Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Gentle Annie.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
106 Valid Reviews
The Gentle Annie experience has a total of 111 reviews. There are 106 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 106 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 87 |
|
82% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
11% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.89% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Gentle Annie valid reviews is 96.89% and is based on 106 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 106 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
75% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Gentle Annie face-to-face reviews is 92.50% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
97.52%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Niklas Obermann | 9/10 | 171 days | 100% |
| Connie | 10/10 | 260 days | 99% |
| Bekbeka | 10/10 | 291 days | 98% |
| EUNJI | 10/10 | 383 days | 94% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 444 days | 91% |
| Anonymous | 9/10 | 625 days | 79% |
| Shaun | 10/10 | 625 days | 80% |
| Gas | 10/10 | 656 days | 77% |
| Ruby. | 10/10 | 687 days | 75% |
| Lesley Langelaan | 10/10 | 687 days | 75% |
| Dee | 10/10 | 717 days | 73% |
| Vagabond | 10/10 | 809 days | 64% |
| Adam w | 10/10 | 840 days | 61% |
| Suzanne & Andy Bishop | 10/10 | 962 days | 49% |
| Jennifer Sergeant | 7/10 | 991 days | 43% |
| mari22 | 10/10 | 1022 days | 43% |
| Ella | 10/10 | 1022 days | 43% |
| chasingthesun141 | 10/10 | 1083 days | 37% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 1114 days | 35% |
| Christoph Soukup | 10/10 | 1144 days | 32% |
| Jojude | 10/10 | 1144 days | 32% |
| Vanessa | 10/10 | 1175 days | 30% |
| Soph | 10/10 | 1175 days | 30% |
| Nz.exploring | 10/10 | 1236 days | 25% |
| Paul & Nic | 10/10 | 1236 days | 25% |
| Steve Bl | 8/10 | 1236 days | 25% |
| Luane | 10/10 | 1236 days | 25% |
| Max | 9/10 | 1267 days | 23% |
| Barry and Pauline Kingston | 10/10 | 1267 days | 23% |
| Karen Tegroen | 10/10 | 1328 days | 19% |
| Sharon | 9/10 | 1356 days | 18% |
| Jodi Scrivens | 9/10 | 1356 days | 18% |
| Kyle | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Haylee Rodmell | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Kerryhpearson@gmail.com | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Helena Falk | 8/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Carolyn | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Sarah S | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Antoinette Christchurch NZ | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Steffan | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Carine | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Mai van Mulligen - NZ | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Selina Walker | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| Nyree | 10/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
| CJ | 10/10 | 1418 days | 15% |
| Ray Bovey | 8/10 | 1418 days | 14% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 1448 days | 13% |
| Kirsten | 10/10 | 1479 days | 12% |
| Karen | 10/10 | 1479 days | 12% |
| Christine Molenaar | 10/10 | 1571 days | 9% |
| AMR | 10/10 | 1752 days | 5% |
| Dianne | 10/10 | 1936 days | 5% |
| Kane Marshall | 10/10 | 2086 days | 4% |
| LeeAnn | 10/10 | 2086 days | 4% |
| Richie Miller | 10/10 | 2148 days | 4% |
| Boardwalk Blss | 10/10 | 2239 days | 4% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 2483 days | 4% |
| Kathy | 10/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Sharron | 10/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Nick | 10/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Craig/ Sarah | 10/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| River | 10/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Natazha Bernie | 10/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 2817 days | 3% |
| Wayne n Leanne Johnson | 10/10 | 2879 days | 3% |
| Caroline | 10/10 | 2879 days | 3% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 2879 days | 3% |
| Grizzly Girl | 10/10 | 2940 days | 3% |
| Kim | 10/10 | 3001 days | 3% |
| Helen Moxon | 10/10 | 3062 days | 2% |
| Jakub Horner | 10/10 | 3148 days | 2% |
| Michael Stützle | 10/10 | 3154 days | 2% |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
| Leo Forster | 10/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
| Violet | 10/10 | 3213 days | 2% |
| Beth Bovey | 10/10 | 3215 days | 2% |
| Lilith Prins | 10/10 | 3241 days | 2% |
| Joanna du Toit | 9/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3432 days | 2% |
| Taya Wiebe | 10/10 | 3479 days | 2% |
| Freddy Gates | 10/10 | 3495 days | 2% |
| Rob & Colleen Elwood | 9/10 | 3609 days | 1% |
| Margo Wiltens | 8/10 | 3676 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Ellis | 10/10 | 3802 days | 1% |
| Angela Mallard | 10/10 | 3898 days | 1% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 3913 days | 1% |
| Liam Clarke | 10/10 | 3928 days | 1% |
| Roger Montenegro | 10/10 | 3972 days | 1% |
| Tessa Smith | 10/10 | 3993 days | 1% |
| Mareike Bach | 10/10 | 3993 days | 1% |
| Forrest Bilek | 10/10 | 4022 days | 0% |
| Megan | 3/10 | 4066 days | 0% |
| Squiesel | 10/10 | 4253 days | 0% |
| Kris Marinomunn | 9/10 | 4261 days | 0% |
| kim | 10/10 | 4431 days | 1% |
| Malcolm & Susan | 10/10 | 4615 days | 1% |
| Bill | 10/10 | 4641 days | 0% |
| Saskia | 10/10 | 4641 days | 0% |
| annie johnson | 10/10 | 4980 days | 1% |
| Karine Scheers | 7/10 | 4981 days | 0% |
| Graeme | 9/10 | 5374 days | 1% |
| Huber | 10/10 | 6098 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Gentle Annie experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.99% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Gentle Annie experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Gentle Annie experience has been adjusted for 164 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 161 | -2.93% |
| 162 | -2.95% |
| 163 | -2.97% |
| 164 | -2.99% |
| 165 | -3.00% |
| 166 | -3.02% |
| 167 | -3.04% |
| … | … |
0.48% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
95%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.