G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kepler Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
199 Valid Reviews
The Kepler Track experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 199 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 199 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track valid reviews is 87.44% and is based on 199 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
195 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 199 valid reviews, the experience has 195 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 57 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track face-to-face reviews is 87.18% and is based on 195 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.98%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mark Ashmore | 10/10 | 2828 days | 100% |
Tom | 9/10 | 2846 days | 98% |
Laureri Foster | 10/10 | 2858 days | 98% |
Tomas Kotul | 8/10 | 2867 days | 95% |
Dubrulle | 8/10 | 2924 days | 92% |
Sabrina Kulikar | 7/10 | 2935 days | 86% |
Lieke vol Velde | 8/10 | 2938 days | 91% |
Olde Vogel | 9/10 | 2938 days | 92% |
Elien Dauwe | 9/10 | 2943 days | 91% |
Simon Dauwe | 9/10 | 2943 days | 91% |
Mona Uttendorf | 8/10 | 2943 days | 90% |
Luke | 8/10 | 2948 days | 90% |
Kat | 9/10 | 2948 days | 91% |
Nanda Dyke | 9/10 | 2950 days | 91% |
Justine Langero | 8/10 | 2968 days | 89% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 2968 days | 89% |
Thomas Nolwenn | 9/10 | 2971 days | 90% |
Nele Foerske | 9/10 | 3184 days | 76% |
Leopold Kern | 9/10 | 3184 days | 76% |
Matej Trampzer | 9/10 | 3190 days | 75% |
Rebecca Grant | 10/10 | 3193 days | 76% |
Sarah Grant | 9/10 | 3193 days | 75% |
Holly Cooper | 8/10 | 3193 days | 74% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3195 days | 74% |
Leonie Kaufmann | 9/10 | 3195 days | 75% |
Selina | 8/10 | 3203 days | 73% |
Radim Halasz | 8/10 | 3206 days | 73% |
Katerina Vobecka | 9/10 | 3206 days | 74% |
Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3206 days | 74% |
Jana Formankoua | 10/10 | 3206 days | 75% |
Rossella | 7/10 | 3207 days | 69% |
Johannes Eisel | 10/10 | 3208 days | 75% |
Alexander Mattea | 8/10 | 3208 days | 73% |
Anouk Jongsma | 7/10 | 3209 days | 69% |
Lukas Havlicek | 7/10 | 3215 days | 69% |
Art Ruisenor | 10/10 | 3215 days | 74% |
Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3217 days | 74% |
Munne | 9/10 | 3220 days | 73% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3221 days | 73% |
Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 3227 days | 73% |
Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 3233 days | 73% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3237 days | 73% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3253 days | 72% |
Anais Boileau | 10/10 | 3285 days | 70% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3289 days | 69% |
Kelsey Austin | 9/10 | 3291 days | 68% |
Thomas Stuber | 9/10 | 3292 days | 68% |
Ludo and Cha | 9/10 | 3296 days | 68% |
Falko | 10/10 | 3305 days | 68% |
Till | 10/10 | 3305 days | 68% |
Alan West | 10/10 | 3305 days | 68% |
Coralie Ambrosino | 9/10 | 3564 days | 50% |
Katharina Block | 7/10 | 3567 days | 47% |
Annika Fletemeyer | 7/10 | 3567 days | 47% |
Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3567 days | 50% |
Martin Kroek | 8/10 | 3611 days | 47% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3616 days | 48% |
Judi Gilchrist | 10/10 | 3628 days | 47% |
Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 3650 days | 45% |
Nikolas Gut | 8/10 | 3909 days | 27% |
Anja Weppler | 9/10 | 3909 days | 28% |
Charlotte | 7/10 | 3913 days | 26% |
Vuillermet | 3/10 | 3913 days | 14% |
Annika Marz | 9/10 | 3934 days | 26% |
Julian Zeissler | 7/10 | 3934 days | 24% |
Daniel Robledo | 9/10 | 3943 days | 25% |
Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 3943 days | 26% |
Linus Larsson | 9/10 | 3948 days | 25% |
Radana Dlouha | 10/10 | 3948 days | 25% |
Maria = Moller Hansen | 8/10 | 3953 days | 25% |
Mike Gemmill | 10/10 | 3953 days | 25% |
Tiit Pullerits | 10/10 | 3957 days | 25% |
Marion Busch | 10/10 | 3957 days | 25% |
Natalie Boehm | 7/10 | 3958 days | 23% |
Steffen | 8/10 | 3958 days | 24% |
Thomas Zilio | 8/10 | 3959 days | 24% |
Tobias Gehring | 8/10 | 3961 days | 24% |
Felix Brettner | 8/10 | 3961 days | 24% |
Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 3961 days | 24% |
Max Stein | 7/10 | 3961 days | 23% |
Simon Tanguy | 7/10 | 3961 days | 23% |
David Krasner | 9/10 | 3967 days | 24% |
G Ballard | 8/10 | 3968 days | 24% |
F Ballard | 9/10 | 3968 days | 24% |
Alexis Redor | 6/10 | 3973 days | 20% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 7/10 | 3989 days | 21% |
Johanna Bak | 8/10 | 3989 days | 22% |
Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 3991 days | 23% |
Guy David | 9/10 | 3991 days | 22% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 3993 days | 22% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 3996 days | 22% |
Alex | 10/10 | 4001 days | 22% |
Omri Ifrsh | 9/10 | 4282 days | 3% |
Jiri van Straelper | 8/10 | 4294 days | 2% |
Lea Scheuvens | 10/10 | 4297 days | 2% |
Luise Fuchs | 8/10 | 4297 days | 2% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 10/10 | 4299 days | 2% |
Christian | 7/10 | 4300 days | 2% |
Joshua Perry | 10/10 | 4303 days | 2% |
Molly Ladd | 9/10 | 4303 days | 2% |
Sabisch Moritz | 8/10 | 4307 days | 1% |
Karina Gratz | 9/10 | 4311 days | 1% |
Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4311 days | 1% |
Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4312 days | 1% |
Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4317 days | 1% |
Veronica and Jordi | 7/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4404 days | 31% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4406 days | 30% |
Stuart Arrol | 8/10 | 4637 days | 30% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4639 days | 31% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4647 days | 31% |
Les Barnes | 8/10 | 4681 days | 30% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4681 days | 31% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4682 days | 26% |
Karin | 9/10 | 4684 days | 30% |
Ken | 7/10 | 4685 days | 28% |
Uwe Henze | 8/10 | 4686 days | 30% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4687 days | 30% |
Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 4688 days | 31% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 10/10 | 4689 days | 31% |
Nikita Sue | 9/10 | 4694 days | 30% |
Francis Corrigan | 8/10 | 4702 days | 30% |
Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 4714 days | 30% |
Jackie & Ray | 8/10 | 4714 days | 30% |
Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 4770 days | 30% |
Berry | 9/10 | 4774 days | 30% |
Jasmin Loeffler | 9/10 | 4983 days | 30% |
Faith Whitcraft | 8/10 | 5015 days | 30% |
R Tearle | 9/10 | 5016 days | 30% |
Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 5018 days | 31% |
Anezka Hlavacova | 6/10 | 5021 days | 26% |
Marii Joekalda | 10/10 | 5021 days | 31% |
Chrissy Crebas | 8/10 | 5023 days | 30% |
noname | 8/10 | 5023 days | 30% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 5025 days | 30% |
Martin Vitiello | 9/10 | 5028 days | 30% |
Stefan Mudl | 7/10 | 5028 days | 28% |
Tara Koenig | 7/10 | 5029 days | 28% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5029 days | 31% |
Fabrizio Consolini | 10/10 | 5029 days | 31% |
Bruce & Elaine Chote | 9/10 | 5030 days | 30% |
Javier Munoz | 9/10 | 5031 days | 30% |
Lisa Lovebarge | 9/10 | 5032 days | 30% |
Susan Herd | 9/10 | 5033 days | 30% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 5036 days | 30% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5038 days | 31% |
Grumbach | 9/10 | 5041 days | 30% |
Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5041 days | 31% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 9/10 | 5042 days | 30% |
Camilla Andersson | 8/10 | 5043 days | 30% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5049 days | 30% |
Martin Current | 8/10 | 5053 days | 30% |
James Jackson | 9/10 | 5056 days | 30% |
Cheryl | 8/10 | 5056 days | 30% |
Nataly Loewidt | 6/10 | 5058 days | 26% |
Martin L | 10/10 | 5059 days | 31% |
Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 7/10 | 5059 days | 28% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5065 days | 31% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5316 days | 30% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5316 days | 31% |
Dud Grossmann | 10/10 | 5320 days | 31% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5336 days | 30% |
philaus | 8/10 | 5372 days | 30% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5377 days | 31% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5378 days | 31% |
Margie | 10/10 | 5381 days | 31% |
Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5389 days | 31% |
Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5389 days | 30% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5391 days | 30% |
Dutertre Annaboue | 8/10 | 5404 days | 30% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 9/10 | 5405 days | 30% |
Colby Smythe | 10/10 | 5406 days | 31% |
Richard | 9/10 | 5407 days | 30% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5409 days | 30% |
John Cox | 6/10 | 5409 days | 26% |
Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 5410 days | 30% |
Sheila Morgan | 9/10 | 5412 days | 30% |
M Sicard | 9/10 | 5413 days | 30% |
Ilst De | 8/10 | 5416 days | 30% |
A Southwood | 8/10 | 5425 days | 30% |
Thomas Stopp | 8/10 | 5431 days | 30% |
BenH | 10/10 | 5431 days | 31% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5436 days | 30% |
Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 5443 days | 31% |
foucherm | 7/10 | 5486 days | 28% |
Stefan Lua | 10/10 | 5495 days | 31% |
anne p | 8/10 | 5516 days | 30% |
Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 5516 days | 31% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5732 days | 30% |
geoffelizabeth | 8/10 | 5737 days | 30% |
annysp | 10/10 | 5737 days | 31% |
JasminA | 7/10 | 5737 days | 28% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5737 days | 28% |
Jelle | 8/10 | 5740 days | 30% |
Dianne | 9/10 | 5846 days | 30% |
JulianeH | 10/10 | 5847 days | 31% |
Charlotta Halfwordson | 10/10 | 5868 days | 31% |
Josefine | 10/10 | 5868 days | 31% |
Sascha | 7/10 | 5935 days | 28% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kepler Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.