Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Little River Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
74 Valid Reviews
The Little River Campground experience has a total of 74 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 74 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 50 |
|
68% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
7% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.81% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Little River Campground valid reviews is 90.81% and is based on 74 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
8 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 74 valid reviews, the experience has 8 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 8 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
38% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
25% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
13% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Little River Campground face-to-face reviews is 82.50% and is based on 8 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.81%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sherilyn Saiyan | 10/10 | 39 days | 100% |
| Lea de Jong | 9/10 | 98 days | 99% |
| Maeva Arnold | 8/10 | 98 days | 98% |
| Eline | 7/10 | 404 days | 84% |
| Felix | 4/10 | 769 days | 43% |
| Kim | 10/10 | 800 days | 64% |
| Janet Lewis | 9/10 | 860 days | 57% |
| Louise | 9/10 | 921 days | 51% |
| Katie Edser | 10/10 | 1166 days | 30% |
| Catherine Barriel | 10/10 | 1194 days | 28% |
| Citlali & Mike | 10/10 | 1225 days | 25% |
| Matthew | 10/10 | 1225 days | 25% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1256 days | 23% |
| Sonia Rocha | 10/10 | 1256 days | 23% |
| :Shane: | 10/10 | 1682 days | 6% |
| Scott | 10/10 | 1682 days | 6% |
| Julieanne Eason | 10/10 | 1955 days | 5% |
| Lucy and Chris | 10/10 | 2016 days | 5% |
| Jess and Shaun | 10/10 | 2016 days | 5% |
| Carla | 10/10 | 2290 days | 4% |
| Captain Erick | 7/10 | 2290 days | 4% |
| Darla | 10/10 | 2321 days | 4% |
| Richard & Chris, UK | 7/10 | 2321 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 2382 days | 4% |
| Joan & Tony | 10/10 | 2596 days | 3% |
| Sophie | 10/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Melanie Berger | 10/10 | 2655 days | 3% |
| Raphy | 9/10 | 2686 days | 3% |
| Mark Blezard | 10/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| EH | 10/10 | 2778 days | 3% |
| Gina | 10/10 | 2778 days | 3% |
| Marie Sassenberg | 10/10 | 2778 days | 3% |
| Joe | 9/10 | 2808 days | 3% |
| Ken and Denice Paterson | 10/10 | 2992 days | 3% |
| Elsie Cornish | 10/10 | 3017 days | 3% |
| Audrey Brault | 10/10 | 3027 days | 3% |
| Manon Moreno | 8/10 | 3042 days | 2% |
| Paul Churton | 10/10 | 3051 days | 3% |
| Laura Meelynn | 10/10 | 3082 days | 2% |
| Graham Moger | 10/10 | 3097 days | 2% |
| Hester | 10/10 | 3385 days | 2% |
| Amy Smith | 3/10 | 3405 days | 1% |
| Teresa Scott | 10/10 | 3416 days | 2% |
| AdamAndCarlin Parkerson | 10/10 | 3447 days | 2% |
| Liz Barnett | 10/10 | 3691 days | 1% |
| Claudia McConnell | 10/10 | 3691 days | 1% |
| Frederik Lambrecht | 10/10 | 3751 days | 1% |
| Borja Valls | 10/10 | 3778 days | 1% |
| Jesse Newman | 10/10 | 3782 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 10/10 | 3806 days | 1% |
| Singapore Sling | 5/10 | 3813 days | 1% |
| Liz Bushby | 10/10 | 3834 days | 1% |
| Will Frost | 9/10 | 3836 days | 1% |
| Duncan White | 10/10 | 3843 days | 1% |
| Paul Nebrich | 9/10 | 4061 days | 1% |
| Eric Lambley | 7/10 | 4164 days | 0% |
| Hannibal Reizen | 10/10 | 4175 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 10/10 | 4178 days | 0% |
| SUE COLEMAN | 8/10 | 4178 days | 0% |
| Hubert Schmid | 8/10 | 4232 days | 0% |
| tschavalon | 10/10 | 4239 days | 0% |
| Lindsay Roup | 10/10 | 4331 days | 0% |
| Jenny | 10/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Rachael | 10/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Monique Monique | 7/10 | 4481 days | 1% |
| Andreas | 10/10 | 4512 days | 1% |
| Jonny Strinati | 8/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
| François | 10/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
| Servane Solana | 10/10 | 4877 days | 1% |
| naturerocks | 7/10 | 4908 days | 1% |
| Audelsol | 10/10 | 4908 days | 1% |
| Bandzior | 2/10 | 4938 days | 0% |
| Sophie | 7/10 | 5577 days | 1% |
| John Mathers | 6/10 | 5923 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Little River Campground experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.50% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 86 days. However the Little River Campground experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Little River Campground experience has been adjusted for 34 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 31 | -0.45% |
| 32 | -0.47% |
| 33 | -0.48% |
| 34 | -0.50% |
| 35 | -0.51% |
| 36 | -0.52% |
| 37 | -0.54% |
| … | … |
1.24% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.