G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Matheson Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
110 Valid Reviews
The Lake Matheson Walk experience has a total of 110 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 110 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 110 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
95 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 110 valid reviews, the experience has 95 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.79% and is based on 95 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 226 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 621 days | 82% |
| Mike Robertson | 10/10 | 1108 days | 36% |
| Susanne | 10/10 | 2234 days | 4% |
| Flatlanders | 7/10 | 2479 days | 4% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2630 days | 4% |
| Katrina | 10/10 | 2934 days | 3% |
| Tony Wilcomes | 7/10 | 2963 days | 3% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3148 days | 3% |
| Jasmin Thuess | 6/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
| John Farley | 5/10 | 3261 days | 2% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3278 days | 2% |
| Chris Schmolz | 10/10 | 3295 days | 2% |
| Colin Fisher | 10/10 | 3295 days | 2% |
| Katrina Sedl | 10/10 | 3295 days | 2% |
| Allie Nertz | 10/10 | 3295 days | 2% |
| Sigrid Duus | 7/10 | 3299 days | 2% |
| Mads Nielsen | 8/10 | 3299 days | 2% |
| Jake Bullin | 8/10 | 3311 days | 2% |
| Dylan Smyth | 7/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
| Rae Hoath | 8/10 | 3350 days | 2% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3555 days | 2% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3555 days | 2% |
| Caleigh | 10/10 | 3556 days | 2% |
| Jeff Barth | 9/10 | 3556 days | 2% |
| Helene Christensen | 10/10 | 3557 days | 2% |
| Sofie Madson | 10/10 | 3557 days | 2% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3563 days | 2% |
| Lucy Murray | 8/10 | 3573 days | 2% |
| Brenda Oomen | 8/10 | 3573 days | 2% |
| Alina Hummel | 8/10 | 3584 days | 2% |
| Udo Wagner | 5/10 | 3651 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3694 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 7/10 | 3804 days | 1% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 3999 days | 1% |
| Sheila Galpin | 10/10 | 4303 days | 0% |
| Douglas Dean | 8/10 | 4305 days | 0% |
| Libby | 6/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
| Xavier | 9/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
| Colin Billington | 9/10 | 4327 days | 0% |
| Lionel | 7/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
| Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4357 days | 0% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 10/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Kim Maertens | 9/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4634 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 9/10 | 4639 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
| Dave Mertzig | 8/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
| Lorna and Seb | 8/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4751 days | 1% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
| Norman UK | 9/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
| Evelyn Mackie | 10/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 10/10 | 5029 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 5032 days | 1% |
| Lucy Duffy | 9/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 7/10 | 5045 days | 1% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5047 days | 1% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5047 days | 1% |
| Kolen | 8/10 | 5047 days | 1% |
| Randewyk | 8/10 | 5048 days | 1% |
| Jessica Lane | 6/10 | 5061 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5064 days | 1% |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 5127 days | 1% |
| Les and Carole Savins | 8/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
| Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5359 days | 1% |
| Peter Cade | 8/10 | 5384 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 5/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
| Kauzta | 10/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 8/10 | 5400 days | 1% |
| katjarege | 10/10 | 5401 days | 1% |
| Julie Pasquignon | 8/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
| Ini & Cees | 8/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Mackie | 8/10 | 5411 days | 1% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| Helen Keighley | 9/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
| John Clarkson | 10/10 | 5427 days | 1% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5452 days | 1% |
| Schumacher | 9/10 | 5753 days | 1% |
| Rob | 7/10 | 5768 days | 1% |
| Bouwma | 9/10 | 5787 days | 1% |
| Silvia Kern | 9/10 | 5788 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 5788 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 7/10 | 5794 days | 1% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 5800 days | 1% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5803 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 5/10 | 5814 days | 1% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 5814 days | 1% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5840 days | 1% |
| niekv | 8/10 | 5841 days | 1% |
| Mark Coffey | 9/10 | 5856 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 9/10 | 5868 days | 1% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| linus | 9/10 | 5982 days | 1% |
| AndyEngland | 8/10 | 6088 days | 1% |
| JonK | 7/10 | 6088 days | 1% |
| Dave Ashun | 9/10 | 6107 days | 1% |
| CraigB | 10/10 | 6112 days | 1% |
| EricS | 8/10 | 6112 days | 1% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 10/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| Sarah Bridge | 9/10 | 6120 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Matheson Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.12% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.