Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
171 Valid Reviews
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has a total of 175 reviews. There are 171 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 171 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 118 |
|
69% |
| 9/10 | 37 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
94.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park valid reviews is 94.68% and is based on 171 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 171 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
67% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 96.44% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
91.01%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hannah | 10/10 | 80 days | 98.99 | 100% | |
| David | 10/10 | 141 days | 96.85 | 98% | |
| Justin | 10/10 | 233 days | 91.4 | 92% | |
| Robert Adler | 10/10 | 233 days | 91.4 | 92% | |
| Liz Wade | 9/10 | 262 days | 89.12 | 90% | |
| Mika Feng | 10/10 | 293 days | 86.4 | 87% | |
| Natalie | 1/10 | 293 days | 63.07 | 64% | |
| Adam | 8/10 | 354 days | 76.14 | 77% | |
| Ayesha Solomon | 10/10 | 354 days | 80.14 | 81% | |
| Adrian Macdonald | 9/10 | 385 days | 76.51 | 77% | |
| Matilda | 10/10 | 477 days | 63.95 | 65% | |
| David | 10/10 | 568 days | 49.01 | 50% | |
| JM | 10/10 | 568 days | 49.01 | 50% | |
| Sarah Everett | 10/10 | 568 days | 49.01 | 50% | |
| kim thomas | 9/10 | 599 days | 43.98 | 44% | |
| Botond Seres | 10/10 | 599 days | 43.98 | 44% | |
| Sir Ed | 1/10 | 627 days | 28.99 | 29% | |
| Lucinda | 10/10 | 627 days | 39.71 | 40% | |
| Liz | 9/10 | 658 days | 35.26 | 36% | |
| Jyoti | 3/10 | 689 days | 23.96 | 24% | |
| Julie Barclay | 10/10 | 689 days | 31.12 | 31% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 780 days | 20.72 | 21% | |
| Jenny | 8/10 | 903 days | 10.3 | 10% | |
| Antony Wilson | 10/10 | 933 days | 9.16 | 9% | |
| S Becker | 10/10 | 933 days | 9.16 | 9% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 933 days | 9.16 | 9% | |
| Antony Lewis | 10/10 | 933 days | 9.16 | 9% | |
| Richard | 9/10 | 933 days | 9.16 | 9% | |
| Boguslaw MAKIELLO | 10/10 | 947 days |  |
8.47 | 9% |
| Nathaniel Bond | 10/10 | 962 days | |
7.8 | 8% |
| Carl Elliott | 10/10 | 964 days | 7.72 | 8% | |
| Bob | 10/10 | 964 days | 7.72 | 8% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 992 days | 6.68 | 7% | |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 10/10 | 1006 days | |
6.26 | 6% |
| Helen Bond | 10/10 | 1023 days | 5.82 | 6% | |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 1023 days | 5.82 | 6% | |
| Maggie Crowe | 10/10 | 1039 days | 5.5 | 6% | |
| Thomas Krasowski | 10/10 | 1041 days | 5.46 | 6% | |
| Joe Barnett | 10/10 | 1063 days | 5.16 | 5% | |
| Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 1095 days | 5.0 | 5% | |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 10/10 | 1135 days | 4.92 | 5% | |
| Andy Dearman | 10/10 | 1165 days | 4.86 | 5% | |
| Yee Ling Teo | 10/10 | 1276 days | 4.65 | 5% | |
| Belinda Clarke | 10/10 | 1302 days | 4.59 | 5% | |
| Jason Perks | 9/10 | 1335 days | 4.53 | 5% | |
| Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 1357 days | 4.49 | 5% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 1386 days | 4.43 | 4% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 1388 days | 4.21 | 4% | |
| Shelley Warkentin | 9/10 | 1419 days | 4.37 | 4% | |
| Andries Lubbe | 10/10 | 1449 days | 4.31 | 4% | |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 1449 days | 4.31 | 4% | |
| Rik Wiel | 9/10 | 1470 days | 4.27 | 4% | |
| Edward De Sousa | 10/10 | 1525 days | 4.16 | 4% | |
| Stuart Jeffrey | 9/10 | 1541 days | 4.13 | 4% | |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 1575 days | 4.06 | 4% | |
| Michelle Cheyne | 10/10 | 1599 days | 4.01 | 4% | |
| Anshuman Bhagwat | 5/10 | 1602 days | 3.25 | 3% | |
| Jennifer Ellis | 8/10 | 1612 days | 3.79 | 4% | |
| Bill Priddy | 8/10 | 1694 days | 3.64 | 4% | |
| Belinda Horn | 10/10 | 1694 days | 3.83 | 4% | |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 9/10 | 1696 days | 3.82 | 4% | |
| Helena Bond | 8/10 | 1699 days | 3.63 | 4% | |
| Jane Louise Stokes | 8/10 | 1708 days | 3.61 | 4% | |
| Alex Macdonald | 10/10 | 1723 days | 3.77 | 4% | |
| Glinys Weller | 10/10 | 1740 days | 3.74 | 4% | |
| Laura Daly | 10/10 | 1743 days | 3.73 | 4% | |
| Stephanie Mouat | 9/10 | 1754 days | 3.71 | 4% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1754 days | 3.71 | 4% | |
| Yung Ok Yoo | 8/10 | 1755 days | 3.52 | 4% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1783 days | 3.47 | 4% | |
| Janelle Sterling | 10/10 | 1812 days | 3.6 | 4% | |
| Thijs Zaadnoordijk | 10/10 | 1815 days | 3.59 | 4% | |
| Flurg McSpong | 10/10 | 1846 days | 3.53 | 4% | |
| Mary Foster | 10/10 | 1876 days | 3.47 | 4% | |
| Viki Ziemba | 10/10 | 1876 days | 3.47 | 4% | |
| Jan mentink | 9/10 | 1901 days | 3.42 | 3% | |
| Jan Mentink | 10/10 | 1903 days | 3.42 | 3% | |
| Jane Monro | 10/10 | 1938 days | 3.35 | 3% | |
| Sally Smith | 10/10 | 1967 days | 3.29 | 3% | |
| Mark Sandbrook | 10/10 | 2029 days | 3.17 | 3% | |
| Andrew Jones | 8/10 | 2060 days | 2.96 | 3% | |
| Christine Andersen | 10/10 | 2060 days | 3.11 | 3% | |
| Jan Collins | 10/10 | 2078 days | 3.08 | 3% | |
| Andrew Stace | 10/10 | 2119 days | 3.0 | 3% | |
| Christian Roerig | 10/10 | 2119 days | 3.0 | 3% | |
| Elham Isari | 10/10 | 2169 days | |
2.9 | 3% |
| SUE COLEMAN | 9/10 | 2180 days | 2.88 | 3% | |
| Sidney Stokkers | 9/10 | 2211 days | 2.82 | 3% | |
| Derek van Niekerk | 10/10 | 2272 days | 2.7 | 3% | |
| Andrew Kermode | 10/10 | 2303 days | 2.64 | 3% | |
| Michelle K | 10/10 | 2364 days | 2.52 | 3% | |
| Eve Clemens | 10/10 | 2364 days | 2.52 | 3% | |
| Ara Moore-Tuwhangai | 10/10 | 2364 days | 2.52 | 3% | |
| Mark Ovens | 10/10 | 2394 days | 2.46 | 2% | |
| Heike Heller | 9/10 | 2403 days | |
2.44 | 2% |
| Walter Neff | 10/10 | 2453 days | 2.34 | 2% | |
| Marianne Bergstrøm Matzen | 10/10 | 2484 days | 2.28 | 2% | |
| Susan Kirkham | 10/10 | 2484 days | 2.28 | 2% | |
| Simon Heffer | 10/10 | 2484 days | 2.28 | 2% | |
| Paul Wood | 9/10 | 2515 days | 2.22 | 2% | |
| griff griffiths | 9/10 | 2515 days | 2.22 | 2% | |
| J Murphy | 9/10 | 2545 days | 2.16 | 2% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 2576 days | 2.1 | 2% | |
| I & K Urquhart | 10/10 | 2637 days | 1.98 | 2% | |
| Gary Greenwell | 10/10 | 2668 days | 1.92 | 2% | |
| Pierre Cinquin | 9/10 | 2717 days | |
1.83 | 2% |
| Chris Quarre | 10/10 | 2729 days | 1.8 | 2% | |
| M Morgan | 10/10 | 2759 days | 1.74 | 2% | |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 2759 days | 1.74 | 2% | |
| Ted Pointing | 10/10 | 2759 days | 1.74 | 2% | |
| Ron Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2759 days | |
1.74 | 2% |
| Elizabeth Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2759 days | |
1.74 | 2% |
| Peti 10 | 10/10 | 2790 days | 1.68 | 2% | |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 2790 days | 1.68 | 2% | |
| M Branche | 9/10 | 2792 days | |
1.68 | 2% |
| Malgorzata | 10/10 | 2794 days | |
1.68 | 2% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 2794 days | |
1.68 | 2% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 10/10 | 2794 days | |
1.68 | 2% |
| brian barran | 9/10 | 2818 days | 1.63 | 2% | |
| Nigel Williams | 10/10 | 2849 days | 1.57 | 2% | |
| William Notcutt | 10/10 | 2849 days | 1.57 | 2% | |
| Moni Sangoi | 9/10 | 2849 days | 1.57 | 2% | |
| paulchris | 10/10 | 2880 days | 1.51 | 2% | |
| doepie277 | 10/10 | 2880 days | 1.51 | 2% | |
| Frank and Suzanne | 9/10 | 2880 days | |
1.51 | 2% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 2887 days | |
1.49 | 2% |
| gigi29 | 10/10 | 2910 days | 1.45 | 1% | |
| Anthony Croton | 10/10 | 2941 days | 1.39 | 1% | |
| CollyLuke | 10/10 | 2971 days | 1.33 | 1% | |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 2971 days | 1.33 | 1% | |
| sueadegizmo | 10/10 | 3063 days | 1.15 | 1% | |
| Carlin | 10/10 | 3063 days | 1.15 | 1% | |
| Adam_Heath | 10/10 | 3063 days | 1.15 | 1% | |
| Waldo Andersen | 10/10 | 3124 days | 1.03 | 1% | |
| Daniel Patricia | 10/10 | 3158 days | |
0.96 | 1% |
| Mike & Julia Stone | 10/10 | 3160 days | |
0.96 | 1% |
| Bottoms | 9/10 | 3165 days | |
0.95 | 1% |
| Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 3166 days | |
0.95 | 1% |
| Dieter Mangold | 9/10 | 3167 days | |
0.95 | 1% |
| Lyn Deavin | 8/10 | 3167 days | |
0.9 | 1% |
| Robert McIlraith | 10/10 | 3170 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| Marian Stolker | 10/10 | 3171 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| elaineandbob | 10/10 | 3184 days | 0.91 | 1% | |
| Berry | 10/10 | 3257 days | |
0.77 | 1% |
| Richard Lechevallier | 10/10 | 3263 days | |
0.76 | 1% |
| qofd | 10/10 | 3460 days | 0.37 | 0% | |
| Stephen Hunt | 10/10 | 3486 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Weez18 | 10/10 | 3490 days | 0.31 | 0% | |
| Karin Kueng | 10/10 | 3509 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 3511 days | |
0.27 | 0% |
| Ellie Thompson | 10/10 | 3513 days | |
0.27 | 0% |
| Diane Johnston | 9/10 | 3514 days | |
0.27 | 0% |
| Beat & Connie | 10/10 | 3515 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| Patrick Schaad | 9/10 | 3515 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| Adrian Beckett | 10/10 | 3517 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| Simon Vickers | 10/10 | 3520 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 9/10 | 3520 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| LandJ | 9/10 | 3521 days | 0.25 | 0% | |
| Eva Bock | 9/10 | 3524 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Plomp | 9/10 | 3525 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| Eva Stauderova | 10/10 | 3540 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Robert Smith | 10/10 | 3540 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Bas Geerts | 9/10 | 3542 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Derek Archibald | 9/10 | 3542 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Kiefer Osterrieder | 10/10 | 3544 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| John Winter | 9/10 | 3911 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| glenmh | 10/10 | 3914 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Steve Canner | 8/10 | 3914 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 3926 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| catdonjaime | 10/10 | 3969 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| CarolB | 10/10 | 4254 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.01% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 56 days. However the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 55 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 52 | -0.96% |
| 53 | -0.97% |
| 54 | -0.99% |
| 55 | -1.01% |
| 56 | -1.03% |
| 57 | -1.05% |
| 58 | -1.07% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.