Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cathedral Cove Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
286 Valid Reviews
The Cathedral Cove Walk experience has a total of 286 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 286 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 96 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 82 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 71 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 29 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk valid reviews is 87.59% and is based on 286 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
265 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 286 valid reviews, the experience has 265 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 265 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 88 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 78 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 68 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.66% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk face-to-face reviews is 87.66% and is based on 265 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael | 10/10 | 2921 days | 100% |
| Matt McCloskey | 9/10 | 3115 days | 84% |
| Matthias and Adriane | 8/10 | 3383 days | 62% |
| Rachael Gray | 7/10 | 3413 days | 56% |
| Martin Fersebner | 7/10 | 3420 days | 56% |
| Chaulet | 9/10 | 3425 days | 60% |
| Breanna Alexander | 7/10 | 3426 days | 55% |
| Clementine | 10/10 | 3449 days | 59% |
| Claudia Schaefer | 8/10 | 3451 days | 57% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 3457 days | 58% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 3457 days | 57% |
| Mireia Sanchez | 10/10 | 3459 days | 58% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 3465 days | 56% |
| Kees Mol | 10/10 | 3468 days | 57% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 8/10 | 3473 days | 55% |
| David Santos | 9/10 | 3476 days | 56% |
| Dominique | 7/10 | 3479 days | 52% |
| Heike Buchmann | 8/10 | 3479 days | 55% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 3480 days | 56% |
| Ulf | 9/10 | 3482 days | 55% |
| Matthew Long | 7/10 | 3482 days | 51% |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 3482 days | 56% |
| Marie Christ | 10/10 | 3500 days | 55% |
| Frederik Fuchs | 10/10 | 3501 days | 55% |
| Anne | 10/10 | 3515 days | 54% |
| Leigh Dodds | 9/10 | 3525 days | 52% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 10/10 | 3565 days | 50% |
| Bernd Muller | 8/10 | 3692 days | 39% |
| Benjamin Leboucq | 9/10 | 3711 days | 38% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3711 days | 38% |
| Sophie Rosenberg | 10/10 | 3713 days | 38% |
| Alexie Lion | 9/10 | 3714 days | 38% |
| Jan Berendsen | 10/10 | 3716 days | 38% |
| Jorge Anderson | 10/10 | 3716 days | 38% |
| Simon Schatz | 7/10 | 3718 days | 34% |
| Camilla Geert | 7/10 | 3723 days | 34% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 3727 days | 36% |
| Luala F | 10/10 | 3730 days | 37% |
| Math Meyer | 10/10 | 3731 days | 37% |
| Virginia Saez | 10/10 | 3731 days | 37% |
| Gessica | 8/10 | 3731 days | 36% |
| Nico Neubauer | 7/10 | 3733 days | 33% |
| Doerte | 10/10 | 3735 days | 36% |
| Benjamin Nager | 8/10 | 3741 days | 35% |
| Julie Miehling | 9/10 | 3742 days | 35% |
| Nico Wedel | 9/10 | 3742 days | 35% |
| Lauren Dinnage | 8/10 | 3743 days | 35% |
| Steve Barnwell | 8/10 | 3743 days | 35% |
| Alex Schott | 9/10 | 3743 days | 35% |
| Andrea Le Stunff | 10/10 | 3744 days | 36% |
| Sunja Abbe | 10/10 | 3746 days | 36% |
| Olga Barathova | 9/10 | 3747 days | 35% |
| Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3749 days | 35% |
| Mira Huckfield | 7/10 | 3749 days | 32% |
| Aaron Stalley | 8/10 | 3751 days | 34% |
| Marcus | 7/10 | 3757 days | 31% |
| Johannes Koch | 7/10 | 3757 days | 31% |
| Louise Boje | 10/10 | 3759 days | 35% |
| Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3761 days | 34% |
| Maddalena Buffoni | 9/10 | 3762 days | 34% |
| Clara Loizeil | 9/10 | 3763 days | 34% |
| Patrick Veber | 5/10 | 3763 days | 23% |
| Hake Dolce | 10/10 | 3764 days | 34% |
| Julien Sene | 9/10 | 3769 days | 33% |
| Sari Aroalho | 8/10 | 3772 days | 33% |
| Briony | 8/10 | 3772 days | 33% |
| Richard Starkeq | 6/10 | 3773 days | 27% |
| Joana Frever | 2/10 | 3774 days | 8% |
| Carmen Pramstaller | 10/10 | 3774 days | 33% |
| Etienne Douse | 7/10 | 3775 days | 30% |
| Sophia Harnisch | 9/10 | 3775 days | 33% |
| Liza Braun | 10/10 | 3775 days | 33% |
| Dario Leyrer | 10/10 | 3775 days | 33% |
| Coral Dawson | 10/10 | 3776 days | 33% |
| Brianna Burd | 9/10 | 3776 days | 33% |
| Daniel Roedel | 10/10 | 3781 days | 33% |
| Jonathan Gourmel | 8/10 | 3781 days | 32% |
| Matte Stemkowitz | 9/10 | 3782 days | 32% |
| Lea and Emmanuel | 9/10 | 3784 days | 32% |
| Petru | 8/10 | 3784 days | 32% |
| Maxima Buisan | 7/10 | 3784 days | 29% |
| Miriam Hack | 8/10 | 3785 days | 32% |
| Annika Locker | 10/10 | 3788 days | 32% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3789 days | 31% |
| Nils | 7/10 | 3794 days | 29% |
| Marie Brauherr | 10/10 | 3794 days | 32% |
| Vanesha Patel | 9/10 | 3795 days | 31% |
| Jenny and Till | 10/10 | 3796 days | 32% |
| Clare Pickford | 9/10 | 3797 days | 31% |
| Jonathan and Gulsen | 10/10 | 3799 days | 31% |
| Nico | 8/10 | 3799 days | 30% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 3818 days | 30% |
| Elodie and Gestan | 8/10 | 3821 days | 29% |
| Julia Huesam | 8/10 | 3826 days | 28% |
| Sophie Giblin | 9/10 | 3827 days | 29% |
| Sebastian and Susanna | 9/10 | 3829 days | 29% |
| Sammy Cronin | 8/10 | 3834 days | 28% |
| Fabian Dilly | 8/10 | 3845 days | 27% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 10/10 | 3863 days | 26% |
| Bob Fontaine | 10/10 | 3963 days | 19% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 4096 days | 8% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 4096 days | 8% |
| Anna Birzle | 10/10 | 4096 days | 8% |
| Elisabeth Ringswandl | 9/10 | 4097 days | 8% |
| Thomas Haslbeck | 7/10 | 4097 days | 7% |
| Miriam Burchartz | 9/10 | 4098 days | 8% |
| Ken | 9/10 | 4099 days | 8% |
| Michael Stibor | 7/10 | 4100 days | 6% |
| Nicol | 8/10 | 4137 days | 5% |
| Jamie McArthur | 9/10 | 4159 days | 3% |
| Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 4190 days | 1% |
| Marion and Ralf | 9/10 | 4199 days | 0% |
| Fiona Hawkins | 7/10 | 4436 days | 23% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4452 days | 26% |
| Becky | 9/10 | 4452 days | 26% |
| Josefin Lind | 9/10 | 4453 days | 26% |
| Herman Holmgist | 10/10 | 4453 days | 26% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 9/10 | 4456 days | 26% |
| Paolo Cases | 8/10 | 4456 days | 25% |
| Lena Hanhart | 10/10 | 4471 days | 26% |
| Vanessa | 4/10 | 4471 days | 12% |
| Tom Hill | 9/10 | 4472 days | 26% |
| Anna Sternberg | 6/10 | 4475 days | 20% |
| Tobias Thull | 8/10 | 4477 days | 25% |
| Katja Kraffzik | 10/10 | 4478 days | 26% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 4480 days | 25% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 4480 days | 26% |
| Anne Courtenay | 8/10 | 4481 days | 25% |
| Andreas Jung | 10/10 | 4481 days | 26% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 9/10 | 4485 days | 26% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4485 days | 26% |
| Lena Wacker | 8/10 | 4485 days | 25% |
| Rikke Petersen | 10/10 | 4492 days | 26% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 4521 days | 26% |
| Rupert | 10/10 | 4528 days | 26% |
| Alineet Gautier | 10/10 | 4533 days | 26% |
| Marie Lillieskold | 9/10 | 4533 days | 26% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 8/10 | 4536 days | 25% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 4625 days | 26% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4808 days | 23% |
| Annika Schmidt | 9/10 | 4813 days | 26% |
| Tim Vennewold | 8/10 | 4826 days | 25% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 9/10 | 4837 days | 26% |
| Jeremy Eng | 7/10 | 4839 days | 23% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4839 days | 26% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4844 days | 26% |
| Neele & Philipp | 7/10 | 4849 days | 23% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4911 days | 26% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4911 days | 26% |
| Julien Bocherens | 8/10 | 4915 days | 25% |
| Joroen Borkert | 8/10 | 4916 days | 25% |
| Lauret Stulemeyer | 8/10 | 4917 days | 25% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4921 days | 25% |
| Fahl | 10/10 | 4928 days | 26% |
| tanyap | 7/10 | 4929 days | 23% |
| Terry Coles | 9/10 | 4929 days | 26% |
| Alexander Klein | 8/10 | 4933 days | 25% |
| Adam Hassan | 7/10 | 4934 days | 23% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 7/10 | 4934 days | 23% |
| Doan | 9/10 | 4934 days | 26% |
| Claudia Mueller | 10/10 | 4934 days | 26% |
| Presot | 10/10 | 4934 days | 26% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 10/10 | 4935 days | 26% |
| Faassen | 9/10 | 4937 days | 26% |
| Julie Lamart | 9/10 | 4938 days | 26% |
| Behrens | 10/10 | 4938 days | 26% |
| Henzen | 8/10 | 4938 days | 25% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 4939 days | 25% |
| The Mowbrays | 8/10 | 4939 days | 25% |
| Stevie | 8/10 | 4941 days | 25% |
| Thys | 8/10 | 4941 days | 25% |
| Rob Klauer | 9/10 | 5192 days | 26% |
| Selwindt | 9/10 | 5198 days | 26% |
| Michael Touzer | 9/10 | 5199 days | 26% |
| Steven Hill | 9/10 | 5200 days | 26% |
| Susanne A | 7/10 | 5201 days | 23% |
| Malena | 7/10 | 5204 days | 23% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 5208 days | 26% |
| Romla | 8/10 | 5211 days | 25% |
| Ronald Veldman | 8/10 | 5211 days | 25% |
| Tom Pratt | 9/10 | 5216 days | 26% |
| Stephan Wolter | 10/10 | 5218 days | 26% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 5218 days | 26% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 10/10 | 5218 days | 26% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 7/10 | 5218 days | 23% |
| Langerak | 8/10 | 5220 days | 25% |
| Lepied | 9/10 | 5220 days | 26% |
| Nic Roggeman | 9/10 | 5220 days | 26% |
| Ralf Glaser | 10/10 | 5221 days | 26% |
| Maria Dietrich | 8/10 | 5228 days | 25% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5233 days | 26% |
| Henriette Haugan | 8/10 | 5246 days | 25% |
| Fred Saunders | 9/10 | 5259 days | 26% |
| Pietsch | 9/10 | 5299 days | 26% |
| Marc & Pauline | 9/10 | 5301 days | 26% |
| Marek Woznica | 9/10 | 5302 days | 26% |
| Willem & Lilian | 8/10 | 5304 days | 25% |
| Andy Lever | 10/10 | 5310 days | 26% |
| Herman Plasman | 7/10 | 5310 days | 23% |
| Waldemar Schuler | 9/10 | 5311 days | 26% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 5311 days | 26% |
| Anders Rathleff | 9/10 | 5311 days | 26% |
| Lardy | 9/10 | 5312 days | 26% |
| JadesWorld | 8/10 | 5325 days | 25% |
| Gary A | 9/10 | 5325 days | 26% |
| Sid | 9/10 | 5325 days | 26% |
| andrew_w | 7/10 | 5539 days | 23% |
| Julie Norton | 9/10 | 5540 days | 26% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5553 days | 25% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5553 days | 25% |
| Hannah Roberts | 10/10 | 5567 days | 26% |
| Scheler | 10/10 | 5569 days | 26% |
| Gord Carnochan | 10/10 | 5571 days | 26% |
| Isabel & Tillmann | 10/10 | 5573 days | 26% |
| Adam Hayley | 6/10 | 5582 days | 20% |
| Kat Fleming | 10/10 | 5584 days | 26% |
| Luise Jaeger | 10/10 | 5588 days | 26% |
| Russell Stevens | 10/10 | 5588 days | 26% |
| F Horrex | 8/10 | 5589 days | 25% |
| Jessie Currie | 10/10 | 5589 days | 26% |
| Michael Eck | 10/10 | 5591 days | 26% |
| David and Karin | 10/10 | 5591 days | 26% |
| Brandt | 8/10 | 5595 days | 25% |
| Chamton | 9/10 | 5598 days | 26% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 5599 days | 26% |
| BigSis | 9/10 | 5782 days | 26% |
| Sophie & Joffrey | 9/10 | 5869 days | 26% |
| kempt | 8/10 | 5874 days | 25% |
| Matt Roper | 9/10 | 5926 days | 26% |
| Matilda Hansson | 9/10 | 5926 days | 26% |
| Kay Beaumont | 10/10 | 5937 days | 26% |
| Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 5941 days | 26% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 5941 days | 26% |
| Gail Mckinstry | 9/10 | 5941 days | 26% |
| Elisabeth Egerup | 10/10 | 5942 days | 26% |
| John Harrison | 8/10 | 5942 days | 25% |
| Peter Koeck | 10/10 | 5944 days | 26% |
| Jakob Pedersen | 10/10 | 5945 days | 26% |
| Vandeput | 9/10 | 5949 days | 26% |
| Fam Leinden | 8/10 | 5957 days | 25% |
| Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5958 days | 26% |
| Helen Power | 8/10 | 5958 days | 25% |
| Mick Thexton | 10/10 | 5958 days | 26% |
| Jens van Evp | 10/10 | 5959 days | 26% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 8/10 | 5959 days | 25% |
| Belinda Godhard | 1/10 | 5960 days | 2% |
| Veltmaat NL | 7/10 | 5969 days | 23% |
| Jakob Jurgen | 8/10 | 5977 days | 25% |
| deanlaw | 10/10 | 6008 days | 26% |
| menzel | 10/10 | 6008 days | 26% |
| timgr | 8/10 | 6010 days | 25% |
| Lynn Maguire | 10/10 | 6011 days | 26% |
| blokzyl | 8/10 | 6014 days | 25% |
| braunweiler | 9/10 | 6014 days | 26% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 6017 days | 25% |
| hofstetterf | 10/10 | 6023 days | 26% |
| Emma Coltman | 10/10 | 6027 days | 26% |
| rolandop | 10/10 | 6029 days | 26% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 10/10 | 6029 days | 26% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 6033 days | 25% |
| Susanne Santer | 9/10 | 6033 days | 26% |
| Richard Kesteleyn | 8/10 | 6033 days | 25% |
| Christy | 8/10 | 6035 days | 25% |
| Ricarda | 9/10 | 6035 days | 26% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 6/10 | 6035 days | 20% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 9/10 | 6036 days | 26% |
| Jessica Clarisse | 9/10 | 6037 days | 26% |
| Lionel Mouesca | 10/10 | 6037 days | 26% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 6037 days | 26% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 6037 days | 26% |
| Wim Put | 8/10 | 6051 days | 25% |
| BryonyS | 10/10 | 6257 days | 26% |
| BouterG | 10/10 | 6265 days | 26% |
| CeesVanW | 8/10 | 6266 days | 25% |
| mikestep | 10/10 | 6269 days | 26% |
| Martien van Brakel | 8/10 | 6269 days | 25% |
| Arjan Muis | 9/10 | 6271 days | 26% |
| DaveV | 9/10 | 6285 days | 26% |
| AmyBarrett | 10/10 | 6285 days | 26% |
| DamienM | 10/10 | 6285 days | 26% |
| StefanGermany1 | 10/10 | 6287 days | 26% |
| FiensG | 8/10 | 6288 days | 25% |
| OdiliaF | 10/10 | 6288 days | 26% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6289 days | 25% |
| BrendaM | 10/10 | 6650 days | 26% |
| AlanN316 | 8/10 | 6650 days | 25% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cathedral Cove Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.26% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.