Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.04%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 162 days | 71% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 345 days | 78% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 406 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 437 days | 96% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 465 days | 83% |
| BR | 5/10 | 496 days | 72% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 496 days | 88% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 496 days | 88% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 496 days | 93% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 496 days | 93% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 496 days | 95% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 496 days | 95% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 496 days | 82% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 527 days | 91% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 557 days | 90% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 588 days | 88% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 618 days | 85% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 618 days | 85% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1137 days | 35% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1258 days | 25% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1288 days | 20% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1319 days | 21% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1380 days | 18% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1380 days | 18% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1411 days | 16% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1441 days | 14% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1472 days | 5% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1502 days | 12% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1592 days | 8% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1592 days | 9% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1837 days | 5% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 2079 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2079 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2263 days | 4% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2323 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2507 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2568 days | 3% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2598 days | 3% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2598 days | 3% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2629 days | 3% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2629 days | 3% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2656 days | 3% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2657 days | 2% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2749 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2749 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2871 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2963 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 3026 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 3067 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 3073 days | 2% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 3080 days | 2% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3086 days | 2% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3144 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3242 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3272 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3290 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3316 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3344 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3359 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3376 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3386 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3386 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3394 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3402 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3417 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3417 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3450 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3454 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3467 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3475 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3485 days | 1% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3491 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3541 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3570 days | 1% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3574 days | 1% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3659 days | 1% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3671 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3692 days | 1% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3696 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3698 days | 1% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3703 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3756 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3764 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3781 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3815 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3820 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3822 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3831 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3867 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3868 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3875 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3875 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3966 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3967 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 4026 days | 0% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 4028 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 4028 days | 0% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 4034 days | 0% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4093 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4131 days | 0% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4148 days | 0% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4155 days | 0% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4158 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4209 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4394 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4424 days | 1% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4424 days | 1% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4462 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4481 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4482 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4482 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4485 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4495 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4497 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4503 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4503 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4514 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4545 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4815 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4820 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4822 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4829 days | 0% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4848 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4848 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4848 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5180 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5181 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5181 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5189 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5191 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5207 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5208 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5212 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5212 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5214 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5265 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5292 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5527 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5529 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5534 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5536 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5536 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5553 days | 0% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5560 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5562 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5564 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5565 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5566 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5566 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5824 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5923 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5925 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5940 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5990 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 6010 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6238 days | 0% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6294 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.99% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.