Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Glowworm Caves.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Te Anau Glowworm Caves

Valid Reviews

190 Valid Reviews

The Te Anau Glowworm Caves experience has a total of 191 reviews. There are 190 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 190 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 49
26%
9/10 43
23%
8/10 41
22%
7/10 34
18%
6/10 9
5%
5/10 8
4%
4/10 5
3%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

82.05% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Glowworm Caves valid reviews is 82.05% and is based on 190 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

176 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 190 valid reviews, the experience has 176 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 45
26%
9/10 39
22%
8/10 38
22%
7/10 34
19%
6/10 8
5%
5/10 8
5%
4/10 3
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

82.10% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Glowworm Caves face-to-face reviews is 82.10% and is based on 176 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

83.67%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Dorothy and Graham Glen 9/10 2963 days 100%
Dan Coates 9/10 3196 days 83%
Dominik 9/10 3196 days 83%
Holloway 10/10 3219 days 82%
Christina 6/10 3287 days 67%
Barbara Knops 9/10 3289 days 77%
Manu Liberta 10/10 3299 days 77%
Bruno 9/10 3309 days 75%
Kirsty Smith 10/10 3332 days 74%
Sophia Satter 8/10 3343 days 72%
Afiya Levy 10/10 3564 days 57%
Johannes Eisel 6/10 3573 days 49%
Alexander Mattea 5/10 3573 days 43%
Timea Bagosi 9/10 3576 days 56%
Riviere 8/10 3587 days 55%
Dani 8/10 3589 days 55%
Benoit Leclerc 7/10 3591 days 52%
Anna Stoehr 10/10 3609 days 54%
Kai Krchmar 6/10 3662 days 43%
Kristina Farkas 5/10 3957 days 22%
Sophia Kadel 10/10 3987 days 27%
Laura and Marie 7/10 3993 days 24%
Rachel S 10/10 4001 days 26%
Joris Giullemot 8/10 4309 days 3%
Laura Metz 7/10 4320 days 2%
Hubertus Thost 7/10 4320 days 2%
Amanda 4/10 4335 days 0%
S B 10/10 4348 days 1%
M K 10/10 4348 days 1%
Maya Bakker-deDreu 8/10 4356 days 0%
Christin Woelk 9/10 4636 days 35%
Maria Klister 7/10 4656 days 33%
Lydia Kleinkoenen 9/10 4676 days 35%
Jessica Grewe 9/10 4676 days 35%
Hannah Lia-Isis Kubillus 9/10 4676 days 35%
Jan Zimmerman 8/10 4687 days 35%
Margaret and Derek McNeil 10/10 4747 days 35%
Frank and Suzanne 8/10 4762 days 35%
RollingMoon 8/10 4823 days 35%
Marcel & Kim Meichtry 7/10 5043 days 33%
Howell Davies 5/10 5046 days 27%
Baas 7/10 5046 days 33%
Pete & Pat Etheridge 8/10 5046 days 35%
Siegfried Richter 7/10 5047 days 33%
Melanie Mathiak 10/10 5049 days 35%
Sig Schrattner 8/10 5049 days 35%
Rebecca Doehl 7/10 5050 days 33%
Seth & Carla 7/10 5051 days 33%
Gabriele Wendt 9/10 5051 days 35%
Tadej Ferjan 8/10 5051 days 35%
Mary Mitchell 10/10 5051 days 35%
Emily Wikston 9/10 5052 days 35%
Andreas & Leonie Fehr 10/10 5058 days 35%
Horst Langstein 9/10 5059 days 35%
Marco Scheiber 9/10 5060 days 35%
Friedrich Kaltner 10/10 5062 days 35%
Frank & Julia 10/10 5065 days 35%
Thyg Lingdal 10/10 5065 days 35%
Nicole van Bergen 8/10 5065 days 35%
Mike & April Prince 7/10 5079 days 33%
Alfred & Henrike 8/10 5091 days 35%
Lyn Stainton 6/10 5140 days 30%
Ken Talan 10/10 5368 days 35%
Jon_and_Family 9/10 5372 days 35%
Gertz 10/10 5376 days 35%
Katarina Bokor 8/10 5380 days 35%
Mark Franklin 6/10 5380 days 30%
Gordon Agent 10/10 5380 days 35%
Maureen Hardy 8/10 5380 days 35%
AJ van Pelt 8/10 5380 days 35%
Werner and Rita 9/10 5387 days 35%
Richard Dudfield 10/10 5389 days 35%
Sayaka 7/10 5389 days 33%
Urs and Isabella 7/10 5390 days 33%
Juliane Kleiu 10/10 5393 days 35%
Linda Kremer 9/10 5394 days 35%
Rebecca Johnston 9/10 5394 days 35%
David Mellard 10/10 5395 days 35%
Bruce & Elaine Chote 10/10 5395 days 35%
Paul Nickson 8/10 5395 days 35%
Monique 8/10 5395 days 35%
Beat & Connie 10/10 5397 days 35%
Alex Stil 9/10 5397 days 35%
Pein van Nosrt 7/10 5402 days 33%
Raith 9/10 5402 days 35%
Elise van Haastert 8/10 5402 days 35%
Claudia 10/10 5404 days 35%
Carolin Ranner 6/10 5404 days 30%
Winskowsky 9/10 5405 days 35%
Hvid 9/10 5419 days 35%
Judith K. 6/10 5421 days 30%
Ruben and Jetske 7/10 5421 days 33%
Roy Seymour 9/10 5422 days 35%
Tom Hill 10/10 5426 days 35%
Ruua Reyrink 7/10 5427 days 33%
Patrick Hugener 9/10 5427 days 35%
JohnHaestad 4/10 5431 days 23%
dollimyxture 10/10 5462 days 35%
aggiemary04 10/10 5554 days 35%
victoriauk 4/10 5676 days 23%
Baumgarten 8/10 5704 days 35%
travelbunnyadventures 8/10 5707 days 35%
Don & Geraldine 10/10 5743 days 35%
Matthias & Ceristiane 8/10 5755 days 35%
Hilary and Chris Ayton 9/10 5756 days 35%
Lis & Rob Tate 9/10 5758 days 35%
ccthornton100 10/10 5768 days 35%
Bob Kusesia 10/10 5769 days 35%
Yssel de Schepper 7/10 5774 days 33%
Janny Meerdinnk Veldboow 7/10 5774 days 33%
Arie Ascher 9/10 5775 days 35%
Wolfgang Engelke 10/10 5777 days 35%
Thomas K 9/10 5777 days 35%
Loleit 7/10 5789 days 33%
Mattias Thorm 9/10 5790 days 35%
Vincente Garrido 4/10 5791 days 23%
R Gilge 10/10 5792 days 35%
Erik Hummelmose 8/10 5792 days 35%
Ian E 6/10 5792 days 30%
Nadine Schaee 9/10 5793 days 35%
Belinda Godhard 2/10 5793 days 15%
Uwe Rieper 10/10 5795 days 35%
E.M. Prideaux 10/10 5810 days 35%
Elizabeth E 8/10 5812 days 35%
Stevens Frans 8/10 5813 days 35%
Heinrich Hax 9/10 5816 days 35%
tanh 7/10 5843 days 33%
Stephanie Steiner 8/10 5862 days 35%
Julia May 9/10 5869 days 35%
X Neils 7/10 5880 days 33%
Sarah Smith 5/10 5884 days 27%
Anna 6/10 5888 days 30%
OliverG1 7/10 6090 days 33%
Philipp 5/10 6102 days 27%
JasminA 5/10 6102 days 27%
ChristinaV 8/10 6112 days 35%
JuergenSchnitzer 9/10 6118 days 35%
AstridVG 7/10 6119 days 33%
NatasjaV 7/10 6120 days 33%
JimmyK 7/10 6120 days 33%
MarcoJ 9/10 6122 days 35%
LucyPoland 9/10 6123 days 35%
Stolz 7/10 6126 days 33%
BrzezinskaM 10/10 6127 days 35%
AndreB 10/10 6127 days 35%
Linda 7/10 6134 days 33%
Susan 8/10 6135 days 35%
Byleveld 7/10 6135 days 33%
JoseB 8/10 6136 days 35%
JetteG 10/10 6136 days 35%
CarolF 7/10 6137 days 33%
Rachel 9/10 6152 days 35%
Claire 7/10 6152 days 33%
Denise 8/10 6153 days 35%
Denk 8/10 6165 days 35%
Klalis 10/10 6167 days 35%
Thomas 4/10 6171 days 23%
Mike 5/10 6172 days 27%
Debbie Mossman 9/10 6177 days 35%
Johann 10/10 6179 days 35%
Carina 10/10 6181 days 35%
Mat 8/10 6220 days 35%
Anette 7/10 6222 days 33%
midlands_missus 8/10 6224 days 35%
David 7/10 6280 days 33%
Suyin 10/10 6300 days 35%
Franz 10/10 6473 days 35%
Jennifer Baulch 7/10 6478 days 33%
George Jeffs 10/10 6481 days 35%
Jacob 9/10 6485 days 35%
Aharon 10/10 6500 days 35%
D.A. Mulder 8/10 6501 days 35%
Knol 8/10 6503 days 35%
Cole Penelope 8/10 6506 days 35%
Jody 7/10 6514 days 33%
Anna 5/10 6514 days 27%
Pauline Thai 8/10 6521 days 35%
Dan Adamson 8/10 6521 days 35%
Stephen Brightman 8/10 6530 days 35%
Madeleine Rowland 8/10 6530 days 35%
Bronwyn Gaby 9/10 6548 days 35%
Free_ride 9/10 6564 days 35%
Michael 9/10 6587 days 35%
Raul 10/10 6837 days 35%
TeamFlorida 9/10 6839 days 35%
TeamFlorida 8/10 6839 days 35%
James 9/10 6852 days 35%
Rudi 10/10 6856 days 35%
Rolf Kruger 10/10 6880 days 35%
Brian 10/10 6884 days 35%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Glowworm Caves experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.06% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Te Anau Glowworm Caves experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Te Anau Glowworm Caves experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.00%
198 -4.02%
199 -4.04%
200 -4.06%
201 -4.08%
202 -4.10%
203 -4.12%

Balancing Adjustment

3.11% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

83%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.