Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Queenstown Hill Time Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
34 Valid Reviews
The Queenstown Hill Time Walk experience has a total of 34 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 34 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Queenstown Hill Time Walk valid reviews is 83.24% and is based on 34 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
32 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 34 valid reviews, the experience has 32 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 32 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Queenstown Hill Time Walk face-to-face reviews is 82.50% and is based on 32 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Mike Fricker||10/10||1407 days||100%|
|Sarah Horley||10/10||2031 days||71%|
|Saskia Irblich||7/10||2060 days||63%|
|Franziska Lobe||7/10||2060 days||63%|
|Laia Pujol||10/10||2066 days||69%|
|Hailey S||9/10||2100 days||68%|
|Pascale Lemieux||9/10||2325 days||57%|
|Floriane Desnoyer||9/10||2333 days||57%|
|Daniel Idiart||10/10||2335 days||57%|
|Remi Lopez||9/10||2370 days||55%|
|Nadav Knoll||7/10||2372 days||50%|
|Saskia Luecke||9/10||2648 days||42%|
|Martin Sajdok||5/10||3053 days||18%|
|Tomas Shairi||6/10||3078 days||18%|
|Sandra Frischmann||8/10||3079 days||21%|
|Siobhan Mee||10/10||3081 days||22%|
|Marc Greeve||10/10||3149 days||19%|
|Yvonne Horpershoeh||8/10||3149 days||18%|
|Wayne Kerr||9/10||3434 days||5%|
|Franz Schueler||10/10||3529 days||1%|
|Darren Ronchetti||10/10||3837 days||19%|
|Nicola Young||9/10||4146 days||19%|
|Juliane Kleiu||9/10||4168 days||19%|
|E C Frans||8/10||4176 days||18%|
|Jim Coffin||6/10||4176 days||15%|
|Joanne Byrne||8/10||4195 days||18%|
|Kyle Riseley||8/10||4644 days||18%|
|Rebecca Jenner||8/10||4644 days||18%|
|Gemma Morris||10/10||4656 days||19%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Queenstown Hill Time Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.