Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Moke Lake Campsite
Valid Reviews
107 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 109 reviews. There are 107 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 107 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 48 |
|
45% |
| 9/10 | 33 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.31% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.31% and is based on 107 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 107 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.99%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirandah | 10/10 | 50 days | 99.6 | 100% | |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 99% | |
| Kath Cox | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 99% | |
| Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 140 days | 96.89 | 97% | |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Yotakahron | 8/10 | 354 days | 80.14 | 80% | |
| Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 465 days |  |
78.88 | 79% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 474 days | 64.4 | 65% | |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 540 days | 53.79 | 54% | |
| Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 545 days | 52.93 | 53% | |
| Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 563 days | 49.85 | 50% | |
| Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 685 days | 31.64 | 32% | |
| Roger | 9/10 | 735 days | 25.54 | 26% | |
| Alison Harway | 10/10 | 753 days | 23.53 | 24% | |
| Di Bennett | 10/10 | 755 days | 23.32 | 23% | |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 800 days | |
22.55 | 23% |
| Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 807 days | 18.14 | 18% | |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 823 days | 16.72 | 17% | |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 824 days | 16.64 | 17% | |
| vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 837 days | 15.55 | 16% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 839 days | 15.39 | 15% | |
| Martine Baars | 7/10 | 843 days | 15.06 | 15% | |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 870 days | 13.02 | 13% | |
| Bob | 9/10 | 874 days | |
15.29 | 15% |
| Peter Moore | 10/10 | 880 days | 12.32 | 12% | |
| Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 931 days | 9.26 | 9% | |
| Chris | 10/10 | 931 days | 9.26 | 9% | |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 960 days | 7.89 | 8% | |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 1077 days | 5.05 | 5% | |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 1136 days | 4.94 | 5% | |
| Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 1150 days | 4.92 | 5% | |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 1155 days | 4.92 | 5% | |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 1167 days | 4.9 | 5% | |
| Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 1171 days | 4.9 | 5% | |
| Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 1173 days | |
5.87 | 6% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 1174 days | 4.89 | 5% | |
| Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 1205 days | 4.85 | 5% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 1242 days | 4.8 | 5% | |
| Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 1251 days | 4.79 | 5% | |
| Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 1539 days | 4.39 | 4% | |
| Vincent S. | 10/10 | 1539 days | 4.39 | 4% | |
| Evelyn | 8/10 | 1539 days | 4.39 | 4% | |
| Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 1542 days | 4.39 | 4% | |
| Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 1568 days | 4.35 | 4% | |
| Alex Leo | 9/10 | 1577 days | 4.34 | 4% | |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 1588 days | 4.32 | 4% | |
| oren schnabel | 10/10 | 1601 days | 4.31 | 4% | |
| Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 1601 days | |
5.17 | 5% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 1692 days | 4.18 | 4% | |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 1848 days | |
4.76 | 5% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 1849 days | |
4.76 | 5% |
| Robert Erni | 9/10 | 1854 days | |
4.75 | 5% |
| Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 1854 days | |
4.75 | 5% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 1854 days | |
4.75 | 5% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 1885 days | |
4.7 | 5% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 1904 days | 3.89 | 4% | |
| Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 1924 days | |
4.64 | 5% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 1924 days | |
4.64 | 5% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 1931 days | |
4.63 | 5% |
| Marine | 9/10 | 1932 days | |
4.62 | 5% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 1940 days | |
4.61 | 5% |
| mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 1966 days | 3.81 | 4% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 2027 days | 3.72 | 4% | |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 2027 days | 3.72 | 4% | |
| Jen | 7/10 | 2057 days | 3.68 | 4% | |
| kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 2210 days | 3.47 | 3% | |
| Friederike | 10/10 | 2225 days | |
4.14 | 4% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 2228 days | |
4.14 | 4% |
| Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 2241 days | |
4.12 | 4% |
| Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 2247 days | |
4.11 | 4% |
| Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 2251 days | |
4.1 | 4% |
| Francis Runge | 9/10 | 2255 days | |
4.09 | 4% |
| William Notcutt | 8/10 | 2300 days | 3.35 | 3% | |
| David | 10/10 | 2300 days | 3.35 | 3% | |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 2322 days | |
3.98 | 4% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 2334 days | 3.3 | 3% | |
| Jacquemard | 8/10 | 2336 days | |
3.96 | 4% |
| Jenben | 9/10 | 2361 days | 3.27 | 3% | |
| Bandzior | 10/10 | 2392 days | 3.22 | 3% | |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 2591 days | |
3.54 | 4% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 2591 days | |
3.54 | 4% |
| Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 2602 days | |
3.52 | 4% |
| Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 2610 days | |
3.51 | 4% |
| Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 2612 days | |
3.51 | 4% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 2613 days | |
3.5 | 4% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 2615 days | |
3.5 | 4% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 2620 days | |
3.49 | 4% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 2633 days | |
3.47 | 3% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 2635 days | 2.89 | 3% | |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 2666 days | 2.85 | 3% | |
| cassie | 9/10 | 2941 days | 2.47 | 2% | |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 2949 days | |
2.95 | 3% |
| Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 2955 days | |
2.94 | 3% |
| Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 2963 days | |
2.93 | 3% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 2965 days | |
2.93 | 3% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 2970 days | |
2.92 | 3% |
| Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 2977 days | |
2.91 | 3% |
| Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 2977 days | |
2.91 | 3% |
| claudian | 10/10 | 3306 days | |
2.37 | 2% |
| Thomas K | 10/10 | 3346 days | |
2.3 | 2% |
| Jules | 9/10 | 3362 days | |
2.27 | 2% |
| Joel K | 8/10 | 3363 days | |
2.27 | 2% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 3668 days | |
1.77 | 2% |
| MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 3687 days | |
1.74 | 2% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 5557 days | 0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.