Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cathedral Cove Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
286 Valid Reviews
The Cathedral Cove Walk experience has a total of 286 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 286 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 96 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 82 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 71 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 29 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk valid reviews is 87.59% and is based on 286 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
265 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 286 valid reviews, the experience has 265 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 265 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 88 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 78 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 68 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.66% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk face-to-face reviews is 87.66% and is based on 265 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.21%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael | 10/10 | 3001 days | 100% |
| Matt McCloskey | 9/10 | 3195 days | 84% |
| Matthias and Adriane | 8/10 | 3463 days | 62% |
| Rachael Gray | 7/10 | 3493 days | 57% |
| Martin Fersebner | 7/10 | 3500 days | 56% |
| Chaulet | 9/10 | 3505 days | 60% |
| Breanna Alexander | 7/10 | 3506 days | 56% |
| Clementine | 10/10 | 3529 days | 59% |
| Claudia Schaefer | 8/10 | 3531 days | 57% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 3537 days | 58% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 3537 days | 57% |
| Mireia Sanchez | 10/10 | 3539 days | 58% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 3545 days | 56% |
| Kees Mol | 10/10 | 3548 days | 57% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 8/10 | 3553 days | 56% |
| David Santos | 9/10 | 3556 days | 56% |
| Dominique | 7/10 | 3559 days | 52% |
| Heike Buchmann | 8/10 | 3559 days | 55% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 3560 days | 56% |
| Ulf | 9/10 | 3562 days | 56% |
| Matthew Long | 7/10 | 3562 days | 52% |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 3562 days | 56% |
| Marie Christ | 10/10 | 3580 days | 55% |
| Frederik Fuchs | 10/10 | 3581 days | 55% |
| Anne | 10/10 | 3595 days | 54% |
| Leigh Dodds | 9/10 | 3605 days | 52% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 10/10 | 3645 days | 50% |
| Bernd Muller | 8/10 | 3772 days | 39% |
| Benjamin Leboucq | 9/10 | 3791 days | 38% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3791 days | 38% |
| Sophie Rosenberg | 10/10 | 3793 days | 38% |
| Alexie Lion | 9/10 | 3794 days | 38% |
| Jan Berendsen | 10/10 | 3796 days | 38% |
| Jorge Anderson | 10/10 | 3796 days | 38% |
| Simon Schatz | 7/10 | 3798 days | 35% |
| Camilla Geert | 7/10 | 3803 days | 34% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 3807 days | 36% |
| Luala F | 10/10 | 3810 days | 37% |
| Math Meyer | 10/10 | 3811 days | 37% |
| Virginia Saez | 10/10 | 3811 days | 37% |
| Gessica | 8/10 | 3811 days | 36% |
| Nico Neubauer | 7/10 | 3813 days | 33% |
| Doerte | 10/10 | 3815 days | 36% |
| Benjamin Nager | 8/10 | 3821 days | 35% |
| Julie Miehling | 9/10 | 3822 days | 35% |
| Nico Wedel | 9/10 | 3822 days | 35% |
| Lauren Dinnage | 8/10 | 3823 days | 35% |
| Steve Barnwell | 8/10 | 3823 days | 35% |
| Alex Schott | 9/10 | 3823 days | 35% |
| Andrea Le Stunff | 10/10 | 3824 days | 36% |
| Sunja Abbe | 10/10 | 3826 days | 35% |
| Olga Barathova | 9/10 | 3827 days | 35% |
| Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3829 days | 35% |
| Mira Huckfield | 7/10 | 3829 days | 32% |
| Aaron Stalley | 8/10 | 3831 days | 34% |
| Marcus | 7/10 | 3837 days | 32% |
| Johannes Koch | 7/10 | 3837 days | 32% |
| Louise Boje | 10/10 | 3839 days | 34% |
| Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3841 days | 34% |
| Maddalena Buffoni | 9/10 | 3842 days | 34% |
| Clara Loizeil | 9/10 | 3843 days | 34% |
| Patrick Veber | 5/10 | 3843 days | 24% |
| Hake Dolce | 10/10 | 3844 days | 34% |
| Julien Sene | 9/10 | 3849 days | 33% |
| Sari Aroalho | 8/10 | 3852 days | 33% |
| Briony | 8/10 | 3852 days | 33% |
| Richard Starkeq | 6/10 | 3853 days | 28% |
| Joana Frever | 2/10 | 3854 days | 11% |
| Carmen Pramstaller | 10/10 | 3854 days | 33% |
| Etienne Douse | 7/10 | 3855 days | 30% |
| Sophia Harnisch | 9/10 | 3855 days | 33% |
| Liza Braun | 10/10 | 3855 days | 33% |
| Dario Leyrer | 10/10 | 3855 days | 33% |
| Coral Dawson | 10/10 | 3856 days | 33% |
| Brianna Burd | 9/10 | 3856 days | 33% |
| Daniel Roedel | 10/10 | 3861 days | 33% |
| Jonathan Gourmel | 8/10 | 3861 days | 32% |
| Matte Stemkowitz | 9/10 | 3862 days | 32% |
| Lea and Emmanuel | 9/10 | 3864 days | 32% |
| Petru | 8/10 | 3864 days | 32% |
| Maxima Buisan | 7/10 | 3864 days | 30% |
| Miriam Hack | 8/10 | 3865 days | 32% |
| Annika Locker | 10/10 | 3868 days | 32% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3869 days | 31% |
| Nils | 7/10 | 3874 days | 29% |
| Marie Brauherr | 10/10 | 3874 days | 32% |
| Vanesha Patel | 9/10 | 3875 days | 31% |
| Jenny and Till | 10/10 | 3876 days | 32% |
| Clare Pickford | 9/10 | 3877 days | 31% |
| Jonathan and Gulsen | 10/10 | 3879 days | 31% |
| Nico | 8/10 | 3879 days | 31% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 3898 days | 30% |
| Elodie and Gestan | 8/10 | 3901 days | 29% |
| Julia Huesam | 8/10 | 3906 days | 29% |
| Sophie Giblin | 9/10 | 3907 days | 29% |
| Sebastian and Susanna | 9/10 | 3909 days | 29% |
| Sammy Cronin | 8/10 | 3914 days | 28% |
| Fabian Dilly | 8/10 | 3925 days | 27% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 10/10 | 3943 days | 26% |
| Bob Fontaine | 10/10 | 4043 days | 19% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 4176 days | 8% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 4176 days | 8% |
| Anna Birzle | 10/10 | 4176 days | 8% |
| Elisabeth Ringswandl | 9/10 | 4177 days | 8% |
| Thomas Haslbeck | 7/10 | 4177 days | 7% |
| Miriam Burchartz | 9/10 | 4178 days | 8% |
| Ken | 9/10 | 4179 days | 8% |
| Michael Stibor | 7/10 | 4180 days | 7% |
| Nicol | 8/10 | 4217 days | 5% |
| Jamie McArthur | 9/10 | 4239 days | 3% |
| Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 4270 days | 1% |
| Marion and Ralf | 9/10 | 4279 days | 0% |
| Fiona Hawkins | 7/10 | 4516 days | 29% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4532 days | 32% |
| Becky | 9/10 | 4532 days | 32% |
| Josefin Lind | 9/10 | 4533 days | 32% |
| Herman Holmgist | 10/10 | 4533 days | 32% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 9/10 | 4536 days | 32% |
| Paolo Cases | 8/10 | 4536 days | 31% |
| Lena Hanhart | 10/10 | 4551 days | 32% |
| Vanessa | 4/10 | 4551 days | 18% |
| Tom Hill | 9/10 | 4552 days | 32% |
| Anna Sternberg | 6/10 | 4555 days | 27% |
| Tobias Thull | 8/10 | 4557 days | 31% |
| Katja Kraffzik | 10/10 | 4558 days | 32% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 4560 days | 31% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 4560 days | 32% |
| Anne Courtenay | 8/10 | 4561 days | 31% |
| Andreas Jung | 10/10 | 4561 days | 32% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 9/10 | 4565 days | 32% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4565 days | 32% |
| Lena Wacker | 8/10 | 4565 days | 31% |
| Rikke Petersen | 10/10 | 4572 days | 32% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 4601 days | 32% |
| Rupert | 10/10 | 4608 days | 32% |
| Alineet Gautier | 10/10 | 4613 days | 32% |
| Marie Lillieskold | 9/10 | 4613 days | 32% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 8/10 | 4616 days | 31% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 4705 days | 32% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4888 days | 29% |
| Annika Schmidt | 9/10 | 4893 days | 32% |
| Tim Vennewold | 8/10 | 4906 days | 31% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 9/10 | 4917 days | 32% |
| Jeremy Eng | 7/10 | 4919 days | 29% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4919 days | 32% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4924 days | 32% |
| Neele & Philipp | 7/10 | 4929 days | 29% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4991 days | 32% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4991 days | 32% |
| Julien Bocherens | 8/10 | 4995 days | 31% |
| Joroen Borkert | 8/10 | 4996 days | 31% |
| Lauret Stulemeyer | 8/10 | 4997 days | 31% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 5001 days | 31% |
| Fahl | 10/10 | 5008 days | 32% |
| tanyap | 7/10 | 5009 days | 29% |
| Terry Coles | 9/10 | 5009 days | 32% |
| Alexander Klein | 8/10 | 5013 days | 31% |
| Adam Hassan | 7/10 | 5014 days | 29% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 7/10 | 5014 days | 29% |
| Doan | 9/10 | 5014 days | 32% |
| Claudia Mueller | 10/10 | 5014 days | 32% |
| Presot | 10/10 | 5014 days | 32% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 10/10 | 5015 days | 32% |
| Faassen | 9/10 | 5017 days | 32% |
| Julie Lamart | 9/10 | 5018 days | 32% |
| Behrens | 10/10 | 5018 days | 32% |
| Henzen | 8/10 | 5018 days | 31% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 5019 days | 31% |
| The Mowbrays | 8/10 | 5019 days | 31% |
| Stevie | 8/10 | 5021 days | 31% |
| Thys | 8/10 | 5021 days | 31% |
| Rob Klauer | 9/10 | 5272 days | 32% |
| Selwindt | 9/10 | 5278 days | 32% |
| Michael Touzer | 9/10 | 5279 days | 32% |
| Steven Hill | 9/10 | 5280 days | 32% |
| Susanne A | 7/10 | 5281 days | 29% |
| Malena | 7/10 | 5284 days | 29% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 5288 days | 32% |
| Romla | 8/10 | 5291 days | 31% |
| Ronald Veldman | 8/10 | 5291 days | 31% |
| Tom Pratt | 9/10 | 5296 days | 32% |
| Stephan Wolter | 10/10 | 5298 days | 32% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 5298 days | 32% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 10/10 | 5298 days | 32% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 7/10 | 5298 days | 29% |
| Langerak | 8/10 | 5300 days | 31% |
| Lepied | 9/10 | 5300 days | 32% |
| Nic Roggeman | 9/10 | 5300 days | 32% |
| Ralf Glaser | 10/10 | 5301 days | 32% |
| Maria Dietrich | 8/10 | 5308 days | 31% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5313 days | 32% |
| Henriette Haugan | 8/10 | 5326 days | 31% |
| Fred Saunders | 9/10 | 5339 days | 32% |
| Pietsch | 9/10 | 5379 days | 32% |
| Marc & Pauline | 9/10 | 5381 days | 32% |
| Marek Woznica | 9/10 | 5382 days | 32% |
| Willem & Lilian | 8/10 | 5384 days | 31% |
| Andy Lever | 10/10 | 5390 days | 32% |
| Herman Plasman | 7/10 | 5390 days | 29% |
| Waldemar Schuler | 9/10 | 5391 days | 32% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 5391 days | 32% |
| Anders Rathleff | 9/10 | 5391 days | 32% |
| Lardy | 9/10 | 5392 days | 32% |
| JadesWorld | 8/10 | 5405 days | 31% |
| Gary A | 9/10 | 5405 days | 32% |
| Sid | 9/10 | 5405 days | 32% |
| andrew_w | 7/10 | 5619 days | 29% |
| Julie Norton | 9/10 | 5620 days | 32% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5633 days | 31% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5633 days | 31% |
| Hannah Roberts | 10/10 | 5647 days | 32% |
| Scheler | 10/10 | 5649 days | 32% |
| Gord Carnochan | 10/10 | 5651 days | 32% |
| Isabel & Tillmann | 10/10 | 5653 days | 32% |
| Adam Hayley | 6/10 | 5662 days | 27% |
| Kat Fleming | 10/10 | 5664 days | 32% |
| Luise Jaeger | 10/10 | 5668 days | 32% |
| Russell Stevens | 10/10 | 5668 days | 32% |
| F Horrex | 8/10 | 5669 days | 31% |
| Jessie Currie | 10/10 | 5669 days | 32% |
| Michael Eck | 10/10 | 5671 days | 32% |
| David and Karin | 10/10 | 5671 days | 32% |
| Brandt | 8/10 | 5675 days | 31% |
| Chamton | 9/10 | 5678 days | 32% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 5679 days | 32% |
| BigSis | 9/10 | 5862 days | 32% |
| Sophie & Joffrey | 9/10 | 5949 days | 32% |
| kempt | 8/10 | 5954 days | 31% |
| Matt Roper | 9/10 | 6006 days | 32% |
| Matilda Hansson | 9/10 | 6006 days | 32% |
| Kay Beaumont | 10/10 | 6017 days | 32% |
| Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 6021 days | 32% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 6021 days | 32% |
| Gail Mckinstry | 9/10 | 6021 days | 32% |
| Elisabeth Egerup | 10/10 | 6022 days | 32% |
| John Harrison | 8/10 | 6022 days | 31% |
| Peter Koeck | 10/10 | 6024 days | 32% |
| Jakob Pedersen | 10/10 | 6025 days | 32% |
| Vandeput | 9/10 | 6029 days | 32% |
| Fam Leinden | 8/10 | 6037 days | 31% |
| Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 6038 days | 32% |
| Helen Power | 8/10 | 6038 days | 31% |
| Mick Thexton | 10/10 | 6038 days | 32% |
| Jens van Evp | 10/10 | 6039 days | 32% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 8/10 | 6039 days | 31% |
| Belinda Godhard | 1/10 | 6040 days | 8% |
| Veltmaat NL | 7/10 | 6049 days | 29% |
| Jakob Jurgen | 8/10 | 6057 days | 31% |
| deanlaw | 10/10 | 6088 days | 32% |
| menzel | 10/10 | 6088 days | 32% |
| timgr | 8/10 | 6090 days | 31% |
| Lynn Maguire | 10/10 | 6091 days | 32% |
| blokzyl | 8/10 | 6094 days | 31% |
| braunweiler | 9/10 | 6094 days | 32% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 6097 days | 31% |
| hofstetterf | 10/10 | 6103 days | 32% |
| Emma Coltman | 10/10 | 6107 days | 32% |
| rolandop | 10/10 | 6109 days | 32% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 10/10 | 6109 days | 32% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 6113 days | 31% |
| Susanne Santer | 9/10 | 6113 days | 32% |
| Richard Kesteleyn | 8/10 | 6113 days | 31% |
| Christy | 8/10 | 6115 days | 31% |
| Ricarda | 9/10 | 6115 days | 32% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 6/10 | 6115 days | 27% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 9/10 | 6116 days | 32% |
| Jessica Clarisse | 9/10 | 6117 days | 32% |
| Lionel Mouesca | 10/10 | 6117 days | 32% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 6117 days | 32% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 6117 days | 32% |
| Wim Put | 8/10 | 6131 days | 31% |
| BryonyS | 10/10 | 6337 days | 32% |
| BouterG | 10/10 | 6345 days | 32% |
| CeesVanW | 8/10 | 6346 days | 31% |
| mikestep | 10/10 | 6349 days | 32% |
| Martien van Brakel | 8/10 | 6349 days | 31% |
| Arjan Muis | 9/10 | 6351 days | 32% |
| DaveV | 9/10 | 6365 days | 32% |
| AmyBarrett | 10/10 | 6365 days | 32% |
| DamienM | 10/10 | 6365 days | 32% |
| StefanGermany1 | 10/10 | 6367 days | 32% |
| FiensG | 8/10 | 6368 days | 31% |
| OdiliaF | 10/10 | 6368 days | 32% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6369 days | 31% |
| BrendaM | 10/10 | 6730 days | 32% |
| AlanN316 | 8/10 | 6730 days | 31% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cathedral Cove Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.26% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.