G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 141 days | 71% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 324 days | 78% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 385 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 416 days | 97% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 444 days | 84% |
| BR | 5/10 | 475 days | 73% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 475 days | 89% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 475 days | 89% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 475 days | 93% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 475 days | 93% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 475 days | 95% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 475 days | 95% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 475 days | 82% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 506 days | 91% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 536 days | 90% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 567 days | 88% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 597 days | 86% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 597 days | 86% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1116 days | 37% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1237 days | 26% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1267 days | 21% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1298 days | 22% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1359 days | 19% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1359 days | 19% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1390 days | 17% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1420 days | 16% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1451 days | 6% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1481 days | 13% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1571 days | 9% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1571 days | 9% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1816 days | 5% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1936 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1936 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 2058 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2058 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2302 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2302 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2486 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2577 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2577 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2608 days | 4% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2608 days | 4% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2636 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2636 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2636 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2667 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2667 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2667 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2667 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2851 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2942 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 3005 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 3046 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 3052 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 3059 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3065 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3124 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3207 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3221 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3251 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3295 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3310 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3323 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3355 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3366 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3366 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3373 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3381 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3429 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3433 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3446 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3454 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3464 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3470 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3520 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3550 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3553 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3622 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3638 days | 2% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3642 days | 2% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3650 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3672 days | 1% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3677 days | 1% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3735 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3743 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3760 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3794 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3799 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3801 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3810 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3846 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3847 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3854 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3854 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3945 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 4005 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 4007 days | 1% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 4008 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 4013 days | 1% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4072 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4110 days | 1% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4128 days | 1% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4134 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4137 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4189 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4441 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4460 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4461 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4461 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4476 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4482 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4482 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4493 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4524 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4646 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4801 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4808 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4827 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4827 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4827 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5159 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5160 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5160 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5168 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5170 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5186 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5187 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5191 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5191 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5193 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5244 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5271 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5506 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5508 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5515 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5515 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5532 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5533 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5539 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5541 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5543 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5545 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5545 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5549 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5803 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5834 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5902 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5919 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5969 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 5989 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6217 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6273 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.97% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.