Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Moke Lake Campsite
Valid Reviews
105 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 106 reviews. There are 105 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 105 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 47 |
|
45% |
| 9/10 | 33 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.33% and is based on 105 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 105 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
91.19%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kath Cox | 10/10 | 47 days | 99.65 | 100% | |
| Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 99% | |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 107 days | 98.19 | 99% | |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 108 days | 98.15 | 98% | |
| Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 108 days | 98.15 | 98% | |
| Yotakahron | 8/10 | 292 days | 86.49 | 87% | |
| Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 403 days |  |
89.12 | 89% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 411 days | 73.23 | 73% | |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 478 days | 63.79 | 64% | |
| Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 483 days | 63.03 | 63% | |
| Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 501 days | 60.23 | 60% | |
| Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 623 days | 40.3 | 40% | |
| Roger | 9/10 | 673 days | 33.22 | 33% | |
| Alison Harway | 10/10 | 691 days | 30.86 | 31% | |
| Di Bennett | 10/10 | 693 days | 30.61 | 31% | |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 738 days | |
30.23 | 30% |
| Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 745 days | 24.41 | 24% | |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 761 days | 22.68 | 23% | |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 762 days | 22.57 | 23% | |
| vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 775 days | 21.23 | 21% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 776 days | 21.13 | 21% | |
| Martine Baars | 7/10 | 781 days | 20.62 | 21% | |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 807 days | 18.14 | 18% | |
| Bob | 9/10 | 812 days | |
21.23 | 21% |
| Peter Moore | 10/10 | 818 days | 17.16 | 17% | |
| Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 868 days | 13.17 | 13% | |
| Chris | 10/10 | 868 days | 13.17 | 13% | |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 898 days | 11.15 | 11% | |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 1015 days | 6.01 | 6% | |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 1074 days | 5.07 | 5% | |
| Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 1088 days | 5.01 | 5% | |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 1093 days | 5.0 | 5% | |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 1105 days | 4.99 | 5% | |
| Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 1109 days | 4.98 | 5% | |
| Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 1111 days | |
5.97 | 6% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 1112 days | 4.98 | 5% | |
| Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 1142 days | 4.94 | 5% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 1180 days | 4.88 | 5% | |
| Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 1189 days | 4.87 | 5% | |
| Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 1476 days | 4.48 | 4% | |
| Vincent S. | 10/10 | 1476 days | 4.48 | 4% | |
| Evelyn | 8/10 | 1476 days | 4.48 | 4% | |
| Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 1480 days | 4.47 | 4% | |
| Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 1506 days | 4.44 | 4% | |
| Alex Leo | 9/10 | 1515 days | 4.42 | 4% | |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 1526 days | 4.41 | 4% | |
| oren schnabel | 10/10 | 1538 days | 4.39 | 4% | |
| Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 1539 days | |
5.27 | 5% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 1629 days | 4.27 | 4% | |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 1786 days | |
4.86 | 5% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 1787 days | |
4.86 | 5% |
| Robert Erni | 9/10 | 1792 days | |
4.85 | 5% |
| Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 1792 days | |
4.85 | 5% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 1792 days | |
4.85 | 5% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 1823 days | |
4.8 | 5% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 1842 days | 3.98 | 4% | |
| Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 1862 days | |
4.74 | 5% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 1862 days | |
4.74 | 5% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 1869 days | |
4.73 | 5% |
| Marine | 9/10 | 1870 days | |
4.73 | 5% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 1878 days | |
4.71 | 5% |
| mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 1904 days | 3.89 | 4% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 1965 days | 3.81 | 4% | |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 1965 days | 3.81 | 4% | |
| Jen | 7/10 | 1995 days | 3.77 | 4% | |
| kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 2148 days | 3.56 | 4% | |
| Friederike | 10/10 | 2163 days | |
4.24 | 4% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 2166 days | |
4.24 | 4% |
| Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 2179 days | |
4.22 | 4% |
| Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 2185 days | |
4.21 | 4% |
| Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 2189 days | |
4.2 | 4% |
| Francis Runge | 9/10 | 2193 days | |
4.2 | 4% |
| William Notcutt | 8/10 | 2238 days | 3.43 | 3% | |
| David | 10/10 | 2238 days | 3.43 | 3% | |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 2260 days | |
4.08 | 4% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 2272 days | 3.39 | 3% | |
| Jacquemard | 8/10 | 2274 days | |
4.06 | 4% |
| Jenben | 9/10 | 2299 days | 3.35 | 3% | |
| Bandzior | 10/10 | 2330 days | 3.31 | 3% | |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 2529 days | |
3.64 | 4% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 2529 days | |
3.64 | 4% |
| Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 2540 days | |
3.62 | 4% |
| Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 2548 days | |
3.61 | 4% |
| Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 2550 days | |
3.61 | 4% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 2551 days | |
3.61 | 4% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 2553 days | |
3.6 | 4% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 2558 days | |
3.6 | 4% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 2571 days | |
3.57 | 4% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 2573 days | 2.98 | 3% | |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 2604 days | 2.93 | 3% | |
| cassie | 9/10 | 2879 days | 2.56 | 3% | |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 2887 days | |
3.05 | 3% |
| Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 2893 days | |
3.04 | 3% |
| Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 2901 days | |
3.03 | 3% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 2903 days | |
3.03 | 3% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 2908 days | |
3.02 | 3% |
| Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 2915 days | |
3.01 | 3% |
| Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 2915 days | |
3.01 | 3% |
| claudian | 10/10 | 3244 days | |
2.47 | 2% |
| Thomas K | 10/10 | 3284 days | |
2.4 | 2% |
| Jules | 9/10 | 3300 days | |
2.38 | 2% |
| Joel K | 8/10 | 3301 days | |
2.37 | 2% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 3606 days | |
1.87 | 2% |
| MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 3625 days | |
1.84 | 2% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 5495 days | 0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.