Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Trounson Kauri Park Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Trounson Kauri Park Campground
Valid Reviews
72 Valid Reviews
The Trounson Kauri Park Campground experience has a total of 74 reviews. There are 72 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 19 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground valid reviews is 84.17% and is based on 72 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
27 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 72 valid reviews, the experience has 27 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 27 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground face-to-face reviews is 87.04% and is based on 27 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
80.19%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Layna | 8/10 | 186 days | 89.79 | 100% | |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 247 days | 85.82 | 96% | |
| Charlie | 8/10 | 520 days | 54.29 | 60% | |
| Don Strachan | 9/10 | 551 days | 51.89 | 58% | |
| Coco B. | 3/10 | 643 days | 28.78 | 32% | |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 673 days | 31.56 | 35% | |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 734 days | 25.65 | 29% | |
| Teb | 7/10 | 735 days | 23.24 | 26% | |
| Nancy | 6/10 | 826 days | 13.67 | 15% | |
| Dominic Gould | 8/10 | 942 days | 8.27 | 9% | |
| Kendra Seamus Matilda and Oskar | 10/10 | 1029 days | 5.69 | 6% | |
| Eugenie Desforges | 9/10 | 1068 days | 5.12 | 6% | |
| Viola Cube | 7/10 | 1085 days | 4.56 | 5% | |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 1105 days | 4.98 | 6% | |
| Haley Everitt | 9/10 | 1144 days | 4.9 | 5% | |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 1219 days | 4.52 | 5% | |
| Maxine Fallot | 7/10 | 1317 days | 4.15 | 5% | |
| Diandra Buesen | 8/10 | 1376 days | 4.23 | 5% | |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 1433 days | 4.34 | 5% | |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 1522 days | 4.16 | 5% | |
| Sean Stevens | 10/10 | 1588 days | 4.04 | 4% | |
| Bill Milburn | 5/10 | 1619 days | 3.22 | 4% | |
| Tim De Boer | 7/10 | 1665 days | 3.53 | 4% | |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 1678 days | 3.86 | 4% | |
| Michelle Rushton | 8/10 | 1685 days | 3.65 | 4% | |
| Mabel Vanasperen | 7/10 | 1688 days | 3.49 | 4% | |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 1707 days | 3.8 | 4% | |
| Andrew Watts | 10/10 | 1718 days | 3.78 | 4% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1725 days | 3.58 | 4% | |
| Lionel C. | 8/10 | 1769 days | 3.5 | 4% | |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 1777 days | 3.67 | 4% | |
| Christine Slowiak | 9/10 | 1830 days | 3.56 | 4% | |
| E Kane | 8/10 | 1839 days | 3.37 | 4% | |
| Christoph | 10/10 | 1943 days |  |
3.34 | 4% |
| Sara Gonzalez | 9/10 | 1974 days | 3.28 | 4% | |
| Mike Merrick | 8/10 | 1983 days | 3.1 | 3% | |
| Celia Nowak | 10/10 | 1986 days | |
3.26 | 4% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 10/10 | 2019 days | 3.19 | 4% | |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 2072 days | 2.93 | 3% | |
| Sara Berton | 8/10 | 2327 days | |
2.46 | 3% |
| Elise Boinnot | 9/10 | 2345 days | |
2.55 | 3% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 10/10 | 2345 days | |
2.55 | 3% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 2375 days | |
2.5 | 3% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 2376 days | |
2.49 | 3% |
| kiwifamily2 | 10/10 | 2377 days | 2.49 | 3% | |
| David Wood | 7/10 | 2469 days | 2.1 | 2% | |
| Shantell Hunter | 7/10 | 2561 days | 1.94 | 2% | |
| Team Kim&James | 10/10 | 2561 days | 2.13 | 2% | |
| Sarah Horn | 10/10 | 2671 days | |
1.92 | 2% |
| Sebastian Russell-Smits | 10/10 | 2671 days | |
1.92 | 2% |
| Loesje | 7/10 | 2683 days | 1.72 | 2% | |
| lisa taylor | 8/10 | 2683 days | 1.8 | 2% | |
| Darren Abbott | 8/10 | 2766 days | |
1.64 | 2% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 2783 days | |
1.61 | 2% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 10/10 | 3048 days | 1.18 | 1% | |
| Daniel & Manuela | 8/10 | 3054 days | |
1.11 | 1% |
| Danielle | 7/10 | 3060 days | |
1.05 | 1% |
| Lotte Foged | 7/10 | 3075 days | |
1.02 | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 8/10 | 3077 days | 1.07 | 1% | |
| Johanna & Mark | 7/10 | 3396 days | |
0.45 | 1% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 3397 days | |
0.47 | 1% |
| Christoph & Maria | 9/10 | 3404 days | |
0.48 | 1% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 3408 days | |
0.47 | 1% |
| Anika Jedelsky | 8/10 | 3415 days | |
0.44 | 0% |
| Omar Candon | 8/10 | 3415 days | |
0.44 | 0% |
| Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 3434 days | |
0.42 | 0% |
| Liz Dolman | 8/10 | 3437 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Mieke Knoops | 8/10 | 3789 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Josy | 9/10 | 3799 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ines Diana | 9/10 | 3806 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| carolineder | 7/10 | 3869 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| billdee | 10/10 | 3991 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Trounson Kauri Park Campground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
80%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.