Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moke Lake Campsite
Valid Reviews
119 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 122 reviews. There are 119 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 119 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 56 |
|
47% |
| 9/10 | 37 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.85% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.85% and is based on 119 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 119 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
95.22%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ange | 10/10 | 112 days | 100% |
| Oliver | 10/10 | 143 days | 99% |
| Sönke | 9/10 | 143 days | 99% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 143 days | 99% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 418 days | 74% |
| Ashleigh Lim | 10/10 | 418 days | 74% |
| Ju | 9/10 | 447 days | 70% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 447 days | 70% |
| Skyeandjoe | 10/10 | 478 days | 65% |
| Dee Keys | 10/10 | 478 days | 65% |
| Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 539 days | 55% |
| Will M | 10/10 | 570 days | 49% |
| Mirandah | 10/10 | 784 days | 20% |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 812 days | 17% |
| Kath Cox | 10/10 | 843 days | 15% |
| Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 874 days | 13% |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 904 days | 11% |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 904 days | 10% |
| Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 904 days | 11% |
| Yotakahron | 8/10 | 1088 days | 4% |
| Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 1199 days | 4% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 1208 days | 4% |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 1274 days | 4% |
| Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 1279 days | 4% |
| Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 1297 days | 4% |
| Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 1419 days | 3% |
| Roger | 9/10 | 1469 days | 4% |
| Alison Harway | 10/10 | 1487 days | 4% |
| Di Bennett | 10/10 | 1489 days | 4% |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 1534 days | 3% |
| Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 1541 days | 4% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 1557 days | 4% |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 1558 days | 4% |
| vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 1571 days | 4% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 1573 days | 4% |
| Martine Baars | 7/10 | 1577 days | 3% |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 1604 days | 4% |
| Bob | 9/10 | 1608 days | 3% |
| Peter Moore | 10/10 | 1614 days | 4% |
| Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 1665 days | 3% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 1665 days | 3% |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 1694 days | 3% |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 1811 days | 3% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 1870 days | 3% |
| Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 1884 days | 3% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 1889 days | 3% |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 1901 days | 3% |
| Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 1905 days | 3% |
| Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 1907 days | 3% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 1908 days | 3% |
| Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 1939 days | 3% |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 1976 days | 3% |
| Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 1985 days | 3% |
| Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 2273 days | 2% |
| Vincent S. | 10/10 | 2273 days | 2% |
| Evelyn | 8/10 | 2273 days | 2% |
| Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 2276 days | 2% |
| Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 2302 days | 2% |
| Alex Leo | 9/10 | 2311 days | 2% |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 2322 days | 2% |
| oren schnabel | 10/10 | 2335 days | 2% |
| Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 2335 days | 2% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 2426 days | 2% |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 2582 days | 1% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 2583 days | 1% |
| Robert Erni | 9/10 | 2588 days | 1% |
| Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 2588 days | 1% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 2588 days | 1% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 2619 days | 1% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 2638 days | 2% |
| Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 2658 days | 1% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 2658 days | 1% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 2665 days | 1% |
| Marine | 9/10 | 2666 days | 1% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 2674 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 2700 days | 1% |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 2761 days | 1% |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 2761 days | 1% |
| Jen | 7/10 | 2791 days | 1% |
| kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 2944 days | 1% |
| Friederike | 10/10 | 2959 days | 1% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 2962 days | 1% |
| Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 2975 days | 1% |
| Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 2981 days | 1% |
| Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 2985 days | 1% |
| Francis Runge | 9/10 | 2989 days | 1% |
| William Notcutt | 8/10 | 3034 days | 1% |
| David | 10/10 | 3034 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 3056 days | 1% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 3068 days | 1% |
| Jacquemard | 8/10 | 3070 days | 0% |
| Jenben | 9/10 | 3095 days | 1% |
| Bandzior | 10/10 | 3126 days | 1% |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 3325 days | 0% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 3325 days | 0% |
| Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 3336 days | 0% |
| Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 3344 days | 0% |
| Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 3346 days | 0% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 3347 days | 0% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 3349 days | 0% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 3354 days | 0% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 3367 days | 0% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 3369 days | 0% |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 3400 days | 0% |
| cassie | 9/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 3683 days | 0% |
| Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 3689 days | 0% |
| Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 3697 days | 0% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 3699 days | 0% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 3704 days | 0% |
| Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 3711 days | 0% |
| Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 3711 days | 0% |
| claudian | 10/10 | 4040 days | 0% |
| Thomas K | 10/10 | 4080 days | 0% |
| Jules | 9/10 | 4096 days | 0% |
| Joel K | 8/10 | 4097 days | 0% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 4402 days | 0% |
| MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 4421 days | 0% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 6291 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
95%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.