Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
79.90%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 222 days | 72% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 404 days | 79% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 466 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 497 days | 96% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 525 days | 83% |
| BR | 5/10 | 556 days | 72% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 556 days | 87% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 556 days | 87% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 556 days | 92% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 556 days | 92% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 556 days | 94% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 556 days | 94% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 556 days | 81% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 587 days | 90% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 617 days | 88% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 648 days | 86% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 677 days | 83% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 677 days | 83% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1197 days | 31% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1318 days | 22% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1348 days | 17% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1379 days | 18% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1439 days | 15% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1439 days | 15% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1470 days | 13% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1500 days | 12% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1531 days | 4% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1562 days | 10% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1652 days | 7% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1652 days | 7% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1896 days | 5% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2017 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 2017 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 2138 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2138 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2383 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2383 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2566 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2627 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2658 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2658 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2689 days | 3% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2689 days | 3% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2716 days | 3% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2809 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2809 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2931 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 3023 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 3086 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 3127 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 3133 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 3140 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3146 days | 2% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3204 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3281 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3349 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3375 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3381 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3391 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3404 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3419 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3436 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3446 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3446 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3454 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3462 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3477 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3477 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3510 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3514 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3527 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3535 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3545 days | 1% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3600 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3630 days | 1% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3633 days | 1% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3722 days | 1% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3730 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3752 days | 1% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3756 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3758 days | 1% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3816 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3824 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3841 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3843 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3875 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3880 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3882 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3891 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3927 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3928 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3935 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3935 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 4025 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 4026 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 4085 days | 0% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 4087 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 4088 days | 0% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 4093 days | 0% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4153 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4191 days | 0% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4208 days | 0% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4215 days | 0% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4218 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4269 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4453 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4484 days | 1% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4484 days | 1% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4541 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4542 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4542 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4545 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4555 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4557 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4563 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4563 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4574 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4605 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4726 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4875 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4880 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4882 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4889 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4908 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4908 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4908 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5240 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5241 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5241 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5249 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5251 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5267 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5268 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5272 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5272 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5274 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5352 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5587 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5589 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5594 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5596 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5596 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5613 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5620 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5622 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5624 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5625 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5626 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5626 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5630 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5914 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5985 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 6000 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 6050 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 6070 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6297 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6354 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.03% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.