Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.17%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 100 days | 70% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 283 days | 78% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 344 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 375 days | 97% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 403 days | 84% |
| BR | 5/10 | 434 days | 73% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 434 days | 89% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 434 days | 89% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 434 days | 94% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 434 days | 94% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 434 days | 96% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 434 days | 96% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 434 days | 82% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 465 days | 92% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 495 days | 91% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 526 days | 89% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 556 days | 87% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 556 days | 87% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1075 days | 40% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1196 days | 29% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1226 days | 23% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1257 days | 25% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1318 days | 21% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1318 days | 21% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1349 days | 19% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1379 days | 17% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1410 days | 6% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1440 days | 14% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1530 days | 10% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1530 days | 11% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1775 days | 5% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1895 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1895 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 2017 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2017 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2201 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2261 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2261 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2445 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2506 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2536 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2536 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2567 days | 4% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2567 days | 4% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2594 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2595 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2595 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2626 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2626 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2626 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2626 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2687 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2687 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2809 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2901 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 2964 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 3005 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 3011 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 3018 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3024 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3082 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3160 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3166 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3180 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3210 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3254 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3260 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3282 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3297 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3314 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3324 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3324 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3332 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3340 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3355 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3355 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3388 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3392 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3405 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3413 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3423 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3429 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3479 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3508 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3512 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3581 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3600 days | 2% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3609 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3630 days | 2% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3634 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3636 days | 2% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3694 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3719 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3721 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3753 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3758 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3760 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3769 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3805 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3806 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3813 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3813 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3904 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3905 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 3964 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 3966 days | 1% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 3966 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 3972 days | 1% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4031 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4069 days | 1% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4086 days | 1% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4093 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4096 days | 1% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4147 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4332 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4400 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4419 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4420 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4420 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4423 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4435 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4441 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4441 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4452 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4483 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4605 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4753 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4758 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4760 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4767 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5118 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5127 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5146 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5152 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5203 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5230 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5465 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5467 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5472 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5474 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5474 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5492 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5498 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5500 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5502 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5503 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5508 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5762 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5793 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5861 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5878 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5928 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 5948 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6176 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6232 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.95% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.