Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Trounson Kauri Park Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
92 Valid Reviews
The Trounson Kauri Park Campground experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 92 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 92 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.83% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground valid reviews is 82.83% and is based on 92 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
27 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 92 valid reviews, the experience has 27 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 27 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground face-to-face reviews is 87.04% and is based on 27 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.91%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stu | 10/10 | 160 days | 100% |
| Jan | 2/10 | 191 days | 45% |
| KL | 10/10 | 556 days | 84% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 587 days | 80% |
| Chris | 6/10 | 617 days | 68% |
| Natasha | 9/10 | 648 days | 76% |
| John Holschier | 10/10 | 648 days | 77% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 801 days | 64% |
| Matt | 10/10 | 831 days | 61% |
| AmericanToby | 10/10 | 831 days | 61% |
| Sietse | 9/10 | 922 days | 52% |
| Kelly | 7/10 | 1014 days | 40% |
| Lucas | 8/10 | 1014 days | 42% |
| Mike | 5/10 | 1379 days | 12% |
| Stefanie | 8/10 | 1440 days | 13% |
| Leet | 9/10 | 1471 days | 12% |
| Henk | 6/10 | 1621 days | 6% |
| Steph and Denise | 10/10 | 1713 days | 6% |
| Mrs H | 5/10 | 2048 days | 3% |
| Mrs H | 5/10 | 2048 days | 3% |
| Layna | 8/10 | 2383 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2444 days | 4% |
| Charlie | 8/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| Don Strachan | 9/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
| Coco B. | 3/10 | 2840 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 2870 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2931 days | 3% |
| Teb | 7/10 | 2932 days | 2% |
| Nancy | 6/10 | 3023 days | 2% |
| Dominic Gould | 8/10 | 3139 days | 2% |
| Kendra Seamus Matilda and Oskar | 10/10 | 3226 days | 2% |
| Eugenie Desforges | 9/10 | 3265 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 7/10 | 3282 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
| Haley Everitt | 9/10 | 3341 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3416 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 7/10 | 3514 days | 1% |
| Diandra Buesen | 8/10 | 3573 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3630 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3719 days | 1% |
| Sean Stevens | 10/10 | 3785 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 5/10 | 3816 days | 1% |
| Tim De Boer | 7/10 | 3862 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3875 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 8/10 | 3882 days | 1% |
| Mabel Vanasperen | 7/10 | 3885 days | 1% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 3904 days | 1% |
| Andrew Watts | 10/10 | 3915 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 3922 days | 1% |
| Lionel C. | 8/10 | 3966 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3974 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 9/10 | 4027 days | 0% |
| E Kane | 8/10 | 4036 days | 0% |
| Christoph | 10/10 | 4140 days | 0% |
| Sara Gonzalez | 9/10 | 4171 days | 0% |
| Mike Merrick | 8/10 | 4180 days | 0% |
| Celia Nowak | 10/10 | 4183 days | 0% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 10/10 | 4216 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4269 days | 0% |
| Sara Berton | 8/10 | 4524 days | 1% |
| Elise Boinnot | 9/10 | 4542 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 10/10 | 4542 days | 1% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 4572 days | 1% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 4573 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 10/10 | 4574 days | 1% |
| David Wood | 7/10 | 4666 days | 1% |
| Shantell Hunter | 7/10 | 4758 days | 1% |
| Team Kim&James | 10/10 | 4758 days | 1% |
| Sarah Horn | 10/10 | 4868 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Russell-Smits | 10/10 | 4868 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 7/10 | 4880 days | 1% |
| lisa taylor | 8/10 | 4880 days | 1% |
| Darren Abbott | 8/10 | 4963 days | 1% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 4980 days | 1% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 10/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 8/10 | 5251 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 7/10 | 5257 days | 1% |
| Lotte Foged | 7/10 | 5272 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 8/10 | 5274 days | 1% |
| Johanna & Mark | 7/10 | 5593 days | 1% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5594 days | 1% |
| Christoph & Maria | 9/10 | 5601 days | 1% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
| Anika Jedelsky | 8/10 | 5612 days | 1% |
| Omar Candon | 8/10 | 5612 days | 1% |
| Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
| Liz Dolman | 8/10 | 5634 days | 1% |
| Mieke Knoops | 8/10 | 5986 days | 1% |
| Josy | 9/10 | 5996 days | 1% |
| Ines Diana | 9/10 | 6003 days | 1% |
| carolineder | 7/10 | 6066 days | 1% |
| billdee | 10/10 | 6188 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Trounson Kauri Park Campground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.