G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Milford Sound Lodge – Rainforest Campervan Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
170 Valid Reviews
The Milford Sound Lodge – Rainforest Campervan Park experience has a total of 172 reviews. There are 170 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 170 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 41 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 46 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 24 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 14 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
79.94% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Milford Sound Lodge – Rainforest Campervan Park valid reviews is 79.94% and is based on 170 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
40 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 170 valid reviews, the experience has 40 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 40 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
20% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
20% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.25% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Milford Sound Lodge – Rainforest Campervan Park face-to-face reviews is 73.25% and is based on 40 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.77%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nancy Vilker-Krause | 10/10 | 190 days | 100% |
| Nick Shailer | 8/10 | 218 days | 97% |
| Thomas Williams | 9/10 | 402 days | 92% |
| Dean | 10/10 | 767 days | 68% |
| parisonchloe@gmail.com | 10/10 | 798 days | 65% |
| Caron | 10/10 | 889 days | 56% |
| Neha Sikka | 7/10 | 920 days | 49% |
| Kathryn | 1/10 | 1072 days | 15% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1072 days | 37% |
| Christa | 10/10 | 1194 days | 28% |
| Basil | 10/10 | 1225 days | 26% |
| Niff | 10/10 | 1255 days | 24% |
| Josh | 10/10 | 1255 days | 24% |
| Matt Olejniczak | 10/10 | 1286 days | 22% |
| Steve | 9/10 | 1286 days | 22% |
| Olivia | 10/10 | 1345 days | 18% |
| Lou | 4/10 | 1376 days | 11% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 1437 days | 14% |
| Hannah and Matthew | 9/10 | 1498 days | 11% |
| Lis | 10/10 | 1710 days | 6% |
| Alec | 8/10 | 1710 days | 6% |
| EvaBelle | 7/10 | 1741 days | 5% |
| Erna | 9/10 | 1802 days | 5% |
| Nicole | 10/10 | 1802 days | 5% |
| Lee | 6/10 | 1802 days | 4% |
| Karthik | 10/10 | 1985 days | 5% |
| Tash and Liam | 9/10 | 2016 days | 5% |
| Kirsty | 9/10 | 2075 days | 5% |
| Rach | 9/10 | 2136 days | 4% |
| Joe Johnson | 9/10 | 2167 days | 4% |
| Jim Henderson | 10/10 | 2167 days | 4% |
| Rawiri johnston | 10/10 | 2228 days | 4% |
| David | 10/10 | 2289 days | 4% |
| Liz Wade | 7/10 | 2441 days | 4% |
| Leona | 9/10 | 2441 days | 4% |
| Dani | 6/10 | 2472 days | 3% |
| Susanne | 7/10 | 2502 days | 3% |
| Slaven Clan | 9/10 | 2533 days | 4% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 2533 days | 4% |
| Kathy | 10/10 | 2533 days | 4% |
| Andrew Hammond | 9/10 | 2563 days | 4% |
| Rose | 10/10 | 2594 days | 4% |
| Erin | 6/10 | 2625 days | 3% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 2686 days | 3% |
| Freya K | 9/10 | 2686 days | 3% |
| Dominique Q | 5/10 | 2716 days | 2% |
| Felix | 8/10 | 2716 days | 3% |
| beth swash | 10/10 | 2716 days | 3% |
| Vicki Hoskinson | 8/10 | 2747 days | 3% |
| Glen Marshall UK | 8/10 | 2747 days | 3% |
| Marie van Tol | 9/10 | 2775 days | 3% |
| From DK | 9/10 | 2806 days | 3% |
| Michael | 6/10 | 2837 days | 3% |
| Raphaele | 10/10 | 2837 days | 3% |
| Macker | 9/10 | 2867 days | 3% |
| Grizzly Girl | 8/10 | 2898 days | 3% |
| Ellen | 9/10 | 2898 days | 3% |
| Bex & Jake | 9/10 | 3051 days | 3% |
| S Becker | 8/10 | 3081 days | 3% |
| Raymor | 10/10 | 3081 days | 3% |
| Matt | 8/10 | 3081 days | 3% |
| Juliane | 8/10 | 3081 days | 3% |
| Tati Moron | 9/10 | 3085 days | 2% |
| Bailey Dunne | 9/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
| Will | 6/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
| Wintercoat | 8/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
| Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 3132 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 8/10 | 3140 days | 2% |
| Tay Dao Han | 9/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
| Ronald Daigneault | 8/10 | 3195 days | 2% |
| Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 3243 days | 2% |
| Sandra Jeffers | 10/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| Joe Trigg | 8/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
| Carl von Horstig | 9/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
| Suzanne Halfpenny | 10/10 | 3261 days | 2% |
| Laureen Trainer | 8/10 | 3400 days | 2% |
| Lotta Vuorjoki | 10/10 | 3409 days | 2% |
| Judy Aspinall | 10/10 | 3431 days | 2% |
| Grace White | 10/10 | 3433 days | 2% |
| Shashank Luthra | 7/10 | 3436 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3442 days | 2% |
| Louise Russell | 8/10 | 3445 days | 2% |
| Kerry Lee | 9/10 | 3476 days | 2% |
| Chris Beer | 10/10 | 3477 days | 2% |
| Jesse Kruithoed | 9/10 | 3486 days | 2% |
| Sarah Killury | 9/10 | 3487 days | 2% |
| Rosanna Leeming | 8/10 | 3491 days | 2% |
| Juan and Sabrina | 9/10 | 3523 days | 1% |
| estelle D | 10/10 | 3567 days | 2% |
| Ivan Wee | 9/10 | 3596 days | 2% |
| Jack Metcalfe | 9/10 | 3688 days | 1% |
| Ren Kline | 10/10 | 3748 days | 1% |
| Thomas Weir | 6/10 | 3754 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Ellis | 8/10 | 3760 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3774 days | 1% |
| B McNally | 7/10 | 3904 days | 1% |
| Avery Wong | 9/10 | 3922 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Ana Guimaraes | 9/10 | 3942 days | 1% |
| John Blyth | 9/10 | 4034 days | 1% |
| Yvonne Wu | 8/10 | 4147 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 5/10 | 4177 days | 0% |
| Wyklicky | 5/10 | 4181 days | 0% |
| sydneyaharris | 5/10 | 4208 days | 0% |
| Kris Marinomunn | 9/10 | 4217 days | 0% |
| Robert Warner | 6/10 | 4236 days | 0% |
| Manuela Opprecht | 7/10 | 4247 days | 0% |
| Constantin D | 6/10 | 4248 days | 0% |
| Rasmus Rantil | 9/10 | 4271 days | 0% |
| Mark Angell | 8/10 | 4278 days | 0% |
| Joanna Doran | 7/10 | 4291 days | 0% |
| Gianpiero Rodari | 7/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Matt Dean | 8/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
| Andrew Kermode | 9/10 | 4451 days | 1% |
| Rawiri johnston | 7/10 | 4481 days | 1% |
| Claudia de Winter | 7/10 | 4544 days | 1% |
| Brian Lexmond | 7/10 | 4545 days | 1% |
| Audrey Le Bourthe | 7/10 | 4551 days | 1% |
| Carolin Kettler | 7/10 | 4587 days | 1% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 4588 days | 1% |
| Ene Pold | 7/10 | 4595 days | 1% |
| The Germans from Australiia | 2/10 | 4632 days | 0% |
| Sally Mortensen | 7/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
| Rhi | 6/10 | 4724 days | 1% |
| Grantygrant | 3/10 | 4907 days | 1% |
| Jitka Krejcova | 3/10 | 4924 days | 0% |
| Tom Somers | 9/10 | 4924 days | 1% |
| Hanneke P | 7/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
| Lydia Holleman | 9/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
| phudgb | 9/10 | 5089 days | 1% |
| sueadegizmo | 7/10 | 5211 days | 1% |
| MeganG | 7/10 | 5242 days | 1% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 5303 days | 1% |
| Daniel Patricia | 2/10 | 5306 days | 0% |
| Madeleine Mueller | 5/10 | 5308 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 6/10 | 5313 days | 1% |
| Mary Mitchell | 10/10 | 5317 days | 1% |
| CMJ | 7/10 | 5363 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5627 days | 1% |
| Lisa Milton | 6/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
| Sarah and Uli Glas | 8/10 | 5649 days | 1% |
| Ellie Thompson | 9/10 | 5661 days | 1% |
| Courtney Wood | 10/10 | 5667 days | 1% |
| Jeff and Carey Brown | 3/10 | 5668 days | 0% |
| LandJ | 6/10 | 5669 days | 1% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 5669 days | 1% |
| Matthias | 9/10 | 5686 days | 1% |
| Sandra Schneifer | 10/10 | 5688 days | 1% |
| Jochen | 7/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
| Axel Vetter | 3/10 | 5697 days | 0% |
| dollimyxture | 4/10 | 5728 days | 1% |
| penz | 10/10 | 5912 days | 1% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5981 days | 1% |
| Peter and Hilda | 10/10 | 6003 days | 1% |
| Bowness | 6/10 | 6021 days | 1% |
| ccthornton100 | 7/10 | 6034 days | 1% |
| Colby Smythe | 9/10 | 6037 days | 1% |
| Honeymooners | 3/10 | 6093 days | 1% |
| marcol | 8/10 | 6109 days | 1% |
| niekv | 7/10 | 6109 days | 1% |
| Tillener | 5/10 | 6150 days | 1% |
| Suzanne | 9/10 | 6185 days | 1% |
| Andrea | 4/10 | 6285 days | 0% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 6365 days | 1% |
| Heide | 7/10 | 6371 days | 1% |
| RebeccaD1 | 5/10 | 6387 days | 1% |
| JohannaB | 6/10 | 6387 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Milford Sound Lodge – Rainforest Campervan Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.33% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 88 days. However the Milford Sound Lodge – Rainforest Campervan Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Milford Sound Lodge – Rainforest Campervan Park experience has been adjusted for 170 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 167 | -2.29% |
| 168 | -2.30% |
| 169 | -2.32% |
| 170 | -2.33% |
| 171 | -2.34% |
| 172 | -2.36% |
| 173 | -2.37% |
| … | … |
1.55% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.