Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moke Lake Campsite
Valid Reviews
138 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 141 reviews. There are 138 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 138 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 61 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 46 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 23 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.52% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.52% and is based on 138 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 138 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.36%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| mark Dawidowicz | 10/10 | 240 days | 100% |
| Jan | 9/10 | 240 days | 99% |
| Clement | 9/10 | 271 days | 98% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 302 days | 96% |
| MB | 9/10 | 577 days | 83% |
| Paul | 7/10 | 577 days | 78% |
| McLean | 9/10 | 605 days | 81% |
| Fredrik | 9/10 | 636 days | 79% |
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 667 days | 77% |
| tasman travels | 10/10 | 850 days | 61% |
| Andi | 9/10 | 971 days | 48% |
| Sarah Mitchell | 10/10 | 1002 days | 45% |
| MORUE | 9/10 | 1155 days | 31% |
| Niff | 8/10 | 1277 days | 22% |
| Katie Edser | 9/10 | 1308 days | 21% |
| Vicky | 9/10 | 1308 days | 21% |
| Citlali & Mike | 8/10 | 1367 days | 17% |
| Nicky | 10/10 | 1701 days | 6% |
| Suzanne | 8/10 | 1977 days | 5% |
| Ange | 10/10 | 2097 days | 5% |
| Oliver | 10/10 | 2128 days | 4% |
| Sönke | 9/10 | 2128 days | 4% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 2128 days | 4% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 2403 days | 4% |
| Ashleigh Lim | 10/10 | 2403 days | 4% |
| Ju | 9/10 | 2432 days | 4% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 2432 days | 4% |
| Skyeandjoe | 10/10 | 2463 days | 4% |
| Dee Keys | 10/10 | 2463 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 2524 days | 4% |
| Will M | 10/10 | 2555 days | 4% |
| Mirandah | 10/10 | 2769 days | 3% |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 2797 days | 3% |
| Kath Cox | 10/10 | 2828 days | 3% |
| Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 2859 days | 3% |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 2889 days | 3% |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2889 days | 3% |
| Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 2889 days | 3% |
| Yotakahron | 8/10 | 3073 days | 2% |
| Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 3184 days | 2% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 3193 days | 2% |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 3259 days | 2% |
| Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 3264 days | 2% |
| Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 3282 days | 2% |
| Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 3404 days | 2% |
| Roger | 9/10 | 3454 days | 2% |
| Alison Harway | 10/10 | 3472 days | 2% |
| Di Bennett | 10/10 | 3474 days | 2% |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 3519 days | 1% |
| Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 3526 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3542 days | 2% |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 3543 days | 2% |
| vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 3556 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 3558 days | 2% |
| Martine Baars | 7/10 | 3562 days | 1% |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 3589 days | 1% |
| Bob | 9/10 | 3593 days | 1% |
| Peter Moore | 10/10 | 3599 days | 1% |
| Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 3650 days | 1% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 3650 days | 1% |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 3679 days | 1% |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 3796 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 3855 days | 1% |
| Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 3869 days | 1% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3874 days | 1% |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 3886 days | 1% |
| Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 3890 days | 1% |
| Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 3892 days | 1% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 3893 days | 1% |
| Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 3924 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 3961 days | 1% |
| Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 3970 days | 1% |
| Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 4258 days | 0% |
| Vincent S. | 10/10 | 4258 days | 0% |
| Evelyn | 8/10 | 4258 days | 0% |
| Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 4261 days | 0% |
| Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 4287 days | 0% |
| Alex Leo | 9/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 4307 days | 0% |
| oren schnabel | 10/10 | 4320 days | 0% |
| Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 4320 days | 0% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 4411 days | 1% |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 4567 days | 1% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 4568 days | 1% |
| Robert Erni | 9/10 | 4573 days | 1% |
| Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 4573 days | 1% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 4573 days | 1% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 4604 days | 1% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 4623 days | 1% |
| Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 4650 days | 1% |
| Marine | 9/10 | 4651 days | 1% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 4659 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 4685 days | 1% |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
| Jen | 7/10 | 4776 days | 1% |
| kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 4929 days | 1% |
| Friederike | 10/10 | 4944 days | 1% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
| Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 4960 days | 1% |
| Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 4966 days | 1% |
| Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 4970 days | 1% |
| Francis Runge | 9/10 | 4974 days | 1% |
| William Notcutt | 8/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
| David | 10/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 5041 days | 1% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 5053 days | 1% |
| Jacquemard | 8/10 | 5055 days | 1% |
| Jenben | 9/10 | 5080 days | 1% |
| Bandzior | 10/10 | 5111 days | 1% |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 5310 days | 1% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 5310 days | 1% |
| Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 5321 days | 1% |
| Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 5329 days | 1% |
| Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 5331 days | 1% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 5332 days | 1% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 5334 days | 1% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 5339 days | 1% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 5352 days | 1% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 5354 days | 1% |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| cassie | 9/10 | 5660 days | 1% |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 5668 days | 1% |
| Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 5674 days | 1% |
| Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 5682 days | 1% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 5684 days | 1% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 5689 days | 1% |
| Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 5696 days | 1% |
| Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 5696 days | 1% |
| claudian | 10/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| Thomas K | 10/10 | 6065 days | 1% |
| Jules | 9/10 | 6081 days | 1% |
| Joel K | 8/10 | 6082 days | 1% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 6387 days | 1% |
| MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 6406 days | 1% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 8276 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.95% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.