Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taranaki Falls.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Taranaki Falls
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The Taranaki Falls experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls valid reviews is 86.77% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
61 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 61 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 21 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls face-to-face reviews is 86.39% and is based on 61 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.43%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dee Greig-Dunn | 9/10 | 967 days | 100% |
| Linnea Sahlberg | 10/10 | 1376 days | 58% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 1635 days | 51% |
| Julia Achatz | 7/10 | 1637 days | 46% |
| Markus Wagner | 9/10 | 1637 days | 51% |
| Katharina Gans | 9/10 | 1645 days | 50% |
| Benedikt Lorenz | 10/10 | 1647 days | 50% |
| Jonas Neumann | 9/10 | 1650 days | 50% |
| Theresa Flach | 10/10 | 1650 days | 50% |
| Daniela Hintermayr | 7/10 | 1651 days | 46% |
| Thomas Klinting | 6/10 | 1651 days | 41% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 8/10 | 1685 days | 47% |
| Tom Rogers | 7/10 | 1699 days | 44% |
| Ulf | 10/10 | 1711 days | 49% |
| Jack Robinson | 10/10 | 1722 days | 48% |
| Robert Elzinga | 8/10 | 1952 days | 40% |
| David Schelensky | 10/10 | 2001 days | 41% |
| Ruven Rintelmann | 9/10 | 2002 days | 41% |
| Daniel Roedel | 8/10 | 2010 days | 39% |
| Catherine Schlachter | 9/10 | 2678 days | 23% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 2678 days | 22% |
| Casandra Prunica | 9/10 | 2705 days | 22% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 2705 days | 21% |
| Anton Thisted | 7/10 | 3035 days | 12% |
| Chantal Mortel | 8/10 | 3073 days | 12% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 3140 days | 11% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 3140 days | 11% |
| Brigitte | 9/10 | 3146 days | 11% |
| Ron | 8/10 | 3162 days | 10% |
| Laurits and Bettina | 9/10 | 3165 days | 10% |
| Kerstin | 9/10 | 3173 days | 10% |
| Helmut Schmid | 9/10 | 3427 days | 3% |
| Melinda Moir | 9/10 | 3439 days | 3% |
| Lars | 8/10 | 3442 days | 3% |
| Lotte Foged | 9/10 | 3460 days | 2% |
| Dean | 8/10 | 3508 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 10/10 | 3513 days | 1% |
| Barry Dunster | 10/10 | 3524 days | 1% |
| Rudy Witt | 8/10 | 3540 days | 0% |
| Tina | 9/10 | 3554 days | 0% |
| Ralph & Marloes Meyers | 9/10 | 3767 days | 11% |
| Wheeler | 10/10 | 3788 days | 11% |
| Michael Orme | 7/10 | 3789 days | 10% |
| Tim | 9/10 | 3789 days | 11% |
| Tina Baun | 8/10 | 3791 days | 10% |
| Erica Moorhouse | 8/10 | 3804 days | 10% |
| Dennis & Claudia | 8/10 | 3819 days | 10% |
| Florian | 7/10 | 3820 days | 10% |
| D Oostrum | 9/10 | 3822 days | 11% |
| Mike Peirce | 9/10 | 4158 days | 11% |
| Cecile | 10/10 | 4167 days | 11% |
| Jannievan Osnabrugge | 7/10 | 4174 days | 10% |
| Lousie Hug | 7/10 | 4178 days | 10% |
| Schubert, Wolfgang & Claudia | 8/10 | 4197 days | 10% |
| ilkal | 8/10 | 4240 days | 10% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 4243 days | 11% |
| usigmund | 8/10 | 4243 days | 10% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 4258 days | 11% |
| Bue Verrept | 8/10 | 4261 days | 10% |
| Monika Wenzel | 10/10 | 4262 days | 11% |
| Louis Duhaime | 9/10 | 4265 days | 11% |
| Jeanette Larsen | 9/10 | 4266 days | 11% |
| johannac | 8/10 | 4373 days | 10% |
| BVanW | 9/10 | 4490 days | 11% |
| Ralph Boese | 10/10 | 4518 days | 11% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Taranaki Falls does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.