Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moke Lake Campsite
Valid Reviews
138 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 141 reviews. There are 138 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 138 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 61 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 46 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 23 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.52% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.52% and is based on 138 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 138 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.37%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| mark Dawidowicz | 10/10 | 180 days | 100% |
| Jan | 9/10 | 180 days | 99% |
| Clement | 9/10 | 211 days | 98% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 242 days | 97% |
| MB | 9/10 | 517 days | 85% |
| Paul | 7/10 | 517 days | 80% |
| McLean | 9/10 | 545 days | 84% |
| Fredrik | 9/10 | 576 days | 82% |
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 607 days | 80% |
| tasman travels | 10/10 | 790 days | 66% |
| Andi | 9/10 | 911 days | 53% |
| Sarah Mitchell | 10/10 | 942 days | 50% |
| MORUE | 9/10 | 1095 days | 36% |
| Niff | 8/10 | 1217 days | 26% |
| Katie Edser | 9/10 | 1248 days | 24% |
| Vicky | 9/10 | 1248 days | 24% |
| Citlali & Mike | 8/10 | 1307 days | 20% |
| Nicky | 10/10 | 1641 days | 7% |
| Suzanne | 8/10 | 1917 days | 5% |
| Ange | 10/10 | 2037 days | 5% |
| Oliver | 10/10 | 2068 days | 5% |
| Sönke | 9/10 | 2068 days | 5% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 2068 days | 5% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 2343 days | 4% |
| Ashleigh Lim | 10/10 | 2343 days | 4% |
| Ju | 9/10 | 2372 days | 4% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 2372 days | 4% |
| Skyeandjoe | 10/10 | 2403 days | 4% |
| Dee Keys | 10/10 | 2403 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 2464 days | 4% |
| Will M | 10/10 | 2494 days | 4% |
| Mirandah | 10/10 | 2709 days | 3% |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 2737 days | 3% |
| Kath Cox | 10/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 2799 days | 3% |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 2828 days | 3% |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2829 days | 3% |
| Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 2829 days | 3% |
| Yotakahron | 8/10 | 3013 days | 3% |
| Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 3124 days | 2% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 3132 days | 2% |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 3199 days | 2% |
| Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 3204 days | 2% |
| Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
| Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 3344 days | 2% |
| Roger | 9/10 | 3394 days | 2% |
| Alison Harway | 10/10 | 3412 days | 2% |
| Di Bennett | 10/10 | 3414 days | 2% |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 3459 days | 2% |
| Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 3466 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3482 days | 2% |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 3483 days | 2% |
| vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 3496 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 3497 days | 2% |
| Martine Baars | 7/10 | 3502 days | 2% |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 3528 days | 2% |
| Bob | 9/10 | 3533 days | 1% |
| Peter Moore | 10/10 | 3539 days | 2% |
| Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 3589 days | 2% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 3589 days | 2% |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 3619 days | 1% |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 3736 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 3795 days | 1% |
| Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 3809 days | 1% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3814 days | 1% |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 3826 days | 1% |
| Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 3830 days | 1% |
| Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 3832 days | 1% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 3833 days | 1% |
| Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 3863 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 3901 days | 1% |
| Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 3910 days | 1% |
| Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 4197 days | 0% |
| Vincent S. | 10/10 | 4197 days | 0% |
| Evelyn | 8/10 | 4197 days | 0% |
| Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 4201 days | 0% |
| Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 4227 days | 0% |
| Alex Leo | 9/10 | 4236 days | 0% |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 4247 days | 0% |
| oren schnabel | 10/10 | 4259 days | 0% |
| Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 4260 days | 0% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 4350 days | 0% |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 4507 days | 1% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 4508 days | 1% |
| Robert Erni | 9/10 | 4513 days | 1% |
| Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 4513 days | 1% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 4513 days | 1% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 4544 days | 1% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 4563 days | 1% |
| Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 4583 days | 1% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 4583 days | 1% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 4590 days | 1% |
| Marine | 9/10 | 4591 days | 1% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 4599 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 4625 days | 1% |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
| Jen | 7/10 | 4716 days | 1% |
| kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 4869 days | 1% |
| Friederike | 10/10 | 4884 days | 1% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 4887 days | 1% |
| Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 4900 days | 1% |
| Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 4906 days | 1% |
| Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 4910 days | 1% |
| Francis Runge | 9/10 | 4914 days | 1% |
| William Notcutt | 8/10 | 4959 days | 1% |
| David | 10/10 | 4959 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4981 days | 1% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 4993 days | 1% |
| Jacquemard | 8/10 | 4995 days | 1% |
| Jenben | 9/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| Bandzior | 10/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 5250 days | 1% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 5250 days | 1% |
| Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 5261 days | 1% |
| Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 5269 days | 1% |
| Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 5271 days | 1% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 5272 days | 1% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 5274 days | 1% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 5279 days | 1% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 5292 days | 1% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| cassie | 9/10 | 5600 days | 1% |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 5608 days | 1% |
| Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
| Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 5622 days | 1% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 5624 days | 1% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 5629 days | 1% |
| Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
| Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
| claudian | 10/10 | 5965 days | 1% |
| Thomas K | 10/10 | 6005 days | 1% |
| Jules | 9/10 | 6021 days | 1% |
| Joel K | 8/10 | 6022 days | 1% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 6327 days | 1% |
| MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 6346 days | 1% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 8216 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.95% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.