Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk
Valid Reviews
47 Valid Reviews
The Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk experience has a total of 48 reviews. There are 47 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.09% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk valid reviews is 88.09% and is based on 47 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
44 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 47 valid reviews, the experience has 44 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk face-to-face reviews is 88.18% and is based on 44 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.53%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susanne | 9/10 | 1354 days |  |
4.49 | 100% |
| Sylvain Schiber | 9/10 | 1424 days | 4.36 | 97% | |
| Sylvain Chanton | 10/10 | 1429 days | |
4.35 | 97% |
| Julian Gury | 9/10 | 1437 days | |
4.33 | 96% |
| Tobi | 10/10 | 1638 days | |
3.94 | 88% |
| Rolf | 8/10 | 1652 days | |
3.71 | 83% |
| Robin Brandl | 8/10 | 1666 days | |
3.69 | 82% |
| Laura Moore | 8/10 | 1668 days | |
3.68 | 82% |
| Frenziska Schmid | 9/10 | 1670 days | |
3.87 | 86% |
| Tim Ronke | 9/10 | 1670 days | |
3.87 | 86% |
| Emily Pohlmann | 7/10 | 1674 days | |
3.52 | 78% |
| George | 10/10 | 1681 days | |
3.85 | 86% |
| Maxim Motheus | 10/10 | 1693 days | |
3.83 | 85% |
| Max Mustermann | 9/10 | 1693 days | |
3.83 | 85% |
| Carmen Pramstaller | 10/10 | 1700 days | |
3.82 | 85% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 8/10 | 1701 days | |
3.62 | 81% |
| Kyle Johnson | 8/10 | 1701 days | |
3.62 | 81% |
| Markus Wabing | 6/10 | 1703 days | |
3.16 | 70% |
| Roland Fischer | 10/10 | 1706 days | |
3.8 | 85% |
| Annett Kiessling | 10/10 | 1706 days | |
3.8 | 85% |
| Tatiana Racheneau | 10/10 | 1712 days | |
3.79 | 84% |
| Johannes Marold | 9/10 | 1714 days | |
3.79 | 84% |
| Flora Kiessling | 10/10 | 1714 days | |
3.79 | 84% |
| Jakub Trojanek | 7/10 | 1739 days | |
3.4 | 76% |
| Tereza Fajfroua | 9/10 | 1740 days | |
3.74 | 83% |
| Julia Martin | 8/10 | 1745 days | |
3.54 | 79% |
| Elsa Caniato | 8/10 | 1760 days | |
3.51 | 78% |
| Till | 8/10 | 1763 days | |
3.51 | 78% |
| Marilyn and Steffen | 7/10 | 1778 days | |
3.33 | 74% |
| Meredith Griffiths | 10/10 | 2388 days | |
2.47 | 55% |
| Jared Hermansson | 9/10 | 2427 days | |
2.39 | 53% |
| Alex | 7/10 | 2459 days | 2.12 | 47% | |
| Petr Dvorak | 9/10 | 2771 days | |
1.72 | 38% |
| Anne Rodofsen | 8/10 | 2845 days | |
1.5 | 33% |
| Jens Moller | 8/10 | 3123 days | |
0.98 | 22% |
| Brian Livesey | 9/10 | 3135 days | |
1.01 | 22% |
| Magda Savels | 5/10 | 3152 days | |
0.79 | 18% |
| John Jacobs | 9/10 | 3187 days | |
0.91 | 20% |
| Todd Pang | 10/10 | 3480 days | |
0.33 | 7% |
| Anika Jedelsky | 10/10 | 3497 days | |
0.3 | 7% |
| J Holden | 9/10 | 3502 days | |
0.29 | 6% |
| Barbara & Sebastian | 10/10 | 3863 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anne Veser | 9/10 | 3881 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| selinab | 10/10 | 3944 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| discerner | 10/10 | 3981 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| richards1 | 9/10 | 4076 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Pavol | 10/10 | 4305 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.