Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
170 Valid Reviews
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has a total of 174 reviews. There are 170 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 170 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 117 |
|
69% |
| 9/10 | 37 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
94.65% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park valid reviews is 94.65% and is based on 170 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 170 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
67% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 96.44% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.46%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David | 10/10 | 74 days | 99.13 | 100% | |
| Justin | 10/10 | 166 days | 95.63 | 96% | |
| Robert Adler | 10/10 | 166 days | 95.63 | 96% | |
| Liz Wade | 9/10 | 195 days | 93.97 | 95% | |
| Mika Feng | 10/10 | 226 days | 91.91 | 93% | |
| Natalie | 1/10 | 226 days | 67.09 | 68% | |
| Adam | 8/10 | 287 days | 82.6 | 83% | |
| Ayesha Solomon | 10/10 | 287 days | 86.95 | 88% | |
| Adrian Macdonald | 9/10 | 318 days | 83.98 | 85% | |
| Matilda | 10/10 | 410 days | 73.36 | 74% | |
| David | 10/10 | 501 days | 60.23 | 61% | |
| JM | 10/10 | 501 days | 60.23 | 61% | |
| Sarah Everett | 10/10 | 501 days | 60.23 | 61% | |
| kim thomas | 9/10 | 532 days | 55.15 | 56% | |
| Botond Seres | 10/10 | 532 days | 55.15 | 56% | |
| Sir Ed | 1/10 | 560 days | 36.76 | 37% | |
| Lucinda | 10/10 | 560 days | 50.36 | 51% | |
| Liz | 9/10 | 591 days | 45.25 | 46% | |
| Jyoti | 3/10 | 622 days | 31.15 | 31% | |
| Julie Barclay | 10/10 | 622 days | 40.45 | 41% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 713 days | 28.12 | 28% | |
| Jenny | 8/10 | 836 days | 14.85 | 15% | |
| Antony Wilson | 10/10 | 866 days | 13.31 | 13% | |
| S Becker | 10/10 | 866 days | 13.31 | 13% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 866 days | 13.31 | 13% | |
| Antony Lewis | 10/10 | 866 days | 13.31 | 13% | |
| Richard | 9/10 | 866 days | 13.31 | 13% | |
| Boguslaw MAKIELLO | 10/10 | 880 days |  |
12.32 | 12% |
| Nathaniel Bond | 10/10 | 895 days | |
11.34 | 11% |
| Carl Elliott | 10/10 | 897 days | 11.21 | 11% | |
| Bob | 10/10 | 897 days | 11.21 | 11% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 925 days | 9.58 | 10% | |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 10/10 | 939 days | |
8.86 | 9% |
| Helen Bond | 10/10 | 956 days | 8.06 | 8% | |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 956 days | 8.06 | 8% | |
| Maggie Crowe | 10/10 | 972 days | 7.4 | 7% | |
| Thomas Krasowski | 10/10 | 974 days | 7.32 | 7% | |
| Joe Barnett | 10/10 | 996 days | 6.55 | 7% | |
| Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 1028 days | 5.71 | 6% | |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 10/10 | 1068 days | 5.12 | 5% | |
| Andy Dearman | 10/10 | 1098 days | 4.99 | 5% | |
| Yee Ling Teo | 10/10 | 1209 days | 4.78 | 5% | |
| Belinda Clarke | 10/10 | 1235 days | 4.73 | 5% | |
| Jason Perks | 9/10 | 1268 days | 4.66 | 5% | |
| Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 1290 days | 4.62 | 5% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 1319 days | 4.56 | 5% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 1321 days | 4.33 | 4% | |
| Shelley Warkentin | 9/10 | 1352 days | 4.5 | 5% | |
| Andries Lubbe | 10/10 | 1382 days | 4.44 | 4% | |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 1382 days | 4.44 | 4% | |
| Rik Wiel | 9/10 | 1403 days | 4.4 | 4% | |
| Edward De Sousa | 10/10 | 1458 days | 4.29 | 4% | |
| Stuart Jeffrey | 9/10 | 1474 days | 4.26 | 4% | |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 1508 days | 4.19 | 4% | |
| Michelle Cheyne | 10/10 | 1532 days | 4.14 | 4% | |
| Anshuman Bhagwat | 5/10 | 1535 days | 3.35 | 3% | |
| Jennifer Ellis | 8/10 | 1545 days | 3.91 | 4% | |
| Bill Priddy | 8/10 | 1627 days | 3.76 | 4% | |
| Belinda Horn | 10/10 | 1627 days | 3.96 | 4% | |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 9/10 | 1629 days | 3.95 | 4% | |
| Helena Bond | 8/10 | 1632 days | 3.75 | 4% | |
| Jane Louise Stokes | 8/10 | 1641 days | 3.73 | 4% | |
| Alex Macdonald | 10/10 | 1656 days | 3.9 | 4% | |
| Glinys Weller | 10/10 | 1673 days | 3.87 | 4% | |
| Laura Daly | 10/10 | 1676 days | 3.86 | 4% | |
| Stephanie Mouat | 9/10 | 1687 days | 3.84 | 4% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1687 days | 3.84 | 4% | |
| Yung Ok Yoo | 8/10 | 1688 days | 3.65 | 4% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1716 days | 3.6 | 4% | |
| Janelle Sterling | 10/10 | 1745 days | 3.73 | 4% | |
| Thijs Zaadnoordijk | 10/10 | 1748 days | 3.72 | 4% | |
| Flurg McSpong | 10/10 | 1779 days | 3.66 | 4% | |
| Mary Foster | 10/10 | 1809 days | 3.6 | 4% | |
| Viki Ziemba | 10/10 | 1809 days | 3.6 | 4% | |
| Jan mentink | 9/10 | 1834 days | 3.55 | 4% | |
| Jan Mentink | 10/10 | 1836 days | 3.55 | 4% | |
| Jane Monro | 10/10 | 1871 days | 3.48 | 4% | |
| Sally Smith | 10/10 | 1900 days | 3.42 | 3% | |
| Mark Sandbrook | 10/10 | 1962 days | 3.3 | 3% | |
| Andrew Jones | 8/10 | 1993 days | 3.08 | 3% | |
| Christine Andersen | 10/10 | 1993 days | 3.24 | 3% | |
| Jan Collins | 10/10 | 2011 days | 3.21 | 3% | |
| Andrew Stace | 10/10 | 2052 days | 3.13 | 3% | |
| Christian Roerig | 10/10 | 2052 days | 3.13 | 3% | |
| Elham Isari | 10/10 | 2102 days | |
3.03 | 3% |
| SUE COLEMAN | 9/10 | 2113 days | 3.01 | 3% | |
| Sidney Stokkers | 9/10 | 2144 days | 2.95 | 3% | |
| Derek van Niekerk | 10/10 | 2205 days | 2.83 | 3% | |
| Andrew Kermode | 10/10 | 2236 days | 2.77 | 3% | |
| Michelle K | 10/10 | 2297 days | 2.65 | 3% | |
| Eve Clemens | 10/10 | 2297 days | 2.65 | 3% | |
| Ara Moore-Tuwhangai | 10/10 | 2297 days | 2.65 | 3% | |
| Mark Ovens | 10/10 | 2327 days | 2.59 | 3% | |
| Heike Heller | 9/10 | 2336 days | |
2.57 | 3% |
| Walter Neff | 10/10 | 2386 days | 2.47 | 2% | |
| Marianne Bergstrøm Matzen | 10/10 | 2417 days | 2.41 | 2% | |
| Susan Kirkham | 10/10 | 2417 days | 2.41 | 2% | |
| Simon Heffer | 10/10 | 2417 days | 2.41 | 2% | |
| Paul Wood | 9/10 | 2448 days | 2.35 | 2% | |
| griff griffiths | 9/10 | 2448 days | 2.35 | 2% | |
| J Murphy | 9/10 | 2478 days | 2.29 | 2% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 2509 days | 2.23 | 2% | |
| I & K Urquhart | 10/10 | 2570 days | 2.11 | 2% | |
| Gary Greenwell | 10/10 | 2601 days | 2.05 | 2% | |
| Pierre Cinquin | 9/10 | 2650 days | |
1.96 | 2% |
| Chris Quarre | 10/10 | 2662 days | 1.93 | 2% | |
| M Morgan | 10/10 | 2692 days | 1.87 | 2% | |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 2692 days | 1.87 | 2% | |
| Ted Pointing | 10/10 | 2692 days | 1.87 | 2% | |
| Ron Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2692 days | |
1.87 | 2% |
| Elizabeth Stenhouse | 10/10 | 2692 days | |
1.87 | 2% |
| Peti 10 | 10/10 | 2723 days | 1.81 | 2% | |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 2723 days | 1.81 | 2% | |
| M Branche | 9/10 | 2725 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| Malgorzata | 10/10 | 2727 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 2727 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 10/10 | 2727 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| brian barran | 9/10 | 2751 days | 1.76 | 2% | |
| Nigel Williams | 10/10 | 2782 days | 1.7 | 2% | |
| William Notcutt | 10/10 | 2782 days | 1.7 | 2% | |
| Moni Sangoi | 9/10 | 2782 days | 1.7 | 2% | |
| paulchris | 10/10 | 2813 days | 1.64 | 2% | |
| doepie277 | 10/10 | 2813 days | 1.64 | 2% | |
| Frank and Suzanne | 9/10 | 2813 days | |
1.64 | 2% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 2820 days | |
1.62 | 2% |
| gigi29 | 10/10 | 2843 days | 1.58 | 2% | |
| Anthony Croton | 10/10 | 2874 days | 1.52 | 2% | |
| CollyLuke | 10/10 | 2904 days | 1.46 | 1% | |
| Ryan J | 10/10 | 2904 days | 1.46 | 1% | |
| sueadegizmo | 10/10 | 2996 days | 1.28 | 1% | |
| Carlin | 10/10 | 2996 days | 1.28 | 1% | |
| Adam_Heath | 10/10 | 2996 days | 1.28 | 1% | |
| Waldo Andersen | 10/10 | 3057 days | 1.16 | 1% | |
| Daniel Patricia | 10/10 | 3091 days | |
1.09 | 1% |
| Mike & Julia Stone | 10/10 | 3093 days | |
1.09 | 1% |
| Bottoms | 9/10 | 3098 days | |
1.08 | 1% |
| Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 3099 days | |
1.08 | 1% |
| Dieter Mangold | 9/10 | 3100 days | |
1.08 | 1% |
| Lyn Deavin | 8/10 | 3100 days | |
1.02 | 1% |
| Robert McIlraith | 10/10 | 3103 days | |
1.07 | 1% |
| Marian Stolker | 10/10 | 3104 days | |
1.07 | 1% |
| elaineandbob | 10/10 | 3117 days | 1.04 | 1% | |
| Berry | 10/10 | 3190 days | |
0.9 | 1% |
| Richard Lechevallier | 10/10 | 3196 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| qofd | 10/10 | 3393 days | 0.5 | 1% | |
| Stephen Hunt | 10/10 | 3419 days | |
0.45 | 0% |
| Weez18 | 10/10 | 3423 days | 0.44 | 0% | |
| Karin Kueng | 10/10 | 3442 days | |
0.41 | 0% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 3444 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Ellie Thompson | 10/10 | 3446 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Diane Johnston | 9/10 | 3447 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Beat & Connie | 10/10 | 3448 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Patrick Schaad | 9/10 | 3448 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Adrian Beckett | 10/10 | 3450 days | |
0.39 | 0% |
| Simon Vickers | 10/10 | 3453 days | |
0.39 | 0% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 9/10 | 3453 days | |
0.39 | 0% |
| LandJ | 9/10 | 3454 days | 0.38 | 0% | |
| Eva Bock | 9/10 | 3457 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Plomp | 9/10 | 3458 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Eva Stauderova | 10/10 | 3473 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Robert Smith | 10/10 | 3473 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Bas Geerts | 9/10 | 3475 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Derek Archibald | 9/10 | 3475 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Kiefer Osterrieder | 10/10 | 3477 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| John Winter | 9/10 | 3844 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| glenmh | 10/10 | 3847 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Steve Canner | 8/10 | 3847 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 3859 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| catdonjaime | 10/10 | 3902 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| CarolB | 10/10 | 4187 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.59% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 114 days. However the Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Jacksons Retreat Campervan Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 51 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 48 | -0.55% |
| 49 | -0.56% |
| 50 | -0.57% |
| 51 | -0.59% |
| 52 | -0.60% |
| 53 | -0.61% |
| 54 | -0.62% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.