Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mossburn Country Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mossburn Country Park

Valid Reviews

120 Valid Reviews

The Mossburn Country Park experience has a total of 128 reviews. There are 120 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 8 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 120 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 72
60%
9/10 24
20%
8/10 15
13%
7/10 6
5%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

92.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park valid reviews is 92.33% and is based on 120 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

15 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 120 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
33%
9/10 4
27%
8/10 5
33%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 1
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

95.64%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Christiane 10/10 42 days 100%
Caron 10/10 225 days 97%
Miriam 10/10 316 days 94%
Sandra Staples 9/10 316 days 93%
Chris H 10/10 347 days 93%
Julia Richter 10/10 347 days 93%
Diana Antunez 10/10 377 days 92%
Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com 10/10 377 days 92%
Chc 10/10 377 days 92%
annelie slaar 9/10 408 days 90%
Ren15 10/10 408 days 91%
Victoria 7/10 408 days 84%
Pauline 10/10 408 days 91%
Elke 10/10 591 days 80%
Tasmin 9/10 622 days 77%
Katie Edser 10/10 622 days 78%
Kelsey Fisher 10/10 622 days 78%
Dave and Nicky 10/10 712 days 71%
Rob J 9/10 712 days 70%
Sue and Ron 10/10 742 days 69%
Shona Beach 10/10 742 days 69%
Joan Hermitage 10/10 772 days 66%
Yuri Fey 10/10 773 days 66%
Russell 1/10 773 days 27%
Anne S 9/10 987 days 45%
Heather and Jim 10/10 1077 days 37%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 1138 days 32%
Steven 10/10 1352 days 18%
Luke 10/10 1380 days 16%
Cait Turner 8/10 1411 days 14%
Tori 10/10 1442 days 13%
Joanne 10/10 1503 days 11%
Lynley and Ian Breeze 10/10 1503 days 11%
Lauren 8/10 1717 days 5%
Amy 10/10 1746 days 5%
Moritz 10/10 1746 days 5%
Pierre-Yves 10/10 1746 days 5%
Allan and Kelly 10/10 1746 days 5%
Johan 10/10 1746 days 5%
Melissa 10/10 1777 days 5%
Nik 10/10 1777 days 5%
Erica 10/10 1777 days 5%
Leon 9/10 1777 days 5%
Chris 10/10 1808 days 5%
Peter Nesnebse 8/10 1808 days 5%
Antoine 10/10 1838 days 5%
Lucie 10/10 1838 days 5%
Javier Williams 9/10 1838 days 5%
K&KRahimi 9/10 1838 days 5%
Shona Beach 10/10 1869 days 5%
Vicki Hoskinson 10/10 2082 days 4%
John 9/10 2083 days 4%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 2111 days 4%
Brigitta 8/10 2111 days 4%
Marty 10/10 2111 days 4%
From DK 9/10 2142 days 4%
Francois & Caroline 9/10 2142 days 4%
Yh kim 10/10 2142 days 4%
Richard 9/10 2142 days 4%
Nadine 10/10 2173 days 4%
Sellers Family 10/10 2203 days 4%
Shona Beach 10/10 2234 days 4%
Carl 10/10 2234 days 4%
S Becker 10/10 2417 days 4%
Jos Mulder 10/10 2479 days 4%
Suzanne Wijsman 9/10 2484 days 3%
Xiao Xiao 9/10 2517 days 3%
Kerine Au 10/10 2537 days 3%
Lukas Hauser 10/10 2556 days 3%
Crystal Wang 3/10 2570 days 2%
Madelyn Fagerman 10/10 2776 days 3%
Vicki 10/10 2786 days 3%
Frank Hofmann 10/10 2807 days 3%
Marie Blom 10/10 2811 days 3%
Josh Marks 10/10 2825 days 3%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 9/10 2855 days 3%
Barbara-Rose Townsend 9/10 2858 days 3%
Martine Baars 10/10 2876 days 3%
Ajit Raut 10/10 2918 days 3%
Ivan Wee 8/10 2932 days 3%
Nancy LeRoy 9/10 2932 days 3%
Ivan W. 10/10 2963 days 3%
Susan H 10/10 2966 days 3%
Matteo Verzi 7/10 3165 days 2%
Sandy Bell 10/10 3205 days 2%
Louise Alexander 10/10 3206 days 2%
Yuan Lin 8/10 3212 days 2%
Rachel Macdonald 7/10 3227 days 2%
robert zdebski 9/10 3268 days 2%
Sarah Gurney 7/10 3276 days 2%
Graham Lighner 10/10 3279 days 1%
Jennifer Brown 9/10 3298 days 2%
Lena + Kristof 10/10 3543 days 1%
Thomas Blom 8/10 3572 days 1%
Kodie Howarth 10/10 3601 days 1%
Rasmus Rantil 10/10 3607 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 10/10 3614 days 1%
Kim Frey 7/10 3614 days 1%
Silvia Hudakova 10/10 3633 days 1%
Julian Kuemme 10/10 3884 days 0%
Andrea Sole 10/10 3884 days 0%
Mandy Reich 9/10 3885 days 0%
Monique Monique 7/10 3937 days 1%
Petra Niemann 10/10 3968 days 1%
Eric and Nienke 8/10 3999 days 1%
J Murphy 8/10 4029 days 0%
Luise Fuchs 9/10 4264 days 0%
Michal 8/10 4278 days 0%
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn 8/10 4278 days 0%
Guillot 9/10 4281 days 0%
phudgb 10/10 4425 days 1%
Rebecca Doehl 8/10 4652 days 0%
Sue DeVries 8/10 4982 days 0%
Marii Joekalda 9/10 4988 days 1%
Tina Madsen 8/10 4991 days 0%
Sabine Tippman 6/10 4991 days 0%
nelliekaye 9/10 5186 days 1%
hellami 8/10 5490 days 1%
Andrea 10/10 5621 days 1%
JohannaB 10/10 5723 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mossburn Country Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.46% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 45 days. However the Mossburn Country Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Mossburn Country Park experience has been adjusted for 23 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
20 -0.40%
21 -0.42%
22 -0.44%
23 -0.46%
24 -0.48%
25 -0.50%
26 -0.52%

Balancing Adjustment

0.42% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

96%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.