Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moke Lake Campsite
Valid Reviews
138 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 141 reviews. There are 138 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 138 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 61 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 46 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 23 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.52% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.52% and is based on 138 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 138 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.37%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| mark Dawidowicz | 10/10 | 220 days | 100% |
| Jan | 9/10 | 220 days | 99% |
| Clement | 9/10 | 251 days | 98% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 282 days | 96% |
| MB | 9/10 | 557 days | 84% |
| Paul | 7/10 | 557 days | 79% |
| McLean | 9/10 | 585 days | 82% |
| Fredrik | 9/10 | 616 days | 80% |
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 647 days | 78% |
| tasman travels | 10/10 | 830 days | 62% |
| Andi | 9/10 | 951 days | 49% |
| Sarah Mitchell | 10/10 | 982 days | 47% |
| MORUE | 9/10 | 1135 days | 33% |
| Niff | 8/10 | 1257 days | 23% |
| Katie Edser | 9/10 | 1288 days | 22% |
| Vicky | 9/10 | 1288 days | 22% |
| Citlali & Mike | 8/10 | 1347 days | 18% |
| Nicky | 10/10 | 1681 days | 6% |
| Suzanne | 8/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
| Ange | 10/10 | 2077 days | 4% |
| Oliver | 10/10 | 2108 days | 4% |
| Sönke | 9/10 | 2108 days | 4% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 2108 days | 4% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 2383 days | 4% |
| Ashleigh Lim | 10/10 | 2383 days | 4% |
| Ju | 9/10 | 2412 days | 4% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 2412 days | 4% |
| Skyeandjoe | 10/10 | 2443 days | 4% |
| Dee Keys | 10/10 | 2443 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
| Will M | 10/10 | 2535 days | 4% |
| Mirandah | 10/10 | 2749 days | 3% |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 2777 days | 3% |
| Kath Cox | 10/10 | 2808 days | 3% |
| Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 2839 days | 3% |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 2869 days | 3% |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2869 days | 3% |
| Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 2869 days | 3% |
| Yotakahron | 8/10 | 3053 days | 2% |
| Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 3164 days | 2% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 3239 days | 2% |
| Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
| Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 3262 days | 2% |
| Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 3384 days | 2% |
| Roger | 9/10 | 3434 days | 2% |
| Alison Harway | 10/10 | 3452 days | 2% |
| Di Bennett | 10/10 | 3454 days | 2% |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 3499 days | 1% |
| Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 3506 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3522 days | 2% |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 3523 days | 2% |
| vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 3536 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 3538 days | 2% |
| Martine Baars | 7/10 | 3542 days | 1% |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 3569 days | 1% |
| Bob | 9/10 | 3573 days | 1% |
| Peter Moore | 10/10 | 3579 days | 1% |
| Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 3630 days | 1% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 3630 days | 1% |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 3659 days | 1% |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 3776 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 3835 days | 1% |
| Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 3849 days | 1% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3854 days | 1% |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 3866 days | 1% |
| Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 3870 days | 1% |
| Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 3872 days | 1% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 3873 days | 1% |
| Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 3904 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 3950 days | 1% |
| Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 4238 days | 0% |
| Vincent S. | 10/10 | 4238 days | 0% |
| Evelyn | 8/10 | 4238 days | 0% |
| Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 4241 days | 0% |
| Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 4267 days | 0% |
| Alex Leo | 9/10 | 4276 days | 0% |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 4287 days | 0% |
| oren schnabel | 10/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 4547 days | 1% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 4548 days | 1% |
| Robert Erni | 9/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 4584 days | 1% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 4603 days | 1% |
| Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 4623 days | 1% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 4623 days | 1% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 4630 days | 1% |
| Marine | 9/10 | 4631 days | 1% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 4639 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 4726 days | 1% |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 4726 days | 1% |
| Jen | 7/10 | 4756 days | 1% |
| kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 4909 days | 1% |
| Friederike | 10/10 | 4924 days | 1% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 4927 days | 1% |
| Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
| Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 4946 days | 1% |
| Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 4950 days | 1% |
| Francis Runge | 9/10 | 4954 days | 1% |
| William Notcutt | 8/10 | 4999 days | 1% |
| David | 10/10 | 4999 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 5033 days | 1% |
| Jacquemard | 8/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
| Jenben | 9/10 | 5060 days | 1% |
| Bandzior | 10/10 | 5091 days | 1% |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 5290 days | 1% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 5290 days | 1% |
| Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
| Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 5309 days | 1% |
| Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 5311 days | 1% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 5312 days | 1% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 5314 days | 1% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 5319 days | 1% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 5332 days | 1% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 5334 days | 1% |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 5365 days | 1% |
| cassie | 9/10 | 5640 days | 1% |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 5648 days | 1% |
| Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 5654 days | 1% |
| Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 5662 days | 1% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 5664 days | 1% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 5669 days | 1% |
| Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 5676 days | 1% |
| Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 5676 days | 1% |
| claudian | 10/10 | 6005 days | 1% |
| Thomas K | 10/10 | 6045 days | 1% |
| Jules | 9/10 | 6061 days | 1% |
| Joel K | 8/10 | 6062 days | 1% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 6367 days | 1% |
| MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 6386 days | 1% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 8256 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.95% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.