Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moke Lake Campsite
Valid Reviews
108 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 111 reviews. There are 108 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 108 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
45% |
| 9/10 | 33 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.39% and is based on 108 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 108 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
92.01%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will M | 10/10 | 14 days | 99.97 | 100% | |
| Mirandah | 10/10 | 229 days | 91.69 | 92% | |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 257 days | 85.06 | 85% | |
| Kath Cox | 10/10 | 288 days | 86.86 | 87% | |
| Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 319 days | 83.87 | 84% | |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 348 days | 80.81 | 81% | |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 349 days | 76.66 | 77% | |
| Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 349 days | 80.7 | 81% | |
| Yotakahron | 8/10 | 533 days | 52.23 | 52% | |
| Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 644 days |  |
37.23 | 37% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 652 days | 36.1 | 36% | |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 719 days | 27.4 | 27% | |
| Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 724 days | 25.47 | 25% | |
| Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 742 days | 24.75 | 25% | |
| Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 864 days | 11.17 | 11% | |
| Roger | 9/10 | 914 days | 10.19 | 10% | |
| Alison Harway | 10/10 | 932 days | 9.21 | 9% | |
| Di Bennett | 10/10 | 934 days | 9.11 | 9% | |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 979 days | |
7.13 | 7% |
| Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 986 days | 6.88 | 7% | |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 1002 days | 6.37 | 6% | |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 1003 days | 6.34 | 6% | |
| vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 1016 days | 5.99 | 6% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 1017 days | 5.96 | 6% | |
| Martine Baars | 7/10 | 1022 days | 5.32 | 5% | |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 1048 days | 5.35 | 5% | |
| Bob | 9/10 | 1053 days | |
5.28 | 5% |
| Peter Moore | 10/10 | 1059 days | 5.21 | 5% | |
| Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 1109 days | 4.98 | 5% | |
| Chris | 10/10 | 1109 days | 4.98 | 5% | |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 1139 days | 4.92 | 5% | |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 1256 days | 4.72 | 5% | |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 1315 days | 4.62 | 5% | |
| Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 1329 days | 4.6 | 5% | |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 1334 days | 4.59 | 5% | |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 1346 days | 4.34 | 4% | |
| Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 1350 days | 4.56 | 5% | |
| Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 1352 days | |
4.56 | 5% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 1353 days | 4.56 | 5% | |
| Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 1383 days | 4.51 | 5% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 1421 days | 4.44 | 4% | |
| Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 1430 days | 4.03 | 4% | |
| Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 1717 days | 3.93 | 4% | |
| Vincent S. | 10/10 | 1717 days | 3.93 | 4% | |
| Evelyn | 8/10 | 1717 days | 3.74 | 4% | |
| Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 1721 days | 3.93 | 4% | |
| Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 1747 days | 3.88 | 4% | |
| Alex Leo | 9/10 | 1756 days | 3.87 | 4% | |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 1767 days | 3.5 | 4% | |
| oren schnabel | 10/10 | 1779 days | 3.83 | 4% | |
| Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 1780 days | |
3.83 | 4% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 1870 days | 3.67 | 4% | |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 2027 days | |
3.23 | 3% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 2028 days | |
3.1 | 3% |
| Robert Erni | 9/10 | 2033 days | |
3.39 | 3% |
| Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 2033 days | |
3.39 | 3% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 2033 days | |
3.39 | 3% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 2064 days | |
3.17 | 3% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 2083 days | 3.31 | 3% | |
| Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 2103 days | |
3.27 | 3% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 2103 days | |
3.27 | 3% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 2110 days | |
3.26 | 3% |
| Marine | 9/10 | 2111 days | |
3.26 | 3% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 2119 days | |
3.25 | 3% |
| mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 2145 days | 3.2 | 3% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 2206 days | 3.1 | 3% | |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 2206 days | 3.1 | 3% | |
| Jen | 7/10 | 2236 days | 2.77 | 3% | |
| kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 2389 days | 2.65 | 3% | |
| Friederike | 10/10 | 2404 days | |
2.76 | 3% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 2407 days | |
2.51 | 3% |
| Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 2420 days | |
2.73 | 3% |
| Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 2426 days | |
2.72 | 3% |
| Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 2430 days | |
2.71 | 3% |
| Francis Runge | 9/10 | 2434 days | |
2.71 | 3% |
| William Notcutt | 8/10 | 2479 days | 2.5 | 2% | |
| David | 10/10 | 2479 days | 2.63 | 3% | |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 2501 days | |
2.46 | 2% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 2513 days | 2.57 | 3% | |
| Jacquemard | 8/10 | 2515 days | |
2.44 | 2% |
| Jenben | 9/10 | 2540 days | 2.53 | 3% | |
| Bandzior | 10/10 | 2571 days | 2.47 | 2% | |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 2770 days | |
2.13 | 2% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 2770 days | |
2.13 | 2% |
| Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 2781 days | |
2.11 | 2% |
| Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 2789 days | |
2.1 | 2% |
| Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 2791 days | |
2.1 | 2% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 2792 days | |
2.09 | 2% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 2794 days | |
2.09 | 2% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 2799 days | |
2.08 | 2% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 2812 days | |
1.96 | 2% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 2814 days | 1.95 | 2% | |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 2845 days | 2.0 | 2% | |
| cassie | 9/10 | 3120 days | 1.53 | 2% | |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 3128 days | |
1.52 | 2% |
| Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 3134 days | |
1.43 | 1% |
| Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 3142 days | |
1.49 | 1% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 3144 days | |
1.49 | 1% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 3149 days | |
1.48 | 1% |
| Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 3156 days | |
1.47 | 1% |
| Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 3156 days | |
1.47 | 1% |
| claudian | 10/10 | 3485 days | |
0.91 | 1% |
| Thomas K | 10/10 | 3525 days | |
0.84 | 1% |
| Jules | 9/10 | 3541 days | |
0.81 | 1% |
| Joel K | 8/10 | 3542 days | |
0.77 | 1% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 3847 days | |
0.27 | 0% |
| MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 3866 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 5736 days | 0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
92%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.