Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.26%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 60 days | 69% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 243 days | 78% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 304 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 335 days | 97% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 363 days | 84% |
| BR | 5/10 | 394 days | 73% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 394 days | 90% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 394 days | 90% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 394 days | 94% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 394 days | 94% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 394 days | 96% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 394 days | 96% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 394 days | 83% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 425 days | 93% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 455 days | 92% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 486 days | 90% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 516 days | 89% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 516 days | 89% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1035 days | 43% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1156 days | 32% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1186 days | 26% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1217 days | 27% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1278 days | 23% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1278 days | 23% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1309 days | 21% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1339 days | 19% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1370 days | 7% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1400 days | 16% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1490 days | 12% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1490 days | 12% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1735 days | 6% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1855 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1855 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 1977 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 1977 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2161 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2221 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2221 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2405 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2466 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2496 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2496 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2527 days | 4% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2527 days | 4% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2555 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2555 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2555 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2586 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2586 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2586 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2586 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2647 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2647 days | 4% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2770 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2861 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 2924 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 2965 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 2971 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 2978 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 2984 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3043 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3120 days | 3% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3126 days | 3% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3140 days | 3% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3170 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3188 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3214 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3220 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3229 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3242 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3274 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3285 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3285 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3292 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3316 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3316 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3348 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3365 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3373 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3383 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3389 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3439 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3469 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3472 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3541 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3557 days | 2% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3561 days | 2% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3569 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3591 days | 2% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3594 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3596 days | 2% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3601 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3654 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3679 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3713 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3720 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3729 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3765 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3766 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3773 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3773 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3864 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3865 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 3924 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 3926 days | 1% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 3927 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 3932 days | 1% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 3991 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4029 days | 1% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4047 days | 1% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4053 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4056 days | 1% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4108 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4292 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4322 days | 0% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4322 days | 0% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4380 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4380 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4383 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4393 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4395 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4443 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4713 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4718 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4720 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4727 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5078 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5087 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5089 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5105 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5106 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5110 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5110 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5163 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5190 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5427 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5432 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5451 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5452 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5458 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5460 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5462 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5463 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5464 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5464 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5468 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5722 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5753 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5821 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5823 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5838 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5888 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 5908 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6136 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6192 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.93% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.