Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

157 Valid Reviews

The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has a total of 161 reviews. There are 157 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 157 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 109
69%
9/10 35
22%
8/10 11
7%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

95.61% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park valid reviews is 95.61% and is based on 157 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

45 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 157 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 30
67%
9/10 14
31%
8/10 1
2%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

96.44% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 96.44% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.91%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
David 10/10 18 days 99.95 100%
kim thomas 9/10 49 days 99.62 100%
Botond Seres 10/10 49 days 99.62 100%
Lucinda 10/10 77 days 99.06 99%
Liz 9/10 108 days 98.15 98%
Jyoti 3/10 139 days 88.21 88%
Julie Barclay 10/10 139 days 96.94 97%
Scooper 10/10 230 days 91.62 92%
Jenny 8/10 353 days 80.25 80%
Antony Wilson 10/10 383 days 76.76 76%
S Becker 10/10 383 days 76.76 76%
Matt 10/10 383 days 76.76 76%
Antony Lewis 10/10 383 days 76.76 76%
Richard 9/10 383 days 76.76 76%
Boguslaw MAKIELLO 10/10 397 days true 90.03 90%
Nathaniel Bond 10/10 412 days true 87.72 88%
Carl Elliott 10/10 414 days 72.84 72%
Bob 10/10 414 days 72.84 72%
Nigel & Annie Dale 10/10 442 days 69.04 69%
Luis Vigil Vidal 10/10 456 days true 80.46 80%
Helen Bond 10/10 473 days 64.55 64%
Eversons 9/10 473 days 64.55 64%
Maggie Crowe 10/10 489 days 62.11 61%
Thomas Krasowski 10/10 491 days 61.8 61%
Joe Barnett 10/10 513 days 58.3 58%
Samantha Brewin 10/10 545 days 52.93 52%
Jozef Pinkerton 10/10 585 days 46.22 45%
Andy Dearman 10/10 615 days 41.51 41%
Yee Ling Teo 10/10 726 days 26.58 25%
Belinda Clarke 10/10 752 days 23.64 22%
Jason Perks 9/10 785 days 20.23 19%
Peter Armstrong 9/10 807 days 18.14 17%
Victoria Strong 10/10 836 days 15.63 14%
Rebecca Lindsey 8/10 838 days 15.47 14%
Shelley Warkentin 9/10 869 days 13.09 12%
Andries Lubbe 10/10 899 days 11.09 10%
S Webb 10/10 899 days 11.09 10%
Rik Wiel 9/10 920 days 9.85 8%
Edward De Sousa 10/10 975 days 7.28 6%
Stuart Jeffrey 9/10 991 days 6.71 5%
Cameron Page 10/10 1025 days 5.78 4%
Michelle Cheyne 10/10 1049 days 5.34 4%
Anshuman Bhagwat 5/10 1052 days 5.29 4%
Jennifer Ellis 8/10 1062 days 5.17 4%
Bill Priddy 8/10 1144 days 4.93 3%
Belinda Horn 10/10 1144 days 4.93 3%
Ann-Catherine Deblon 9/10 1146 days 4.93 3%
Helena Bond 8/10 1149 days 4.93 3%
Jane Louise Stokes 8/10 1158 days 4.91 3%
Alex Macdonald 10/10 1173 days 4.89 3%
Glinys Weller 10/10 1190 days 4.87 3%
Laura Daly 10/10 1193 days 4.87 3%
Stephanie Mouat 9/10 1204 days 4.85 3%
Sam Brydon 10/10 1204 days 4.85 3%
Yung Ok Yoo 8/10 1205 days 4.85 3%
Sarah Gurney 8/10 1233 days 4.81 3%
Janelle Sterling 10/10 1262 days 4.77 3%
Thijs Zaadnoordijk 10/10 1265 days 4.77 3%
Flurg McSpong 10/10 1296 days 4.72 3%
Mary Foster 10/10 1326 days 4.68 3%
Viki Ziemba 10/10 1326 days 4.68 3%
Jan mentink 9/10 1351 days 4.65 3%
Jan Mentink 10/10 1353 days 4.65 3%
Jane Monro 10/10 1388 days 4.6 3%
Sally Smith 10/10 1417 days 4.56 3%
Mark Sandbrook 10/10 1479 days 4.47 3%
Andrew Jones 8/10 1510 days 4.43 3%
Christine Andersen 10/10 1510 days 4.43 3%
Jan Collins 10/10 1528 days 4.41 3%
Andrew Stace 10/10 1569 days 4.35 3%
Christian Roerig 10/10 1569 days 4.35 3%
Elham Isari 10/10 1619 days true 5.14 3%
SUE COLEMAN 9/10 1630 days 4.27 3%
Sidney Stokkers 9/10 1661 days 4.22 3%
Derek van Niekerk 10/10 1722 days 4.14 2%
Andrew Kermode 10/10 1753 days 4.1 2%
Michelle K 10/10 1814 days 4.02 2%
Eve Clemens 10/10 1814 days 4.02 2%
Ara Moore-Tuwhangai 10/10 1814 days 4.02 2%
Mark Ovens 10/10 1844 days 3.97 2%
Heike Heller 9/10 1853 days true 4.75 3%
Walter Neff 10/10 1903 days 3.89 2%
Marianne Bergstrøm Matzen 10/10 1934 days 3.85 2%
Susan Kirkham 10/10 1934 days 3.85 2%
Simon Heffer 10/10 1934 days 3.85 2%
Paul Wood 9/10 1965 days 3.81 2%
griff griffiths 9/10 1965 days 3.81 2%
J Murphy 9/10 1995 days 3.77 2%
Kiwix3 10/10 2026 days 3.72 2%
I & K Urquhart 10/10 2087 days 3.64 2%
Gary Greenwell 10/10 2118 days 3.6 2%
Pierre Cinquin 9/10 2167 days true 4.24 3%
Chris Quarre 10/10 2179 days 3.52 2%
M Morgan 10/10 2209 days 3.47 2%
Grantygrant 10/10 2209 days 3.47 2%
Ted Pointing 10/10 2209 days 3.47 2%
Ron Stenhouse 10/10 2209 days true 4.17 3%
Elizabeth Stenhouse 10/10 2209 days true 4.17 3%
Peti 10 10/10 2240 days 3.43 2%
Julian Roots 9/10 2240 days 3.43 2%
M Branche 9/10 2242 days true 4.11 2%
Malgorzata 10/10 2244 days true 4.11 2%
Michal 10/10 2244 days true 4.11 2%
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn 10/10 2244 days true 4.11 2%
brian barran 9/10 2268 days 3.39 2%
Nigel Williams 10/10 2299 days 3.35 2%
William Notcutt 10/10 2299 days 3.35 2%
Moni Sangoi 9/10 2299 days 3.35 2%
paulchris 10/10 2330 days 3.31 2%
doepie277 10/10 2330 days 3.31 2%
Frank and Suzanne 9/10 2330 days true 3.97 2%
Alex Laidlaw 10/10 2337 days true 3.96 2%
gigi29 10/10 2360 days 3.27 2%
Anthony Croton 10/10 2391 days 3.22 2%
CollyLuke 10/10 2421 days 3.18 1%
Ryan J 10/10 2421 days 3.18 1%
sueadegizmo 10/10 2513 days 3.06 1%
Carlin 10/10 2513 days 3.06 1%
Adam_Heath 10/10 2513 days 3.06 1%
Waldo Andersen 10/10 2574 days 2.97 1%
Daniel Patricia 10/10 2608 days true 3.51 2%
Mike & Julia Stone 10/10 2610 days true 3.51 2%
Bottoms 9/10 2615 days true 3.5 2%
Hazel & Alan Damerell 10/10 2616 days true 3.5 2%
Dieter Mangold 9/10 2617 days true 3.5 2%
Lyn Deavin 8/10 2617 days true 3.5 2%
Robert McIlraith 10/10 2620 days true 3.49 2%
Marian Stolker 10/10 2621 days true 3.49 2%
elaineandbob 10/10 2634 days 2.89 1%
Berry 10/10 2707 days true 3.35 2%
Richard Lechevallier 10/10 2713 days true 3.34 2%
qofd 10/10 2910 days 2.51 1%
Stephen Hunt 10/10 2936 days true 2.97 1%
Weez18 10/10 2940 days 2.47 1%
Karin Kueng 10/10 2959 days true 2.94 1%
bryfrance 10/10 2961 days true 2.93 1%
Ellie Thompson 10/10 2963 days true 2.93 1%
Diane Johnston 9/10 2964 days true 2.93 1%
Beat & Connie 10/10 2965 days true 2.93 1%
Patrick Schaad 9/10 2965 days true 2.93 1%
Adrian Beckett 10/10 2967 days true 2.92 1%
Simon Vickers 10/10 2970 days true 2.92 1%
Pein van Nosrt 9/10 2970 days true 2.92 1%
LandJ 9/10 2971 days 2.43 1%
Eva Bock 9/10 2974 days true 2.91 1%
Plomp 9/10 2975 days true 2.91 1%
Eva Stauderova 10/10 2990 days true 2.88 1%
Robert Smith 10/10 2990 days true 2.88 1%
Bas Geerts 9/10 2992 days true 2.88 1%
Derek Archibald 9/10 2992 days true 2.88 1%
Kiefer Osterrieder 10/10 2994 days true 2.88 1%
John Winter 9/10 3361 days true 2.28 1%
glenmh 10/10 3364 days 1.89 0%
Steve Canner 8/10 3364 days 1.89 0%
Anne Heriot 10/10 3376 days true 2.25 1%
catdonjaime 10/10 3419 days true 2.18 0%
CarolB 10/10 3704 days true 1.71 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Final Ranking Score

95%

The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.

Love Christchurch