Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cathedral Cove Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
286 Valid Reviews
The Cathedral Cove Walk experience has a total of 286 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 286 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 96 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 82 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 71 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 29 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk valid reviews is 87.59% and is based on 286 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
265 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 286 valid reviews, the experience has 265 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 265 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 88 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 78 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 68 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.66% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk face-to-face reviews is 87.66% and is based on 265 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael | 10/10 | 2759 days | 100% |
| Matt McCloskey | 9/10 | 2953 days | 87% |
| Matthias and Adriane | 8/10 | 3221 days | 70% |
| Rachael Gray | 7/10 | 3251 days | 65% |
| Martin Fersebner | 7/10 | 3258 days | 64% |
| Chaulet | 9/10 | 3263 days | 68% |
| Breanna Alexander | 7/10 | 3264 days | 64% |
| Clementine | 10/10 | 3287 days | 67% |
| Claudia Schaefer | 8/10 | 3289 days | 66% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 3295 days | 67% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 3295 days | 66% |
| Mireia Sanchez | 10/10 | 3297 days | 67% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 3303 days | 65% |
| Kees Mol | 10/10 | 3306 days | 66% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 8/10 | 3311 days | 65% |
| David Santos | 9/10 | 3314 days | 65% |
| Dominique | 7/10 | 3317 days | 61% |
| Heike Buchmann | 8/10 | 3317 days | 64% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 3318 days | 65% |
| Ulf | 9/10 | 3320 days | 65% |
| Matthew Long | 7/10 | 3320 days | 61% |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 3320 days | 65% |
| Marie Christ | 10/10 | 3338 days | 64% |
| Frederik Fuchs | 10/10 | 3339 days | 64% |
| Anne | 10/10 | 3353 days | 63% |
| Leigh Dodds | 9/10 | 3363 days | 62% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 10/10 | 3403 days | 60% |
| Bernd Muller | 8/10 | 3530 days | 51% |
| Benjamin Leboucq | 9/10 | 3549 days | 51% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3549 days | 51% |
| Sophie Rosenberg | 10/10 | 3551 days | 51% |
| Alexie Lion | 9/10 | 3552 days | 50% |
| Jan Berendsen | 10/10 | 3554 days | 51% |
| Jorge Anderson | 10/10 | 3554 days | 51% |
| Simon Schatz | 7/10 | 3556 days | 47% |
| Camilla Geert | 7/10 | 3561 days | 47% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 3565 days | 49% |
| Luala F | 10/10 | 3568 days | 50% |
| Math Meyer | 10/10 | 3569 days | 50% |
| Virginia Saez | 10/10 | 3569 days | 50% |
| Gessica | 8/10 | 3569 days | 49% |
| Nico Neubauer | 7/10 | 3571 days | 46% |
| Doerte | 10/10 | 3573 days | 50% |
| Benjamin Nager | 8/10 | 3579 days | 48% |
| Julie Miehling | 9/10 | 3580 days | 49% |
| Nico Wedel | 9/10 | 3580 days | 49% |
| Lauren Dinnage | 8/10 | 3581 days | 48% |
| Steve Barnwell | 8/10 | 3581 days | 48% |
| Alex Schott | 9/10 | 3581 days | 49% |
| Andrea Le Stunff | 10/10 | 3582 days | 49% |
| Sunja Abbe | 10/10 | 3584 days | 49% |
| Olga Barathova | 9/10 | 3585 days | 48% |
| Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3587 days | 49% |
| Mira Huckfield | 7/10 | 3587 days | 45% |
| Aaron Stalley | 8/10 | 3589 days | 48% |
| Marcus | 7/10 | 3595 days | 45% |
| Johannes Koch | 7/10 | 3595 days | 45% |
| Louise Boje | 10/10 | 3597 days | 48% |
| Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3599 days | 48% |
| Maddalena Buffoni | 9/10 | 3600 days | 47% |
| Clara Loizeil | 9/10 | 3601 days | 47% |
| Patrick Veber | 5/10 | 3601 days | 36% |
| Hake Dolce | 10/10 | 3602 days | 48% |
| Julien Sene | 9/10 | 3607 days | 47% |
| Sari Aroalho | 8/10 | 3610 days | 46% |
| Briony | 8/10 | 3610 days | 46% |
| Richard Starkeq | 6/10 | 3611 days | 41% |
| Joana Frever | 2/10 | 3612 days | 21% |
| Carmen Pramstaller | 10/10 | 3612 days | 47% |
| Etienne Douse | 7/10 | 3613 days | 44% |
| Sophia Harnisch | 9/10 | 3613 days | 47% |
| Liza Braun | 10/10 | 3613 days | 47% |
| Dario Leyrer | 10/10 | 3613 days | 47% |
| Coral Dawson | 10/10 | 3614 days | 47% |
| Brianna Burd | 9/10 | 3614 days | 47% |
| Daniel Roedel | 10/10 | 3619 days | 47% |
| Jonathan Gourmel | 8/10 | 3619 days | 46% |
| Matte Stemkowitz | 9/10 | 3620 days | 46% |
| Lea and Emmanuel | 9/10 | 3622 days | 46% |
| Petru | 8/10 | 3622 days | 46% |
| Maxima Buisan | 7/10 | 3622 days | 43% |
| Miriam Hack | 8/10 | 3623 days | 46% |
| Annika Locker | 10/10 | 3626 days | 46% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3627 days | 45% |
| Nils | 7/10 | 3632 days | 43% |
| Marie Brauherr | 10/10 | 3632 days | 46% |
| Vanesha Patel | 9/10 | 3633 days | 45% |
| Jenny and Till | 10/10 | 3634 days | 46% |
| Clare Pickford | 9/10 | 3635 days | 45% |
| Jonathan and Gulsen | 10/10 | 3637 days | 46% |
| Nico | 8/10 | 3637 days | 45% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 3656 days | 44% |
| Elodie and Gestan | 8/10 | 3659 days | 43% |
| Julia Huesam | 8/10 | 3664 days | 43% |
| Sophie Giblin | 9/10 | 3665 days | 43% |
| Sebastian and Susanna | 9/10 | 3667 days | 43% |
| Sammy Cronin | 8/10 | 3672 days | 43% |
| Fabian Dilly | 8/10 | 3683 days | 42% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 10/10 | 3701 days | 42% |
| Bob Fontaine | 10/10 | 3801 days | 35% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 3934 days | 27% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 3934 days | 27% |
| Anna Birzle | 10/10 | 3934 days | 27% |
| Elisabeth Ringswandl | 9/10 | 3935 days | 27% |
| Thomas Haslbeck | 7/10 | 3935 days | 25% |
| Miriam Burchartz | 9/10 | 3936 days | 27% |
| Ken | 9/10 | 3937 days | 27% |
| Michael Stibor | 7/10 | 3938 days | 25% |
| Nicol | 8/10 | 3975 days | 24% |
| Jamie McArthur | 9/10 | 3997 days | 23% |
| Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 4028 days | 21% |
| Marion and Ralf | 9/10 | 4037 days | 21% |
| Fiona Hawkins | 7/10 | 4274 days | 6% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4290 days | 5% |
| Becky | 9/10 | 4290 days | 5% |
| Josefin Lind | 9/10 | 4291 days | 5% |
| Herman Holmgist | 10/10 | 4291 days | 5% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 9/10 | 4294 days | 5% |
| Paolo Cases | 8/10 | 4294 days | 5% |
| Lena Hanhart | 10/10 | 4309 days | 4% |
| Vanessa | 4/10 | 4309 days | 3% |
| Tom Hill | 9/10 | 4310 days | 4% |
| Anna Sternberg | 6/10 | 4313 days | 3% |
| Tobias Thull | 8/10 | 4315 days | 4% |
| Katja Kraffzik | 10/10 | 4316 days | 4% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 4318 days | 3% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 4318 days | 3% |
| Anne Courtenay | 8/10 | 4319 days | 3% |
| Andreas Jung | 10/10 | 4319 days | 3% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 9/10 | 4323 days | 3% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4323 days | 3% |
| Lena Wacker | 8/10 | 4323 days | 3% |
| Rikke Petersen | 10/10 | 4330 days | 3% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 4359 days | 1% |
| Rupert | 10/10 | 4366 days | 1% |
| Alineet Gautier | 10/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
| Marie Lillieskold | 9/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 8/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 4463 days | 31% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4646 days | 29% |
| Annika Schmidt | 9/10 | 4651 days | 31% |
| Tim Vennewold | 8/10 | 4664 days | 31% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 9/10 | 4675 days | 31% |
| Jeremy Eng | 7/10 | 4677 days | 29% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4677 days | 31% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4682 days | 31% |
| Neele & Philipp | 7/10 | 4687 days | 29% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4749 days | 31% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4749 days | 31% |
| Julien Bocherens | 8/10 | 4753 days | 31% |
| Joroen Borkert | 8/10 | 4754 days | 31% |
| Lauret Stulemeyer | 8/10 | 4755 days | 31% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4759 days | 31% |
| Fahl | 10/10 | 4766 days | 31% |
| tanyap | 7/10 | 4767 days | 29% |
| Terry Coles | 9/10 | 4767 days | 31% |
| Alexander Klein | 8/10 | 4771 days | 31% |
| Adam Hassan | 7/10 | 4772 days | 29% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 7/10 | 4772 days | 29% |
| Doan | 9/10 | 4772 days | 31% |
| Claudia Mueller | 10/10 | 4772 days | 31% |
| Presot | 10/10 | 4772 days | 31% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 10/10 | 4773 days | 31% |
| Faassen | 9/10 | 4775 days | 31% |
| Julie Lamart | 9/10 | 4776 days | 31% |
| Behrens | 10/10 | 4776 days | 31% |
| Henzen | 8/10 | 4776 days | 31% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 4777 days | 31% |
| The Mowbrays | 8/10 | 4777 days | 31% |
| Stevie | 8/10 | 4779 days | 31% |
| Thys | 8/10 | 4779 days | 31% |
| Rob Klauer | 9/10 | 5030 days | 31% |
| Selwindt | 9/10 | 5036 days | 31% |
| Michael Touzer | 9/10 | 5037 days | 31% |
| Steven Hill | 9/10 | 5038 days | 31% |
| Susanne A | 7/10 | 5039 days | 29% |
| Malena | 7/10 | 5042 days | 29% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 5046 days | 31% |
| Romla | 8/10 | 5049 days | 31% |
| Ronald Veldman | 8/10 | 5049 days | 31% |
| Tom Pratt | 9/10 | 5054 days | 31% |
| Stephan Wolter | 10/10 | 5056 days | 31% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 5056 days | 31% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 10/10 | 5056 days | 31% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 7/10 | 5056 days | 29% |
| Langerak | 8/10 | 5058 days | 31% |
| Lepied | 9/10 | 5058 days | 31% |
| Nic Roggeman | 9/10 | 5058 days | 31% |
| Ralf Glaser | 10/10 | 5059 days | 31% |
| Maria Dietrich | 8/10 | 5066 days | 31% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5071 days | 31% |
| Henriette Haugan | 8/10 | 5084 days | 31% |
| Fred Saunders | 9/10 | 5097 days | 31% |
| Pietsch | 9/10 | 5137 days | 31% |
| Marc & Pauline | 9/10 | 5139 days | 31% |
| Marek Woznica | 9/10 | 5140 days | 31% |
| Willem & Lilian | 8/10 | 5142 days | 31% |
| Andy Lever | 10/10 | 5148 days | 31% |
| Herman Plasman | 7/10 | 5148 days | 29% |
| Waldemar Schuler | 9/10 | 5149 days | 31% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 5149 days | 31% |
| Anders Rathleff | 9/10 | 5149 days | 31% |
| Lardy | 9/10 | 5150 days | 31% |
| JadesWorld | 8/10 | 5163 days | 31% |
| Gary A | 9/10 | 5163 days | 31% |
| Sid | 9/10 | 5163 days | 31% |
| andrew_w | 7/10 | 5377 days | 29% |
| Julie Norton | 9/10 | 5378 days | 31% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5391 days | 31% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5391 days | 31% |
| Hannah Roberts | 10/10 | 5405 days | 31% |
| Scheler | 10/10 | 5407 days | 31% |
| Gord Carnochan | 10/10 | 5409 days | 31% |
| Isabel & Tillmann | 10/10 | 5411 days | 31% |
| Adam Hayley | 6/10 | 5420 days | 27% |
| Kat Fleming | 10/10 | 5422 days | 31% |
| Luise Jaeger | 10/10 | 5426 days | 31% |
| Russell Stevens | 10/10 | 5426 days | 31% |
| F Horrex | 8/10 | 5427 days | 31% |
| Jessie Currie | 10/10 | 5427 days | 31% |
| Michael Eck | 10/10 | 5429 days | 31% |
| David and Karin | 10/10 | 5429 days | 31% |
| Brandt | 8/10 | 5433 days | 31% |
| Chamton | 9/10 | 5436 days | 31% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 5437 days | 31% |
| BigSis | 9/10 | 5620 days | 31% |
| Sophie & Joffrey | 9/10 | 5707 days | 31% |
| kempt | 8/10 | 5712 days | 31% |
| Matt Roper | 9/10 | 5764 days | 31% |
| Matilda Hansson | 9/10 | 5764 days | 31% |
| Kay Beaumont | 10/10 | 5775 days | 31% |
| Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 5779 days | 31% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 5779 days | 31% |
| Gail Mckinstry | 9/10 | 5779 days | 31% |
| Elisabeth Egerup | 10/10 | 5780 days | 31% |
| John Harrison | 8/10 | 5780 days | 31% |
| Peter Koeck | 10/10 | 5782 days | 31% |
| Jakob Pedersen | 10/10 | 5783 days | 31% |
| Vandeput | 9/10 | 5787 days | 31% |
| Fam Leinden | 8/10 | 5795 days | 31% |
| Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5796 days | 31% |
| Helen Power | 8/10 | 5796 days | 31% |
| Mick Thexton | 10/10 | 5796 days | 31% |
| Jens van Evp | 10/10 | 5797 days | 31% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 8/10 | 5797 days | 31% |
| Belinda Godhard | 1/10 | 5798 days | 12% |
| Veltmaat NL | 7/10 | 5807 days | 29% |
| Jakob Jurgen | 8/10 | 5815 days | 31% |
| deanlaw | 10/10 | 5846 days | 31% |
| menzel | 10/10 | 5846 days | 31% |
| timgr | 8/10 | 5848 days | 31% |
| Lynn Maguire | 10/10 | 5849 days | 31% |
| blokzyl | 8/10 | 5852 days | 31% |
| braunweiler | 9/10 | 5852 days | 31% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 5855 days | 31% |
| hofstetterf | 10/10 | 5861 days | 31% |
| Emma Coltman | 10/10 | 5865 days | 31% |
| rolandop | 10/10 | 5867 days | 31% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 10/10 | 5867 days | 31% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 5871 days | 31% |
| Susanne Santer | 9/10 | 5871 days | 31% |
| Richard Kesteleyn | 8/10 | 5871 days | 31% |
| Christy | 8/10 | 5873 days | 31% |
| Ricarda | 9/10 | 5873 days | 31% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 6/10 | 5873 days | 27% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 9/10 | 5874 days | 31% |
| Jessica Clarisse | 9/10 | 5875 days | 31% |
| Lionel Mouesca | 10/10 | 5875 days | 31% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 5875 days | 31% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 5875 days | 31% |
| Wim Put | 8/10 | 5889 days | 31% |
| BryonyS | 10/10 | 6095 days | 31% |
| BouterG | 10/10 | 6103 days | 31% |
| CeesVanW | 8/10 | 6104 days | 31% |
| mikestep | 10/10 | 6107 days | 31% |
| Martien van Brakel | 8/10 | 6107 days | 31% |
| Arjan Muis | 9/10 | 6109 days | 31% |
| DaveV | 9/10 | 6123 days | 31% |
| AmyBarrett | 10/10 | 6123 days | 31% |
| DamienM | 10/10 | 6123 days | 31% |
| StefanGermany1 | 10/10 | 6125 days | 31% |
| FiensG | 8/10 | 6126 days | 31% |
| OdiliaF | 10/10 | 6126 days | 31% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6127 days | 31% |
| BrendaM | 10/10 | 6488 days | 31% |
| AlanN316 | 8/10 | 6488 days | 31% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cathedral Cove Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.