Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cathedral Cove Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
286 Valid Reviews
The Cathedral Cove Walk experience has a total of 286 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 286 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 96 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 82 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 71 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 29 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk valid reviews is 87.59% and is based on 286 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
265 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 286 valid reviews, the experience has 265 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 265 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 88 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 78 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 68 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.66% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk face-to-face reviews is 87.66% and is based on 265 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.20%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael | 10/10 | 2961 days | 100% |
| Matt McCloskey | 9/10 | 3155 days | 84% |
| Matthias and Adriane | 8/10 | 3423 days | 62% |
| Rachael Gray | 7/10 | 3453 days | 57% |
| Martin Fersebner | 7/10 | 3460 days | 56% |
| Chaulet | 9/10 | 3465 days | 60% |
| Breanna Alexander | 7/10 | 3466 days | 56% |
| Clementine | 10/10 | 3489 days | 59% |
| Claudia Schaefer | 8/10 | 3491 days | 57% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 3497 days | 58% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 3497 days | 57% |
| Mireia Sanchez | 10/10 | 3499 days | 58% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 3505 days | 56% |
| Kees Mol | 10/10 | 3508 days | 57% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 8/10 | 3513 days | 56% |
| David Santos | 9/10 | 3516 days | 56% |
| Dominique | 7/10 | 3519 days | 52% |
| Heike Buchmann | 8/10 | 3519 days | 55% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 3520 days | 56% |
| Ulf | 9/10 | 3522 days | 55% |
| Matthew Long | 7/10 | 3522 days | 52% |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 3522 days | 56% |
| Marie Christ | 10/10 | 3540 days | 55% |
| Frederik Fuchs | 10/10 | 3541 days | 55% |
| Anne | 10/10 | 3555 days | 54% |
| Leigh Dodds | 9/10 | 3565 days | 52% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 10/10 | 3605 days | 50% |
| Bernd Muller | 8/10 | 3732 days | 39% |
| Benjamin Leboucq | 9/10 | 3751 days | 38% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3751 days | 38% |
| Sophie Rosenberg | 10/10 | 3753 days | 38% |
| Alexie Lion | 9/10 | 3754 days | 38% |
| Jan Berendsen | 10/10 | 3756 days | 38% |
| Jorge Anderson | 10/10 | 3756 days | 38% |
| Simon Schatz | 7/10 | 3758 days | 34% |
| Camilla Geert | 7/10 | 3763 days | 34% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 3767 days | 36% |
| Luala F | 10/10 | 3770 days | 37% |
| Math Meyer | 10/10 | 3771 days | 37% |
| Virginia Saez | 10/10 | 3771 days | 37% |
| Gessica | 8/10 | 3771 days | 36% |
| Nico Neubauer | 7/10 | 3773 days | 33% |
| Doerte | 10/10 | 3775 days | 36% |
| Benjamin Nager | 8/10 | 3781 days | 35% |
| Julie Miehling | 9/10 | 3782 days | 35% |
| Nico Wedel | 9/10 | 3782 days | 35% |
| Lauren Dinnage | 8/10 | 3783 days | 35% |
| Steve Barnwell | 8/10 | 3783 days | 35% |
| Alex Schott | 9/10 | 3783 days | 35% |
| Andrea Le Stunff | 10/10 | 3784 days | 36% |
| Sunja Abbe | 10/10 | 3786 days | 36% |
| Olga Barathova | 9/10 | 3787 days | 35% |
| Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3789 days | 35% |
| Mira Huckfield | 7/10 | 3789 days | 32% |
| Aaron Stalley | 8/10 | 3791 days | 34% |
| Marcus | 7/10 | 3797 days | 31% |
| Johannes Koch | 7/10 | 3797 days | 31% |
| Louise Boje | 10/10 | 3799 days | 35% |
| Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3801 days | 34% |
| Maddalena Buffoni | 9/10 | 3802 days | 34% |
| Clara Loizeil | 9/10 | 3803 days | 34% |
| Patrick Veber | 5/10 | 3803 days | 23% |
| Hake Dolce | 10/10 | 3804 days | 34% |
| Julien Sene | 9/10 | 3809 days | 33% |
| Sari Aroalho | 8/10 | 3812 days | 33% |
| Briony | 8/10 | 3812 days | 33% |
| Richard Starkeq | 6/10 | 3813 days | 27% |
| Joana Frever | 2/10 | 3814 days | 9% |
| Carmen Pramstaller | 10/10 | 3814 days | 33% |
| Etienne Douse | 7/10 | 3815 days | 30% |
| Sophia Harnisch | 9/10 | 3815 days | 33% |
| Liza Braun | 10/10 | 3815 days | 33% |
| Dario Leyrer | 10/10 | 3815 days | 33% |
| Coral Dawson | 10/10 | 3816 days | 33% |
| Brianna Burd | 9/10 | 3816 days | 33% |
| Daniel Roedel | 10/10 | 3821 days | 33% |
| Jonathan Gourmel | 8/10 | 3821 days | 32% |
| Matte Stemkowitz | 9/10 | 3822 days | 32% |
| Lea and Emmanuel | 9/10 | 3824 days | 32% |
| Petru | 8/10 | 3824 days | 32% |
| Maxima Buisan | 7/10 | 3824 days | 30% |
| Miriam Hack | 8/10 | 3825 days | 32% |
| Annika Locker | 10/10 | 3828 days | 32% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3829 days | 31% |
| Nils | 7/10 | 3834 days | 29% |
| Marie Brauherr | 10/10 | 3834 days | 32% |
| Vanesha Patel | 9/10 | 3835 days | 31% |
| Jenny and Till | 10/10 | 3836 days | 32% |
| Clare Pickford | 9/10 | 3837 days | 31% |
| Jonathan and Gulsen | 10/10 | 3839 days | 31% |
| Nico | 8/10 | 3839 days | 31% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 3858 days | 30% |
| Elodie and Gestan | 8/10 | 3861 days | 29% |
| Julia Huesam | 8/10 | 3866 days | 28% |
| Sophie Giblin | 9/10 | 3867 days | 29% |
| Sebastian and Susanna | 9/10 | 3869 days | 29% |
| Sammy Cronin | 8/10 | 3874 days | 28% |
| Fabian Dilly | 8/10 | 3885 days | 27% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 10/10 | 3903 days | 26% |
| Bob Fontaine | 10/10 | 4003 days | 19% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 4136 days | 8% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 4136 days | 8% |
| Anna Birzle | 10/10 | 4136 days | 8% |
| Elisabeth Ringswandl | 9/10 | 4137 days | 8% |
| Thomas Haslbeck | 7/10 | 4137 days | 7% |
| Miriam Burchartz | 9/10 | 4138 days | 8% |
| Ken | 9/10 | 4139 days | 8% |
| Michael Stibor | 7/10 | 4140 days | 7% |
| Nicol | 8/10 | 4177 days | 5% |
| Jamie McArthur | 9/10 | 4199 days | 3% |
| Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 4230 days | 1% |
| Marion and Ralf | 9/10 | 4239 days | 0% |
| Fiona Hawkins | 7/10 | 4476 days | 26% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4492 days | 29% |
| Becky | 9/10 | 4492 days | 29% |
| Josefin Lind | 9/10 | 4493 days | 29% |
| Herman Holmgist | 10/10 | 4493 days | 29% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 9/10 | 4496 days | 29% |
| Paolo Cases | 8/10 | 4496 days | 28% |
| Lena Hanhart | 10/10 | 4511 days | 29% |
| Vanessa | 4/10 | 4511 days | 15% |
| Tom Hill | 9/10 | 4512 days | 29% |
| Anna Sternberg | 6/10 | 4515 days | 23% |
| Tobias Thull | 8/10 | 4517 days | 28% |
| Katja Kraffzik | 10/10 | 4518 days | 29% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 4520 days | 28% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 4520 days | 29% |
| Anne Courtenay | 8/10 | 4521 days | 28% |
| Andreas Jung | 10/10 | 4521 days | 29% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 9/10 | 4525 days | 29% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4525 days | 29% |
| Lena Wacker | 8/10 | 4525 days | 28% |
| Rikke Petersen | 10/10 | 4532 days | 29% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 4561 days | 29% |
| Rupert | 10/10 | 4568 days | 29% |
| Alineet Gautier | 10/10 | 4573 days | 29% |
| Marie Lillieskold | 9/10 | 4573 days | 29% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 8/10 | 4576 days | 28% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 4665 days | 29% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4848 days | 26% |
| Annika Schmidt | 9/10 | 4853 days | 29% |
| Tim Vennewold | 8/10 | 4866 days | 28% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 9/10 | 4877 days | 29% |
| Jeremy Eng | 7/10 | 4879 days | 26% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4879 days | 29% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4884 days | 29% |
| Neele & Philipp | 7/10 | 4889 days | 26% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4951 days | 29% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4951 days | 29% |
| Julien Bocherens | 8/10 | 4955 days | 28% |
| Joroen Borkert | 8/10 | 4956 days | 28% |
| Lauret Stulemeyer | 8/10 | 4957 days | 28% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4961 days | 28% |
| Fahl | 10/10 | 4968 days | 29% |
| tanyap | 7/10 | 4969 days | 26% |
| Terry Coles | 9/10 | 4969 days | 29% |
| Alexander Klein | 8/10 | 4973 days | 28% |
| Adam Hassan | 7/10 | 4974 days | 26% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 7/10 | 4974 days | 26% |
| Doan | 9/10 | 4974 days | 29% |
| Claudia Mueller | 10/10 | 4974 days | 29% |
| Presot | 10/10 | 4974 days | 29% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 10/10 | 4975 days | 29% |
| Faassen | 9/10 | 4977 days | 29% |
| Julie Lamart | 9/10 | 4978 days | 29% |
| Behrens | 10/10 | 4978 days | 29% |
| Henzen | 8/10 | 4978 days | 28% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 4979 days | 28% |
| The Mowbrays | 8/10 | 4979 days | 28% |
| Stevie | 8/10 | 4981 days | 28% |
| Thys | 8/10 | 4981 days | 28% |
| Rob Klauer | 9/10 | 5232 days | 29% |
| Selwindt | 9/10 | 5238 days | 29% |
| Michael Touzer | 9/10 | 5239 days | 29% |
| Steven Hill | 9/10 | 5240 days | 29% |
| Susanne A | 7/10 | 5241 days | 26% |
| Malena | 7/10 | 5244 days | 26% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 5248 days | 29% |
| Romla | 8/10 | 5251 days | 28% |
| Ronald Veldman | 8/10 | 5251 days | 28% |
| Tom Pratt | 9/10 | 5256 days | 29% |
| Stephan Wolter | 10/10 | 5258 days | 29% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 5258 days | 29% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 10/10 | 5258 days | 29% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 7/10 | 5258 days | 26% |
| Langerak | 8/10 | 5260 days | 28% |
| Lepied | 9/10 | 5260 days | 29% |
| Nic Roggeman | 9/10 | 5260 days | 29% |
| Ralf Glaser | 10/10 | 5261 days | 29% |
| Maria Dietrich | 8/10 | 5268 days | 28% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5273 days | 29% |
| Henriette Haugan | 8/10 | 5286 days | 28% |
| Fred Saunders | 9/10 | 5299 days | 29% |
| Pietsch | 9/10 | 5339 days | 29% |
| Marc & Pauline | 9/10 | 5341 days | 29% |
| Marek Woznica | 9/10 | 5342 days | 29% |
| Willem & Lilian | 8/10 | 5344 days | 28% |
| Andy Lever | 10/10 | 5350 days | 29% |
| Herman Plasman | 7/10 | 5350 days | 26% |
| Waldemar Schuler | 9/10 | 5351 days | 29% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 5351 days | 29% |
| Anders Rathleff | 9/10 | 5351 days | 29% |
| Lardy | 9/10 | 5352 days | 29% |
| JadesWorld | 8/10 | 5365 days | 28% |
| Gary A | 9/10 | 5365 days | 29% |
| Sid | 9/10 | 5365 days | 29% |
| andrew_w | 7/10 | 5579 days | 26% |
| Julie Norton | 9/10 | 5580 days | 29% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5593 days | 28% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5593 days | 28% |
| Hannah Roberts | 10/10 | 5607 days | 29% |
| Scheler | 10/10 | 5609 days | 29% |
| Gord Carnochan | 10/10 | 5611 days | 29% |
| Isabel & Tillmann | 10/10 | 5613 days | 29% |
| Adam Hayley | 6/10 | 5622 days | 23% |
| Kat Fleming | 10/10 | 5624 days | 29% |
| Luise Jaeger | 10/10 | 5628 days | 29% |
| Russell Stevens | 10/10 | 5628 days | 29% |
| F Horrex | 8/10 | 5629 days | 28% |
| Jessie Currie | 10/10 | 5629 days | 29% |
| Michael Eck | 10/10 | 5631 days | 29% |
| David and Karin | 10/10 | 5631 days | 29% |
| Brandt | 8/10 | 5635 days | 28% |
| Chamton | 9/10 | 5638 days | 29% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 5639 days | 29% |
| BigSis | 9/10 | 5822 days | 29% |
| Sophie & Joffrey | 9/10 | 5909 days | 29% |
| kempt | 8/10 | 5914 days | 28% |
| Matt Roper | 9/10 | 5966 days | 29% |
| Matilda Hansson | 9/10 | 5966 days | 29% |
| Kay Beaumont | 10/10 | 5977 days | 29% |
| Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 5981 days | 29% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 5981 days | 29% |
| Gail Mckinstry | 9/10 | 5981 days | 29% |
| Elisabeth Egerup | 10/10 | 5982 days | 29% |
| John Harrison | 8/10 | 5982 days | 28% |
| Peter Koeck | 10/10 | 5984 days | 29% |
| Jakob Pedersen | 10/10 | 5985 days | 29% |
| Vandeput | 9/10 | 5989 days | 29% |
| Fam Leinden | 8/10 | 5997 days | 28% |
| Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5998 days | 29% |
| Helen Power | 8/10 | 5998 days | 28% |
| Mick Thexton | 10/10 | 5998 days | 29% |
| Jens van Evp | 10/10 | 5999 days | 29% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 8/10 | 5999 days | 28% |
| Belinda Godhard | 1/10 | 6000 days | 5% |
| Veltmaat NL | 7/10 | 6009 days | 26% |
| Jakob Jurgen | 8/10 | 6017 days | 28% |
| deanlaw | 10/10 | 6048 days | 29% |
| menzel | 10/10 | 6048 days | 29% |
| timgr | 8/10 | 6050 days | 28% |
| Lynn Maguire | 10/10 | 6051 days | 29% |
| blokzyl | 8/10 | 6054 days | 28% |
| braunweiler | 9/10 | 6054 days | 29% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 6057 days | 28% |
| hofstetterf | 10/10 | 6063 days | 29% |
| Emma Coltman | 10/10 | 6067 days | 29% |
| rolandop | 10/10 | 6069 days | 29% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 10/10 | 6069 days | 29% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 6073 days | 28% |
| Susanne Santer | 9/10 | 6073 days | 29% |
| Richard Kesteleyn | 8/10 | 6073 days | 28% |
| Christy | 8/10 | 6075 days | 28% |
| Ricarda | 9/10 | 6075 days | 29% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 6/10 | 6075 days | 23% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 9/10 | 6076 days | 29% |
| Jessica Clarisse | 9/10 | 6077 days | 29% |
| Lionel Mouesca | 10/10 | 6077 days | 29% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 6077 days | 29% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 6077 days | 29% |
| Wim Put | 8/10 | 6091 days | 28% |
| BryonyS | 10/10 | 6297 days | 29% |
| BouterG | 10/10 | 6305 days | 29% |
| CeesVanW | 8/10 | 6306 days | 28% |
| mikestep | 10/10 | 6309 days | 29% |
| Martien van Brakel | 8/10 | 6309 days | 28% |
| Arjan Muis | 9/10 | 6311 days | 29% |
| DaveV | 9/10 | 6325 days | 29% |
| AmyBarrett | 10/10 | 6325 days | 29% |
| DamienM | 10/10 | 6325 days | 29% |
| StefanGermany1 | 10/10 | 6327 days | 29% |
| FiensG | 8/10 | 6328 days | 28% |
| OdiliaF | 10/10 | 6328 days | 29% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6329 days | 28% |
| BrendaM | 10/10 | 6690 days | 29% |
| AlanN316 | 8/10 | 6690 days | 28% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cathedral Cove Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.26% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.