G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
79.71%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 303 days | 75% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 486 days | 80% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 547 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 578 days | 96% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 606 days | 82% |
| BR | 5/10 | 637 days | 71% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 637 days | 86% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 637 days | 86% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 637 days | 91% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 637 days | 91% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 637 days | 93% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 637 days | 93% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 637 days | 80% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 668 days | 88% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 698 days | 86% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 729 days | 83% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 759 days | 80% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 759 days | 80% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1278 days | 27% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1399 days | 18% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1429 days | 14% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1460 days | 15% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1521 days | 12% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1521 days | 12% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1552 days | 11% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1582 days | 10% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1613 days | 4% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1643 days | 8% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1733 days | 6% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1733 days | 7% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1978 days | 6% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2098 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 2098 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 2220 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2220 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2404 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2464 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2464 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2648 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2709 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2739 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2739 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2770 days | 3% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2770 days | 3% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2797 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2798 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2798 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2829 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2829 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2829 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2829 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2890 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2890 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 3012 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 3104 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 3167 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 3208 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 3214 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 3221 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3227 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3285 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3363 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3369 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3383 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3413 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3431 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3457 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3463 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3472 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3485 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3500 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3517 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3527 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3527 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3535 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3543 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3558 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3558 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3591 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3595 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3608 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3616 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3632 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3682 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3711 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3715 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3784 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3800 days | 1% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3803 days | 1% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3812 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3833 days | 1% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3837 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3839 days | 1% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3844 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3897 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3905 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3922 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3924 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3956 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3961 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3963 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3972 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 4008 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 4009 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 4016 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 4016 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 4107 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 4108 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 4167 days | 0% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 4169 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 4169 days | 0% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 4175 days | 0% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4234 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4272 days | 0% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4289 days | 0% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4299 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4350 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4535 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4603 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4622 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4623 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4623 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4626 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4636 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4638 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4644 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4644 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4808 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4956 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4961 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4963 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4970 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5321 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5322 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5322 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5330 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5332 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5348 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5349 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5353 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5353 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5355 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5433 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5668 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5670 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5675 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5677 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5677 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5701 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5703 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5705 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5706 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5707 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5707 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5711 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5965 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5996 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 6064 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 6066 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 6081 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 6131 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 6151 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6379 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6435 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.08% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.