Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mossburn Country Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mossburn Country Park

Valid Reviews

133 Valid Reviews

The Mossburn Country Park experience has a total of 141 reviews. There are 133 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 8 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 133 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 83
62%
9/10 24
18%
8/10 16
12%
7/10 7
5%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

92.71% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park valid reviews is 92.71% and is based on 133 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

15 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 133 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
33%
9/10 4
27%
8/10 5
33%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 1
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

96.11%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Stevoz 10/10 51 days 100%
Jan 10/10 79 days 100%
Liss 10/10 141 days 99%
Mireille & Philippe 8/10 141 days 97%
Vera 10/10 202 days 98%
Eline 10/10 385 days 92%
Rhonda 10/10 444 days 89%
VamperCan 10/10 444 days 89%
Andy Williamson 10/10 475 days 87%
YC 10/10 475 days 87%
Anne 10/10 475 days 87%
Brett 7/10 475 days 81%
Charly and family 10/10 506 days 85%
Christiane 10/10 567 days 82%
Caron 10/10 750 days 68%
Miriam 10/10 841 days 60%
Sandra Staples 9/10 841 days 59%
Chris H 10/10 872 days 57%
Julia Richter 10/10 872 days 57%
Diana Antunez 10/10 902 days 53%
Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com 10/10 902 days 53%
Chc 10/10 902 days 53%
annelie slaar 9/10 933 days 50%
Ren15 10/10 933 days 50%
Victoria 7/10 933 days 47%
Pauline 10/10 933 days 50%
Elke 10/10 1116 days 33%
Tasmin 9/10 1147 days 31%
Katie Edser 10/10 1147 days 31%
Kelsey Fisher 10/10 1147 days 31%
Dave and Nicky 10/10 1237 days 24%
Rob J 9/10 1237 days 24%
Sue and Ron 10/10 1267 days 22%
Shona Beach 10/10 1267 days 22%
Joan Hermitage 10/10 1297 days 21%
Yuri Fey 10/10 1298 days 21%
Russell 1/10 1298 days 8%
Anne S 9/10 1512 days 10%
Heather and Jim 10/10 1602 days 7%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 1663 days 6%
Steven 10/10 1877 days 4%
Luke 10/10 1905 days 4%
Cait Turner 8/10 1936 days 4%
Tori 10/10 1967 days 4%
Joanne 10/10 2028 days 4%
Lynley and Ian Breeze 10/10 2028 days 4%
Lauren 8/10 2242 days 4%
Amy 10/10 2271 days 4%
Moritz 10/10 2271 days 4%
Pierre-Yves 10/10 2271 days 4%
Allan and Kelly 10/10 2271 days 4%
Johan 10/10 2271 days 4%
Melissa 10/10 2302 days 4%
Nik 10/10 2302 days 4%
Erica 10/10 2302 days 4%
Leon 9/10 2302 days 4%
Chris 10/10 2333 days 4%
Peter Nesnebse 8/10 2333 days 4%
Antoine 10/10 2363 days 4%
Lucie 10/10 2363 days 4%
Javier Williams 9/10 2363 days 3%
K&KRahimi 9/10 2363 days 3%
Shona Beach 10/10 2394 days 3%
Vicki Hoskinson 10/10 2607 days 3%
John 9/10 2608 days 3%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 2636 days 3%
Brigitta 8/10 2636 days 3%
Marty 10/10 2636 days 3%
From DK 9/10 2667 days 3%
Francois & Caroline 9/10 2667 days 3%
Yh kim 10/10 2667 days 3%
Richard 9/10 2667 days 3%
Nadine 10/10 2698 days 3%
Sellers Family 10/10 2728 days 3%
Shona Beach 10/10 2759 days 3%
Carl 10/10 2759 days 3%
S Becker 10/10 2942 days 2%
Jos Mulder 10/10 3004 days 2%
Suzanne Wijsman 9/10 3009 days 2%
Xiao Xiao 9/10 3042 days 2%
Kerine Au 10/10 3062 days 2%
Lukas Hauser 10/10 3081 days 2%
Crystal Wang 3/10 3095 days 1%
Madelyn Fagerman 10/10 3301 days 2%
Vicki 10/10 3311 days 2%
Frank Hofmann 10/10 3332 days 2%
Marie Blom 10/10 3336 days 2%
Josh Marks 10/10 3350 days 2%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 9/10 3380 days 2%
Barbara-Rose Townsend 9/10 3383 days 2%
Martine Baars 10/10 3401 days 1%
Ajit Raut 10/10 3443 days 1%
Ivan Wee 8/10 3457 days 1%
Nancy LeRoy 9/10 3457 days 1%
Ivan W. 10/10 3488 days 1%
Susan H 10/10 3491 days 1%
Matteo Verzi 7/10 3690 days 1%
Sandy Bell 10/10 3730 days 1%
Louise Alexander 10/10 3731 days 1%
Yuan Lin 8/10 3737 days 1%
Rachel Macdonald 7/10 3752 days 1%
robert zdebski 9/10 3793 days 1%
Sarah Gurney 7/10 3801 days 1%
Graham Lighner 10/10 3804 days 0%
Jennifer Brown 9/10 3823 days 1%
Lena + Kristof 10/10 4068 days 0%
Thomas Blom 8/10 4097 days 0%
Kodie Howarth 10/10 4126 days 0%
Rasmus Rantil 10/10 4132 days 0%
Bjorn Privat 10/10 4139 days 0%
Kim Frey 7/10 4139 days 0%
Silvia Hudakova 10/10 4158 days 0%
Julian Kuemme 10/10 4409 days 0%
Andrea Sole 10/10 4409 days 0%
Mandy Reich 9/10 4410 days 0%
Monique Monique 7/10 4462 days 0%
Petra Niemann 10/10 4493 days 1%
Eric and Nienke 8/10 4524 days 1%
J Murphy 8/10 4554 days 1%
Luise Fuchs 9/10 4789 days 0%
Michal 8/10 4803 days 0%
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn 8/10 4803 days 0%
Guillot 9/10 4806 days 0%
phudgb 10/10 4950 days 1%
Rebecca Doehl 8/10 5177 days 0%
Sue DeVries 8/10 5507 days 0%
Marii Joekalda 9/10 5513 days 0%
Tina Madsen 8/10 5516 days 0%
Sabine Tippman 6/10 5516 days 0%
nelliekaye 9/10 5711 days 1%
hellami 8/10 6015 days 1%
Andrea 10/10 6146 days 0%
JohannaB 10/10 6248 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mossburn Country Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.40% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 70 days. However the Mossburn Country Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Mossburn Country Park experience has been adjusted for 24 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
21 -0.35%
22 -0.37%
23 -0.38%
24 -0.40%
25 -0.42%
26 -0.43%
27 -0.45%

Balancing Adjustment

0.37% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

96%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.