Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Trounson Kauri Park Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
92 Valid Reviews
The Trounson Kauri Park Campground experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 92 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 92 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.83% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground valid reviews is 82.83% and is based on 92 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
27 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 92 valid reviews, the experience has 27 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 27 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground face-to-face reviews is 87.04% and is based on 27 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.93%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stu | 10/10 | 120 days | 100% |
| Jan | 2/10 | 151 days | 45% |
| KL | 10/10 | 516 days | 85% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 547 days | 82% |
| Chris | 6/10 | 577 days | 70% |
| Natasha | 9/10 | 608 days | 79% |
| John Holschier | 10/10 | 608 days | 80% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 761 days | 67% |
| Matt | 10/10 | 791 days | 65% |
| AmericanToby | 10/10 | 791 days | 65% |
| Sietse | 9/10 | 882 days | 55% |
| Kelly | 7/10 | 974 days | 43% |
| Lucas | 8/10 | 974 days | 46% |
| Mike | 5/10 | 1339 days | 14% |
| Stefanie | 8/10 | 1400 days | 15% |
| Leet | 9/10 | 1431 days | 14% |
| Henk | 6/10 | 1581 days | 7% |
| Steph and Denise | 10/10 | 1673 days | 6% |
| Mrs H | 5/10 | 2008 days | 3% |
| Mrs H | 5/10 | 2008 days | 3% |
| Layna | 8/10 | 2343 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2404 days | 4% |
| Charlie | 8/10 | 2677 days | 3% |
| Don Strachan | 9/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
| Coco B. | 3/10 | 2800 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 2830 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2891 days | 3% |
| Teb | 7/10 | 2892 days | 2% |
| Nancy | 6/10 | 2983 days | 2% |
| Dominic Gould | 8/10 | 3099 days | 2% |
| Kendra Seamus Matilda and Oskar | 10/10 | 3186 days | 2% |
| Eugenie Desforges | 9/10 | 3225 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 7/10 | 3242 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3262 days | 2% |
| Haley Everitt | 9/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3376 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 7/10 | 3474 days | 1% |
| Diandra Buesen | 8/10 | 3533 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3590 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3679 days | 1% |
| Sean Stevens | 10/10 | 3745 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 5/10 | 3776 days | 1% |
| Tim De Boer | 7/10 | 3822 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3835 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 8/10 | 3842 days | 1% |
| Mabel Vanasperen | 7/10 | 3845 days | 1% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 3864 days | 1% |
| Andrew Watts | 10/10 | 3875 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 3882 days | 1% |
| Lionel C. | 8/10 | 3926 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3934 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 9/10 | 3987 days | 0% |
| E Kane | 8/10 | 3996 days | 0% |
| Christoph | 10/10 | 4100 days | 0% |
| Sara Gonzalez | 9/10 | 4131 days | 0% |
| Mike Merrick | 8/10 | 4140 days | 0% |
| Celia Nowak | 10/10 | 4143 days | 0% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 10/10 | 4176 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4229 days | 0% |
| Sara Berton | 8/10 | 4484 days | 0% |
| Elise Boinnot | 9/10 | 4502 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 10/10 | 4502 days | 1% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 4532 days | 1% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 4533 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 10/10 | 4534 days | 1% |
| David Wood | 7/10 | 4626 days | 1% |
| Shantell Hunter | 7/10 | 4718 days | 1% |
| Team Kim&James | 10/10 | 4718 days | 1% |
| Sarah Horn | 10/10 | 4828 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Russell-Smits | 10/10 | 4828 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 7/10 | 4840 days | 1% |
| lisa taylor | 8/10 | 4840 days | 1% |
| Darren Abbott | 8/10 | 4923 days | 0% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 4940 days | 0% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 10/10 | 5205 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 8/10 | 5211 days | 0% |
| Danielle | 7/10 | 5217 days | 0% |
| Lotte Foged | 7/10 | 5232 days | 0% |
| Mike1952 | 8/10 | 5234 days | 1% |
| Johanna & Mark | 7/10 | 5553 days | 0% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5554 days | 0% |
| Christoph & Maria | 9/10 | 5561 days | 1% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 5565 days | 1% |
| Anika Jedelsky | 8/10 | 5572 days | 0% |
| Omar Candon | 8/10 | 5572 days | 0% |
| Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 5591 days | 1% |
| Liz Dolman | 8/10 | 5594 days | 0% |
| Mieke Knoops | 8/10 | 5946 days | 0% |
| Josy | 9/10 | 5956 days | 1% |
| Ines Diana | 9/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| carolineder | 7/10 | 6026 days | 0% |
| billdee | 10/10 | 6148 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Trounson Kauri Park Campground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.