Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Trounson Kauri Park Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Trounson Kauri Park Campground
Valid Reviews
71 Valid Reviews
The Trounson Kauri Park Campground experience has a total of 73 reviews. There are 71 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 71 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 19 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 23 |
|
32% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.23% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground valid reviews is 84.23% and is based on 71 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
27 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 71 valid reviews, the experience has 27 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 27 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground face-to-face reviews is 87.04% and is based on 27 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
79.46%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine | 8/10 | 40 days | 94.76 | 100% | |
| Charlie | 8/10 | 313 days | 80.25 | 85% | |
| Don Strachan | 9/10 | 344 days | 81.25 | 86% | |
| Coco B. | 3/10 | 436 days | 53.81 | 57% | |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 466 days | 62.31 | 66% | |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 527 days | 55.99 | 59% | |
| Teb | 7/10 | 528 days | 50.8 | 54% | |
| Nancy | 6/10 | 619 days | 33.95 | 36% | |
| Dominic Gould | 8/10 | 735 days | 24.26 | 26% | |
| Kendra Seamus Matilda and Oskar | 10/10 | 822 days | 16.81 | 18% | |
| Eugenie Desforges | 9/10 | 861 days | 13.68 | 14% | |
| Viola Cube | 7/10 | 878 days | 11.34 | 12% | |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 898 days | 11.15 | 12% | |
| Haley Everitt | 9/10 | 937 days | 8.96 | 9% | |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 1012 days | 5.79 | 6% | |
| Maxine Fallot | 7/10 | 1110 days | 4.52 | 5% | |
| Diandra Buesen | 8/10 | 1169 days | 4.61 | 5% | |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 1226 days | 4.74 | 5% | |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 1315 days | 4.57 | 5% | |
| Sean Stevens | 10/10 | 1381 days | 4.44 | 5% | |
| Bill Milburn | 5/10 | 1412 days | 3.55 | 4% | |
| Tim De Boer | 7/10 | 1458 days | 3.9 | 4% | |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 1471 days | 4.26 | 5% | |
| Michelle Rushton | 8/10 | 1478 days | 4.04 | 4% | |
| Mabel Vanasperen | 7/10 | 1481 days | 3.86 | 4% | |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 1500 days | 4.21 | 4% | |
| Andrew Watts | 10/10 | 1511 days | 4.19 | 4% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1518 days | 3.96 | 4% | |
| Lionel C. | 8/10 | 1562 days | 3.88 | 4% | |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 1570 days | 4.07 | 4% | |
| Christine Slowiak | 9/10 | 1623 days | 3.97 | 4% | |
| E Kane | 8/10 | 1632 days | 3.75 | 4% | |
| Christoph | 10/10 | 1736 days |  |
3.75 | 4% |
| Sara Gonzalez | 9/10 | 1767 days | 3.68 | 4% | |
| Mike Merrick | 8/10 | 1776 days | 3.48 | 4% | |
| Celia Nowak | 10/10 | 1779 days | |
3.66 | 4% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 10/10 | 1812 days | 3.6 | 4% | |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 1865 days | 3.32 | 4% | |
| Sara Berton | 8/10 | 2120 days | |
2.84 | 3% |
| Elise Boinnot | 9/10 | 2138 days | |
2.96 | 3% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 10/10 | 2138 days | |
2.96 | 3% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 2168 days | |
2.9 | 3% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 2169 days | |
2.9 | 3% |
| kiwifamily2 | 10/10 | 2170 days | 2.9 | 3% | |
| David Wood | 7/10 | 2262 days | 2.47 | 3% | |
| Shantell Hunter | 7/10 | 2354 days | 2.31 | 2% | |
| Team Kim&James | 10/10 | 2354 days | 2.54 | 3% | |
| Sarah Horn | 10/10 | 2464 days | |
2.32 | 2% |
| Sebastian Russell-Smits | 10/10 | 2464 days | |
2.32 | 2% |
| Loesje | 7/10 | 2476 days | 2.09 | 2% | |
| lisa taylor | 8/10 | 2476 days | 2.18 | 2% | |
| Darren Abbott | 8/10 | 2559 days | |
2.03 | 2% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 2576 days | |
2.0 | 2% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 10/10 | 2841 days | 1.58 | 2% | |
| Daniel & Manuela | 8/10 | 2847 days | |
1.49 | 2% |
| Danielle | 7/10 | 2853 days | |
1.42 | 1% |
| Lotte Foged | 7/10 | 2868 days | |
1.39 | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 8/10 | 2870 days | 1.45 | 2% | |
| Johanna & Mark | 7/10 | 3189 days | |
0.82 | 1% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 3190 days | |
0.86 | 1% |
| Christoph & Maria | 9/10 | 3197 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 3201 days | |
0.88 | 1% |
| Anika Jedelsky | 8/10 | 3208 days | |
0.82 | 1% |
| Omar Candon | 8/10 | 3208 days | |
0.82 | 1% |
| Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 3227 days | |
0.83 | 1% |
| Liz Dolman | 8/10 | 3230 days | |
0.78 | 1% |
| Mieke Knoops | 8/10 | 3582 days | |
0.13 | 0% |
| Josy | 9/10 | 3592 days | |
0.11 | 0% |
| Ines Diana | 9/10 | 3599 days | |
0.1 | 0% |
| carolineder | 7/10 | 3662 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| billdee | 10/10 | 3784 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Trounson Kauri Park Campground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
79%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.