Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Trounson Kauri Park Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Trounson Kauri Park Campground
Valid Reviews
92 Valid Reviews
The Trounson Kauri Park Campground experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 92 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 92 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.83% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground valid reviews is 82.83% and is based on 92 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
27 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 92 valid reviews, the experience has 27 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 27 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Trounson Kauri Park Campground face-to-face reviews is 87.04% and is based on 27 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
84.92%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stu | 10/10 | 59 days | 100% |
| Jan | 2/10 | 90 days | 45% |
| KL | 10/10 | 455 days | 88% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 486 days | 85% |
| Chris | 6/10 | 516 days | 73% |
| Natasha | 9/10 | 547 days | 82% |
| John Holschier | 10/10 | 547 days | 83% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 700 days | 71% |
| Matt | 10/10 | 730 days | 70% |
| AmericanToby | 10/10 | 730 days | 70% |
| Sietse | 9/10 | 821 days | 61% |
| Kelly | 7/10 | 913 days | 49% |
| Lucas | 8/10 | 913 days | 51% |
| Mike | 5/10 | 1278 days | 17% |
| Stefanie | 8/10 | 1339 days | 18% |
| Leet | 9/10 | 1370 days | 16% |
| Henk | 6/10 | 1520 days | 9% |
| Steph and Denise | 10/10 | 1612 days | 7% |
| Mrs H | 5/10 | 1947 days | 3% |
| Mrs H | 5/10 | 1947 days | 3% |
| Layna | 8/10 | 2282 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2343 days | 4% |
| Charlie | 8/10 | 2616 days | 3% |
| Don Strachan | 9/10 | 2647 days | 3% |
| Coco B. | 3/10 | 2739 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 2769 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2831 days | 3% |
| Teb | 7/10 | 2831 days | 2% |
| Nancy | 6/10 | 2922 days | 2% |
| Dominic Gould | 8/10 | 3038 days | 2% |
| Kendra Seamus Matilda and Oskar | 10/10 | 3125 days | 2% |
| Eugenie Desforges | 9/10 | 3164 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 7/10 | 3181 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
| Haley Everitt | 9/10 | 3240 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 7/10 | 3413 days | 1% |
| Diandra Buesen | 8/10 | 3472 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3530 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3618 days | 1% |
| Sean Stevens | 10/10 | 3684 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 5/10 | 3715 days | 1% |
| Tim De Boer | 7/10 | 3761 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3774 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 8/10 | 3781 days | 1% |
| Mabel Vanasperen | 7/10 | 3784 days | 1% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 3804 days | 1% |
| Andrew Watts | 10/10 | 3814 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 3821 days | 1% |
| Lionel C. | 8/10 | 3865 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3873 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 9/10 | 3926 days | 0% |
| E Kane | 8/10 | 3935 days | 0% |
| Christoph | 10/10 | 4039 days | 0% |
| Sara Gonzalez | 9/10 | 4070 days | 0% |
| Mike Merrick | 8/10 | 4079 days | 0% |
| Celia Nowak | 10/10 | 4082 days | 0% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 10/10 | 4115 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4169 days | 0% |
| Sara Berton | 8/10 | 4423 days | 0% |
| Elise Boinnot | 9/10 | 4441 days | 0% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 10/10 | 4441 days | 0% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 4471 days | 0% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 4472 days | 0% |
| kiwifamily2 | 10/10 | 4473 days | 1% |
| David Wood | 7/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| Shantell Hunter | 7/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
| Team Kim&James | 10/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
| Sarah Horn | 10/10 | 4767 days | 0% |
| Sebastian Russell-Smits | 10/10 | 4767 days | 0% |
| Loesje | 7/10 | 4779 days | 1% |
| lisa taylor | 8/10 | 4779 days | 1% |
| Darren Abbott | 8/10 | 4862 days | 0% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 4879 days | 0% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 10/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 8/10 | 5150 days | 0% |
| Danielle | 7/10 | 5156 days | 0% |
| Lotte Foged | 7/10 | 5171 days | 0% |
| Mike1952 | 8/10 | 5173 days | 1% |
| Johanna & Mark | 7/10 | 5492 days | 0% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5493 days | 0% |
| Christoph & Maria | 9/10 | 5500 days | 0% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 5504 days | 0% |
| Anika Jedelsky | 8/10 | 5511 days | 0% |
| Omar Candon | 8/10 | 5511 days | 0% |
| Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 5530 days | 0% |
| Liz Dolman | 8/10 | 5533 days | 0% |
| Mieke Knoops | 8/10 | 5885 days | 0% |
| Josy | 9/10 | 5895 days | 0% |
| Ines Diana | 9/10 | 5902 days | 0% |
| carolineder | 7/10 | 5965 days | 0% |
| billdee | 10/10 | 6087 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Trounson Kauri Park Campground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.