/10 | 194 days | 94.04 | 100% | |
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 865 days | 13.38 | 14% | |
| Rikke Hessellund, Denmark | 9/10 | 896 days | 11.28 | 12% | |
| Marcal Serrallonga | 10/10 | 1351 days | 4.5 | 5% | |
| Matthias Hottex | 10/10 | 1605 days |  |
4.0 | 4% |
| Jan Sojka | 8/10 | 1605 days | |
3.8 | 4% |
| Leon Schotter | 9/10 | 1627 days | |
3.96 | 4% |
| Rahel Baufeld | 10/10 | 1634 days | |
3.95 | 4% |
| Lena Wesselink | 10/10 | 1646 days | 3.92 | 4% | |
| Till | 9/10 | 1679 days | |
3.86 | 4% |
| Roman and Liz | 5/10 | 1704 days | |
3.08 | 3% |
| Ronja and Lena | 10/10 | 1709 days | |
3.8 | 4% |
| Tobias Becker | 10/10 | 2034 days | |
3.16 | 3% |
| Katarina | 10/10 | 2328 days | |
2.59 | 3% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 2328 days | |
2.59 | 3% |
| Vuillermet | 10/10 | 2328 days | |
2.59 | 3% |
| Maria-Julia Frilaj | 10/10 | 2334 days | |
2.58 | 3% |
| Ann Wilson | 10/10 | 2343 days | |
2.56 | 3% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 9/10 | 2362 days | |
2.52 | 3% |
| Natalie Boehm | 10/10 | 2385 days | |
2.48 | 3% |
| Evyatar Karni | 10/10 | 2419 days | |
2.41 | 3% |
| Gal Bero | 10/10 | 2419 days | |
2.41 | 3% |
| Elly Zimmer | 10/10 | 2423 days | |
2.4 | 3% |
| Omri Ifrsh | 10/10 | 2697 days | |
1.86 | 2% |
| Michal Sturma | 10/10 | 2708 days | |
1.84 | 2% |
| Katey Justice | 10/10 | 2717 days | |
1.83 | 2% |
| Tanja Schlagermann | 10/10 | 2724 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| Alexander Mukasa | 10/10 | 2724 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| Arno Leleu | 10/10 | 2731 days | |
1.8 | 2% |
| Fabian and Teresa | 9/10 | 2743 days | |
1.77 | 2% |
| D Pieter | 9/10 | 2810 days | |
1.64 | 2% |
| Hans Duerst | 9/10 | 3093 days | |
1.09 | 1% |
| Marcel & Kim Meichtry | 9/10 | 3093 days | |
1.09 | 1% |
| Dieter Mangold | 9/10 | 3099 days | |
1.08 | 1% |
| Francis Corrigan | 9/10 | 3117 days | |
1.04 | 1% |
| Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 3129 days | |
1.02 | 1% |
| Jory Singer | 10/10 | 3193 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 3434 days | |
0.42 | 0% |
| Oppenoorth | 9/10 | 3441 days | |
0.41 | 0% |
| Mark Walker | 10/10 | 3441 days | |
0.41 | 0% |
| Malcolm McLean | 9/10 | 3443 days | |
0.41 | 0% |
| Stefan Mudl | 10/10 | 3443 days | |
0.41 | 0% |
| Tony & Marina Greenaway | 8/10 | 3446 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Jol Balder | 9/10 | 3469 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Judith K. | 10/10 | 3471 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Victoria Slater | 10/10 | 3792 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 3799 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lukas Blaauw | 8/10 | 3805 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Inbar Yizhar Barnea | 10/10 | 3806 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Thirza & Roeland | 9/10 | 3825 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MiepS | 9/10 | 4140 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 4152 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Curio Bay Dolphin Watch does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
93%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.