Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Port Jackson Campsite.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Port Jackson Campsite

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Port Jackson Campsite experience has a total of 54 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 29
54%
9/10 19
35%
8/10 6
11%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

94.26% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Port Jackson Campsite valid reviews is 94.26% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

22 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 22 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 22 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 8
36%
9/10 12
55%
8/10 2
9%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.73% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Port Jackson Campsite face-to-face reviews is 92.73% and is based on 22 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

96.75%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Jacob 10/10 71 days 100%
Rachel Dawn 10/10 99 days 100%
Jane 10/10 526 days 84%
Christopher 10/10 617 days 78%
Beth 8/10 801 days 62%
Rokki Bud 10/10 1287 days 21%
Jacob Carrapetta 10/10 1348 days 18%
Nicky 8/10 1591 days 8%
Hannah 10/10 1713 days 5%
Alex 10/10 1775 days 5%
Jenni 9/10 2017 days 4%
Gareth 10/10 2322 days 4%
Bert 9/10 2353 days 4%
Sheryll 10/10 2628 days 3%
Ashleigh 10/10 2656 days 3%
Krishna Ponguru 10/10 2779 days 3%
Michael Smith 9/10 3176 days 2%
Fabio Flepp 10/10 3364 days 2%
Paul Smith 8/10 3380 days 2%
Claire Buckham 10/10 3386 days 2%
James Oakes 10/10 3398 days 2%
Sarah Stone 9/10 3441 days 1%
Rima 9/10 3478 days 1%
Patrick Baritz 10/10 3758 days 1%
Dave O'Brien 9/10 3760 days 1%
Michael 10/10 3848 days 1%
Camille Guevel 10/10 4079 days 0%
Hans Munster 10/10 4093 days 0%
Matthias Bohmert 9/10 4115 days 0%
Jurgen Moors 10/10 4183 days 0%
James Russell 9/10 4430 days 1%
Hannah Watt 10/10 4430 days 1%
Mark Hofmann 9/10 4460 days 1%
Steven Lotrian 10/10 4468 days 1%
Clarissa Krote 10/10 4494 days 1%
Lane 10/10 4513 days 1%
sharyn wright 8/10 4544 days 1%
GN100 10/10 4544 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 9/10 4788 days 1%
Nigel Shaw 10/10 4788 days 1%
Menu 9/10 4809 days 1%
Kathy Arthurs 8/10 4819 days 1%
Fabian Brand 9/10 4840 days 1%
Nora and Edward 9/10 4842 days 1%
Markus Frei 8/10 5170 days 1%
Jessica Marling 9/10 5193 days 1%
Mike & Suzann 9/10 5195 days 1%
Kaelin 10/10 5289 days 1%
Harald Schmidt 10/10 5535 days 1%
Sophie 9/10 5578 days 1%
Brent S 9/10 5909 days 1%
olafrick 9/10 5943 days 1%
Johannes & Jopke Fokkema 9/10 6269 days 1%
Lars 10/10 6292 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Port Jackson Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.27% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

97%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.