Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taranaki Falls.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Taranaki Falls
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The Taranaki Falls experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls valid reviews is 86.77% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
61 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 61 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 21 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls face-to-face reviews is 86.39% and is based on 61 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.25%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dee Greig-Dunn | 9/10 | 2792 days | 100% |
| Linnea Sahlberg | 10/10 | 3201 days | 64% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3460 days | 41% |
| Julia Achatz | 7/10 | 3462 days | 35% |
| Markus Wagner | 9/10 | 3462 days | 40% |
| Katharina Gans | 9/10 | 3470 days | 39% |
| Benedikt Lorenz | 10/10 | 3472 days | 39% |
| Jonas Neumann | 9/10 | 3475 days | 38% |
| Theresa Flach | 10/10 | 3475 days | 39% |
| Daniela Hintermayr | 7/10 | 3476 days | 33% |
| Thomas Klinting | 6/10 | 3476 days | 28% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 8/10 | 3510 days | 34% |
| Tom Rogers | 7/10 | 3524 days | 29% |
| Ulf | 10/10 | 3536 days | 34% |
| Jack Robinson | 10/10 | 3547 days | 33% |
| Robert Elzinga | 8/10 | 3777 days | 11% |
| David Schelensky | 10/10 | 3826 days | 7% |
| Ruven Rintelmann | 9/10 | 3827 days | 7% |
| Daniel Roedel | 8/10 | 3835 days | 5% |
| Catherine Schlachter | 9/10 | 4503 days | 3% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 4503 days | 2% |
| Casandra Prunica | 9/10 | 4530 days | 3% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 4530 days | 2% |
| Anton Thisted | 7/10 | 4860 days | 0% |
| Chantal Mortel | 8/10 | 4898 days | 2% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4965 days | 3% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4965 days | 3% |
| Brigitte | 9/10 | 4971 days | 3% |
| Ron | 8/10 | 4987 days | 2% |
| Laurits and Bettina | 9/10 | 4990 days | 3% |
| Kerstin | 9/10 | 4998 days | 3% |
| Helmut Schmid | 9/10 | 5252 days | 3% |
| Melinda Moir | 9/10 | 5264 days | 3% |
| Lars | 8/10 | 5267 days | 2% |
| Lotte Foged | 9/10 | 5285 days | 3% |
| Dean | 8/10 | 5333 days | 2% |
| Lisa Beutler | 10/10 | 5338 days | 3% |
| Barry Dunster | 10/10 | 5349 days | 3% |
| Rudy Witt | 8/10 | 5365 days | 2% |
| Tina | 9/10 | 5379 days | 3% |
| Ralph & Marloes Meyers | 9/10 | 5592 days | 3% |
| Wheeler | 10/10 | 5613 days | 3% |
| Michael Orme | 7/10 | 5614 days | 0% |
| Tim | 9/10 | 5614 days | 3% |
| Tina Baun | 8/10 | 5616 days | 2% |
| Erica Moorhouse | 8/10 | 5629 days | 2% |
| Dennis & Claudia | 8/10 | 5644 days | 2% |
| Florian | 7/10 | 5645 days | 0% |
| D Oostrum | 9/10 | 5647 days | 3% |
| Mike Peirce | 9/10 | 5983 days | 3% |
| Cecile | 10/10 | 5992 days | 3% |
| Jannievan Osnabrugge | 7/10 | 5999 days | 0% |
| Lousie Hug | 7/10 | 6003 days | 0% |
| Schubert, Wolfgang & Claudia | 8/10 | 6022 days | 2% |
| ilkal | 8/10 | 6065 days | 2% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 6068 days | 3% |
| usigmund | 8/10 | 6068 days | 2% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 6083 days | 3% |
| Bue Verrept | 8/10 | 6086 days | 2% |
| Monika Wenzel | 10/10 | 6087 days | 3% |
| Louis Duhaime | 9/10 | 6090 days | 3% |
| Jeanette Larsen | 9/10 | 6091 days | 3% |
| johannac | 8/10 | 6198 days | 2% |
| BVanW | 9/10 | 6315 days | 3% |
| Ralph Boese | 10/10 | 6343 days | 3% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Taranaki Falls does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.42% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.