Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
79.95%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 202 days | 72% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 385 days | 79% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 446 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 477 days | 96% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 505 days | 83% |
| BR | 5/10 | 536 days | 72% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 536 days | 88% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 536 days | 88% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 536 days | 92% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 536 days | 92% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 536 days | 94% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 536 days | 94% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 536 days | 81% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 567 days | 90% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 597 days | 89% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 628 days | 87% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 658 days | 84% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 658 days | 84% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1177 days | 32% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1298 days | 23% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1328 days | 18% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1359 days | 19% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1420 days | 16% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1420 days | 16% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1451 days | 14% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1481 days | 13% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1512 days | 5% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1542 days | 11% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1632 days | 8% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1632 days | 8% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1877 days | 5% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1997 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1997 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 2119 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2119 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2303 days | 4% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2363 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2363 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2608 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2638 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2638 days | 3% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2669 days | 3% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2669 days | 3% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2696 days | 3% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2789 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2789 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2911 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 3003 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 3066 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 3107 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 3113 days | 2% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 3120 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3126 days | 2% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3184 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3262 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3268 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3282 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3312 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3356 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3362 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3371 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3384 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3399 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3416 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3426 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3426 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3434 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3442 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3457 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3457 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3490 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3494 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3507 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3515 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3525 days | 1% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3531 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3581 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3610 days | 1% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3614 days | 1% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3683 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3699 days | 1% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3711 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3732 days | 1% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3736 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3738 days | 1% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3743 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3796 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3804 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3821 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3823 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3855 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3860 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3862 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3871 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3907 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3908 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3915 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3915 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 4006 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 4007 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 4066 days | 0% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 4068 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 4068 days | 0% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 4074 days | 0% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4133 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4171 days | 0% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4188 days | 0% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4195 days | 0% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4198 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4249 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4434 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4502 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4521 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4525 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4535 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4537 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4543 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4543 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4554 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4585 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4707 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4855 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4860 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4862 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4869 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4888 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4888 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4888 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5220 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5221 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5221 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5229 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5231 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5247 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5248 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5252 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5252 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5254 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5305 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5332 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5567 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5569 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5574 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5576 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5576 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5593 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5594 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5600 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5602 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5604 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5606 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5606 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5864 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5895 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5965 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5980 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 6030 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 6050 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6278 days | 0% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6334 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.01% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.