Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Matheson Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
110 Valid Reviews
The Lake Matheson Walk experience has a total of 110 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 110 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 110 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
95 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 110 valid reviews, the experience has 95 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.79% and is based on 95 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.96%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 516 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 911 days | 63% |
| Mike Robertson | 10/10 | 1398 days | 18% |
| Susanne | 10/10 | 2524 days | 4% |
| Flatlanders | 7/10 | 2769 days | 3% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2920 days | 3% |
| Katrina | 10/10 | 3224 days | 3% |
| Tony Wilcomes | 7/10 | 3253 days | 2% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3438 days | 2% |
| Jasmin Thuess | 6/10 | 3536 days | 2% |
| John Farley | 5/10 | 3551 days | 1% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3568 days | 2% |
| Chris Schmolz | 10/10 | 3585 days | 2% |
| Colin Fisher | 10/10 | 3585 days | 2% |
| Katrina Sedl | 10/10 | 3585 days | 2% |
| Allie Nertz | 10/10 | 3585 days | 2% |
| Sigrid Duus | 7/10 | 3589 days | 2% |
| Mads Nielsen | 8/10 | 3589 days | 2% |
| Jake Bullin | 8/10 | 3601 days | 2% |
| Dylan Smyth | 7/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
| Rae Hoath | 8/10 | 3640 days | 1% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3845 days | 1% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3845 days | 1% |
| Caleigh | 10/10 | 3846 days | 1% |
| Jeff Barth | 9/10 | 3846 days | 1% |
| Helene Christensen | 10/10 | 3847 days | 1% |
| Sofie Madson | 10/10 | 3847 days | 1% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3853 days | 1% |
| Lucy Murray | 8/10 | 3863 days | 1% |
| Brenda Oomen | 8/10 | 3863 days | 1% |
| Alina Hummel | 8/10 | 3874 days | 1% |
| Udo Wagner | 5/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3984 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 7/10 | 4094 days | 0% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4289 days | 0% |
| Sheila Galpin | 10/10 | 4593 days | 1% |
| Douglas Dean | 8/10 | 4595 days | 1% |
| Libby | 6/10 | 4616 days | 1% |
| Xavier | 9/10 | 4616 days | 1% |
| Colin Billington | 9/10 | 4617 days | 1% |
| Lionel | 7/10 | 4627 days | 1% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4627 days | 1% |
| Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4629 days | 1% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4647 days | 1% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 10/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 4664 days | 1% |
| Kim Maertens | 9/10 | 4664 days | 1% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4924 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 9/10 | 4929 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4960 days | 1% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4960 days | 1% |
| Dave Mertzig | 8/10 | 4960 days | 1% |
| Lorna and Seb | 8/10 | 4963 days | 1% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4967 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 5041 days | 1% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5309 days | 1% |
| Norman UK | 9/10 | 5317 days | 1% |
| Evelyn Mackie | 10/10 | 5318 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 10/10 | 5319 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 5322 days | 1% |
| Lucy Duffy | 9/10 | 5328 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 7/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5337 days | 1% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5337 days | 1% |
| Kolen | 8/10 | 5337 days | 1% |
| Randewyk | 8/10 | 5338 days | 1% |
| Jessica Lane | 6/10 | 5351 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5354 days | 1% |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| Les and Carole Savins | 8/10 | 5422 days | 1% |
| Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 5423 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5649 days | 1% |
| Peter Cade | 8/10 | 5674 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5677 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 5/10 | 5678 days | 1% |
| Kauzta | 10/10 | 5679 days | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 8/10 | 5690 days | 1% |
| katjarege | 10/10 | 5691 days | 1% |
| Julie Pasquignon | 8/10 | 5692 days | 1% |
| Ini & Cees | 8/10 | 5693 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Mackie | 8/10 | 5701 days | 1% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5707 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5707 days | 1% |
| Helen Keighley | 9/10 | 5711 days | 1% |
| John Clarkson | 10/10 | 5717 days | 1% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5742 days | 1% |
| Schumacher | 9/10 | 6043 days | 1% |
| Rob | 7/10 | 6058 days | 1% |
| Bouwma | 9/10 | 6077 days | 1% |
| Silvia Kern | 9/10 | 6078 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 6078 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 7/10 | 6084 days | 1% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 6090 days | 1% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 6093 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 5/10 | 6104 days | 1% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 6104 days | 1% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 6130 days | 1% |
| niekv | 8/10 | 6131 days | 1% |
| Mark Coffey | 9/10 | 6146 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 9/10 | 6158 days | 1% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 6173 days | 1% |
| linus | 9/10 | 6272 days | 1% |
| AndyEngland | 8/10 | 6378 days | 1% |
| JonK | 7/10 | 6378 days | 1% |
| Dave Ashun | 9/10 | 6397 days | 1% |
| CraigB | 10/10 | 6402 days | 1% |
| EricS | 8/10 | 6402 days | 1% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6406 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 10/10 | 6406 days | 1% |
| Sarah Bridge | 9/10 | 6410 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Matheson Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.