Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
79.99%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 182 days | 71% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 365 days | 79% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 426 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 457 days | 96% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 485 days | 83% |
| BR | 5/10 | 516 days | 72% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 516 days | 88% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 516 days | 88% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 516 days | 93% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 516 days | 93% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 516 days | 95% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 516 days | 95% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 516 days | 81% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 547 days | 91% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 577 days | 89% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 608 days | 87% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 638 days | 85% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 638 days | 85% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1157 days | 34% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1278 days | 24% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1308 days | 19% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1339 days | 20% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1400 days | 17% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1400 days | 17% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1431 days | 15% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1461 days | 14% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1492 days | 5% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1522 days | 11% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1612 days | 8% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1612 days | 8% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1857 days | 5% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1977 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1977 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 2099 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2099 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2283 days | 4% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2343 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2343 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2527 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2588 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2618 days | 3% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2618 days | 3% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2649 days | 3% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2649 days | 3% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2676 days | 3% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2677 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2677 days | 3% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2769 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2769 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2891 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2983 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 3046 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 3087 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 3093 days | 2% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 3100 days | 2% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3106 days | 2% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3164 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3242 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3262 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3292 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3310 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3342 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3351 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3364 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3379 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3396 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3406 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3406 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3414 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3422 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3437 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3437 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3470 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3474 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3487 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3495 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3505 days | 1% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3511 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3561 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3590 days | 1% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3594 days | 1% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3663 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3679 days | 1% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3691 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3712 days | 1% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3716 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3723 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3776 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3784 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3801 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3803 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3835 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3840 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3842 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3851 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3887 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3888 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3895 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3895 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3986 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3987 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 4046 days | 0% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 4048 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 4048 days | 0% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 4054 days | 0% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4113 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4151 days | 0% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4168 days | 0% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4175 days | 0% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4178 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4229 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4414 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4444 days | 1% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4444 days | 1% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4482 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4501 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4502 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4502 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4505 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4515 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4517 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4523 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4523 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4534 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4687 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4835 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4840 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4842 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4849 days | 0% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4868 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4868 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4868 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5200 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5201 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5201 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5209 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5211 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5227 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5228 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5232 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5232 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5234 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5285 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5312 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5549 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5556 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5556 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5573 days | 0% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5574 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5580 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5582 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5584 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5585 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5586 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5586 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5590 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5844 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5875 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5943 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5945 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5960 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 6010 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 6030 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6258 days | 0% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6314 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.00% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.