Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Maitai Bay Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
77 Valid Reviews
The Maitai Bay Campsite experience has a total of 77 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 23 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 21 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 23 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.36% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Maitai Bay Campsite valid reviews is 86.36% and is based on 77 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
21 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 77 valid reviews, the experience has 21 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 21 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Maitai Bay Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 21 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.80%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jackie | 10/10 | 261 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 10/10 | 536 days | 87% |
| Marilyn Miller | 9/10 | 564 days | 84% |
| JAA | 8/10 | 564 days | 83% |
| Tim Schmitter | 9/10 | 626 days | 80% |
| Lucy | 9/10 | 656 days | 78% |
| Max | 9/10 | 901 days | 55% |
| Anna Swain | 8/10 | 1844 days | 5% |
| Belen Ramirez | 10/10 | 1875 days | 5% |
| Claudi | 9/10 | 1905 days | 5% |
| Adam | 7/10 | 2025 days | 4% |
| James | 8/10 | 2056 days | 5% |
| Olivia | 8/10 | 2056 days | 5% |
| Crystal | 9/10 | 2209 days | 4% |
| Kate B | 10/10 | 2240 days | 4% |
| Critta | 10/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
| Rachel | 9/10 | 2756 days | 3% |
| Lauren Glass | 10/10 | 2818 days | 3% |
| Anton Gordon | 7/10 | 2848 days | 3% |
| Amul | 10/10 | 3032 days | 3% |
| Emma Guthrie | 8/10 | 3093 days | 2% |
| Georgia Gray | 7/10 | 3123 days | 2% |
| Belinda Du Plessis | 10/10 | 3124 days | 2% |
| Mikayla Candido | 6/10 | 3168 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smith | 8/10 | 3188 days | 2% |
| Laura | 6/10 | 3243 days | 2% |
| George Keiller | 4/10 | 3268 days | 1% |
| Jason Stalgis | 8/10 | 3479 days | 2% |
| Paul Smith | 8/10 | 3488 days | 2% |
| Tobias Krieghoff | 8/10 | 3584 days | 2% |
| Philipp Jahn | 9/10 | 3617 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 7/10 | 3669 days | 1% |
| Chantal Heller | 9/10 | 3814 days | 1% |
| Urs Baumgartner | 9/10 | 3872 days | 1% |
| Matthias Turck | 10/10 | 3891 days | 1% |
| Marianne Leclerco | 10/10 | 3918 days | 1% |
| Timo von Wirth | 9/10 | 3930 days | 1% |
| Jonathan Briggs | 8/10 | 3942 days | 1% |
| Nikita Jones | 10/10 | 3943 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 4065 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 10/10 | 4133 days | 0% |
| Mike Merrick | 7/10 | 4219 days | 0% |
| Stephanie King | 8/10 | 4230 days | 0% |
| Thomas and Sonja | 10/10 | 4271 days | 0% |
| Jurgen Moors | 10/10 | 4283 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4308 days | 0% |
| Ron Clarke | 8/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 4554 days | 1% |
| Sara Clausen | 9/10 | 4560 days | 1% |
| Philipp | 9/10 | 4594 days | 1% |
| Blue Bottle | 4/10 | 4612 days | 1% |
| kiwifamily2 | 7/10 | 4613 days | 1% |
| Juandflow | 8/10 | 4613 days | 1% |
| Ourlot | 10/10 | 4919 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 8/10 | 4919 days | 1% |
| lisa taylor | 8/10 | 4919 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 8/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 9/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
| Jan and Pedi | 9/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
| Steven Hill | 9/10 | 5280 days | 1% |
| Samplonius | 8/10 | 5308 days | 1% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5311 days | 1% |
| S Tucker | 9/10 | 5364 days | 1% |
| colinrea | 10/10 | 5405 days | 1% |
| Rachel Cockroft | 9/10 | 5622 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5628 days | 1% |
| Iain Campbell | 10/10 | 5628 days | 1% |
| Kendall | 8/10 | 5633 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5633 days | 1% |
| joke | 8/10 | 5637 days | 1% |
| Lukis Haertel | 10/10 | 5675 days | 1% |
| iBert | 10/10 | 5678 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 10/10 | 5923 days | 1% |
| hooperuk | 10/10 | 5984 days | 1% |
| timgr | 8/10 | 6090 days | 1% |
| jennyb | 9/10 | 6103 days | 1% |
| Mike | 8/10 | 6117 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Maitai Bay Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.89% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.