Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taranaki Falls.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Taranaki Falls
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The Taranaki Falls experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls valid reviews is 86.77% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
61 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 61 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 21 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls face-to-face reviews is 86.39% and is based on 61 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.94%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dee Greig-Dunn | 9/10 | 787 days | 100% |
| Linnea Sahlberg | 10/10 | 1196 days | 24% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 1455 days | 21% |
| Julia Achatz | 7/10 | 1457 days | 19% |
| Markus Wagner | 9/10 | 1457 days | 21% |
| Katharina Gans | 9/10 | 1465 days | 21% |
| Benedikt Lorenz | 10/10 | 1467 days | 21% |
| Jonas Neumann | 9/10 | 1470 days | 21% |
| Theresa Flach | 10/10 | 1470 days | 21% |
| Daniela Hintermayr | 7/10 | 1471 days | 19% |
| Thomas Klinting | 6/10 | 1471 days | 18% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 8/10 | 1505 days | 20% |
| Tom Rogers | 7/10 | 1519 days | 19% |
| Ulf | 10/10 | 1531 days | 21% |
| Jack Robinson | 10/10 | 1542 days | 21% |
| Robert Elzinga | 8/10 | 1772 days | 17% |
| David Schelensky | 10/10 | 1821 days | 18% |
| Ruven Rintelmann | 9/10 | 1822 days | 18% |
| Daniel Roedel | 8/10 | 1830 days | 17% |
| Catherine Schlachter | 9/10 | 2498 days | 11% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 2498 days | 11% |
| Casandra Prunica | 9/10 | 2525 days | 11% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 2525 days | 10% |
| Anton Thisted | 7/10 | 2855 days | 7% |
| Chantal Mortel | 8/10 | 2893 days | 7% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 2960 days | 7% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 2960 days | 7% |
| Brigitte | 9/10 | 2966 days | 7% |
| Ron | 8/10 | 2982 days | 6% |
| Laurits and Bettina | 9/10 | 2985 days | 6% |
| Kerstin | 9/10 | 2993 days | 6% |
| Helmut Schmid | 9/10 | 3247 days | 4% |
| Melinda Moir | 9/10 | 3259 days | 4% |
| Lars | 8/10 | 3262 days | 4% |
| Lotte Foged | 9/10 | 3280 days | 4% |
| Dean | 8/10 | 3328 days | 3% |
| Lisa Beutler | 10/10 | 3333 days | 3% |
| Barry Dunster | 10/10 | 3344 days | 3% |
| Rudy Witt | 8/10 | 3360 days | 3% |
| Tina | 9/10 | 3374 days | 3% |
| Ralph & Marloes Meyers | 9/10 | 3587 days | 1% |
| Wheeler | 10/10 | 3608 days | 0% |
| Michael Orme | 7/10 | 3609 days | 0% |
| Tim | 9/10 | 3609 days | 0% |
| Tina Baun | 8/10 | 3611 days | 0% |
| Erica Moorhouse | 8/10 | 3624 days | 0% |
| Dennis & Claudia | 8/10 | 3639 days | 0% |
| Florian | 7/10 | 3640 days | 0% |
| D Oostrum | 9/10 | 3642 days | 0% |
| Mike Peirce | 9/10 | 3978 days | 5% |
| Cecile | 10/10 | 3987 days | 5% |
| Jannievan Osnabrugge | 7/10 | 3994 days | 4% |
| Lousie Hug | 7/10 | 3998 days | 4% |
| Schubert, Wolfgang & Claudia | 8/10 | 4017 days | 5% |
| ilkal | 8/10 | 4060 days | 5% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 4063 days | 5% |
| usigmund | 8/10 | 4063 days | 5% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 4078 days | 5% |
| Bue Verrept | 8/10 | 4081 days | 5% |
| Monika Wenzel | 10/10 | 4082 days | 5% |
| Louis Duhaime | 9/10 | 4085 days | 5% |
| Jeanette Larsen | 9/10 | 4086 days | 5% |
| johannac | 8/10 | 4193 days | 5% |
| BVanW | 9/10 | 4310 days | 5% |
| Ralph Boese | 10/10 | 4338 days | 5% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Taranaki Falls does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.