Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
150 Valid Reviews
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has a total of 154 reviews. There are 150 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 150 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 105 |
|
70% |
| 9/10 | 33 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
7% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park valid reviews is 96.00% and is based on 150 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 150 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
67% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 96.44% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
97.03%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scooper | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 93% | |
| Jenny | 8/10 | 232 days | 91.47 | 86% | |
| Antony Wilson | 10/10 | 261 days | 89.21 | 84% | |
| S Becker | 10/10 | 262 days | 89.12 | 84% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 262 days | 89.12 | 84% | |
| Antony Lewis | 10/10 | 262 days | 89.12 | 84% | |
| Richard | 9/10 | 262 days | 89.12 | 84% | |
| Boguslaw MAKIELLO | 10/10 | 276 days |  |
105.51 | 100% |
| Nathaniel Bond | 10/10 | 291 days | |
103.9 | 98% |
| Carl Elliott | 10/10 | 293 days | 86.4 | 82% | |
| Bob | 10/10 | 293 days | 86.4 | 82% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 320 days | 83.77 | 79% | |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 10/10 | 335 days | |
98.66 | 93% |
| Helen Bond | 10/10 | 352 days | 80.37 | 76% | |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 352 days | 80.37 | 76% | |
| Maggie Crowe | 10/10 | 368 days | 78.54 | 74% | |
| Thomas Krasowski | 10/10 | 370 days | 78.31 | 74% | |
| Joe Barnett | 10/10 | 392 days | 75.65 | 71% | |
| Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 424 days | 71.51 | 67% | |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 10/10 | 464 days | 65.88 | 62% | |
| Andy Dearman | 10/10 | 494 days | 61.33 | 57% | |
| Yee Ling Teo | 10/10 | 605 days | 43.05 | 40% | |
| Belinda Clarke | 10/10 | 631 days | 39.12 | 36% | |
| Jason Perks | 9/10 | 664 days | 34.44 | 31% | |
| Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 685 days | 31.64 | 29% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 715 days | 27.88 | 25% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 716 days | 27.76 | 25% | |
| Shelley Warkentin | 9/10 | 747 days | 24.19 | 22% | |
| Andries Lubbe | 10/10 | 777 days | 21.02 | 18% | |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 777 days | 21.02 | 18% | |
| Rik Wiel | 9/10 | 799 days | 18.88 | 16% | |
| Edward De Sousa | 10/10 | 854 days | 14.2 | 12% | |
| Stuart Jeffrey | 9/10 | 869 days | 13.09 | 11% | |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 904 days | 10.78 | 9% | |
| Michelle Cheyne | 10/10 | 928 days | 9.42 | 7% | |
| Anshuman Bhagwat | 5/10 | 931 days | 9.26 | 7% | |
| Jennifer Ellis | 8/10 | 941 days | 8.76 | 7% | |
| Bill Priddy | 8/10 | 1022 days | 5.84 | 4% | |
| Belinda Horn | 10/10 | 1023 days | 5.82 | 4% | |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 9/10 | 1025 days | 5.78 | 4% | |
| Helena Bond | 8/10 | 1028 days | 5.71 | 4% | |
| Jane Louise Stokes | 8/10 | 1037 days | 5.53 | 3% | |
| Alex Macdonald | 10/10 | 1051 days | 5.31 | 3% | |
| Glinys Weller | 10/10 | 1069 days | 5.11 | 3% | |
| Laura Daly | 10/10 | 1072 days | 5.08 | 3% | |
| Stephanie Mouat | 9/10 | 1082 days | 5.03 | 3% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1082 days | 5.03 | 3% | |
| Yung Ok Yoo | 8/10 | 1084 days | 5.02 | 3% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1112 days | 4.98 | 3% | |
| Janelle Sterling | 10/10 | 1141 days | 4.94 | 3% | |
| Thijs Zaadnoordijk | 10/10 | 1143 days | 4.93 | 3% | |
| Flurg McSpong | 10/10 | 1174 days | 4.89 | 3% | |
| Mary Foster | 10/10 | 1204 days | 4.85 | 3% | |
| Viki Ziemba | 10/10 | 1205 days | 4.85 | 3% | |
| Jan mentink | 9/10 | 1230 days | 4.82 | 3% | |
| Jan Mentink | 10/10 | 1232 days | 4.81 | 3% | |
| Jane Monro | 10/10 | 1266 days | 4.77 | 3% | |
| Sally Smith | 10/10 | 1296 days | 4.72 | 3% | |
| Mark Sandbrook | 10/10 | 1357 days | 4.64 | 3% | |
| Andrew Jones | 8/10 | 1388 days | 4.6 | 3% | |
| Christine Andersen | 10/10 | 1388 days | 4.6 | 3% | |
| Jan Collins | 10/10 | 1407 days | 4.57 | 3% | |
| Andrew Stace | 10/10 | 1447 days | 4.52 | 3% | |
| Christian Roerig | 10/10 | 1447 days | 4.52 | 3% | |
| Elham Isari | 10/10 | 1498 days | |
5.34 | 3% |
| SUE COLEMAN | 9/10 | 1508 days | 4.43 | 2% | |
| Sidney Stokkers | 9/10 | 1539 days | 4.39 | 2% | |
| Derek van Niekerk | 10/10 | 1601 days | 4.31 | 2% | |
| Andi Kermode | 10/10 | 1632 days | 4.26 | 2% | |
| Michelle K | 10/10 | 1693 days | 4.18 | 2% | |
| Eve Clemens | 10/10 | 1693 days | 4.18 | 2% | |
| Ara Moore-Tuwhangai | 10/10 | 1693 days | 4.18 | 2% | |
| Mark Ovens | 10/10 | 1723 days | 4.14 | 2% | |
| Heike Heller | 9/10 | 1732 days | |
4.95 | 3% |
| Walter Neff | 10/10 | 1782 days | 4.06 | 2% | |
| Marianne Bergstrøm Matzen | 10/10 | 1813 days | 4.02 | 2% | |
| Susan Kirkham | 10/10 | 1813 days | 4.02 | 2% | |
| Simon Heffer | 10/10 | 1813 days | 4.02 | 2% | |
| Paul Wood | 9/10 | 1844 days | 3.97 | 2% | |
| griff griffiths | 9/10 | 1844 days | 3.97 | 2% | |
| J Murphy | 9/10 | 1874 days | 3.93 | 2% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 1905 days | 3.89 | 2% | |
| I & K Urquhart | 10/10 | 1966 days | 3.81 | 2% | |
| Gary Greenwell | 10/10 | 1997 days | 3.76 | 2% | |
| Pierre Cinquin | 9/10 | 2046 days | |
4.44 | 2% |
| Chris Quarre | 10/10 | 2058 days | 3.68 | 2% | |
| M Morgan | 10/10 | 2088 days | 3.64 | 2% | |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 2088 days | 3.64 | 2% | |
| Ted Pointing | 10/10 | 2088 days | 3.64 | 2% | |
| Ron Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2088 days | |
4.37 | 2% |
| Elizabeth Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2088 days | |
4.37 | 2% |
| Peti 10 | 10/10 | 2119 days | 3.6 | 2% | |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 2119 days | 3.6 | 2% | |
| M Branche | 9/10 | 2121 days | |
4.31 | 2% |
| Malgorzata | 10/10 | 2123 days | |
4.31 | 2% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 2123 days | |
4.31 | 2% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 10/10 | 2123 days | |
4.31 | 2% |
| brian barran | 9/10 | 2147 days | 3.56 | 2% | |
| Nigel Williams | 10/10 | 2178 days | 3.52 | 2% | |
| William Notcutt | 10/10 | 2178 days | 3.52 | 2% | |
| Moni Sangoi | 9/10 | 2178 days | 3.52 | 2% | |
| paulchris | 10/10 | 2209 days | 3.47 | 2% | |
| doepie277 | 10/10 | 2209 days | 3.47 | 2% | |
| Frank and Suzanne | 9/10 | 2209 days | |
4.17 | 2% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 2216 days | |
4.16 | 2% |
| gigi29 | 10/10 | 2239 days | 3.43 | 1% | |
| Anthony Croton | 10/10 | 2270 days | 3.39 | 1% | |
| CollyLuke | 10/10 | 2300 days | 3.35 | 1% | |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 2300 days | 3.35 | 1% | |
| sueadegizmo | 10/10 | 2392 days | 3.22 | 1% | |
| Carlin | 10/10 | 2392 days | 3.22 | 1% | |
| Adam_Heath | 10/10 | 2392 days | 3.22 | 1% | |
| Waldo Andersen | 10/10 | 2453 days | 3.14 | 1% | |
| Daniel Patricia | 10/10 | 2487 days | |
3.71 | 2% |
| Mike & Julia Stone | 10/10 | 2489 days | |
3.71 | 2% |
| Bottoms | 9/10 | 2494 days | |
3.7 | 2% |
| Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 2495 days | |
3.7 | 2% |
| Dieter Mangold | 9/10 | 2496 days | |
3.7 | 2% |
| Lyn Deavin | 8/10 | 2496 days | |
3.7 | 2% |
| Robert McIlraith | 10/10 | 2499 days | |
3.69 | 2% |
| Marian Stolker | 10/10 | 2500 days | |
3.69 | 2% |
| elaineandbob | 10/10 | 2513 days | 3.06 | 1% | |
| Berry | 10/10 | 2586 days | |
3.55 | 2% |
| Richard Lechevallier | 10/10 | 2592 days | |
3.54 | 2% |
| qofd | 10/10 | 2789 days | 2.68 | 1% | |
| Stephen Hunt | 10/10 | 2815 days | |
3.17 | 1% |
| Weez18 | 10/10 | 2819 days | 2.64 | 1% | |
| Karin Kueng | 10/10 | 2838 days | |
3.13 | 1% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 2840 days | |
3.13 | 1% |
| Ellie Thompson | 10/10 | 2842 days | |
3.13 | 1% |
| Diane Johnston | 9/10 | 2843 days | |
3.13 | 1% |
| Beat & Connie | 10/10 | 2844 days | |
3.12 | 1% |
| Patrick Schaad | 9/10 | 2844 days | |
3.12 | 1% |
| Adrian Beckett | 10/10 | 2846 days | |
3.12 | 1% |
| Simon Vickers | 10/10 | 2849 days | |
3.12 | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 9/10 | 2849 days | |
3.12 | 1% |
| LandJ | 9/10 | 2850 days | 2.6 | 1% | |
| Eva Bock | 9/10 | 2853 days | |
3.11 | 1% |
| Plomp | 9/10 | 2854 days | |
3.11 | 1% |
| Eva Stauderova | 10/10 | 2869 days | |
3.08 | 1% |
| Robert Smith | 10/10 | 2869 days | |
3.08 | 1% |
| Bas Geerts | 9/10 | 2871 days | |
3.08 | 1% |
| Derek Archibald | 9/10 | 2871 days | |
3.08 | 1% |
| Kiefer Osterrieder | 10/10 | 2873 days | |
3.08 | 1% |
| John Winter | 9/10 | 3240 days | |
2.47 | 1% |
| glenmh | 10/10 | 3243 days | 2.06 | 0% | |
| Steve Canner | 8/10 | 3243 days | 2.06 | 0% | |
| Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 3255 days | |
2.45 | 1% |
| catdonjaime | 10/10 | 3298 days | |
2.38 | 0% |
| CarolB | 10/10 | 3583 days | |
1.91 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.72% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 36 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 33 | -0.66% |
| 34 | -0.68% |
| 35 | -0.70% |
| 36 | -0.72% |
| 37 | -0.74% |
| 38 | -0.76% |
| 39 | -0.78% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
96%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.