Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.27%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 54 days | 69% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 237 days | 78% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 298 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 329 days | 97% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 357 days | 84% |
| BR | 5/10 | 388 days | 73% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 388 days | 90% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 388 days | 90% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 388 days | 94% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 388 days | 94% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 388 days | 96% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 388 days | 96% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 388 days | 83% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 419 days | 93% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 449 days | 92% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 480 days | 91% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 510 days | 89% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 510 days | 89% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1029 days | 43% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1150 days | 32% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1180 days | 26% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1211 days | 27% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1272 days | 24% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1272 days | 23% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1303 days | 21% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1333 days | 20% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1364 days | 7% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1394 days | 16% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1484 days | 12% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1484 days | 12% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1729 days | 6% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1849 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1849 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 1971 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 1971 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2155 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2215 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2215 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2399 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2460 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2490 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2490 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2521 days | 4% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2521 days | 4% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2549 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2549 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2549 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2580 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2580 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2580 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2580 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2641 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2641 days | 4% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2764 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2855 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 2918 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 2959 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 2965 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 2972 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 2978 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3037 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3114 days | 3% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3120 days | 3% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3134 days | 3% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3164 days | 3% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3208 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3214 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3223 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3236 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3251 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3268 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3279 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3279 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3286 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3294 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3310 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3310 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3342 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3346 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3359 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3367 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3377 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3383 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3433 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3463 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3466 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3535 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3555 days | 2% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3563 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3585 days | 2% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3588 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3590 days | 2% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3595 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3648 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3673 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3676 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3707 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3712 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3714 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3723 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3759 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3760 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3858 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3859 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 3918 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 3920 days | 1% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 3921 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 3926 days | 1% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 3985 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4023 days | 1% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4041 days | 1% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4047 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4050 days | 1% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4102 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4286 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4387 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4395 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4395 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4406 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4437 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4559 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4707 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4712 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4714 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4721 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5072 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5073 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5073 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5081 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5083 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5099 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5100 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5104 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5104 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5106 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5157 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5184 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5419 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5426 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5428 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5428 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5445 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5446 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5452 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5456 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5457 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5458 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5458 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5716 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5747 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5815 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5817 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5832 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5882 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 5902 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6130 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6186 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.93% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.