Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mount Taranaki Summit Track.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mount Taranaki Summit Track

Valid Reviews

97 Valid Reviews

The Mount Taranaki Summit Track experience has a total of 97 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 97 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 40
41%
9/10 24
25%
8/10 20
21%
7/10 8
8%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 4
4%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.45% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount Taranaki Summit Track valid reviews is 88.45% and is based on 97 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

91 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 97 valid reviews, the experience has 91 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 91 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 35
38%
9/10 23
25%
8/10 20
22%
7/10 8
9%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 4
4%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

87.80% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount Taranaki Summit Track face-to-face reviews is 87.80% and is based on 91 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

89.76%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Leila Minuzzo 10/10 1708 days 100%
Chris 10/10 2073 days 77%
Takeru Yonahr 9/10 3257 days 35%
Mark Nickson 10/10 3521 days 27%
Henna 9/10 3536 days 26%
Tom Koppe 7/10 3536 days 24%
Dan Schmidt 10/10 3548 days 26%
David 8/10 3583 days 24%
Heyuuiutha Lokithas 10/10 3586 days 24%
Benjamin Leboucq 9/10 3839 days 15%
Adrien Richard 9/10 3839 days 15%
Alexie Lion 9/10 3842 days 15%
Birthe 7/10 3862 days 13%
Yoomm 9/10 3865 days 14%
Robin Brandl 9/10 3868 days 14%
Adrienne Hoet 9/10 3874 days 14%
Meral Calar 7/10 3874 days 13%
Jan Homann 9/10 3874 days 14%
Josh Symons 10/10 3878 days 14%
Jacob Winchester 10/10 3879 days 14%
Benoit Leclerc 8/10 3886 days 13%
Verena 7/10 3889 days 12%
Lennox 10/10 3890 days 14%
Jaquein Bucholz 9/10 3890 days 13%
Marie 7/10 3890 days 12%
Maddalena Buffoni 8/10 3890 days 13%
Teo Golja 8/10 3890 days 13%
Annika Weber 6/10 3890 days 11%
Antoine Boudin 8/10 3890 days 13%
Yannick Schroeder 9/10 3890 days 13%
Cariotta Kemper 8/10 3890 days 13%
Jakub Ira 9/10 3891 days 13%
Michal Putnar 10/10 3891 days 14%
Ales Bronec 8/10 3891 days 13%
Felix 8/10 3894 days 13%
Philipp 7/10 3895 days 12%
Juro 8/10 3895 days 13%
Delphine Contrel 10/10 3898 days 13%
Bernhard Fichtl 10/10 3899 days 13%
Nilles Ullner 9/10 3902 days 13%
Martina Cervenkova 10/10 3906 days 13%
Anat Yossef 9/10 3916 days 13%
Vincent 8/10 3917 days 12%
Edwine 8/10 3918 days 12%
Linda and Gunther 10/10 3945 days 12%
Gessica 8/10 3995 days 10%
Elisabeth Ringswandl 9/10 4225 days 2%
Thomas Haslbeck 10/10 4225 days 2%
Nicolas Justin 9/10 4227 days 2%
Stephanie Piou 10/10 4227 days 2%
Martha Taatz 10/10 4271 days 0%
Manuela Opprecht 9/10 4276 days 0%
Jakub Stastny 8/10 4572 days 14%
Denisa Mecikova 9/10 4576 days 14%
Alex 5/10 4580 days 10%
Becky 5/10 4580 days 10%
Cindy Benayoum 5/10 4613 days 10%
Phillip 10/10 4620 days 14%
Kristina 8/10 4620 days 14%
Dana 10/10 4620 days 14%
Manuel Bach 9/10 4621 days 14%
Marc Engstle 9/10 4624 days 14%
Rita Hochstiasser 10/10 4627 days 14%
Florian Littmann 10/10 4632 days 14%
Anna 10/10 4632 days 14%
Claudia 10/10 4639 days 14%
Aitnan Melman 7/10 4663 days 13%
Sarah Horn 10/10 4955 days 14%
Sebastian Russell-Smits 10/10 4955 days 14%
Nora 10/10 4960 days 14%
Thomas 10/10 4965 days 14%
Annika 7/10 4971 days 13%
Rouquette 10/10 4977 days 14%
Kristine and William 8/10 4980 days 14%
Elodie and jo 10/10 4990 days 14%
Anna Gottsch 10/10 5072 days 14%
Darina Kvasnicova 10/10 5334 days 14%
Melanie Friessen 10/10 5334 days 14%
Merlyn 10/10 5345 days 14%
Franziska & Katrin 8/10 5353 days 14%
Magda Savels 8/10 5354 days 14%
Johannes & Katrin 9/10 5360 days 14%
Steve Collier 8/10 5360 days 14%
_mel_ 10/10 5392 days 14%
Rachel Cockroft 9/10 5670 days 14%
Chloe Finster 9/10 5713 days 14%
Eva Weichs 10/10 5716 days 14%
Karen Phillips 10/10 5723 days 14%
TheBigLebowski 10/10 5757 days 14%
Martin 10/10 6002 days 14%
Denecke Thorsten 8/10 6072 days 14%
Johan 9/10 6073 days 14%
Johan Vaartjes 10/10 6107 days 14%
Chris Mackamul 5/10 6160 days 10%
LaurensD 10/10 6397 days 14%
Brigette Guikens 10/10 6418 days 14%
RuddM 8/10 6431 days 14%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mount Taranaki Summit Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.03% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.