Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.14%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 120 days | 70% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 303 days | 78% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 364 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 395 days | 97% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 423 days | 84% |
| BR | 5/10 | 454 days | 73% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 454 days | 89% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 454 days | 89% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 454 days | 94% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 454 days | 94% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 454 days | 95% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 454 days | 95% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 454 days | 82% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 485 days | 92% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 515 days | 91% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 546 days | 89% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 576 days | 87% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 576 days | 87% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1095 days | 38% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1216 days | 28% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1246 days | 22% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1277 days | 23% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1338 days | 20% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1338 days | 20% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1369 days | 18% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1399 days | 16% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1430 days | 6% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1460 days | 14% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1550 days | 10% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1550 days | 10% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1795 days | 5% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1915 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1915 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 2037 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2037 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2221 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2281 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2281 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2465 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2526 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2556 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2556 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2587 days | 3% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2587 days | 3% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2615 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2615 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2615 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2646 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2646 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2646 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2646 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2707 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2707 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2830 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2921 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 2984 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 3025 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 3031 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 3038 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3044 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3103 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3180 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3186 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3200 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3274 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3280 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3289 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3317 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3334 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3345 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3345 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3360 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3376 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3376 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3408 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3412 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3425 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3433 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3443 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3449 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3499 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3529 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3532 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3601 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3617 days | 2% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3621 days | 2% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3629 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3651 days | 1% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3654 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3661 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3714 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3722 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3739 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3742 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3773 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3778 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3780 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3789 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3825 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3826 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3833 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3833 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3924 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3925 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 3984 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 3986 days | 1% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 3987 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 3992 days | 1% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4051 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4089 days | 1% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4107 days | 1% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4113 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4116 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4168 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4352 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4382 days | 1% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4382 days | 1% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4420 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4439 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4440 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4440 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4443 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4453 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4455 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4461 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4461 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4472 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4503 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4625 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4773 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4780 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4806 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4806 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4806 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5149 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5165 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5166 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5170 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5170 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5172 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5223 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5250 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5485 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5492 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5494 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5494 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5512 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5518 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5520 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5522 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5523 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5528 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5782 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5813 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5881 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5898 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5948 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 5968 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6196 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6252 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.96% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.