Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Matheson Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
110 Valid Reviews
The Lake Matheson Walk experience has a total of 110 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 110 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 110 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
95 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 110 valid reviews, the experience has 95 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.79% and is based on 95 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.20%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 218 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 613 days | 82% |
| Mike Robertson | 10/10 | 1100 days | 37% |
| Susanne | 10/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| Flatlanders | 7/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2622 days | 4% |
| Katrina | 10/10 | 2925 days | 3% |
| Tony Wilcomes | 7/10 | 2955 days | 3% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3139 days | 3% |
| Jasmin Thuess | 6/10 | 3238 days | 2% |
| John Farley | 5/10 | 3253 days | 2% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3270 days | 2% |
| Chris Schmolz | 10/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
| Colin Fisher | 10/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
| Katrina Sedl | 10/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
| Allie Nertz | 10/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
| Sigrid Duus | 7/10 | 3291 days | 2% |
| Mads Nielsen | 8/10 | 3291 days | 2% |
| Jake Bullin | 8/10 | 3303 days | 2% |
| Dylan Smyth | 7/10 | 3328 days | 2% |
| Rae Hoath | 8/10 | 3342 days | 2% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3547 days | 2% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3547 days | 2% |
| Caleigh | 10/10 | 3548 days | 2% |
| Jeff Barth | 9/10 | 3548 days | 2% |
| Helene Christensen | 10/10 | 3549 days | 2% |
| Sofie Madson | 10/10 | 3549 days | 2% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3555 days | 2% |
| Lucy Murray | 8/10 | 3565 days | 2% |
| Brenda Oomen | 8/10 | 3565 days | 2% |
| Alina Hummel | 8/10 | 3576 days | 2% |
| Udo Wagner | 5/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3686 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 7/10 | 3796 days | 1% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 3990 days | 1% |
| Sheila Galpin | 10/10 | 4295 days | 0% |
| Douglas Dean | 8/10 | 4297 days | 0% |
| Libby | 6/10 | 4318 days | 0% |
| Xavier | 9/10 | 4318 days | 0% |
| Colin Billington | 9/10 | 4319 days | 0% |
| Lionel | 7/10 | 4329 days | 0% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4329 days | 0% |
| Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4331 days | 0% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4349 days | 0% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 10/10 | 4357 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Kim Maertens | 9/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4626 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 9/10 | 4631 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| Dave Mertzig | 8/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| Lorna and Seb | 8/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4669 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4743 days | 1% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5011 days | 1% |
| Norman UK | 9/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
| Evelyn Mackie | 10/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 10/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 5024 days | 1% |
| Lucy Duffy | 9/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 7/10 | 5037 days | 1% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Kolen | 8/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Randewyk | 8/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
| Jessica Lane | 6/10 | 5053 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
| Les and Carole Savins | 8/10 | 5124 days | 1% |
| Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 5125 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5351 days | 1% |
| Peter Cade | 8/10 | 5376 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 5/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Kauzta | 10/10 | 5381 days | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 8/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
| katjarege | 10/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
| Julie Pasquignon | 8/10 | 5394 days | 1% |
| Ini & Cees | 8/10 | 5395 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Mackie | 8/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5409 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5409 days | 1% |
| Helen Keighley | 9/10 | 5413 days | 1% |
| John Clarkson | 10/10 | 5419 days | 1% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5444 days | 1% |
| Schumacher | 9/10 | 5745 days | 1% |
| Rob | 7/10 | 5760 days | 1% |
| Bouwma | 9/10 | 5779 days | 1% |
| Silvia Kern | 9/10 | 5780 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 5780 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 7/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 5792 days | 1% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5795 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 5/10 | 5806 days | 1% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 5806 days | 1% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5832 days | 1% |
| niekv | 8/10 | 5833 days | 1% |
| Mark Coffey | 9/10 | 5848 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 9/10 | 5860 days | 1% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 5875 days | 1% |
| linus | 9/10 | 5974 days | 1% |
| AndyEngland | 8/10 | 6080 days | 1% |
| JonK | 7/10 | 6080 days | 1% |
| Dave Ashun | 9/10 | 6099 days | 1% |
| CraigB | 10/10 | 6104 days | 1% |
| EricS | 8/10 | 6104 days | 1% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6108 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 10/10 | 6108 days | 1% |
| Sarah Bridge | 9/10 | 6112 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Matheson Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.11% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.