Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.22%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 81 days | 69% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 263 days | 78% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 325 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 356 days | 97% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 384 days | 84% |
| BR | 5/10 | 415 days | 73% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 415 days | 89% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 415 days | 89% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 415 days | 94% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 415 days | 94% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 415 days | 96% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 415 days | 96% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 415 days | 83% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 446 days | 92% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 476 days | 92% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 507 days | 90% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 536 days | 88% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 536 days | 88% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1056 days | 41% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1177 days | 30% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1207 days | 24% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1238 days | 26% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1298 days | 22% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1298 days | 22% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1329 days | 20% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1359 days | 18% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1390 days | 7% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1421 days | 15% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1511 days | 11% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1511 days | 11% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1755 days | 6% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 1997 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 1997 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2182 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2242 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2425 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2486 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2548 days | 3% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2548 days | 3% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2575 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2576 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2607 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2607 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2607 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2607 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2668 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2668 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2790 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 2945 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 2986 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 2992 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 2999 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3005 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3063 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3140 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3146 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3160 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3190 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3208 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3234 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3240 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3278 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3295 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3313 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3321 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3369 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3373 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3386 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3394 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3404 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3410 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3459 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3489 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3492 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3561 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3577 days | 2% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3581 days | 2% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3589 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3611 days | 2% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3615 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3617 days | 2% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3622 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3683 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3700 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3734 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3739 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3741 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3750 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3786 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3787 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3794 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3794 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3884 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3885 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 3944 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 3952 days | 1% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4012 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4050 days | 1% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4067 days | 1% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4074 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4077 days | 1% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4128 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4312 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4400 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4404 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4414 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4416 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4422 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4422 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4585 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4734 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4739 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4741 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4748 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4767 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4767 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4767 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5099 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5100 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5100 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5108 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5110 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5126 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5127 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5184 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5211 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5446 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5448 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5453 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5455 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5455 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5472 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5473 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5479 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5483 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5484 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5485 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5485 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5489 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5742 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5773 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5844 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5859 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5909 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 5929 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6156 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6213 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.94% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.