Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
166 Valid Reviews
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has a total of 170 reviews. There are 166 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 114 |
|
69% |
| 9/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
94.58% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park valid reviews is 94.58% and is based on 166 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 166 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
67% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 96.44% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
89.75%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mika Feng | 10/10 | 23 days | 99.92 | 100% | |
| Natalie | 1/10 | 23 days | 72.94 | 73% | |
| Adam | 8/10 | 84 days | 93.94 | 94% | |
| Ayesha Solomon | 10/10 | 84 days | 98.88 | 99% | |
| Adrian Macdonald | 9/10 | 115 days | 97.9 | 98% | |
| Matilda | 10/10 | 207 days | 93.21 | 93% | |
| David | 10/10 | 298 days | 85.93 | 86% | |
| JM | 10/10 | 298 days | 85.93 | 86% | |
| Sarah Everett | 10/10 | 298 days | 85.93 | 86% | |
| kim thomas | 9/10 | 329 days | 82.85 | 83% | |
| Botond Seres | 10/10 | 329 days | 82.85 | 83% | |
| Sir Ed | 1/10 | 357 days | 58.26 | 58% | |
| Lucinda | 10/10 | 357 days | 79.8 | 80% | |
| Liz | 9/10 | 388 days | 76.14 | 76% | |
| Jyoti | 3/10 | 419 days | 55.58 | 56% | |
| Julie Barclay | 10/10 | 419 days | 72.18 | 72% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 510 days | 58.78 | 59% | |
| Jenny | 8/10 | 633 days | 36.88 | 37% | |
| Antony Wilson | 10/10 | 663 days | 34.57 | 35% | |
| S Becker | 10/10 | 663 days | 34.57 | 35% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 663 days | 34.57 | 35% | |
| Antony Lewis | 10/10 | 663 days | 34.57 | 35% | |
| Richard | 9/10 | 663 days | 34.57 | 35% | |
| Boguslaw MAKIELLO | 10/10 | 677 days |  |
32.69 | 33% |
| Nathaniel Bond | 10/10 | 692 days | |
30.74 | 31% |
| Carl Elliott | 10/10 | 694 days | 30.48 | 31% | |
| Bob | 10/10 | 694 days | 30.48 | 31% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 722 days | 27.05 | 27% | |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 10/10 | 736 days | |
25.42 | 25% |
| Helen Bond | 10/10 | 753 days | 23.53 | 24% | |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 753 days | 23.53 | 24% | |
| Maggie Crowe | 10/10 | 769 days | 21.84 | 22% | |
| Thomas Krasowski | 10/10 | 771 days | 21.63 | 22% | |
| Joe Barnett | 10/10 | 793 days | 19.45 | 19% | |
| Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 825 days | 16.55 | 17% | |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 10/10 | 865 days | 13.38 | 13% | |
| Andy Dearman | 10/10 | 895 days | 11.34 | 11% | |
| Yee Ling Teo | 10/10 | 1006 days | 6.26 | 6% | |
| Belinda Clarke | 10/10 | 1032 days | 5.63 | 6% | |
| Jason Perks | 9/10 | 1065 days | 5.14 | 5% | |
| Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 1087 days | 5.01 | 5% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 1116 days | 4.96 | 5% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 1118 days | 4.71 | 5% | |
| Shelley Warkentin | 9/10 | 1149 days | 4.89 | 5% | |
| Andries Lubbe | 10/10 | 1179 days | 4.84 | 5% | |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 1179 days | 4.84 | 5% | |
| Rik Wiel | 9/10 | 1200 days | 4.79 | 5% | |
| Edward De Sousa | 10/10 | 1255 days | 4.69 | 5% | |
| Stuart Jeffrey | 9/10 | 1271 days | 4.66 | 5% | |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 1305 days | 4.59 | 5% | |
| Michelle Cheyne | 10/10 | 1329 days | 4.54 | 5% | |
| Anshuman Bhagwat | 5/10 | 1332 days | 3.67 | 4% | |
| Jennifer Ellis | 8/10 | 1342 days | 4.29 | 4% | |
| Bill Priddy | 8/10 | 1424 days | 4.14 | 4% | |
| Belinda Horn | 10/10 | 1424 days | 4.36 | 4% | |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 9/10 | 1426 days | 4.35 | 4% | |
| Helena Bond | 8/10 | 1429 days | 4.13 | 4% | |
| Jane Louise Stokes | 8/10 | 1438 days | 4.11 | 4% | |
| Alex Macdonald | 10/10 | 1453 days | 4.3 | 4% | |
| Glinys Weller | 10/10 | 1470 days | 4.27 | 4% | |
| Laura Daly | 10/10 | 1473 days | 4.26 | 4% | |
| Stephanie Mouat | 9/10 | 1484 days | 4.24 | 4% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1484 days | 4.24 | 4% | |
| Yung Ok Yoo | 8/10 | 1485 days | 4.02 | 4% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1513 days | 3.97 | 4% | |
| Janelle Sterling | 10/10 | 1542 days | 4.13 | 4% | |
| Thijs Zaadnoordijk | 10/10 | 1545 days | 4.12 | 4% | |
| Flurg McSpong | 10/10 | 1576 days | 4.06 | 4% | |
| Mary Foster | 10/10 | 1606 days | 4.0 | 4% | |
| Viki Ziemba | 10/10 | 1606 days | 4.0 | 4% | |
| Jan mentink | 9/10 | 1631 days | 3.95 | 4% | |
| Jan Mentink | 10/10 | 1633 days | 3.95 | 4% | |
| Jane Monro | 10/10 | 1668 days | 3.88 | 4% | |
| Sally Smith | 10/10 | 1697 days | 3.82 | 4% | |
| Mark Sandbrook | 10/10 | 1759 days | 3.7 | 4% | |
| Andrew Jones | 8/10 | 1790 days | 3.46 | 3% | |
| Christine Andersen | 10/10 | 1790 days | 3.64 | 4% | |
| Jan Collins | 10/10 | 1808 days | 3.6 | 4% | |
| Andrew Stace | 10/10 | 1849 days | 3.52 | 4% | |
| Christian Roerig | 10/10 | 1849 days | 3.52 | 4% | |
| Elham Isari | 10/10 | 1899 days | |
3.43 | 3% |
| SUE COLEMAN | 9/10 | 1910 days | 3.41 | 3% | |
| Sidney Stokkers | 9/10 | 1941 days | 3.34 | 3% | |
| Derek van Niekerk | 10/10 | 2002 days | 3.23 | 3% | |
| Andrew Kermode | 10/10 | 2033 days | 3.16 | 3% | |
| Michelle K | 10/10 | 2094 days | 3.05 | 3% | |
| Eve Clemens | 10/10 | 2094 days | 3.05 | 3% | |
| Ara Moore-Tuwhangai | 10/10 | 2094 days | 3.05 | 3% | |
| Mark Ovens | 10/10 | 2124 days | 2.99 | 3% | |
| Heike Heller | 9/10 | 2133 days | |
2.97 | 3% |
| Walter Neff | 10/10 | 2183 days | 2.87 | 3% | |
| Marianne Bergstrøm Matzen | 10/10 | 2214 days | 2.81 | 3% | |
| Susan Kirkham | 10/10 | 2214 days | 2.81 | 3% | |
| Simon Heffer | 10/10 | 2214 days | 2.81 | 3% | |
| Paul Wood | 9/10 | 2245 days | 2.75 | 3% | |
| griff griffiths | 9/10 | 2245 days | 2.75 | 3% | |
| J Murphy | 9/10 | 2275 days | 2.69 | 3% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 2306 days | 2.63 | 3% | |
| I & K Urquhart | 10/10 | 2367 days | 2.51 | 3% | |
| Gary Greenwell | 10/10 | 2398 days | 2.45 | 2% | |
| Pierre Cinquin | 9/10 | 2447 days | |
2.35 | 2% |
| Chris Quarre | 10/10 | 2459 days | 2.33 | 2% | |
| M Morgan | 10/10 | 2489 days | 2.27 | 2% | |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 2489 days | 2.27 | 2% | |
| Ted Pointing | 10/10 | 2489 days | 2.27 | 2% | |
| Ron Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2489 days | |
2.27 | 2% |
| Elizabeth Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2489 days | |
2.27 | 2% |
| Peti 10 | 10/10 | 2520 days | 2.21 | 2% | |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 2520 days | 2.21 | 2% | |
| M Branche | 9/10 | 2522 days | |
2.21 | 2% |
| Malgorzata | 10/10 | 2524 days | |
2.2 | 2% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 2524 days | |
2.2 | 2% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 10/10 | 2524 days | |
2.2 | 2% |
| brian barran | 9/10 | 2548 days | 2.16 | 2% | |
| Nigel Williams | 10/10 | 2579 days | 2.1 | 2% | |
| William Notcutt | 10/10 | 2579 days | 2.1 | 2% | |
| Moni Sangoi | 9/10 | 2579 days | 2.1 | 2% | |
| paulchris | 10/10 | 2610 days | 2.04 | 2% | |
| doepie277 | 10/10 | 2610 days | 2.04 | 2% | |
| Frank and Suzanne | 9/10 | 2610 days | |
2.04 | 2% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 2617 days | |
2.02 | 2% |
| gigi29 | 10/10 | 2640 days | 1.98 | 2% | |
| Anthony Croton | 10/10 | 2671 days | 1.92 | 2% | |
| CollyLuke | 10/10 | 2701 days | 1.86 | 2% | |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 2701 days | 1.86 | 2% | |
| sueadegizmo | 10/10 | 2793 days | 1.68 | 2% | |
| Carlin | 10/10 | 2793 days | 1.68 | 2% | |
| Adam_Heath | 10/10 | 2793 days | 1.68 | 2% | |
| Waldo Andersen | 10/10 | 2854 days | 1.56 | 2% | |
| Daniel Patricia | 10/10 | 2888 days | |
1.49 | 1% |
| Mike & Julia Stone | 10/10 | 2890 days | |
1.49 | 1% |
| Bottoms | 9/10 | 2895 days | |
1.48 | 1% |
| Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 2896 days | |
1.48 | 1% |
| Dieter Mangold | 9/10 | 2897 days | |
1.47 | 1% |
| Lyn Deavin | 8/10 | 2897 days | |
1.4 | 1% |
| Robert McIlraith | 10/10 | 2900 days | |
1.47 | 1% |
| Marian Stolker | 10/10 | 2901 days | |
1.47 | 1% |
| elaineandbob | 10/10 | 2914 days | 1.44 | 1% | |
| Berry | 10/10 | 2987 days | |
1.3 | 1% |
| Richard Lechevallier | 10/10 | 2993 days | |
1.29 | 1% |
| qofd | 10/10 | 3190 days | 0.9 | 1% | |
| Stephen Hunt | 10/10 | 3216 days | |
0.85 | 1% |
| Weez18 | 10/10 | 3220 days | 0.84 | 1% | |
| Karin Kueng | 10/10 | 3239 days | |
0.8 | 1% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 3241 days | |
0.8 | 1% |
| Ellie Thompson | 10/10 | 3243 days | |
0.8 | 1% |
| Diane Johnston | 9/10 | 3244 days | |
0.79 | 1% |
| Beat & Connie | 10/10 | 3245 days | |
0.79 | 1% |
| Patrick Schaad | 9/10 | 3245 days | |
0.79 | 1% |
| Adrian Beckett | 10/10 | 3247 days | |
0.79 | 1% |
| Simon Vickers | 10/10 | 3250 days | |
0.78 | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 9/10 | 3250 days | |
0.78 | 1% |
| LandJ | 9/10 | 3251 days | 0.78 | 1% | |
| Eva Bock | 9/10 | 3254 days | |
0.77 | 1% |
| Plomp | 9/10 | 3255 days | |
0.77 | 1% |
| Eva Stauderova | 10/10 | 3270 days | |
0.74 | 1% |
| Robert Smith | 10/10 | 3270 days | |
0.74 | 1% |
| Bas Geerts | 9/10 | 3272 days | |
0.74 | 1% |
| Derek Archibald | 9/10 | 3272 days | |
0.74 | 1% |
| Kiefer Osterrieder | 10/10 | 3274 days | |
0.74 | 1% |
| John Winter | 9/10 | 3641 days | |
0.02 | 0% |
| glenmh | 10/10 | 3644 days | 0.01 | 0% | |
| Steve Canner | 8/10 | 3644 days | 0.01 | 0% | |
| Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 3656 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| catdonjaime | 10/10 | 3699 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| CarolB | 10/10 | 3984 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 2 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 0 | -0.00% |
| 1 | -0.02% |
| 2 | -0.04% |
| 3 | -0.06% |
| 4 | -0.08% |
| 5 | -0.10% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.