Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite
Valid Reviews
59 Valid Reviews
The Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite experience has a total of 62 reviews. There are 59 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 24 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.02% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite valid reviews is 91.02% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
23 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 59 valid reviews, the experience has 23 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 23 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
39% |
| 8/10 | 7 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.70% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.70% and is based on 23 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
92.01%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula G | 9/10 | 18 days | 99.95 | 100% | |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 47 days | 99.65 | 100% | |
| Demi Thompson | 8/10 | 48 days | 99.63 | 100% | |
| Cindy | 9/10 | 48 days | 99.63 | 100% | |
| Eva | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 98% | |
| James | 10/10 | 262 days | 89.12 | 89% | |
| Arne | 9/10 | 262 days | 89.12 | 89% | |
| Mallory | 10/10 | 293 days | 86.4 | 86% | |
| Tristan & Jolie | 10/10 | 293 days | 86.4 | 86% | |
| Sophie Avison | 9/10 | 308 days | 84.97 | 85% | |
| Clare Davies | 10/10 | 351 days | 80.48 | 80% | |
| Derek Gillard | 9/10 | 351 days | 80.48 | 80% | |
| Geart-Jan Benedictus | 8/10 | 371 days | 78.19 | 78% | |
| Lucile Gendre | 9/10 | 612 days | 41.97 | 41% | |
| Lucy Oury | 9/10 | 614 days | 41.66 | 40% | |
| Nick Lawson | 9/10 | 617 days | 41.21 | 40% | |
| Brandon | 10/10 | 647 days | 36.8 | 35% | |
| Paul Williams | 10/10 | 680 days | 32.29 | 31% | |
| Linda Livett | 5/10 | 685 days | 31.64 | 30% | |
| Craig Eagleton | 10/10 | 691 days | 30.86 | 29% | |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 10/10 | 707 days | 28.86 | 27% | |
| Joe Hopkins | 10/10 | 715 days | 27.88 | 26% | |
| Ruiyi Yin | 10/10 | 754 days | 23.43 | 22% | |
| Jude Ong | 10/10 | 777 days | 21.02 | 19% | |
| Arthur | 9/10 | 969 days | 7.52 | 5% | |
| Lena Wesselink | 9/10 | 1026 days | 5.75 | 3% | |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 1033 days | 5.61 | 3% | |
| Felicity Fay | 9/10 | 1051 days |  |
6.37 | 4% |
| Lisa Conradie | 8/10 | 1052 days | 5.29 | 3% | |
| Jonas Jutzi | 10/10 | 1163 days | 4.91 | 3% | |
| Petra Geblova | 10/10 | 1436 days | 4.53 | 2% | |
| Janie Allen | 10/10 | 1441 days | 4.53 | 2% | |
| Henrik Bours | 8/10 | 1738 days | |
4.94 | 3% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 9/10 | 1738 days | |
4.94 | 3% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 10/10 | 1759 days | |
4.91 | 3% |
| Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 1777 days | |
4.88 | 2% |
| Kiernan Matthew | 9/10 | 1781 days | |
4.87 | 2% |
| Zoe Ross | 9/10 | 1782 days | 4.06 | 2% | |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 1782 days | 4.06 | 2% | |
| Danyelle Miller | 9/10 | 1805 days | |
4.83 | 2% |
| Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 1815 days | |
4.82 | 2% |
| Mycall | 10/10 | 2088 days | 3.64 | 1% | |
| ramy | 9/10 | 2088 days | 3.64 | 1% | |
| Annika Schmidt | 7/10 | 2093 days | |
4.36 | 2% |
| Michael Heuer | 9/10 | 2096 days | |
4.35 | 2% |
| Steve Maona | 9/10 | 2112 days | |
4.33 | 2% |
| Billy Koichopolos | 8/10 | 2112 days | |
4.33 | 2% |
| Gina Lisi | 8/10 | 2112 days | |
4.33 | 2% |
| Petra Blumberg | 8/10 | 2125 days | |
4.31 | 2% |
| Clare Cannon | 9/10 | 2129 days | |
4.3 | 2% |
| Jan Zimmerman | 8/10 | 2134 days | |
4.29 | 2% |
| Kerri | 7/10 | 2178 days | 3.52 | 1% | |
| Val Phillips | 8/10 | 2477 days | |
3.73 | 1% |
| Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 2495 days | |
3.7 | 1% |
| Kasten | 10/10 | 2852 days | |
3.11 | 1% |
| Kasia Robshaw | 9/10 | 2854 days | |
3.11 | 1% |
| Andy | 8/10 | 2865 days | |
3.09 | 1% |
| Dr Dorthe Bossow | 10/10 | 2874 days | |
3.08 | 1% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 9/10 | 3249 days | |
2.46 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
92%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.