Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
102 Valid Reviews
The Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite experience has a total of 105 reviews. There are 102 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 102 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 45 |
|
44% |
9/10 | 35 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.78% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite valid reviews is 90.78% and is based on 102 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
23 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 102 valid reviews, the experience has 23 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 23 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 6 |
|
26% |
9/10 | 9 |
|
39% |
8/10 | 7 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.70% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.70% and is based on 23 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.97%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Sophie | 9/10 | 19 days | 99% |
Laura | 7/10 | 19 days | 93% |
Magda Musa | 10/10 | 19 days | 100% |
Emily | 9/10 | 50 days | 99% |
Jakub | 5/10 | 111 days | 76% |
Khalid | 9/10 | 325 days | 93% |
Jesse Leake | 10/10 | 325 days | 94% |
Janet and Kevin | 10/10 | 354 days | 93% |
Andi | 9/10 | 354 days | 92% |
Daggi | 9/10 | 446 days | 88% |
Niff | 6/10 | 660 days | 65% |
Manuel Mayer | 10/10 | 719 days | 71% |
J King | 6/10 | 750 days | 58% |
Marion | 9/10 | 750 days | 67% |
Nyree | 10/10 | 750 days | 68% |
Mckenzie Galbraith | 8/10 | 781 days | 64% |
Julia | 10/10 | 781 days | 65% |
Yuri Fey | 10/10 | 842 days | 60% |
RaghaV | 8/10 | 1115 days | 33% |
EvaBelle | 7/10 | 1146 days | 29% |
Siobhan | 10/10 | 1449 days | 13% |
Maree | 10/10 | 1449 days | 13% |
The Gillies | 10/10 | 1449 days | 13% |
Ange | 10/10 | 1480 days | 12% |
Ambili | 9/10 | 1480 days | 12% |
Paula | 8/10 | 1541 days | 9% |
Boardwalk Blss | 9/10 | 1633 days | 7% |
Anneke | 9/10 | 1786 days | 5% |
Jean-Michel and Bambi | 10/10 | 1786 days | 5% |
Thangs | 10/10 | 1786 days | 5% |
Leona | 9/10 | 1846 days | 5% |
GM | 9/10 | 1877 days | 5% |
Fred | 10/10 | 1907 days | 5% |
Suthep | 10/10 | 2121 days | 4% |
Cathy Casanova | 10/10 | 2152 days | 4% |
Jonathan | 10/10 | 2180 days | 4% |
Anne | 9/10 | 2180 days | 4% |
Sam | 7/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
Lauren | 9/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
Paula G | 9/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
Thijs | 10/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
Raphaele | 10/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
Maka | 10/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
Connor | 10/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
Demi Thompson | 8/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
Cindy | 9/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
Eva | 10/10 | 2333 days | 4% |
James | 10/10 | 2486 days | 4% |
Arne | 9/10 | 2486 days | 4% |
Mallory | 10/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
Tristan & Jolie | 10/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
Sophie Avison | 9/10 | 2532 days | 4% |
Clare Davies | 10/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
Derek Gillard | 9/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
Geart-Jan Benedictus | 8/10 | 2595 days | 3% |
Lucile Gendre | 9/10 | 2836 days | 3% |
Lucy Oury | 9/10 | 2838 days | 3% |
Nick Lawson | 9/10 | 2841 days | 3% |
Brandon | 10/10 | 2871 days | 3% |
Paul Williams | 10/10 | 2904 days | 3% |
Linda Livett | 5/10 | 2910 days | 2% |
Craig Eagleton | 10/10 | 2915 days | 3% |
Trent O'Keeffe | 10/10 | 2931 days | 3% |
Joe Hopkins | 10/10 | 2939 days | 3% |
Ruiyi Yin | 10/10 | 2978 days | 3% |
Jude Ong | 10/10 | 3002 days | 3% |
Arthur | 9/10 | 3193 days | 2% |
Lena Wesselink | 9/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
Felicity Fay | 9/10 | 3275 days | 2% |
Lisa Conradie | 8/10 | 3276 days | 2% |
Jonas Jutzi | 10/10 | 3387 days | 2% |
Petra Geblova | 10/10 | 3660 days | 1% |
Janie Allen | 10/10 | 3665 days | 1% |
Henrik Bours | 8/10 | 3962 days | 1% |
Svenja Trubenbach | 9/10 | 3962 days | 1% |
Kathrin Deichmann | 10/10 | 3983 days | 1% |
Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4001 days | 1% |
Kiernan Matthew | 9/10 | 4005 days | 1% |
Zoe Ross | 9/10 | 4006 days | 1% |
Andrew Young | 10/10 | 4006 days | 1% |
Danyelle Miller | 9/10 | 4029 days | 1% |
Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 4039 days | 0% |
Mycall | 10/10 | 4312 days | 0% |
ramy | 9/10 | 4312 days | 0% |
Annika Schmidt | 7/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
Michael Heuer | 9/10 | 4320 days | 0% |
Steve Maona | 9/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
Billy Koichopolos | 8/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
Gina Lisi | 8/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
Petra Blumberg | 8/10 | 4349 days | 0% |
Clare Cannon | 9/10 | 4353 days | 0% |
Jan Zimmerman | 8/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
Kerri | 7/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
Val Phillips | 8/10 | 4701 days | 1% |
Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 4719 days | 1% |
Kasten | 10/10 | 5076 days | 1% |
Kasia Robshaw | 9/10 | 5078 days | 1% |
Andy | 8/10 | 5089 days | 1% |
Dr Dorthe Bossow | 10/10 | 5098 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 9/10 | 5473 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.