Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Trounson Kauri Park Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
92 Valid Reviews
The Trounson Kauri Park Campground experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 92 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 92 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.83% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground valid reviews is 82.83% and is based on 92 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
27 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 92 valid reviews, the experience has 27 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 27 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground face-to-face reviews is 87.04% and is based on 27 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.90%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stu | 10/10 | 180 days | 100% |
| Jan | 2/10 | 211 days | 45% |
| KL | 10/10 | 576 days | 83% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 607 days | 79% |
| Chris | 6/10 | 637 days | 67% |
| Natasha | 9/10 | 668 days | 75% |
| John Holschier | 10/10 | 668 days | 76% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 821 days | 62% |
| Matt | 10/10 | 851 days | 60% |
| AmericanToby | 10/10 | 851 days | 60% |
| Sietse | 9/10 | 942 days | 50% |
| Kelly | 7/10 | 1034 days | 38% |
| Lucas | 8/10 | 1034 days | 41% |
| Mike | 5/10 | 1399 days | 12% |
| Stefanie | 8/10 | 1460 days | 12% |
| Leet | 9/10 | 1491 days | 11% |
| Henk | 6/10 | 1641 days | 6% |
| Steph and Denise | 10/10 | 1733 days | 5% |
| Mrs H | 5/10 | 2068 days | 3% |
| Mrs H | 5/10 | 2068 days | 3% |
| Layna | 8/10 | 2403 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2464 days | 4% |
| Charlie | 8/10 | 2737 days | 3% |
| Don Strachan | 9/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Coco B. | 3/10 | 2860 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 2890 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2952 days | 3% |
| Teb | 7/10 | 2952 days | 2% |
| Nancy | 6/10 | 3043 days | 2% |
| Dominic Gould | 8/10 | 3159 days | 2% |
| Kendra Seamus Matilda and Oskar | 10/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
| Eugenie Desforges | 9/10 | 3285 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 7/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
| Haley Everitt | 9/10 | 3361 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3436 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 7/10 | 3534 days | 1% |
| Diandra Buesen | 8/10 | 3593 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3651 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3739 days | 1% |
| Sean Stevens | 10/10 | 3805 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 5/10 | 3836 days | 1% |
| Tim De Boer | 7/10 | 3882 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3895 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 8/10 | 3902 days | 1% |
| Mabel Vanasperen | 7/10 | 3905 days | 1% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 3925 days | 1% |
| Andrew Watts | 10/10 | 3935 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 3942 days | 1% |
| Lionel C. | 8/10 | 3986 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3994 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 9/10 | 4047 days | 0% |
| E Kane | 8/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
| Christoph | 10/10 | 4160 days | 0% |
| Sara Gonzalez | 9/10 | 4191 days | 0% |
| Mike Merrick | 8/10 | 4200 days | 0% |
| Celia Nowak | 10/10 | 4203 days | 0% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 10/10 | 4236 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4290 days | 0% |
| Sara Berton | 8/10 | 4544 days | 1% |
| Elise Boinnot | 9/10 | 4562 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 10/10 | 4562 days | 1% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 4592 days | 1% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 4593 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 10/10 | 4594 days | 1% |
| David Wood | 7/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
| Shantell Hunter | 7/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
| Team Kim&James | 10/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
| Sarah Horn | 10/10 | 4888 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Russell-Smits | 10/10 | 4888 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 7/10 | 4900 days | 1% |
| lisa taylor | 8/10 | 4900 days | 1% |
| Darren Abbott | 8/10 | 4983 days | 1% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 10/10 | 5265 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 8/10 | 5271 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 7/10 | 5277 days | 1% |
| Lotte Foged | 7/10 | 5292 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 8/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
| Johanna & Mark | 7/10 | 5613 days | 1% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
| Christoph & Maria | 9/10 | 5621 days | 1% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 5625 days | 1% |
| Anika Jedelsky | 8/10 | 5632 days | 1% |
| Omar Candon | 8/10 | 5632 days | 1% |
| Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 5651 days | 1% |
| Liz Dolman | 8/10 | 5654 days | 1% |
| Mieke Knoops | 8/10 | 6006 days | 1% |
| Josy | 9/10 | 6016 days | 1% |
| Ines Diana | 9/10 | 6023 days | 1% |
| carolineder | 7/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| billdee | 10/10 | 6208 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Trounson Kauri Park Campground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.