Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mossburn Country Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mossburn Country Park

Valid Reviews

131 Valid Reviews

The Mossburn Country Park experience has a total of 139 reviews. There are 131 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 8 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 131 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 81
62%
9/10 24
18%
8/10 16
12%
7/10 7
5%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

92.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park valid reviews is 92.60% and is based on 131 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

15 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 131 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
33%
9/10 4
27%
8/10 5
33%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 1
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

95.76%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Liss 10/10 40 days 100%
Mireille & Philippe 8/10 40 days 98%
Vera 10/10 101 days 100%
Eline 10/10 284 days 95%
Rhonda 10/10 343 days 93%
VamperCan 10/10 343 days 93%
Andy Williamson 10/10 374 days 92%
YC 10/10 374 days 92%
Anne 10/10 374 days 92%
Brett 7/10 374 days 86%
Charly and family 10/10 405 days 91%
Christiane 10/10 466 days 88%
Caron 10/10 649 days 76%
Miriam 10/10 740 days 69%
Sandra Staples 9/10 740 days 68%
Chris H 10/10 771 days 66%
Julia Richter 10/10 771 days 66%
Diana Antunez 10/10 801 days 63%
Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com 10/10 801 days 63%
Chc 10/10 801 days 63%
annelie slaar 9/10 832 days 60%
Ren15 10/10 832 days 61%
Victoria 7/10 832 days 56%
Pauline 10/10 832 days 61%
Elke 10/10 1015 days 42%
Tasmin 9/10 1046 days 39%
Katie Edser 10/10 1046 days 40%
Kelsey Fisher 10/10 1046 days 40%
Dave and Nicky 10/10 1136 days 32%
Rob J 9/10 1136 days 32%
Sue and Ron 10/10 1166 days 30%
Shona Beach 10/10 1166 days 30%
Joan Hermitage 10/10 1196 days 28%
Yuri Fey 10/10 1197 days 27%
Russell 1/10 1197 days 11%
Anne S 9/10 1411 days 15%
Heather and Jim 10/10 1501 days 11%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 1562 days 9%
Steven 10/10 1776 days 5%
Luke 10/10 1804 days 5%
Cait Turner 8/10 1835 days 5%
Tori 10/10 1866 days 5%
Joanne 10/10 1927 days 5%
Lynley and Ian Breeze 10/10 1927 days 5%
Lauren 8/10 2141 days 4%
Amy 10/10 2170 days 4%
Moritz 10/10 2170 days 4%
Pierre-Yves 10/10 2170 days 4%
Allan and Kelly 10/10 2170 days 4%
Johan 10/10 2170 days 4%
Melissa 10/10 2201 days 4%
Nik 10/10 2201 days 4%
Erica 10/10 2201 days 4%
Leon 9/10 2201 days 4%
Chris 10/10 2232 days 4%
Peter Nesnebse 8/10 2232 days 4%
Antoine 10/10 2262 days 4%
Lucie 10/10 2262 days 4%
Javier Williams 9/10 2262 days 4%
K&KRahimi 9/10 2262 days 4%
Shona Beach 10/10 2293 days 4%
Vicki Hoskinson 10/10 2506 days 4%
John 9/10 2507 days 4%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 2535 days 4%
Brigitta 8/10 2535 days 4%
Marty 10/10 2535 days 4%
From DK 9/10 2566 days 3%
Francois & Caroline 9/10 2566 days 3%
Yh kim 10/10 2566 days 4%
Richard 9/10 2566 days 3%
Nadine 10/10 2597 days 3%
Sellers Family 10/10 2627 days 3%
Shona Beach 10/10 2658 days 3%
Carl 10/10 2658 days 3%
S Becker 10/10 2841 days 3%
Jos Mulder 10/10 2903 days 3%
Suzanne Wijsman 9/10 2908 days 3%
Xiao Xiao 9/10 2941 days 3%
Kerine Au 10/10 2961 days 3%
Lukas Hauser 10/10 2980 days 3%
Crystal Wang 3/10 2994 days 1%
Madelyn Fagerman 10/10 3200 days 2%
Vicki 10/10 3210 days 2%
Frank Hofmann 10/10 3231 days 2%
Marie Blom 10/10 3235 days 2%
Josh Marks 10/10 3249 days 2%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 9/10 3279 days 2%
Barbara-Rose Townsend 9/10 3282 days 2%
Martine Baars 10/10 3300 days 2%
Ajit Raut 10/10 3342 days 2%
Ivan Wee 8/10 3356 days 2%
Nancy LeRoy 9/10 3356 days 2%
Ivan W. 10/10 3387 days 2%
Susan H 10/10 3390 days 2%
Matteo Verzi 7/10 3589 days 1%
Sandy Bell 10/10 3629 days 1%
Louise Alexander 10/10 3630 days 1%
Yuan Lin 8/10 3636 days 1%
Rachel Macdonald 7/10 3651 days 1%
robert zdebski 9/10 3692 days 1%
Sarah Gurney 7/10 3700 days 1%
Graham Lighner 10/10 3703 days 1%
Jennifer Brown 9/10 3722 days 1%
Lena + Kristof 10/10 3967 days 1%
Thomas Blom 8/10 3996 days 1%
Kodie Howarth 10/10 4025 days 1%
Rasmus Rantil 10/10 4031 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 10/10 4038 days 1%
Kim Frey 7/10 4038 days 1%
Silvia Hudakova 10/10 4057 days 1%
Julian Kuemme 10/10 4308 days 0%
Andrea Sole 10/10 4308 days 0%
Mandy Reich 9/10 4309 days 0%
Monique Monique 7/10 4361 days 0%
Petra Niemann 10/10 4392 days 1%
Eric and Nienke 8/10 4423 days 1%
J Murphy 8/10 4453 days 1%
Luise Fuchs 9/10 4688 days 1%
Michal 8/10 4702 days 1%
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn 8/10 4702 days 1%
Guillot 9/10 4705 days 1%
phudgb 10/10 4849 days 1%
Rebecca Doehl 8/10 5076 days 1%
Sue DeVries 8/10 5406 days 1%
Marii Joekalda 9/10 5412 days 1%
Tina Madsen 8/10 5415 days 1%
Sabine Tippman 6/10 5415 days 1%
nelliekaye 9/10 5610 days 1%
hellami 8/10 5914 days 1%
Andrea 10/10 6045 days 1%
JohannaB 10/10 6147 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mossburn Country Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.45% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Mossburn Country Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Mossburn Country Park experience has been adjusted for 22 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
19 -0.39%
20 -0.41%
21 -0.43%
22 -0.45%
23 -0.47%
24 -0.49%
25 -0.51%

Balancing Adjustment

0.40% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

96%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.