Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cathedral Cove Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
286 Valid Reviews
The Cathedral Cove Walk experience has a total of 286 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 286 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 96 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 82 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 71 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 29 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk valid reviews is 87.59% and is based on 286 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
265 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 286 valid reviews, the experience has 265 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 265 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 88 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 78 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 68 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.66% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk face-to-face reviews is 87.66% and is based on 265 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael | 10/10 | 2901 days | 100% |
| Matt McCloskey | 9/10 | 3095 days | 84% |
| Matthias and Adriane | 8/10 | 3363 days | 62% |
| Rachael Gray | 7/10 | 3393 days | 56% |
| Martin Fersebner | 7/10 | 3400 days | 56% |
| Chaulet | 9/10 | 3405 days | 60% |
| Breanna Alexander | 7/10 | 3406 days | 55% |
| Clementine | 10/10 | 3429 days | 59% |
| Claudia Schaefer | 8/10 | 3431 days | 57% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 3437 days | 58% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 3437 days | 57% |
| Mireia Sanchez | 10/10 | 3439 days | 58% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 3445 days | 56% |
| Kees Mol | 10/10 | 3448 days | 57% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 8/10 | 3453 days | 55% |
| David Santos | 9/10 | 3456 days | 56% |
| Dominique | 7/10 | 3459 days | 51% |
| Heike Buchmann | 8/10 | 3459 days | 55% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 3460 days | 56% |
| Ulf | 9/10 | 3462 days | 55% |
| Matthew Long | 7/10 | 3462 days | 51% |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 3462 days | 56% |
| Marie Christ | 10/10 | 3480 days | 55% |
| Frederik Fuchs | 10/10 | 3481 days | 55% |
| Anne | 10/10 | 3495 days | 54% |
| Leigh Dodds | 9/10 | 3505 days | 52% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 10/10 | 3545 days | 50% |
| Bernd Muller | 8/10 | 3672 days | 39% |
| Benjamin Leboucq | 9/10 | 3691 days | 38% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3691 days | 38% |
| Sophie Rosenberg | 10/10 | 3693 days | 38% |
| Alexie Lion | 9/10 | 3694 days | 38% |
| Jan Berendsen | 10/10 | 3696 days | 38% |
| Jorge Anderson | 10/10 | 3696 days | 38% |
| Simon Schatz | 7/10 | 3698 days | 34% |
| Camilla Geert | 7/10 | 3703 days | 34% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 3707 days | 36% |
| Luala F | 10/10 | 3710 days | 37% |
| Math Meyer | 10/10 | 3711 days | 37% |
| Virginia Saez | 10/10 | 3711 days | 37% |
| Gessica | 8/10 | 3711 days | 36% |
| Nico Neubauer | 7/10 | 3713 days | 33% |
| Doerte | 10/10 | 3715 days | 36% |
| Benjamin Nager | 8/10 | 3721 days | 35% |
| Julie Miehling | 9/10 | 3722 days | 35% |
| Nico Wedel | 9/10 | 3722 days | 35% |
| Lauren Dinnage | 8/10 | 3723 days | 35% |
| Steve Barnwell | 8/10 | 3723 days | 35% |
| Alex Schott | 9/10 | 3723 days | 35% |
| Andrea Le Stunff | 10/10 | 3724 days | 36% |
| Sunja Abbe | 10/10 | 3726 days | 36% |
| Olga Barathova | 9/10 | 3727 days | 35% |
| Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3729 days | 35% |
| Mira Huckfield | 7/10 | 3729 days | 32% |
| Aaron Stalley | 8/10 | 3731 days | 34% |
| Marcus | 7/10 | 3737 days | 31% |
| Johannes Koch | 7/10 | 3737 days | 31% |
| Louise Boje | 10/10 | 3739 days | 35% |
| Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3741 days | 34% |
| Maddalena Buffoni | 9/10 | 3742 days | 34% |
| Clara Loizeil | 9/10 | 3743 days | 34% |
| Patrick Veber | 5/10 | 3743 days | 22% |
| Hake Dolce | 10/10 | 3744 days | 34% |
| Julien Sene | 9/10 | 3749 days | 33% |
| Sari Aroalho | 8/10 | 3752 days | 33% |
| Briony | 8/10 | 3752 days | 33% |
| Richard Starkeq | 6/10 | 3753 days | 27% |
| Joana Frever | 2/10 | 3754 days | 7% |
| Carmen Pramstaller | 10/10 | 3754 days | 33% |
| Etienne Douse | 7/10 | 3755 days | 30% |
| Sophia Harnisch | 9/10 | 3755 days | 33% |
| Liza Braun | 10/10 | 3755 days | 33% |
| Dario Leyrer | 10/10 | 3755 days | 33% |
| Coral Dawson | 10/10 | 3756 days | 33% |
| Brianna Burd | 9/10 | 3756 days | 33% |
| Daniel Roedel | 10/10 | 3761 days | 33% |
| Jonathan Gourmel | 8/10 | 3761 days | 32% |
| Matte Stemkowitz | 9/10 | 3762 days | 32% |
| Lea and Emmanuel | 9/10 | 3764 days | 32% |
| Petru | 8/10 | 3764 days | 32% |
| Maxima Buisan | 7/10 | 3764 days | 29% |
| Miriam Hack | 8/10 | 3765 days | 32% |
| Annika Locker | 10/10 | 3768 days | 32% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3769 days | 31% |
| Nils | 7/10 | 3774 days | 29% |
| Marie Brauherr | 10/10 | 3774 days | 32% |
| Vanesha Patel | 9/10 | 3775 days | 31% |
| Jenny and Till | 10/10 | 3776 days | 32% |
| Clare Pickford | 9/10 | 3777 days | 31% |
| Jonathan and Gulsen | 10/10 | 3779 days | 31% |
| Nico | 8/10 | 3779 days | 30% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 3798 days | 30% |
| Elodie and Gestan | 8/10 | 3801 days | 29% |
| Julia Huesam | 8/10 | 3806 days | 28% |
| Sophie Giblin | 9/10 | 3807 days | 29% |
| Sebastian and Susanna | 9/10 | 3809 days | 29% |
| Sammy Cronin | 8/10 | 3814 days | 28% |
| Fabian Dilly | 8/10 | 3825 days | 27% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 10/10 | 3843 days | 26% |
| Bob Fontaine | 10/10 | 3943 days | 19% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 4076 days | 8% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 4076 days | 8% |
| Anna Birzle | 10/10 | 4076 days | 8% |
| Elisabeth Ringswandl | 9/10 | 4077 days | 8% |
| Thomas Haslbeck | 7/10 | 4077 days | 6% |
| Miriam Burchartz | 9/10 | 4078 days | 8% |
| Ken | 9/10 | 4079 days | 8% |
| Michael Stibor | 7/10 | 4080 days | 6% |
| Nicol | 8/10 | 4117 days | 5% |
| Jamie McArthur | 9/10 | 4139 days | 3% |
| Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 4170 days | 1% |
| Marion and Ralf | 9/10 | 4179 days | 0% |
| Fiona Hawkins | 7/10 | 4416 days | 22% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4432 days | 24% |
| Becky | 9/10 | 4432 days | 24% |
| Josefin Lind | 9/10 | 4433 days | 24% |
| Herman Holmgist | 10/10 | 4433 days | 24% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 9/10 | 4436 days | 24% |
| Paolo Cases | 8/10 | 4436 days | 24% |
| Lena Hanhart | 10/10 | 4451 days | 24% |
| Vanessa | 4/10 | 4451 days | 11% |
| Tom Hill | 9/10 | 4452 days | 24% |
| Anna Sternberg | 6/10 | 4455 days | 19% |
| Tobias Thull | 8/10 | 4457 days | 24% |
| Katja Kraffzik | 10/10 | 4458 days | 24% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 4460 days | 24% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 4460 days | 24% |
| Anne Courtenay | 8/10 | 4461 days | 24% |
| Andreas Jung | 10/10 | 4461 days | 24% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 9/10 | 4465 days | 24% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4465 days | 24% |
| Lena Wacker | 8/10 | 4465 days | 24% |
| Rikke Petersen | 10/10 | 4472 days | 24% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 4501 days | 24% |
| Rupert | 10/10 | 4508 days | 24% |
| Alineet Gautier | 10/10 | 4513 days | 24% |
| Marie Lillieskold | 9/10 | 4513 days | 24% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 8/10 | 4516 days | 24% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 4605 days | 24% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4788 days | 22% |
| Annika Schmidt | 9/10 | 4793 days | 24% |
| Tim Vennewold | 8/10 | 4806 days | 24% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 9/10 | 4817 days | 24% |
| Jeremy Eng | 7/10 | 4819 days | 22% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4819 days | 24% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4824 days | 24% |
| Neele & Philipp | 7/10 | 4829 days | 22% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4891 days | 24% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4891 days | 24% |
| Julien Bocherens | 8/10 | 4895 days | 24% |
| Joroen Borkert | 8/10 | 4896 days | 24% |
| Lauret Stulemeyer | 8/10 | 4897 days | 24% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4901 days | 24% |
| Fahl | 10/10 | 4908 days | 24% |
| tanyap | 7/10 | 4909 days | 22% |
| Terry Coles | 9/10 | 4909 days | 24% |
| Alexander Klein | 8/10 | 4913 days | 24% |
| Adam Hassan | 7/10 | 4914 days | 22% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 7/10 | 4914 days | 22% |
| Doan | 9/10 | 4914 days | 24% |
| Claudia Mueller | 10/10 | 4914 days | 24% |
| Presot | 10/10 | 4914 days | 24% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 10/10 | 4915 days | 24% |
| Faassen | 9/10 | 4917 days | 24% |
| Julie Lamart | 9/10 | 4918 days | 24% |
| Behrens | 10/10 | 4918 days | 24% |
| Henzen | 8/10 | 4918 days | 24% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 4919 days | 24% |
| The Mowbrays | 8/10 | 4919 days | 24% |
| Stevie | 8/10 | 4921 days | 24% |
| Thys | 8/10 | 4921 days | 24% |
| Rob Klauer | 9/10 | 5172 days | 24% |
| Selwindt | 9/10 | 5178 days | 24% |
| Michael Touzer | 9/10 | 5179 days | 24% |
| Steven Hill | 9/10 | 5180 days | 24% |
| Susanne A | 7/10 | 5181 days | 22% |
| Malena | 7/10 | 5184 days | 22% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 5188 days | 24% |
| Romla | 8/10 | 5191 days | 24% |
| Ronald Veldman | 8/10 | 5191 days | 24% |
| Tom Pratt | 9/10 | 5196 days | 24% |
| Stephan Wolter | 10/10 | 5198 days | 24% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 5198 days | 24% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 10/10 | 5198 days | 24% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 7/10 | 5198 days | 22% |
| Langerak | 8/10 | 5200 days | 24% |
| Lepied | 9/10 | 5200 days | 24% |
| Nic Roggeman | 9/10 | 5200 days | 24% |
| Ralf Glaser | 10/10 | 5201 days | 24% |
| Maria Dietrich | 8/10 | 5208 days | 24% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5213 days | 24% |
| Henriette Haugan | 8/10 | 5226 days | 24% |
| Fred Saunders | 9/10 | 5239 days | 24% |
| Pietsch | 9/10 | 5279 days | 24% |
| Marc & Pauline | 9/10 | 5281 days | 24% |
| Marek Woznica | 9/10 | 5282 days | 24% |
| Willem & Lilian | 8/10 | 5284 days | 24% |
| Andy Lever | 10/10 | 5290 days | 24% |
| Herman Plasman | 7/10 | 5290 days | 22% |
| Waldemar Schuler | 9/10 | 5291 days | 24% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 5291 days | 24% |
| Anders Rathleff | 9/10 | 5291 days | 24% |
| Lardy | 9/10 | 5292 days | 24% |
| JadesWorld | 8/10 | 5305 days | 24% |
| Gary A | 9/10 | 5305 days | 24% |
| Sid | 9/10 | 5305 days | 24% |
| andrew_w | 7/10 | 5519 days | 22% |
| Julie Norton | 9/10 | 5520 days | 24% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5533 days | 24% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5533 days | 24% |
| Hannah Roberts | 10/10 | 5547 days | 24% |
| Scheler | 10/10 | 5549 days | 24% |
| Gord Carnochan | 10/10 | 5551 days | 24% |
| Isabel & Tillmann | 10/10 | 5553 days | 24% |
| Adam Hayley | 6/10 | 5562 days | 19% |
| Kat Fleming | 10/10 | 5564 days | 24% |
| Luise Jaeger | 10/10 | 5568 days | 24% |
| Russell Stevens | 10/10 | 5568 days | 24% |
| F Horrex | 8/10 | 5569 days | 24% |
| Jessie Currie | 10/10 | 5569 days | 24% |
| Michael Eck | 10/10 | 5571 days | 24% |
| David and Karin | 10/10 | 5571 days | 24% |
| Brandt | 8/10 | 5575 days | 24% |
| Chamton | 9/10 | 5578 days | 24% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 5579 days | 24% |
| BigSis | 9/10 | 5762 days | 24% |
| Sophie & Joffrey | 9/10 | 5849 days | 24% |
| kempt | 8/10 | 5854 days | 24% |
| Matt Roper | 9/10 | 5906 days | 24% |
| Matilda Hansson | 9/10 | 5906 days | 24% |
| Kay Beaumont | 10/10 | 5917 days | 24% |
| Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 5921 days | 24% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 5921 days | 24% |
| Gail Mckinstry | 9/10 | 5921 days | 24% |
| Elisabeth Egerup | 10/10 | 5922 days | 24% |
| John Harrison | 8/10 | 5922 days | 24% |
| Peter Koeck | 10/10 | 5924 days | 24% |
| Jakob Pedersen | 10/10 | 5925 days | 24% |
| Vandeput | 9/10 | 5929 days | 24% |
| Fam Leinden | 8/10 | 5937 days | 24% |
| Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5938 days | 24% |
| Helen Power | 8/10 | 5938 days | 24% |
| Mick Thexton | 10/10 | 5938 days | 24% |
| Jens van Evp | 10/10 | 5939 days | 24% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 8/10 | 5939 days | 24% |
| Belinda Godhard | 1/10 | 5940 days | 1% |
| Veltmaat NL | 7/10 | 5949 days | 22% |
| Jakob Jurgen | 8/10 | 5957 days | 24% |
| deanlaw | 10/10 | 5988 days | 24% |
| menzel | 10/10 | 5988 days | 24% |
| timgr | 8/10 | 5990 days | 24% |
| Lynn Maguire | 10/10 | 5991 days | 24% |
| blokzyl | 8/10 | 5994 days | 24% |
| braunweiler | 9/10 | 5994 days | 24% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 5997 days | 24% |
| hofstetterf | 10/10 | 6003 days | 24% |
| Emma Coltman | 10/10 | 6007 days | 24% |
| rolandop | 10/10 | 6009 days | 24% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 10/10 | 6009 days | 24% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 6013 days | 24% |
| Susanne Santer | 9/10 | 6013 days | 24% |
| Richard Kesteleyn | 8/10 | 6013 days | 24% |
| Christy | 8/10 | 6015 days | 24% |
| Ricarda | 9/10 | 6015 days | 24% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 6/10 | 6015 days | 19% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 9/10 | 6016 days | 24% |
| Jessica Clarisse | 9/10 | 6017 days | 24% |
| Lionel Mouesca | 10/10 | 6017 days | 24% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 6017 days | 24% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 6017 days | 24% |
| Wim Put | 8/10 | 6031 days | 24% |
| BryonyS | 10/10 | 6237 days | 24% |
| BouterG | 10/10 | 6245 days | 24% |
| CeesVanW | 8/10 | 6246 days | 24% |
| mikestep | 10/10 | 6249 days | 24% |
| Martien van Brakel | 8/10 | 6249 days | 24% |
| Arjan Muis | 9/10 | 6251 days | 24% |
| DaveV | 9/10 | 6265 days | 24% |
| AmyBarrett | 10/10 | 6265 days | 24% |
| DamienM | 10/10 | 6265 days | 24% |
| StefanGermany1 | 10/10 | 6267 days | 24% |
| FiensG | 8/10 | 6268 days | 24% |
| OdiliaF | 10/10 | 6268 days | 24% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6269 days | 24% |
| BrendaM | 10/10 | 6630 days | 24% |
| AlanN316 | 8/10 | 6630 days | 24% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cathedral Cove Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.27% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.