G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Matheson Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
110 Valid Reviews
The Lake Matheson Walk experience has a total of 110 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 110 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 110 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
95 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 110 valid reviews, the experience has 95 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.79% and is based on 95 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.69%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 335 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 730 days | 76% |
| Mike Robertson | 10/10 | 1217 days | 28% |
| Susanne | 10/10 | 2343 days | 4% |
| Flatlanders | 7/10 | 2588 days | 3% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2739 days | 3% |
| Katrina | 10/10 | 3042 days | 2% |
| Tony Wilcomes | 7/10 | 3072 days | 2% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3256 days | 2% |
| Jasmin Thuess | 6/10 | 3355 days | 1% |
| John Farley | 5/10 | 3370 days | 1% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3387 days | 2% |
| Chris Schmolz | 10/10 | 3404 days | 2% |
| Colin Fisher | 10/10 | 3404 days | 2% |
| Katrina Sedl | 10/10 | 3404 days | 2% |
| Allie Nertz | 10/10 | 3404 days | 2% |
| Sigrid Duus | 7/10 | 3408 days | 1% |
| Mads Nielsen | 8/10 | 3408 days | 1% |
| Jake Bullin | 8/10 | 3420 days | 1% |
| Dylan Smyth | 7/10 | 3445 days | 1% |
| Rae Hoath | 8/10 | 3459 days | 1% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3664 days | 1% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3664 days | 1% |
| Caleigh | 10/10 | 3665 days | 1% |
| Jeff Barth | 9/10 | 3665 days | 1% |
| Helene Christensen | 10/10 | 3666 days | 1% |
| Sofie Madson | 10/10 | 3666 days | 1% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3672 days | 1% |
| Lucy Murray | 8/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| Brenda Oomen | 8/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| Alina Hummel | 8/10 | 3693 days | 1% |
| Udo Wagner | 5/10 | 3760 days | 0% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3803 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 7/10 | 3913 days | 0% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4107 days | 0% |
| Sheila Galpin | 10/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
| Douglas Dean | 8/10 | 4414 days | 0% |
| Libby | 6/10 | 4435 days | 0% |
| Xavier | 9/10 | 4435 days | 1% |
| Colin Billington | 9/10 | 4436 days | 1% |
| Lionel | 7/10 | 4446 days | 0% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4446 days | 0% |
| Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4448 days | 0% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4466 days | 1% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 10/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 4483 days | 1% |
| Kim Maertens | 9/10 | 4483 days | 1% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4743 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 9/10 | 4748 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4779 days | 0% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4779 days | 1% |
| Dave Mertzig | 8/10 | 4779 days | 0% |
| Lorna and Seb | 8/10 | 4782 days | 0% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4860 days | 0% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5128 days | 1% |
| Norman UK | 9/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
| Evelyn Mackie | 10/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 10/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
| Lucy Duffy | 9/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 7/10 | 5154 days | 0% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5156 days | 0% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5156 days | 1% |
| Kolen | 8/10 | 5156 days | 0% |
| Randewyk | 8/10 | 5157 days | 0% |
| Jessica Lane | 6/10 | 5170 days | 0% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5173 days | 1% |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 5236 days | 1% |
| Les and Carole Savins | 8/10 | 5241 days | 0% |
| Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 5242 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5468 days | 1% |
| Peter Cade | 8/10 | 5493 days | 0% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5496 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 5/10 | 5497 days | 0% |
| Kauzta | 10/10 | 5498 days | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 8/10 | 5509 days | 0% |
| katjarege | 10/10 | 5510 days | 1% |
| Julie Pasquignon | 8/10 | 5511 days | 0% |
| Ini & Cees | 8/10 | 5512 days | 0% |
| Mr & Mrs Mackie | 8/10 | 5520 days | 0% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5526 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5526 days | 1% |
| Helen Keighley | 9/10 | 5530 days | 1% |
| John Clarkson | 10/10 | 5536 days | 1% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5561 days | 0% |
| Schumacher | 9/10 | 5862 days | 1% |
| Rob | 7/10 | 5877 days | 0% |
| Bouwma | 9/10 | 5896 days | 1% |
| Silvia Kern | 9/10 | 5897 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 5897 days | 0% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 7/10 | 5903 days | 0% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 5909 days | 1% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5912 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 5/10 | 5923 days | 0% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 5923 days | 0% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5949 days | 1% |
| niekv | 8/10 | 5950 days | 0% |
| Mark Coffey | 9/10 | 5965 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 9/10 | 5977 days | 1% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 5992 days | 1% |
| linus | 9/10 | 6091 days | 1% |
| AndyEngland | 8/10 | 6197 days | 0% |
| JonK | 7/10 | 6197 days | 0% |
| Dave Ashun | 9/10 | 6216 days | 1% |
| CraigB | 10/10 | 6221 days | 1% |
| EricS | 8/10 | 6221 days | 0% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6225 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 10/10 | 6225 days | 1% |
| Sarah Bridge | 9/10 | 6229 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Matheson Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.19% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.