Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mossburn Country Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
70 Valid Reviews
The Mossburn Country Park experience has a total of 75 reviews. There are 70 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park valid reviews is 90.57% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
15 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 70 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Vicki Hoskinson||10/10||139 days||96.94||100%|
|Kathryn Torkington||10/10||167 days||95.58||99%|
|From DK||9/10||198 days||93.79||97%|
|Francois & Caroline||9/10||198 days||93.79||97%|
|Yh kim||10/10||198 days||93.79||97%|
|Sellers Family||10/10||259 days||89.37||92%|
|Shona Beach||10/10||290 days||86.67||89%|
|S Becker||10/10||473 days||64.55||66%|
|Jos Mulder||10/10||535 days||54.64||56%|
|Suzanne Wijsman||9/10||540 days||53.79||55%|
|Xiao Xiao||9/10||573 days||48.18||49%|
|Kerine Au||10/10||594 days||44.77||45%|
|Lukas Hauser||10/10||612 days||41.97||42%|
|Crystal Wang||3/10||626 days||36.27||36%|
|Madelyn Fagerman||10/10||832 days||15.96||15%|
|Frank Hofmann||10/10||863 days||13.53||13%|
|Marie Blom||10/10||867 days||13.24||12%|
|Josh Marks||10/10||881 days||12.26||11%|
|Matthias Wohlgemuth||9/10||911 days||10.36||9%|
|Barbara-Rose Townsend||9/10||914 days||10.19||9%|
|Martine Baars||10/10||932 days||9.21||8%|
|Ajit Raut||10/10||974 days||7.32||6%|
|Ivan Wee||8/10||988 days||6.81||5%|
|Nancy LeRoy||9/10||989 days||6.78||5%|
|Ivan W.||10/10||1020 days||5.89||5%|
|Susan H||10/10||1022 days||5.84||4%|
|Matteo Verzi||7/10||1221 days||4.83||3%|
|Sandy Bell||10/10||1261 days||4.77||3%|
|Louise Alexander||10/10||1263 days||4.77||3%|
|Yuan Lin||8/10||1268 days||4.76||3%|
|Rachel Macdonald||7/10||1283 days||4.74||3%|
|robert zdebski||9/10||1325 days||4.68||3%|
|Sarah Gurney||7/10||1332 days||4.68||3%|
|Graham Lighner||10/10||1335 days||5.61||4%|
|Jennifer Brown||9/10||1355 days||4.64||3%|
|Lena + Kristof||10/10||1600 days||4.31||3%|
|Thomas Blom||8/10||1628 days||4.27||3%|
|Kodie Howarth||10/10||1657 days||4.23||3%|
|Rasmus Rantil||10/10||1663 days||4.22||3%|
|Bjorn Privat||10/10||1670 days||4.21||3%|
|Kim Frey||7/10||1670 days||4.21||3%|
|Silvia Hudakova||10/10||1690 days||4.18||3%|
|Julian Kuemme||10/10||1940 days||4.61||3%|
|Andrea Sole||10/10||1940 days||4.61||3%|
|Mandy Reich||9/10||1941 days||4.61||3%|
|Monique Monique||7/10||1993 days||3.77||2%|
|Petra Niemann||10/10||2024 days||3.73||2%|
|Eric and Nienke||8/10||2055 days||3.68||2%|
|J Murphy||8/10||2085 days||3.64||2%|
|Luise Fuchs||9/10||2320 days||3.99||3%|
|Przemystaw Tymizyszyn||8/10||2334 days||3.96||2%|
|Rebecca Doehl||8/10||2708 days||3.35||2%|
|Sue DeVries||8/10||3038 days||2.81||1%|
|Marii Joekalda||9/10||3044 days||2.8||1%|
|Tina Madsen||8/10||3047 days||2.79||1%|
|Sabine Tippman||6/10||3047 days||2.79||1%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mossburn Country Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Mossburn Country Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.
The Mossburn Country Park experience has been adjusted for 106 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.