Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
176 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 180 reviews. There are 176 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 176 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.82% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 86.82% and is based on 176 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 176 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
79.85%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marielle | 4/10 | 242 days | 73% |
| Nico | 5/10 | 425 days | 79% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 486 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 517 days | 96% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 545 days | 83% |
| BR | 5/10 | 576 days | 71% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 576 days | 87% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 576 days | 87% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 576 days | 92% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 576 days | 92% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 576 days | 94% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 576 days | 94% |
| Jodie Sugg | 6/10 | 576 days | 81% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 607 days | 89% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 637 days | 88% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 668 days | 85% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 698 days | 83% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 698 days | 83% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1217 days | 30% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1338 days | 21% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1368 days | 17% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1399 days | 17% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1460 days | 14% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1460 days | 14% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1491 days | 13% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1521 days | 12% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1552 days | 4% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1582 days | 9% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1672 days | 7% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1672 days | 7% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1917 days | 5% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2037 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 2037 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 2159 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2159 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2343 days | 4% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2403 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2403 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2587 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2648 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2678 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2678 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2709 days | 3% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2709 days | 3% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2737 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2737 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2737 days | 3% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2829 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2829 days | 3% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2952 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 3043 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 3106 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 3147 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 3153 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 3160 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 3166 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3225 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3308 days | 2% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3370 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3396 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3402 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3411 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3424 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3439 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3456 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3467 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3467 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3474 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3482 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3498 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3498 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3530 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3534 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3547 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3555 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3565 days | 1% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3571 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3621 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3651 days | 1% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3654 days | 1% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3723 days | 1% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3739 days | 1% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3743 days | 1% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3751 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3773 days | 1% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3776 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3778 days | 1% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3836 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3844 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3861 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3864 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3895 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3900 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3902 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3911 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3948 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3955 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3955 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 4046 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 4047 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 4106 days | 0% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 4108 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 4109 days | 0% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 4114 days | 0% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 4173 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 4211 days | 0% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4229 days | 0% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4235 days | 0% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4238 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4290 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4504 days | 1% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4504 days | 1% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4542 days | 1% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4561 days | 1% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4562 days | 1% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4562 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4575 days | 1% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4577 days | 1% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4583 days | 1% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4583 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4594 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4625 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4747 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4895 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4900 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4902 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4909 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4928 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4928 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4928 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5260 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5261 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5261 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5269 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5271 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5287 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5288 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5292 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5292 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5345 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5372 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5607 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5609 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5616 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5616 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5633 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5634 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5640 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5642 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5644 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5645 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5646 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5646 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5650 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 6003 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 6005 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 6020 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 6070 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 6090 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6318 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6374 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.04% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.