Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
153 Valid Reviews
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has a total of 157 reviews. There are 153 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 153 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 106 |
|
69% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
7% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.56% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park valid reviews is 95.56% and is based on 153 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 153 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
67% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 96.44% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
94.66%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz | 9/10 | 48 days | 99.63 | 100% | |
| Jyoti | 3/10 | 79 days | 90.1 | 90% | |
| Julie Barclay | 10/10 | 79 days | 99.01 | 99% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Jenny | 8/10 | 293 days | 86.4 | 86% | |
| Antony Wilson | 10/10 | 322 days | 83.57 | 84% | |
| S Becker | 10/10 | 323 days | 83.47 | 83% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 323 days | 83.47 | 83% | |
| Antony Lewis | 10/10 | 323 days | 83.47 | 83% | |
| Richard | 9/10 | 323 days | 83.47 | 83% | |
| Boguslaw MAKIELLO | 10/10 | 337 days |  |
98.4 | 99% |
| Nathaniel Bond | 10/10 | 352 days | |
96.44 | 97% |
| Carl Elliott | 10/10 | 354 days | 80.14 | 80% | |
| Bob | 10/10 | 354 days | 80.14 | 80% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 381 days | 77.0 | 77% | |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 10/10 | 396 days | |
90.18 | 90% |
| Helen Bond | 10/10 | 413 days | 72.97 | 73% | |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 413 days | 72.97 | 73% | |
| Maggie Crowe | 10/10 | 429 days | 70.84 | 71% | |
| Thomas Krasowski | 10/10 | 431 days | 70.56 | 70% | |
| Joe Barnett | 10/10 | 453 days | 67.48 | 67% | |
| Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 485 days | 62.73 | 62% | |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 10/10 | 525 days | 56.32 | 56% | |
| Andy Dearman | 10/10 | 555 days | 51.21 | 50% | |
| Yee Ling Teo | 10/10 | 666 days | 34.16 | 33% | |
| Belinda Clarke | 10/10 | 692 days | 30.74 | 30% | |
| Jason Perks | 9/10 | 725 days | 26.69 | 25% | |
| Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 746 days | 24.3 | 23% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 776 days | 21.13 | 20% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 777 days | 21.02 | 20% | |
| Shelley Warkentin | 9/10 | 808 days | 18.05 | 17% | |
| Andries Lubbe | 10/10 | 838 days | 15.47 | 14% | |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 838 days | 15.47 | 14% | |
| Rik Wiel | 9/10 | 860 days | 13.75 | 12% | |
| Edward De Sousa | 10/10 | 915 days | 10.13 | 9% | |
| Stuart Jeffrey | 9/10 | 930 days | 9.31 | 8% | |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 965 days | 7.68 | 6% | |
| Michelle Cheyne | 10/10 | 989 days | 6.78 | 5% | |
| Anshuman Bhagwat | 5/10 | 992 days | 6.68 | 5% | |
| Jennifer Ellis | 8/10 | 1002 days | 6.37 | 5% | |
| Bill Priddy | 8/10 | 1083 days | 5.02 | 3% | |
| Belinda Horn | 10/10 | 1084 days | 5.02 | 3% | |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 9/10 | 1086 days | 5.01 | 3% | |
| Helena Bond | 8/10 | 1089 days | 5.01 | 3% | |
| Jane Louise Stokes | 8/10 | 1098 days | 5.0 | 3% | |
| Alex Macdonald | 10/10 | 1112 days | 4.98 | 3% | |
| Glinys Weller | 10/10 | 1130 days | 4.95 | 3% | |
| Laura Daly | 10/10 | 1133 days | 4.95 | 3% | |
| Stephanie Mouat | 9/10 | 1143 days | 4.93 | 3% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1143 days | 4.93 | 3% | |
| Yung Ok Yoo | 8/10 | 1145 days | 4.93 | 3% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1173 days | 4.89 | 3% | |
| Janelle Sterling | 10/10 | 1202 days | 4.85 | 3% | |
| Thijs Zaadnoordijk | 10/10 | 1204 days | 4.85 | 3% | |
| Flurg McSpong | 10/10 | 1235 days | 4.81 | 3% | |
| Mary Foster | 10/10 | 1265 days | 4.77 | 3% | |
| Viki Ziemba | 10/10 | 1266 days | 4.77 | 3% | |
| Jan mentink | 9/10 | 1291 days | 4.73 | 3% | |
| Jan Mentink | 10/10 | 1293 days | 4.73 | 3% | |
| Jane Monro | 10/10 | 1327 days | 4.68 | 3% | |
| Sally Smith | 10/10 | 1357 days | 4.64 | 3% | |
| Mark Sandbrook | 10/10 | 1418 days | 4.56 | 3% | |
| Andrew Jones | 8/10 | 1449 days | 4.52 | 3% | |
| Christine Andersen | 10/10 | 1449 days | 4.52 | 3% | |
| Jan Collins | 10/10 | 1468 days | 4.49 | 3% | |
| Andrew Stace | 10/10 | 1508 days | 4.43 | 3% | |
| Christian Roerig | 10/10 | 1508 days | 4.43 | 3% | |
| Elham Isari | 10/10 | 1559 days | |
5.24 | 4% |
| SUE COLEMAN | 9/10 | 1569 days | 4.35 | 3% | |
| Sidney Stokkers | 9/10 | 1600 days | 4.31 | 3% | |
| Derek van Niekerk | 10/10 | 1662 days | 4.22 | 2% | |
| Andrew Kermode | 10/10 | 1693 days | 4.18 | 2% | |
| Michelle K | 10/10 | 1754 days | 4.1 | 2% | |
| Eve Clemens | 10/10 | 1754 days | 4.1 | 2% | |
| Ara Moore-Tuwhangai | 10/10 | 1754 days | 4.1 | 2% | |
| Mark Ovens | 10/10 | 1784 days | 4.06 | 2% | |
| Heike Heller | 9/10 | 1793 days | |
4.85 | 3% |
| Walter Neff | 10/10 | 1843 days | 3.98 | 2% | |
| Marianne Bergstrøm Matzen | 10/10 | 1874 days | 3.93 | 2% | |
| Susan Kirkham | 10/10 | 1874 days | 3.93 | 2% | |
| Simon Heffer | 10/10 | 1874 days | 3.93 | 2% | |
| Paul Wood | 9/10 | 1905 days | 3.89 | 2% | |
| griff griffiths | 9/10 | 1905 days | 3.89 | 2% | |
| J Murphy | 9/10 | 1935 days | 3.85 | 2% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 1966 days | 3.81 | 2% | |
| I & K Urquhart | 10/10 | 2027 days | 3.72 | 2% | |
| Gary Greenwell | 10/10 | 2058 days | 3.68 | 2% | |
| Pierre Cinquin | 9/10 | 2107 days | |
4.34 | 3% |
| Chris Quarre | 10/10 | 2119 days | 3.6 | 2% | |
| M Morgan | 10/10 | 2149 days | 3.56 | 2% | |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 2149 days | 3.56 | 2% | |
| Ted Pointing | 10/10 | 2149 days | 3.56 | 2% | |
| Ron Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2149 days | |
4.27 | 3% |
| Elizabeth Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2149 days | |
4.27 | 3% |
| Peti 10 | 10/10 | 2180 days | 3.51 | 2% | |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 2180 days | 3.51 | 2% | |
| M Branche | 9/10 | 2182 days | |
4.21 | 2% |
| Malgorzata | 10/10 | 2184 days | |
4.21 | 2% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 2184 days | |
4.21 | 2% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 10/10 | 2184 days | |
4.21 | 2% |
| brian barran | 9/10 | 2208 days | 3.48 | 2% | |
| Nigel Williams | 10/10 | 2239 days | 3.43 | 2% | |
| William Notcutt | 10/10 | 2239 days | 3.43 | 2% | |
| Moni Sangoi | 9/10 | 2239 days | 3.43 | 2% | |
| paulchris | 10/10 | 2270 days | 3.39 | 2% | |
| doepie277 | 10/10 | 2270 days | 3.39 | 2% | |
| Frank and Suzanne | 9/10 | 2270 days | |
4.07 | 2% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 2277 days | |
4.06 | 2% |
| gigi29 | 10/10 | 2300 days | 3.35 | 2% | |
| Anthony Croton | 10/10 | 2331 days | 3.31 | 2% | |
| CollyLuke | 10/10 | 2361 days | 3.27 | 1% | |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 2361 days | 3.27 | 1% | |
| sueadegizmo | 10/10 | 2453 days | 3.14 | 1% | |
| Carlin | 10/10 | 2453 days | 3.14 | 1% | |
| Adam_Heath | 10/10 | 2453 days | 3.14 | 1% | |
| Waldo Andersen | 10/10 | 2514 days | 3.06 | 1% | |
| Daniel Patricia | 10/10 | 2548 days | |
3.61 | 2% |
| Mike & Julia Stone | 10/10 | 2550 days | |
3.61 | 2% |
| Bottoms | 9/10 | 2555 days | |
3.6 | 2% |
| Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 2556 days | |
3.6 | 2% |
| Dieter Mangold | 9/10 | 2557 days | |
3.6 | 2% |
| Lyn Deavin | 8/10 | 2557 days | |
3.6 | 2% |
| Robert McIlraith | 10/10 | 2560 days | |
3.59 | 2% |
| Marian Stolker | 10/10 | 2561 days | |
3.59 | 2% |
| elaineandbob | 10/10 | 2574 days | 2.97 | 1% | |
| Berry | 10/10 | 2647 days | |
3.45 | 2% |
| Richard Lechevallier | 10/10 | 2653 days | |
3.44 | 2% |
| qofd | 10/10 | 2850 days | 2.6 | 1% | |
| Stephen Hunt | 10/10 | 2876 days | |
3.07 | 1% |
| Weez18 | 10/10 | 2880 days | 2.55 | 1% | |
| Karin Kueng | 10/10 | 2899 days | |
3.03 | 1% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 2901 days | |
3.03 | 1% |
| Ellie Thompson | 10/10 | 2903 days | |
3.03 | 1% |
| Diane Johnston | 9/10 | 2904 days | |
3.03 | 1% |
| Beat & Connie | 10/10 | 2905 days | |
3.02 | 1% |
| Patrick Schaad | 9/10 | 2905 days | |
3.02 | 1% |
| Adrian Beckett | 10/10 | 2907 days | |
3.02 | 1% |
| Simon Vickers | 10/10 | 2910 days | |
3.02 | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 9/10 | 2910 days | |
3.02 | 1% |
| LandJ | 9/10 | 2911 days | 2.51 | 1% | |
| Eva Bock | 9/10 | 2914 days | |
3.01 | 1% |
| Plomp | 9/10 | 2915 days | |
3.01 | 1% |
| Eva Stauderova | 10/10 | 2930 days | |
2.98 | 1% |
| Robert Smith | 10/10 | 2930 days | |
2.98 | 1% |
| Bas Geerts | 9/10 | 2932 days | |
2.98 | 1% |
| Derek Archibald | 9/10 | 2932 days | |
2.98 | 1% |
| Kiefer Osterrieder | 10/10 | 2934 days | |
2.98 | 1% |
| John Winter | 9/10 | 3301 days | |
2.37 | 1% |
| glenmh | 10/10 | 3304 days | 1.97 | 0% | |
| Steve Canner | 8/10 | 3304 days | 1.97 | 0% | |
| Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 3316 days | |
2.35 | 1% |
| catdonjaime | 10/10 | 3359 days | |
2.28 | 0% |
| CarolB | 10/10 | 3644 days | |
1.81 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.28% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 14 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 11 | -0.22% |
| 12 | -0.24% |
| 13 | -0.26% |
| 14 | -0.28% |
| 15 | -0.30% |
| 16 | -0.32% |
| 17 | -0.34% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.