G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Matheson Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
110 Valid Reviews
The Lake Matheson Walk experience has a total of 110 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 110 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 110 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
95 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 110 valid reviews, the experience has 95 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.79% and is based on 95 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.16%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 253 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 648 days | 81% |
| Mike Robertson | 10/10 | 1135 days | 34% |
| Susanne | 10/10 | 2261 days | 4% |
| Flatlanders | 7/10 | 2506 days | 4% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2657 days | 4% |
| Katrina | 10/10 | 2961 days | 3% |
| Tony Wilcomes | 7/10 | 2990 days | 3% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3175 days | 2% |
| Jasmin Thuess | 6/10 | 3273 days | 2% |
| John Farley | 5/10 | 3288 days | 2% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| Chris Schmolz | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
| Colin Fisher | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
| Katrina Sedl | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
| Allie Nertz | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
| Sigrid Duus | 7/10 | 3326 days | 2% |
| Mads Nielsen | 8/10 | 3326 days | 2% |
| Jake Bullin | 8/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
| Dylan Smyth | 7/10 | 3363 days | 2% |
| Rae Hoath | 8/10 | 3377 days | 2% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3582 days | 2% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3582 days | 2% |
| Caleigh | 10/10 | 3583 days | 2% |
| Jeff Barth | 9/10 | 3583 days | 2% |
| Helene Christensen | 10/10 | 3584 days | 2% |
| Sofie Madson | 10/10 | 3584 days | 2% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3590 days | 1% |
| Lucy Murray | 8/10 | 3600 days | 2% |
| Brenda Oomen | 8/10 | 3600 days | 2% |
| Alina Hummel | 8/10 | 3611 days | 2% |
| Udo Wagner | 5/10 | 3678 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3721 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 7/10 | 3831 days | 1% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4026 days | 1% |
| Sheila Galpin | 10/10 | 4330 days | 0% |
| Douglas Dean | 8/10 | 4332 days | 0% |
| Libby | 6/10 | 4353 days | 0% |
| Xavier | 9/10 | 4353 days | 0% |
| Colin Billington | 9/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Lionel | 7/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
| Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4384 days | 1% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 10/10 | 4392 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| Kim Maertens | 9/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4661 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 9/10 | 4666 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4697 days | 1% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4697 days | 1% |
| Dave Mertzig | 8/10 | 4697 days | 1% |
| Lorna and Seb | 8/10 | 4700 days | 1% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4704 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
| Norman UK | 9/10 | 5054 days | 1% |
| Evelyn Mackie | 10/10 | 5055 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 10/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 5059 days | 1% |
| Lucy Duffy | 9/10 | 5065 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 7/10 | 5072 days | 1% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5074 days | 1% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5074 days | 1% |
| Kolen | 8/10 | 5074 days | 1% |
| Randewyk | 8/10 | 5075 days | 1% |
| Jessica Lane | 6/10 | 5088 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5091 days | 1% |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 5154 days | 1% |
| Les and Carole Savins | 8/10 | 5159 days | 1% |
| Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 5160 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| Peter Cade | 8/10 | 5411 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5414 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 5/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
| Kauzta | 10/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 8/10 | 5427 days | 1% |
| katjarege | 10/10 | 5428 days | 1% |
| Julie Pasquignon | 8/10 | 5429 days | 1% |
| Ini & Cees | 8/10 | 5430 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Mackie | 8/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5444 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5444 days | 1% |
| Helen Keighley | 9/10 | 5448 days | 1% |
| John Clarkson | 10/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5479 days | 1% |
| Schumacher | 9/10 | 5780 days | 1% |
| Rob | 7/10 | 5795 days | 1% |
| Bouwma | 9/10 | 5814 days | 1% |
| Silvia Kern | 9/10 | 5815 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 5815 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 7/10 | 5821 days | 1% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 5827 days | 1% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5830 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 5/10 | 5841 days | 1% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 5841 days | 1% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
| niekv | 8/10 | 5868 days | 1% |
| Mark Coffey | 9/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 9/10 | 5895 days | 1% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 5910 days | 1% |
| linus | 9/10 | 6009 days | 1% |
| AndyEngland | 8/10 | 6115 days | 1% |
| JonK | 7/10 | 6115 days | 1% |
| Dave Ashun | 9/10 | 6134 days | 1% |
| CraigB | 10/10 | 6139 days | 1% |
| EricS | 8/10 | 6139 days | 1% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6143 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 10/10 | 6143 days | 1% |
| Sarah Bridge | 9/10 | 6147 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Matheson Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.12% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.