Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mossburn Country Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mossburn Country Park

Valid Reviews

127 Valid Reviews

The Mossburn Country Park experience has a total of 135 reviews. There are 127 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 8 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 127 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 78
61%
9/10 24
19%
8/10 15
12%
7/10 7
6%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

92.52% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park valid reviews is 92.52% and is based on 127 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

15 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 127 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
33%
9/10 4
27%
8/10 5
33%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 1
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

95.76%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Rhonda 10/10 51 days 100%
VamperCan 10/10 51 days 100%
Andy Williamson 10/10 82 days 100%
YC 10/10 82 days 100%
Anne 10/10 82 days 100%
Brett 7/10 82 days 93%
Charly and family 10/10 113 days 99%
Christiane 10/10 174 days 98%
Caron 10/10 357 days 93%
Miriam 10/10 448 days 89%
Sandra Staples 9/10 448 days 88%
Chris H 10/10 479 days 87%
Julia Richter 10/10 479 days 87%
Diana Antunez 10/10 509 days 85%
Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com 10/10 509 days 85%
Chc 10/10 509 days 85%
annelie slaar 9/10 540 days 83%
Ren15 10/10 540 days 83%
Victoria 7/10 540 days 78%
Pauline 10/10 540 days 83%
Elke 10/10 723 days 70%
Tasmin 9/10 754 days 67%
Katie Edser 10/10 754 days 68%
Kelsey Fisher 10/10 754 days 68%
Dave and Nicky 10/10 844 days 59%
Rob J 9/10 844 days 59%
Sue and Ron 10/10 874 days 56%
Shona Beach 10/10 874 days 56%
Joan Hermitage 10/10 905 days 53%
Yuri Fey 10/10 905 days 53%
Russell 1/10 905 days 21%
Anne S 9/10 1119 days 33%
Heather and Jim 10/10 1209 days 26%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 1270 days 22%
Steven 10/10 1484 days 11%
Luke 10/10 1512 days 10%
Cait Turner 8/10 1543 days 9%
Tori 10/10 1574 days 8%
Joanne 10/10 1635 days 7%
Lynley and Ian Breeze 10/10 1635 days 7%
Lauren 8/10 1849 days 4%
Amy 10/10 1878 days 5%
Moritz 10/10 1878 days 5%
Pierre-Yves 10/10 1878 days 5%
Allan and Kelly 10/10 1878 days 5%
Johan 10/10 1878 days 5%
Melissa 10/10 1909 days 4%
Nik 10/10 1909 days 4%
Erica 10/10 1909 days 4%
Leon 9/10 1909 days 4%
Chris 10/10 1940 days 4%
Peter Nesnebse 8/10 1940 days 4%
Antoine 10/10 1970 days 4%
Lucie 10/10 1970 days 4%
Javier Williams 9/10 1970 days 4%
K&KRahimi 9/10 1970 days 4%
Shona Beach 10/10 2001 days 4%
Vicki Hoskinson 10/10 2215 days 4%
John 9/10 2215 days 4%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 2243 days 4%
Brigitta 8/10 2243 days 4%
Marty 10/10 2243 days 4%
From DK 9/10 2274 days 4%
Francois & Caroline 9/10 2274 days 4%
Yh kim 10/10 2274 days 4%
Richard 9/10 2274 days 4%
Nadine 10/10 2305 days 4%
Sellers Family 10/10 2335 days 4%
Shona Beach 10/10 2366 days 4%
Carl 10/10 2366 days 4%
S Becker 10/10 2549 days 3%
Jos Mulder 10/10 2611 days 3%
Suzanne Wijsman 9/10 2616 days 3%
Xiao Xiao 9/10 2649 days 3%
Kerine Au 10/10 2670 days 3%
Lukas Hauser 10/10 2688 days 3%
Crystal Wang 3/10 2702 days 1%
Madelyn Fagerman 10/10 2908 days 2%
Vicki 10/10 2918 days 2%
Frank Hofmann 10/10 2939 days 2%
Marie Blom 10/10 2943 days 2%
Josh Marks 10/10 2957 days 2%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 9/10 2987 days 2%
Barbara-Rose Townsend 9/10 2990 days 2%
Martine Baars 10/10 3008 days 2%
Ajit Raut 10/10 3050 days 2%
Ivan Wee 8/10 3064 days 2%
Nancy LeRoy 9/10 3065 days 2%
Ivan W. 10/10 3096 days 2%
Susan H 10/10 3098 days 2%
Matteo Verzi 7/10 3297 days 2%
Sandy Bell 10/10 3337 days 2%
Louise Alexander 10/10 3339 days 2%
Yuan Lin 8/10 3344 days 2%
Rachel Macdonald 7/10 3359 days 1%
robert zdebski 9/10 3401 days 1%
Sarah Gurney 7/10 3408 days 1%
Graham Lighner 10/10 3411 days 1%
Jennifer Brown 9/10 3431 days 1%
Lena + Kristof 10/10 3676 days 1%
Thomas Blom 8/10 3704 days 1%
Kodie Howarth 10/10 3733 days 1%
Rasmus Rantil 10/10 3739 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 10/10 3746 days 1%
Kim Frey 7/10 3746 days 1%
Silvia Hudakova 10/10 3766 days 1%
Julian Kuemme 10/10 4016 days 0%
Andrea Sole 10/10 4016 days 0%
Mandy Reich 9/10 4017 days 0%
Monique Monique 7/10 4069 days 0%
Petra Niemann 10/10 4100 days 0%
Eric and Nienke 8/10 4131 days 0%
J Murphy 8/10 4161 days 0%
Luise Fuchs 9/10 4396 days 0%
Michal 8/10 4410 days 0%
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn 8/10 4410 days 0%
Guillot 9/10 4413 days 0%
phudgb 10/10 4557 days 1%
Rebecca Doehl 8/10 4784 days 0%
Sue DeVries 8/10 5114 days 0%
Marii Joekalda 9/10 5120 days 0%
Tina Madsen 8/10 5123 days 0%
Sabine Tippman 6/10 5123 days 0%
nelliekaye 9/10 5318 days 1%
hellami 8/10 5622 days 1%
Andrea 10/10 5753 days 0%
JohannaB 10/10 5855 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mossburn Country Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.72% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 58 days. However the Mossburn Country Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Mossburn Country Park experience has been adjusted for 37 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
34 -0.66%
35 -0.68%
36 -0.70%
37 -0.72%
38 -0.74%
39 -0.75%
40 -0.77%

Balancing Adjustment

0.43% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

96%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.