Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tongariro Northern Circuit.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
75 Valid Reviews
The Tongariro Northern Circuit experience has a total of 75 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 75 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 41 |
|
55% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.47% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tongariro Northern Circuit valid reviews is 91.47% and is based on 75 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
70 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 75 valid reviews, the experience has 70 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
51% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.86% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tongariro Northern Circuit face-to-face reviews is 90.86% and is based on 70 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
96.50%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chris | 10/10 | 439 days | 100% |
| Eva Cordemeyer | 9/10 | 2962 days | 3% |
| Matti Picus | 10/10 | 3224 days | 3% |
| Vic Baughen | 9/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 10/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 10/10 | 3255 days | 2% |
| Kallan Mrozek | 9/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Frank Fabian | 8/10 | 3313 days | 2% |
| Sabine Schwandegger | 10/10 | 3313 days | 2% |
| Carmen Stanow | 10/10 | 3337 days | 2% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3543 days | 2% |
| Estelle Coquard | 10/10 | 3546 days | 2% |
| Juliane Mueller | 10/10 | 3549 days | 2% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 3560 days | 2% |
| Bjoern | 10/10 | 3560 days | 2% |
| Floren Hoenschler | 9/10 | 3589 days | 2% |
| Simone De Angiou | 10/10 | 3594 days | 2% |
| William Lendway | 10/10 | 3595 days | 2% |
| Morgan Fog | 10/10 | 3595 days | 2% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 3603 days | 2% |
| Lorne Paterson | 10/10 | 3603 days | 2% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 10/10 | 3607 days | 2% |
| Kyle Johnson | 9/10 | 3607 days | 2% |
| Tamara | 8/10 | 3607 days | 2% |
| Markus Wabing | 9/10 | 3609 days | 2% |
| Uschi Pongratz | 10/10 | 3609 days | 2% |
| Jessica Ruhland | 10/10 | 3609 days | 2% |
| Edwine | 6/10 | 3622 days | 1% |
| Sara Kuenzi | 9/10 | 3624 days | 2% |
| Maxime Louis | 10/10 | 3625 days | 2% |
| Lukas Schenke | 10/10 | 3654 days | 2% |
| Till | 10/10 | 3669 days | 2% |
| Nicolas Justin | 8/10 | 3931 days | 1% |
| Damaris Mayer | 8/10 | 3980 days | 1% |
| Friederike Kranzin | 10/10 | 4313 days | 0% |
| Marc Engstle | 7/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4332 days | 0% |
| Johannes | 9/10 | 4333 days | 0% |
| Max Grabowski | 10/10 | 4334 days | 0% |
| Victor Herranz | 10/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
| Nimh Oudhof | 8/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Harel Cliad | 9/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| Aitnan Melman | 9/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
| Alex Artigues | 7/10 | 4368 days | 0% |
| Simon Zenzen | 10/10 | 4368 days | 0% |
| Thomas | 10/10 | 4669 days | 1% |
| Marketa | 10/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Lusi13 | 10/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Jana Simcikova | 10/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
| Tobi | 10/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
| Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
| Jean Raisin | 10/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
| Tony and Helene | 8/10 | 4679 days | 1% |
| Missy and Chaz | 10/10 | 4681 days | 1% |
| Evyatar Tulipman | 7/10 | 4684 days | 1% |
| Anne Rodofsen | 9/10 | 4751 days | 1% |
| Michael Neumann | 10/10 | 5023 days | 1% |
| Be Groen | 7/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
| Ian Sainsbury | 7/10 | 5050 days | 1% |
| Anika | 9/10 | 5064 days | 1% |
| John Jacobs | 9/10 | 5093 days | 1% |
| snoopidoops | 10/10 | 5096 days | 1% |
| Natascha & Greg | 9/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
| Robin van der Linden | 9/10 | 5353 days | 1% |
| Zoe Barker | 10/10 | 5376 days | 1% |
| R Tearle | 4/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Susannah Eduart | 8/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| Nadia Husain | 8/10 | 5430 days | 1% |
| anon | 10/10 | 5774 days | 1% |
| Marcel Baessle | 10/10 | 5781 days | 1% |
| Karen Raven | 7/10 | 5864 days | 1% |
| bdevries | 8/10 | 5868 days | 1% |
| Pavol | 10/10 | 6211 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tongariro Northern Circuit does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.