Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Trounson Kauri Park Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Trounson Kauri Park Campground
Valid Reviews
70 Valid Reviews
The Trounson Kauri Park Campground experience has a total of 71 reviews. There are 70 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 19 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground valid reviews is 84.29% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
27 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 70 valid reviews, the experience has 27 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 27 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground face-to-face reviews is 87.04% and is based on 27 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
79.55%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie | 8/10 | 257 days | 85.06 | 98% | |
| Don Strachan | 9/10 | 288 days | 86.86 | 100% | |
| Coco B. | 3/10 | 380 days | 59.38 | 68% | |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 410 days | 69.69 | 80% | |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 472 days | 64.7 | 74% | |
| Teb | 7/10 | 472 days | 58.87 | 68% | |
| Nancy | 6/10 | 563 days | 41.37 | 47% | |
| Dominic Gould | 8/10 | 679 days | 30.8 | 35% | |
| Kendra Seamus Matilda and Oskar | 10/10 | 766 days | 22.15 | 25% | |
| Eugenie Desforges | 9/10 | 805 days | 18.33 | 21% | |
| Viola Cube | 7/10 | 822 days | 15.3 | 17% | |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 842 days | 15.14 | 17% | |
| Haley Everitt | 9/10 | 881 days | 12.26 | 14% | |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 956 days | 7.66 | 8% | |
| Maxine Fallot | 7/10 | 1054 days | 4.79 | 5% | |
| Diandra Buesen | 8/10 | 1113 days | 4.72 | 5% | |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 1171 days | 4.87 | 5% | |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 1259 days | 4.72 | 5% | |
| Sean Stevens | 10/10 | 1325 days | 4.61 | 5% | |
| Bill Milburn | 5/10 | 1356 days | 3.69 | 4% | |
| Tim De Boer | 7/10 | 1402 days | 4.07 | 4% | |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 1415 days | 4.45 | 5% | |
| Michelle Rushton | 8/10 | 1422 days | 4.22 | 4% | |
| Mabel Vanasperen | 7/10 | 1425 days | 4.04 | 4% | |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 1445 days | 4.4 | 5% | |
| Andrew Watts | 10/10 | 1455 days | 4.38 | 5% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1462 days | 4.15 | 4% | |
| Lionel C. | 8/10 | 1506 days | 4.08 | 4% | |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 1514 days | 4.28 | 4% | |
| Christine Slowiak | 9/10 | 1567 days | 4.19 | 4% | |
| E Kane | 8/10 | 1576 days | 3.97 | 4% | |
| Christoph | 10/10 | 1680 days |  |
4.0 | 4% |
| Sara Gonzalez | 9/10 | 1711 days | 3.95 | 4% | |
| Mike Merrick | 8/10 | 1720 days | 3.73 | 4% | |
| Celia Nowak | 10/10 | 1723 days | |
3.92 | 4% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 10/10 | 1756 days | 3.87 | 4% | |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 1810 days | 3.59 | 4% | |
| Sara Berton | 8/10 | 2064 days | |
3.17 | 3% |
| Elise Boinnot | 9/10 | 2082 days | |
3.31 | 3% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 10/10 | 2082 days | |
3.31 | 3% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 2112 days | |
3.26 | 3% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 2113 days | |
3.26 | 3% |
| kiwifamily2 | 10/10 | 2114 days | 3.26 | 3% | |
| David Wood | 7/10 | 2206 days | 2.82 | 3% | |
| Shantell Hunter | 7/10 | 2298 days | 2.68 | 3% | |
| Team Kim&James | 10/10 | 2298 days | 2.94 | 3% | |
| Sarah Horn | 10/10 | 2408 days | |
2.75 | 3% |
| Sebastian Russell-Smits | 10/10 | 2408 days | |
2.75 | 3% |
| Loesje | 7/10 | 2420 days | 2.49 | 2% | |
| lisa taylor | 8/10 | 2420 days | 2.59 | 2% | |
| Darren Abbott | 8/10 | 2503 days | |
2.46 | 2% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 2520 days | |
2.43 | 2% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 10/10 | 2785 days | 2.11 | 2% | |
| Daniel & Manuela | 8/10 | 2791 days | |
1.99 | 2% |
| Danielle | 7/10 | 2797 days | |
1.9 | 2% |
| Lotte Foged | 7/10 | 2812 days | |
1.87 | 2% |
| Mike1952 | 8/10 | 2814 days | 1.95 | 2% | |
| Johanna & Mark | 7/10 | 3133 days | |
1.37 | 1% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 3134 days | |
1.43 | 1% |
| Christoph & Maria | 9/10 | 3141 days | |
1.5 | 1% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 3145 days | |
1.49 | 1% |
| Anika Jedelsky | 8/10 | 3152 days | |
1.4 | 1% |
| Omar Candon | 8/10 | 3152 days | |
1.4 | 1% |
| Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 3171 days | |
1.45 | 1% |
| Liz Dolman | 8/10 | 3174 days | |
1.37 | 1% |
| Mieke Knoops | 8/10 | 3526 days | |
0.8 | 0% |
| Josy | 9/10 | 3536 days | |
0.82 | 0% |
| Ines Diana | 9/10 | 3543 days | |
0.81 | 0% |
| carolineder | 7/10 | 3606 days | |
0.64 | 0% |
| billdee | 10/10 | 3728 days | |
0.49 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Trounson Kauri Park Campground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
80%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.