Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mount Taranaki Summit Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
97 Valid Reviews
The Mount Taranaki Summit Track experience has a total of 97 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 97 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 40 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 24 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount Taranaki Summit Track valid reviews is 88.45% and is based on 97 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
91 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 97 valid reviews, the experience has 91 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 91 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 35 |
|
38% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.80% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount Taranaki Summit Track face-to-face reviews is 87.80% and is based on 91 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.76%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leila Minuzzo | 10/10 | 1708 days | 100% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 2073 days | 77% |
| Takeru Yonahr | 9/10 | 3257 days | 35% |
| Mark Nickson | 10/10 | 3521 days | 27% |
| Henna | 9/10 | 3536 days | 26% |
| Tom Koppe | 7/10 | 3536 days | 24% |
| Dan Schmidt | 10/10 | 3548 days | 26% |
| David | 8/10 | 3583 days | 24% |
| Heyuuiutha Lokithas | 10/10 | 3586 days | 24% |
| Benjamin Leboucq | 9/10 | 3839 days | 15% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3839 days | 15% |
| Alexie Lion | 9/10 | 3842 days | 15% |
| Birthe | 7/10 | 3862 days | 13% |
| Yoomm | 9/10 | 3865 days | 14% |
| Robin Brandl | 9/10 | 3868 days | 14% |
| Adrienne Hoet | 9/10 | 3874 days | 14% |
| Meral Calar | 7/10 | 3874 days | 13% |
| Jan Homann | 9/10 | 3874 days | 14% |
| Josh Symons | 10/10 | 3878 days | 14% |
| Jacob Winchester | 10/10 | 3879 days | 14% |
| Benoit Leclerc | 8/10 | 3886 days | 13% |
| Verena | 7/10 | 3889 days | 12% |
| Lennox | 10/10 | 3890 days | 14% |
| Jaquein Bucholz | 9/10 | 3890 days | 13% |
| Marie | 7/10 | 3890 days | 12% |
| Maddalena Buffoni | 8/10 | 3890 days | 13% |
| Teo Golja | 8/10 | 3890 days | 13% |
| Annika Weber | 6/10 | 3890 days | 11% |
| Antoine Boudin | 8/10 | 3890 days | 13% |
| Yannick Schroeder | 9/10 | 3890 days | 13% |
| Cariotta Kemper | 8/10 | 3890 days | 13% |
| Jakub Ira | 9/10 | 3891 days | 13% |
| Michal Putnar | 10/10 | 3891 days | 14% |
| Ales Bronec | 8/10 | 3891 days | 13% |
| Felix | 8/10 | 3894 days | 13% |
| Philipp | 7/10 | 3895 days | 12% |
| Juro | 8/10 | 3895 days | 13% |
| Delphine Contrel | 10/10 | 3898 days | 13% |
| Bernhard Fichtl | 10/10 | 3899 days | 13% |
| Nilles Ullner | 9/10 | 3902 days | 13% |
| Martina Cervenkova | 10/10 | 3906 days | 13% |
| Anat Yossef | 9/10 | 3916 days | 13% |
| Vincent | 8/10 | 3917 days | 12% |
| Edwine | 8/10 | 3918 days | 12% |
| Linda and Gunther | 10/10 | 3945 days | 12% |
| Gessica | 8/10 | 3995 days | 10% |
| Elisabeth Ringswandl | 9/10 | 4225 days | 2% |
| Thomas Haslbeck | 10/10 | 4225 days | 2% |
| Nicolas Justin | 9/10 | 4227 days | 2% |
| Stephanie Piou | 10/10 | 4227 days | 2% |
| Martha Taatz | 10/10 | 4271 days | 0% |
| Manuela Opprecht | 9/10 | 4276 days | 0% |
| Jakub Stastny | 8/10 | 4572 days | 14% |
| Denisa Mecikova | 9/10 | 4576 days | 14% |
| Alex | 5/10 | 4580 days | 10% |
| Becky | 5/10 | 4580 days | 10% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 5/10 | 4613 days | 10% |
| Phillip | 10/10 | 4620 days | 14% |
| Kristina | 8/10 | 4620 days | 14% |
| Dana | 10/10 | 4620 days | 14% |
| Manuel Bach | 9/10 | 4621 days | 14% |
| Marc Engstle | 9/10 | 4624 days | 14% |
| Rita Hochstiasser | 10/10 | 4627 days | 14% |
| Florian Littmann | 10/10 | 4632 days | 14% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 4632 days | 14% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 4639 days | 14% |
| Aitnan Melman | 7/10 | 4663 days | 13% |
| Sarah Horn | 10/10 | 4955 days | 14% |
| Sebastian Russell-Smits | 10/10 | 4955 days | 14% |
| Nora | 10/10 | 4960 days | 14% |
| Thomas | 10/10 | 4965 days | 14% |
| Annika | 7/10 | 4971 days | 13% |
| Rouquette | 10/10 | 4977 days | 14% |
| Kristine and William | 8/10 | 4980 days | 14% |
| Elodie and jo | 10/10 | 4990 days | 14% |
| Anna Gottsch | 10/10 | 5072 days | 14% |
| Darina Kvasnicova | 10/10 | 5334 days | 14% |
| Melanie Friessen | 10/10 | 5334 days | 14% |
| Merlyn | 10/10 | 5345 days | 14% |
| Franziska & Katrin | 8/10 | 5353 days | 14% |
| Magda Savels | 8/10 | 5354 days | 14% |
| Johannes & Katrin | 9/10 | 5360 days | 14% |
| Steve Collier | 8/10 | 5360 days | 14% |
| _mel_ | 10/10 | 5392 days | 14% |
| Rachel Cockroft | 9/10 | 5670 days | 14% |
| Chloe Finster | 9/10 | 5713 days | 14% |
| Eva Weichs | 10/10 | 5716 days | 14% |
| Karen Phillips | 10/10 | 5723 days | 14% |
| TheBigLebowski | 10/10 | 5757 days | 14% |
| Martin | 10/10 | 6002 days | 14% |
| Denecke Thorsten | 8/10 | 6072 days | 14% |
| Johan | 9/10 | 6073 days | 14% |
| Johan Vaartjes | 10/10 | 6107 days | 14% |
| Chris Mackamul | 5/10 | 6160 days | 10% |
| LaurensD | 10/10 | 6397 days | 14% |
| Brigette Guikens | 10/10 | 6418 days | 14% |
| RuddM | 8/10 | 6431 days | 14% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mount Taranaki Summit Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.03% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.