G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Gentle Annie.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
106 Valid Reviews
The Gentle Annie experience has a total of 111 reviews. There are 106 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 106 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 87 |
|
82% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
11% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.95% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Gentle Annie valid reviews is 96.95% and is based on 105 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 106 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
75% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Gentle Annie face-to-face reviews is 92.50% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
97.72%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Niklas Obermann | 9/10 | 10 days | 100% |
| Connie | 10/10 | 99 days | 100% |
| Bekbeka | 10/10 | 130 days | 100% |
| EUNJI | 10/10 | 222 days | 98% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 283 days | 96% |
| Anonymous | 9/10 | 464 days | 87% |
| Shaun | 10/10 | 464 days | 88% |
| Gas | 10/10 | 495 days | 86% |
| Ruby. | 10/10 | 526 days | 85% |
| Lesley Langelaan | 10/10 | 526 days | 85% |
| Dee | 10/10 | 556 days | 83% |
| Vagabond | 10/10 | 648 days | 76% |
| Adam w | 10/10 | 679 days | 74% |
| Suzanne & Andy Bishop | 10/10 | 801 days | 64% |
| Jennifer Sergeant | 7/10 | 830 days | 57% |
| mari22 | 10/10 | 861 days | 58% |
| Ella | 10/10 | 861 days | 58% |
| chasingthesun141 | 10/10 | 922 days | 52% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 953 days | 49% |
| Christoph Soukup | 10/10 | 983 days | 46% |
| Jojude | 10/10 | 983 days | 46% |
| Vanessa | 10/10 | 1014 days | 43% |
| Soph | 10/10 | 1014 days | 43% |
| Nz.exploring | 10/10 | 1075 days | 37% |
| Paul & Nic | 10/10 | 1075 days | 37% |
| Steve Bl | 8/10 | 1075 days | 36% |
| Luane | 10/10 | 1075 days | 37% |
| Max | 9/10 | 1106 days | 34% |
| Barry and Pauline Kingston | 10/10 | 1106 days | 35% |
| Karen Tegroen | 10/10 | 1167 days | 30% |
| Sharon | 9/10 | 1195 days | 27% |
| Jodi Scrivens | 9/10 | 1195 days | 27% |
| Kyle | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Haylee Rodmell | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Kerryhpearson@gmail.com | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Helena Falk | 8/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Carolyn | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Sarah S | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Antoinette Christchurch NZ | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Steffan | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Carine | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Mai van Mulligen - NZ | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Selina Walker | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Nyree | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| CJ | 10/10 | 1257 days | 23% |
| Ray Bovey | 8/10 | 1257 days | 23% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 1287 days | 21% |
| Kirsten | 10/10 | 1318 days | 20% |
| Karen | 10/10 | 1318 days | 20% |
| Christine Molenaar | 10/10 | 1410 days | 15% |
| AMR | 10/10 | 1591 days | 8% |
| Dianne | 10/10 | 1775 days | 5% |
| Kane Marshall | 10/10 | 1925 days | 5% |
| LeeAnn | 10/10 | 1925 days | 5% |
| Richie Miller | 10/10 | 1987 days | 5% |
| Boardwalk Blss | 10/10 | 2078 days | 4% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 2322 days | 4% |
| Kathy | 10/10 | 2414 days | 4% |
| Sharron | 10/10 | 2414 days | 4% |
| Nick | 10/10 | 2414 days | 4% |
| Craig/ Sarah | 10/10 | 2414 days | 4% |
| River | 10/10 | 2506 days | 3% |
| Natazha Bernie | 10/10 | 2506 days | 3% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 2656 days | 3% |
| Wayne n Leanne Johnson | 10/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Caroline | 10/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Grizzly Girl | 10/10 | 2779 days | 3% |
| Kim | 10/10 | 2840 days | 3% |
| Helen Moxon | 10/10 | 2901 days | 3% |
| Jakub Horner | 10/10 | 2987 days | 3% |
| Michael Stützle | 10/10 | 2993 days | 3% |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 3021 days | 2% |
| Leo Forster | 10/10 | 3021 days | 2% |
| Violet | 10/10 | 3052 days | 2% |
| Beth Bovey | 10/10 | 3054 days | 2% |
| Lilith Prins | 10/10 | 3080 days | 2% |
| Joanna du Toit | 9/10 | 3083 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3271 days | 2% |
| Taya Wiebe | 10/10 | 3318 days | 2% |
| Freddy Gates | 10/10 | 3334 days | 2% |
| Rob & Colleen Elwood | 9/10 | 3448 days | 2% |
| Margo Wiltens | 8/10 | 3515 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Ellis | 10/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
| Angela Mallard | 10/10 | 3737 days | 1% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 3752 days | 1% |
| Liam Clarke | 10/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Roger Montenegro | 10/10 | 3811 days | 1% |
| Tessa Smith | 10/10 | 3832 days | 1% |
| Mareike Bach | 10/10 | 3832 days | 1% |
| Forrest Bilek | 10/10 | 3861 days | 1% |
| Megan | 3/10 | 3905 days | 0% |
| Squiesel | 10/10 | 4092 days | 0% |
| Kris Marinomunn | 9/10 | 4100 days | 0% |
| kim | 10/10 | 4270 days | 0% |
| Malcolm & Susan | 10/10 | 4454 days | 1% |
| Bill | 10/10 | 4480 days | 0% |
| Saskia | 10/10 | 4480 days | 0% |
| annie johnson | 10/10 | 4819 days | 1% |
| Karine Scheers | 7/10 | 4820 days | 0% |
| Graeme | 9/10 | 5213 days | 1% |
| Huber | 10/10 | 5937 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Gentle Annie experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 87 days. However the Gentle Annie experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Gentle Annie experience has been adjusted for 3 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 0 | -0.00% |
| 1 | -0.01% |
| 2 | -0.03% |
| 3 | -0.04% |
| 4 | -0.06% |
| 5 | -0.07% |
| 6 | -0.09% |
| … | … |
0.24% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.