Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Glowworm Caves.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Te Anau Glowworm Caves

Valid Reviews

190 Valid Reviews

The Te Anau Glowworm Caves experience has a total of 191 reviews. There are 190 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 190 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 49
26%
9/10 43
23%
8/10 41
22%
7/10 34
18%
6/10 9
5%
5/10 8
4%
4/10 5
3%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

82.05% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Glowworm Caves valid reviews is 82.05% and is based on 190 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

176 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 190 valid reviews, the experience has 176 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 45
26%
9/10 39
22%
8/10 38
22%
7/10 34
19%
6/10 8
5%
5/10 8
5%
4/10 3
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

82.10% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Glowworm Caves face-to-face reviews is 82.10% and is based on 176 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

83.67%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Dorothy and Graham Glen 9/10 2968 days 100%
Dan Coates 9/10 3201 days 83%
Dominik 9/10 3201 days 83%
Holloway 10/10 3224 days 82%
Christina 6/10 3292 days 67%
Barbara Knops 9/10 3294 days 77%
Manu Liberta 10/10 3304 days 77%
Bruno 9/10 3314 days 75%
Kirsty Smith 10/10 3337 days 74%
Sophia Satter 8/10 3348 days 72%
Afiya Levy 10/10 3569 days 57%
Johannes Eisel 6/10 3578 days 49%
Alexander Mattea 5/10 3578 days 43%
Timea Bagosi 9/10 3581 days 56%
Riviere 8/10 3592 days 55%
Dani 8/10 3594 days 55%
Benoit Leclerc 7/10 3596 days 52%
Anna Stoehr 10/10 3614 days 54%
Kai Krchmar 6/10 3667 days 43%
Kristina Farkas 5/10 3962 days 22%
Sophia Kadel 10/10 3992 days 27%
Laura and Marie 7/10 3998 days 24%
Rachel S 10/10 4006 days 26%
Joris Giullemot 8/10 4314 days 3%
Laura Metz 7/10 4325 days 2%
Hubertus Thost 7/10 4325 days 2%
Amanda 4/10 4340 days 1%
S B 10/10 4353 days 1%
M K 10/10 4353 days 1%
Maya Bakker-deDreu 8/10 4361 days 0%
Christin Woelk 9/10 4641 days 35%
Maria Klister 7/10 4661 days 33%
Lydia Kleinkoenen 9/10 4681 days 35%
Jessica Grewe 9/10 4681 days 35%
Hannah Lia-Isis Kubillus 9/10 4681 days 35%
Jan Zimmerman 8/10 4692 days 35%
Margaret and Derek McNeil 10/10 4752 days 36%
Frank and Suzanne 8/10 4767 days 35%
RollingMoon 8/10 4828 days 35%
Marcel & Kim Meichtry 7/10 5048 days 33%
Howell Davies 5/10 5051 days 27%
Baas 7/10 5051 days 33%
Pete & Pat Etheridge 8/10 5051 days 35%
Siegfried Richter 7/10 5052 days 33%
Melanie Mathiak 10/10 5054 days 36%
Sig Schrattner 8/10 5054 days 35%
Rebecca Doehl 7/10 5055 days 33%
Seth & Carla 7/10 5056 days 33%
Gabriele Wendt 9/10 5056 days 35%
Tadej Ferjan 8/10 5056 days 35%
Mary Mitchell 10/10 5056 days 36%
Emily Wikston 9/10 5057 days 35%
Andreas & Leonie Fehr 10/10 5063 days 36%
Horst Langstein 9/10 5064 days 35%
Marco Scheiber 9/10 5065 days 35%
Friedrich Kaltner 10/10 5067 days 36%
Frank & Julia 10/10 5070 days 36%
Thyg Lingdal 10/10 5070 days 36%
Nicole van Bergen 8/10 5070 days 35%
Mike & April Prince 7/10 5084 days 33%
Alfred & Henrike 8/10 5096 days 35%
Lyn Stainton 6/10 5145 days 31%
Ken Talan 10/10 5373 days 36%
Jon_and_Family 9/10 5377 days 35%
Gertz 10/10 5381 days 36%
Katarina Bokor 8/10 5385 days 35%
Mark Franklin 6/10 5385 days 31%
Gordon Agent 10/10 5385 days 36%
Maureen Hardy 8/10 5385 days 35%
AJ van Pelt 8/10 5385 days 35%
Werner and Rita 9/10 5392 days 35%
Richard Dudfield 10/10 5394 days 36%
Sayaka 7/10 5394 days 33%
Urs and Isabella 7/10 5395 days 33%
Juliane Kleiu 10/10 5398 days 36%
Linda Kremer 9/10 5399 days 35%
Rebecca Johnston 9/10 5399 days 35%
David Mellard 10/10 5400 days 36%
Bruce & Elaine Chote 10/10 5400 days 36%
Paul Nickson 8/10 5400 days 35%
Monique 8/10 5400 days 35%
Beat & Connie 10/10 5402 days 36%
Alex Stil 9/10 5402 days 35%
Pein van Nosrt 7/10 5407 days 33%
Raith 9/10 5407 days 35%
Elise van Haastert 8/10 5407 days 35%
Claudia 10/10 5409 days 36%
Carolin Ranner 6/10 5409 days 31%
Winskowsky 9/10 5410 days 35%
Hvid 9/10 5424 days 35%
Judith K. 6/10 5426 days 31%
Ruben and Jetske 7/10 5426 days 33%
Roy Seymour 9/10 5427 days 35%
Tom Hill 10/10 5431 days 36%
Ruua Reyrink 7/10 5432 days 33%
Patrick Hugener 9/10 5432 days 35%
JohnHaestad 4/10 5436 days 23%
dollimyxture 10/10 5467 days 36%
aggiemary04 10/10 5559 days 36%
victoriauk 4/10 5681 days 23%
Baumgarten 8/10 5709 days 35%
travelbunnyadventures 8/10 5712 days 35%
Don & Geraldine 10/10 5748 days 36%
Matthias & Ceristiane 8/10 5760 days 35%
Hilary and Chris Ayton 9/10 5761 days 35%
Lis & Rob Tate 9/10 5763 days 35%
ccthornton100 10/10 5773 days 36%
Bob Kusesia 10/10 5774 days 36%
Yssel de Schepper 7/10 5779 days 33%
Janny Meerdinnk Veldboow 7/10 5779 days 33%
Arie Ascher 9/10 5780 days 35%
Wolfgang Engelke 10/10 5782 days 36%
Thomas K 9/10 5782 days 35%
Loleit 7/10 5794 days 33%
Mattias Thorm 9/10 5795 days 35%
Vincente Garrido 4/10 5796 days 23%
R Gilge 10/10 5797 days 36%
Erik Hummelmose 8/10 5797 days 35%
Ian E 6/10 5797 days 31%
Nadine Schaee 9/10 5798 days 35%
Belinda Godhard 2/10 5798 days 16%
Uwe Rieper 10/10 5800 days 36%
E.M. Prideaux 10/10 5815 days 36%
Elizabeth E 8/10 5817 days 35%
Stevens Frans 8/10 5818 days 35%
Heinrich Hax 9/10 5821 days 35%
tanh 7/10 5848 days 33%
Stephanie Steiner 8/10 5867 days 35%
Julia May 9/10 5874 days 35%
X Neils 7/10 5885 days 33%
Sarah Smith 5/10 5889 days 27%
Anna 6/10 5893 days 31%
OliverG1 7/10 6095 days 33%
Philipp 5/10 6107 days 27%
JasminA 5/10 6107 days 27%
ChristinaV 8/10 6117 days 35%
JuergenSchnitzer 9/10 6123 days 35%
AstridVG 7/10 6123 days 33%
NatasjaV 7/10 6125 days 33%
JimmyK 7/10 6125 days 33%
MarcoJ 9/10 6127 days 35%
LucyPoland 9/10 6128 days 35%
Stolz 7/10 6131 days 33%
BrzezinskaM 10/10 6132 days 36%
AndreB 10/10 6132 days 36%
Linda 7/10 6139 days 33%
Susan 8/10 6139 days 35%
Byleveld 7/10 6140 days 33%
JoseB 8/10 6141 days 35%
JetteG 10/10 6141 days 36%
CarolF 7/10 6142 days 33%
Rachel 9/10 6156 days 35%
Claire 7/10 6156 days 33%
Denise 8/10 6158 days 35%
Denk 8/10 6169 days 35%
Klalis 10/10 6172 days 36%
Thomas 4/10 6175 days 23%
Mike 5/10 6176 days 27%
Debbie Mossman 9/10 6182 days 35%
Johann 10/10 6184 days 36%
Carina 10/10 6186 days 36%
Mat 8/10 6224 days 35%
Anette 7/10 6226 days 33%
midlands_missus 8/10 6229 days 35%
David 7/10 6285 days 33%
Suyin 10/10 6305 days 36%
Franz 10/10 6478 days 36%
Jennifer Baulch 7/10 6483 days 33%
George Jeffs 10/10 6486 days 36%
Jacob 9/10 6490 days 35%
Aharon 10/10 6505 days 36%
D.A. Mulder 8/10 6506 days 35%
Knol 8/10 6508 days 35%
Cole Penelope 8/10 6511 days 35%
Jody 7/10 6519 days 33%
Anna 5/10 6519 days 27%
Pauline Thai 8/10 6526 days 35%
Dan Adamson 8/10 6526 days 35%
Stephen Brightman 8/10 6535 days 35%
Madeleine Rowland 8/10 6535 days 35%
Bronwyn Gaby 9/10 6553 days 35%
Free_ride 9/10 6569 days 35%
Michael 9/10 6592 days 35%
Raul 10/10 6842 days 36%
TeamFlorida 9/10 6844 days 35%
TeamFlorida 8/10 6844 days 35%
James 9/10 6857 days 35%
Rudi 10/10 6861 days 36%
Rolf Kruger 10/10 6885 days 36%
Brian 10/10 6889 days 36%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Glowworm Caves experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.04% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Te Anau Glowworm Caves experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Te Anau Glowworm Caves experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.98%
198 -4.00%
199 -4.02%
200 -4.04%
201 -4.06%
202 -4.08%
203 -4.10%

Balancing Adjustment

3.10% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

83%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.