Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cameron Flat Campsite.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Cameron Flat Campsite

Valid Reviews

61 Valid Reviews

The Cameron Flat Campsite experience has a total of 64 reviews. There are 61 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 10
16%
9/10 12
20%
8/10 17
28%
7/10 9
15%
6/10 6
10%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 2
3%
1/10 2
3%

75.74% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Cameron Flat Campsite valid reviews is 75.74% and is based on 61 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

8 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 61 valid reviews, the experience has 8 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 8 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 1
13%
9/10 0
0%
8/10 1
13%
7/10 2
25%
6/10 2
25%
5/10 1
13%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
13%

62.50% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Cameron Flat Campsite face-to-face reviews is 62.50% and is based on 8 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

73.62%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Adam 1/10 151 days 44%
Sol 7/10 241 days 100%
Jakub 7/10 271 days 99%
jo 8/10 455 days 96%
In-cydah-traders 10/10 485 days 96%
Laura 9/10 485 days 95%
Laura 2/10 544 days 42%
Thom S 6/10 575 days 78%
Samuel Bullock 7/10 606 days 82%
Lea 9/10 667 days 82%
Dylan 3/10 820 days 37%
Rebecca 8/10 850 days 64%
Joel Fryett 8/10 941 days 54%
Niff 9/10 1216 days 29%
Sarah Elliott 10/10 1306 days 22%
ElizabethE 8/10 1306 days 22%
Bradley 8/10 1306 days 22%
Lucy 7/10 1459 days 13%
The Gillies 9/10 2005 days 5%
Terezka 6/10 2036 days 4%
Ying 9/10 2128 days 5%
Just a guy 8/10 2342 days 4%
Emma 7/10 2371 days 4%
GiuliaG 7/10 2433 days 4%
Julianne McKie 9/10 2494 days 4%
Michael S 5/10 2736 days 2%
Dave Reynolds 6/10 2767 days 3%
Matt Tebbit 10/10 2798 days 3%
vally 8/10 2798 days 3%
Safire B 6/10 2798 days 3%
Indy 8/10 2828 days 3%
Melinda Pyke 8/10 2889 days 3%
Louis 8/10 2951 days 3%
Sezz bella 9/10 3012 days 3%
Raylene Harvey 10/10 3012 days 3%
Matthew Hall 10/10 3127 days 2%
Katrina 9/10 3163 days 2%
Debbie Lesurf 9/10 3163 days 2%
Cat Pinder 9/10 3191 days 2%
Joe Trigg 7/10 3204 days 2%
Esmee Winnubst 9/10 3381 days 2%
Marc Lambert 8/10 3413 days 2%
Katie Marx 8/10 3438 days 2%
Angie Abbink 9/10 3646 days 1%
Rita Ashby 8/10 3711 days 1%
Rebecca Symons 10/10 3864 days 1%
Udo Wagner 2/10 3880 days 0%
Erica b 8/10 4138 days 0%
Liliana Zahut 10/10 4259 days 0%
Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp 10/10 4412 days 1%
Tom Guthknecht 10/10 4497 days 1%
Karen Perry 10/10 4715 days 1%
Deon Bossenger 8/10 4868 days 1%
Marcel 7/10 4892 days 0%
Maria 6/10 4892 days 0%
Rob Cadmus 8/10 4902 days 0%
Kate Glover 6/10 4902 days 0%
Chew (Peter) 7/10 4980 days 0%
Ofir Avimeir 1/10 5608 days 0%
Rissa W 8/10 5658 days 1%
linus 5/10 6211 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cameron Flat Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

5.21% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

79%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.