Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Matheson Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
110 Valid Reviews
The Lake Matheson Walk experience has a total of 110 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 110 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 110 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
95 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 110 valid reviews, the experience has 95 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.79% and is based on 95 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.30%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 436 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 831 days | 69% |
| Mike Robertson | 10/10 | 1318 days | 22% |
| Susanne | 10/10 | 2444 days | 4% |
| Flatlanders | 7/10 | 2689 days | 3% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2840 days | 3% |
| Katrina | 10/10 | 3143 days | 2% |
| Tony Wilcomes | 7/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3357 days | 2% |
| Jasmin Thuess | 6/10 | 3456 days | 1% |
| John Farley | 5/10 | 3471 days | 1% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3488 days | 2% |
| Chris Schmolz | 10/10 | 3505 days | 2% |
| Colin Fisher | 10/10 | 3505 days | 2% |
| Katrina Sedl | 10/10 | 3505 days | 2% |
| Allie Nertz | 10/10 | 3505 days | 2% |
| Sigrid Duus | 7/10 | 3509 days | 1% |
| Mads Nielsen | 8/10 | 3509 days | 2% |
| Jake Bullin | 8/10 | 3521 days | 2% |
| Dylan Smyth | 7/10 | 3546 days | 1% |
| Rae Hoath | 8/10 | 3560 days | 1% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3765 days | 1% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3765 days | 1% |
| Caleigh | 10/10 | 3766 days | 1% |
| Jeff Barth | 9/10 | 3766 days | 1% |
| Helene Christensen | 10/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Sofie Madson | 10/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3773 days | 1% |
| Lucy Murray | 8/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| Brenda Oomen | 8/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| Alina Hummel | 8/10 | 3794 days | 1% |
| Udo Wagner | 5/10 | 3861 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3904 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 7/10 | 4014 days | 0% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4208 days | 0% |
| Sheila Galpin | 10/10 | 4513 days | 1% |
| Douglas Dean | 8/10 | 4515 days | 1% |
| Libby | 6/10 | 4536 days | 1% |
| Xavier | 9/10 | 4536 days | 1% |
| Colin Billington | 9/10 | 4537 days | 1% |
| Lionel | 7/10 | 4547 days | 1% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4547 days | 1% |
| Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4549 days | 1% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4567 days | 1% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 10/10 | 4575 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 4584 days | 1% |
| Kim Maertens | 9/10 | 4584 days | 1% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4844 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 9/10 | 4849 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4880 days | 1% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4880 days | 1% |
| Dave Mertzig | 8/10 | 4880 days | 1% |
| Lorna and Seb | 8/10 | 4883 days | 1% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4887 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4961 days | 1% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5229 days | 1% |
| Norman UK | 9/10 | 5237 days | 1% |
| Evelyn Mackie | 10/10 | 5238 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 10/10 | 5239 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 5242 days | 1% |
| Lucy Duffy | 9/10 | 5248 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 7/10 | 5255 days | 1% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5257 days | 1% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5257 days | 1% |
| Kolen | 8/10 | 5257 days | 1% |
| Randewyk | 8/10 | 5258 days | 1% |
| Jessica Lane | 6/10 | 5271 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5274 days | 1% |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 5337 days | 1% |
| Les and Carole Savins | 8/10 | 5342 days | 1% |
| Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 5343 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5569 days | 1% |
| Peter Cade | 8/10 | 5594 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5597 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 5/10 | 5598 days | 0% |
| Kauzta | 10/10 | 5599 days | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 8/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
| katjarege | 10/10 | 5611 days | 1% |
| Julie Pasquignon | 8/10 | 5612 days | 1% |
| Ini & Cees | 8/10 | 5613 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Mackie | 8/10 | 5621 days | 1% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5627 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5627 days | 1% |
| Helen Keighley | 9/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
| John Clarkson | 10/10 | 5637 days | 1% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5662 days | 1% |
| Schumacher | 9/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Rob | 7/10 | 5978 days | 1% |
| Bouwma | 9/10 | 5997 days | 1% |
| Silvia Kern | 9/10 | 5998 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 5998 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 7/10 | 6004 days | 1% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 6010 days | 1% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 6013 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 5/10 | 6024 days | 0% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 6050 days | 1% |
| niekv | 8/10 | 6051 days | 1% |
| Mark Coffey | 9/10 | 6066 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 9/10 | 6078 days | 1% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 6093 days | 1% |
| linus | 9/10 | 6192 days | 1% |
| AndyEngland | 8/10 | 6298 days | 1% |
| JonK | 7/10 | 6298 days | 1% |
| Dave Ashun | 9/10 | 6317 days | 1% |
| CraigB | 10/10 | 6322 days | 1% |
| EricS | 8/10 | 6322 days | 1% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6326 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 10/10 | 6326 days | 1% |
| Sarah Bridge | 9/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Matheson Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.25% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.