Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
160 Valid Reviews
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has a total of 164 reviews. There are 160 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 160 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 111 |
|
69% |
| 9/10 | 35 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
7% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
95.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park valid reviews is 95.13% and is based on 160 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 160 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
67% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 96.44% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
92.44%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 100% | |
| JM | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 100% | |
| Sarah Everett | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 100% | |
| kim thomas | 9/10 | 143 days | 96.76 | 99% | |
| Botond Seres | 10/10 | 143 days | 96.76 | 99% | |
| Sir Ed | 1/10 | 170 days | 81.11 | 82% | |
| Lucinda | 10/10 | 171 days | 95.37 | 97% | |
| Liz | 9/10 | 202 days | 93.53 | 95% | |
| Jyoti | 3/10 | 233 days | 83.17 | 85% | |
| Julie Barclay | 10/10 | 233 days | 91.4 | 93% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 324 days | 83.37 | 85% | |
| Jenny | 8/10 | 447 days | 68.34 | 69% | |
| Antony Wilson | 10/10 | 476 days | 64.1 | 65% | |
| S Becker | 10/10 | 477 days | 63.95 | 65% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 477 days | 63.95 | 65% | |
| Antony Lewis | 10/10 | 477 days | 63.95 | 65% | |
| Richard | 9/10 | 477 days | 63.95 | 65% | |
| Boguslaw MAKIELLO | 10/10 | 491 days |  |
74.16 | 75% |
| Nathaniel Bond | 10/10 | 506 days | |
71.31 | 72% |
| Carl Elliott | 10/10 | 508 days | 59.11 | 60% | |
| Bob | 10/10 | 508 days | 59.11 | 60% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 535 days | 54.64 | 55% | |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 10/10 | 550 days | |
62.48 | 63% |
| Helen Bond | 10/10 | 567 days | 49.18 | 49% | |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 567 days | 49.18 | 49% | |
| Maggie Crowe | 10/10 | 583 days | 46.54 | 47% | |
| Thomas Krasowski | 10/10 | 585 days | 46.22 | 46% | |
| Joe Barnett | 10/10 | 607 days | 42.74 | 43% | |
| Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 639 days | 37.95 | 38% | |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 10/10 | 679 days | 32.42 | 32% | |
| Andy Dearman | 10/10 | 709 days | 28.61 | 28% | |
| Yee Ling Teo | 10/10 | 820 days | 16.98 | 16% | |
| Belinda Clarke | 10/10 | 846 days | 14.82 | 14% | |
| Jason Perks | 9/10 | 879 days | 12.39 | 11% | |
| Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 900 days | 11.03 | 10% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 930 days | 9.31 | 8% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 931 days | 9.26 | 8% | |
| Shelley Warkentin | 9/10 | 962 days | 7.8 | 6% | |
| Andries Lubbe | 10/10 | 992 days | 6.68 | 5% | |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 992 days | 6.68 | 5% | |
| Rik Wiel | 9/10 | 1014 days | 6.04 | 5% | |
| Edward De Sousa | 10/10 | 1069 days | 5.11 | 4% | |
| Stuart Jeffrey | 9/10 | 1084 days | 5.02 | 4% | |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 1119 days | 4.97 | 4% | |
| Michelle Cheyne | 10/10 | 1143 days | 4.93 | 4% | |
| Anshuman Bhagwat | 5/10 | 1146 days | 4.93 | 3% | |
| Jennifer Ellis | 8/10 | 1156 days | 4.92 | 3% | |
| Bill Priddy | 8/10 | 1237 days | 4.81 | 3% | |
| Belinda Horn | 10/10 | 1238 days | 4.8 | 3% | |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 9/10 | 1240 days | 4.8 | 3% | |
| Helena Bond | 8/10 | 1243 days | 4.8 | 3% | |
| Jane Louise Stokes | 8/10 | 1252 days | 4.78 | 3% | |
| Alex Macdonald | 10/10 | 1266 days | 4.77 | 3% | |
| Glinys Weller | 10/10 | 1284 days | 4.74 | 3% | |
| Laura Daly | 10/10 | 1287 days | 4.74 | 3% | |
| Stephanie Mouat | 9/10 | 1297 days | 4.72 | 3% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1297 days | 4.72 | 3% | |
| Yung Ok Yoo | 8/10 | 1299 days | 4.72 | 3% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1327 days | 4.68 | 3% | |
| Janelle Sterling | 10/10 | 1356 days | 4.64 | 3% | |
| Thijs Zaadnoordijk | 10/10 | 1358 days | 4.64 | 3% | |
| Flurg McSpong | 10/10 | 1389 days | 4.6 | 3% | |
| Mary Foster | 10/10 | 1419 days | 4.56 | 3% | |
| Viki Ziemba | 10/10 | 1420 days | 4.55 | 3% | |
| Jan mentink | 9/10 | 1445 days | 4.52 | 3% | |
| Jan Mentink | 10/10 | 1447 days | 4.52 | 3% | |
| Jane Monro | 10/10 | 1481 days | 4.47 | 3% | |
| Sally Smith | 10/10 | 1511 days | 4.43 | 3% | |
| Mark Sandbrook | 10/10 | 1572 days | 4.35 | 3% | |
| Andrew Jones | 8/10 | 1603 days | 4.3 | 3% | |
| Christine Andersen | 10/10 | 1603 days | 4.3 | 3% | |
| Jan Collins | 10/10 | 1622 days | 4.28 | 3% | |
| Andrew Stace | 10/10 | 1662 days | 4.22 | 3% | |
| Christian Roerig | 10/10 | 1662 days | 4.22 | 3% | |
| Elham Isari | 10/10 | 1713 days | |
4.98 | 4% |
| SUE COLEMAN | 9/10 | 1723 days | 4.14 | 3% | |
| Sidney Stokkers | 9/10 | 1754 days | 4.1 | 3% | |
| Derek van Niekerk | 10/10 | 1816 days | 4.01 | 3% | |
| Andrew Kermode | 10/10 | 1847 days | 3.97 | 3% | |
| Michelle K | 10/10 | 1908 days | 3.89 | 2% | |
| Eve Clemens | 10/10 | 1908 days | 3.89 | 2% | |
| Ara Moore-Tuwhangai | 10/10 | 1908 days | 3.89 | 2% | |
| Mark Ovens | 10/10 | 1938 days | 3.85 | 2% | |
| Heike Heller | 9/10 | 1947 days | |
4.6 | 3% |
| Walter Neff | 10/10 | 1997 days | 3.76 | 2% | |
| Marianne Bergstrøm Matzen | 10/10 | 2028 days | 3.72 | 2% | |
| Susan Kirkham | 10/10 | 2028 days | 3.72 | 2% | |
| Simon Heffer | 10/10 | 2028 days | 3.72 | 2% | |
| Paul Wood | 9/10 | 2059 days | 3.68 | 2% | |
| griff griffiths | 9/10 | 2059 days | 3.68 | 2% | |
| J Murphy | 9/10 | 2089 days | 3.64 | 2% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 2120 days | 3.6 | 2% | |
| I & K Urquhart | 10/10 | 2181 days | 3.51 | 2% | |
| Gary Greenwell | 10/10 | 2212 days | 3.47 | 2% | |
| Pierre Cinquin | 9/10 | 2261 days | |
4.08 | 3% |
| Chris Quarre | 10/10 | 2273 days | 3.39 | 2% | |
| M Morgan | 10/10 | 2303 days | 3.35 | 2% | |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 2303 days | 3.35 | 2% | |
| Ted Pointing | 10/10 | 2303 days | 3.35 | 2% | |
| Ron Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2303 days | |
4.01 | 3% |
| Elizabeth Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2303 days | |
4.01 | 3% |
| Peti 10 | 10/10 | 2334 days | 3.3 | 2% | |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 2334 days | 3.3 | 2% | |
| M Branche | 9/10 | 2336 days | |
3.96 | 2% |
| Malgorzata | 10/10 | 2338 days | |
3.96 | 2% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 2338 days | |
3.96 | 2% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 10/10 | 2338 days | |
3.96 | 2% |
| brian barran | 9/10 | 2362 days | 3.26 | 2% | |
| Nigel Williams | 10/10 | 2393 days | 3.22 | 2% | |
| William Notcutt | 10/10 | 2393 days | 3.22 | 2% | |
| Moni Sangoi | 9/10 | 2393 days | 3.22 | 2% | |
| paulchris | 10/10 | 2424 days | 3.18 | 2% | |
| doepie277 | 10/10 | 2424 days | 3.18 | 2% | |
| Frank and Suzanne | 9/10 | 2424 days | |
3.82 | 2% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 2431 days | |
3.8 | 2% |
| gigi29 | 10/10 | 2454 days | 3.14 | 2% | |
| Anthony Croton | 10/10 | 2485 days | 3.1 | 2% | |
| CollyLuke | 10/10 | 2515 days | 3.05 | 2% | |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 2515 days | 3.05 | 2% | |
| sueadegizmo | 10/10 | 2607 days | 2.93 | 1% | |
| Carlin | 10/10 | 2607 days | 2.93 | 1% | |
| Adam_Heath | 10/10 | 2607 days | 2.93 | 1% | |
| Waldo Andersen | 10/10 | 2668 days | 2.85 | 1% | |
| Daniel Patricia | 10/10 | 2702 days | |
3.36 | 2% |
| Mike & Julia Stone | 10/10 | 2704 days | |
3.36 | 2% |
| Bottoms | 9/10 | 2709 days | |
3.35 | 2% |
| Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 2710 days | |
3.35 | 2% |
| Dieter Mangold | 9/10 | 2711 days | |
3.34 | 2% |
| Lyn Deavin | 8/10 | 2711 days | |
3.34 | 2% |
| Robert McIlraith | 10/10 | 2714 days | |
3.34 | 2% |
| Marian Stolker | 10/10 | 2715 days | |
3.34 | 2% |
| elaineandbob | 10/10 | 2728 days | 2.76 | 1% | |
| Berry | 10/10 | 2801 days | |
3.2 | 2% |
| Richard Lechevallier | 10/10 | 2807 days | |
3.19 | 2% |
| qofd | 10/10 | 3004 days | 2.38 | 1% | |
| Stephen Hunt | 10/10 | 3030 days | |
2.82 | 1% |
| Weez18 | 10/10 | 3034 days | 2.34 | 1% | |
| Karin Kueng | 10/10 | 3053 days | |
2.78 | 1% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 3055 days | |
2.78 | 1% |
| Ellie Thompson | 10/10 | 3057 days | |
2.77 | 1% |
| Diane Johnston | 9/10 | 3058 days | |
2.77 | 1% |
| Beat & Connie | 10/10 | 3059 days | |
2.77 | 1% |
| Patrick Schaad | 9/10 | 3059 days | |
2.77 | 1% |
| Adrian Beckett | 10/10 | 3061 days | |
2.77 | 1% |
| Simon Vickers | 10/10 | 3064 days | |
2.76 | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 9/10 | 3064 days | |
2.76 | 1% |
| LandJ | 9/10 | 3065 days | 2.3 | 1% | |
| Eva Bock | 9/10 | 3068 days | |
2.76 | 1% |
| Plomp | 9/10 | 3069 days | |
2.76 | 1% |
| Eva Stauderova | 10/10 | 3084 days | |
2.73 | 1% |
| Robert Smith | 10/10 | 3084 days | |
2.73 | 1% |
| Bas Geerts | 9/10 | 3086 days | |
2.73 | 1% |
| Derek Archibald | 9/10 | 3086 days | |
2.73 | 1% |
| Kiefer Osterrieder | 10/10 | 3088 days | |
2.72 | 1% |
| John Winter | 9/10 | 3455 days | |
2.12 | 1% |
| glenmh | 10/10 | 3458 days | 1.76 | 0% | |
| Steve Canner | 8/10 | 3458 days | 1.76 | 0% | |
| Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 3470 days | |
2.1 | 1% |
| catdonjaime | 10/10 | 3513 days | |
2.03 | 0% |
| CarolB | 10/10 | 3798 days | |
1.56 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 2 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 0 | -0.00% |
| 1 | -0.02% |
| 2 | -0.04% |
| 3 | -0.06% |
| 4 | -0.08% |
| 5 | -0.10% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
92%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.