G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Boundary Creek Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Boundary Creek Campsite
Valid Reviews
82 Valid Reviews
The Boundary Creek Campsite experience has a total of 85 reviews. There are 82 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 82 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 20 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 25 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Boundary Creek Campsite valid reviews is 83.17% and is based on 82 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 82 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Boundary Creek Campsite face-to-face reviews is 82.50% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
85.40%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cait Turner | 10/10 | 1955 days | 100% |
| Drew | 10/10 | 2321 days | 84% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2321 days | 82% |
| Timothy Davies | 7/10 | 2382 days | 75% |
| A&E | 8/10 | 2413 days | 78% |
| ScoutnIndi | 10/10 | 2535 days | 74% |
| Fabian | 10/10 | 2686 days | 68% |
| Joe | 8/10 | 2686 days | 66% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 2686 days | 67% |
| From DK | 9/10 | 2686 days | 67% |
| Heather Abbott | 8/10 | 2686 days | 66% |
| Anwang | 10/10 | 2717 days | 66% |
| Graham Anna | 10/10 | 2717 days | 66% |
| Dave Reynolds | 9/10 | 2717 days | 65% |
| Joanne | 10/10 | 2747 days | 65% |
| Eranda | 10/10 | 2778 days | 63% |
| Christina | 6/10 | 2961 days | 47% |
| Juliane | 9/10 | 2961 days | 55% |
| MJW | 8/10 | 2992 days | 53% |
| Qi Moss | 8/10 | 2992 days | 53% |
| Jill McGrath | 6/10 | 3015 days | 32% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 7/10 | 3018 days | 37% |
| Niall McGrath | 7/10 | 3022 days | 48% |
| Fei Fei Lei | 7/10 | 3041 days | 36% |
| Oceane Imber | 10/10 | 3046 days | 52% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 10/10 | 3092 days | 49% |
| Jarod | 8/10 | 3112 days | 47% |
| Michael Talbot | 8/10 | 3117 days | 47% |
| Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 3173 days | 46% |
| Bruce Graham | 9/10 | 3300 days | 40% |
| Roger | 9/10 | 3305 days | 40% |
| deborah cooper | 7/10 | 3357 days | 35% |
| Andy Kubic | 6/10 | 3363 days | 31% |
| Adrian Soldati | 6/10 | 3411 days | 29% |
| Joe Hopkins | 8/10 | 3414 days | 34% |
| Nicola Barlow | 6/10 | 3442 days | 28% |
| Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 3446 days | 26% |
| Sujanyag | 10/10 | 3481 days | 32% |
| Kim Donze | 8/10 | 3550 days | 28% |
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 3699 days | 22% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 8/10 | 3708 days | 22% |
| Juan Viscegle | 6/10 | 3715 days | 12% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3722 days | 21% |
| Gabor Kabacs | 7/10 | 3733 days | 19% |
| Bill McMurray | 10/10 | 3733 days | 21% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 5/10 | 3742 days | 14% |
| R Werder | 8/10 | 3766 days | 19% |
| Jakob Kofoed | 10/10 | 3771 days | 19% |
| Sandy Stamp | 8/10 | 3784 days | 18% |
| Ellen Schmitz | 9/10 | 3793 days | 18% |
| Steve Warren | 8/10 | 3904 days | 13% |
| Miguel | 8/10 | 4088 days | 5% |
| Bert Gielen | 9/10 | 4119 days | 4% |
| Petra Geblova | 7/10 | 4135 days | 2% |
| Elles Janssen | 7/10 | 4147 days | 2% |
| Clare Lambley | 8/10 | 4163 days | 0% |
| bzh974 | 6/10 | 4178 days | 0% |
| Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com | 8/10 | 4422 days | 15% |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 7/10 | 4425 days | 9% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4464 days | 10% |
| Lena Wacker | 9/10 | 4464 days | 10% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4504 days | 10% |
| Team Kim&James | 8/10 | 4665 days | 15% |
| Rainer | 8/10 | 4793 days | 10% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 5/10 | 4805 days | 5% |
| Kadyan | 8/10 | 4818 days | 15% |
| Enna Keet | 8/10 | 4830 days | 10% |
| Nils Poppenborg | 10/10 | 4831 days | 10% |
| Philip Gibbons | 9/10 | 4846 days | 15% |
| Andreas & Leonie Fehr | 10/10 | 5204 days | 10% |
| Tom Connis | 9/10 | 5211 days | 10% |
| Mirando4ka | 9/10 | 5212 days | 15% |
| Graeme | 7/10 | 5243 days | 13% |
| jule | 9/10 | 5304 days | 15% |
| Bill Mclennan | 10/10 | 5531 days | 10% |
| Coral Last | 8/10 | 5535 days | 10% |
| Ian and Ailsa | 7/10 | 5536 days | 9% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 5570 days | 10% |
| Annette Schmitt | 9/10 | 5936 days | 10% |
| Mike | 10/10 | 5988 days | 10% |
| Becca1 | 9/10 | 6250 days | 10% |
| winter_uk | 8/10 | 6291 days | 10% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Boundary Creek Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.75% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.