Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moke Lake Campsite
Valid Reviews
107 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 109 reviews. There are 107 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 107 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 48 |
|
45% |
| 9/10 | 33 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.31% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.31% and is based on 107 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 107 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
91.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirandah | 10/10 | 171 days | 95.37 | 100% | |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 199 days | 89.04 | 93% | |
| Kath Cox | 10/10 | 230 days | 91.62 | 96% | |
| Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 261 days | 89.21 | 94% | |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 290 days | 86.67 | 91% | |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 291 days | 82.25 | 86% | |
| Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 291 days | 86.58 | 91% | |
| Yotakahron | 8/10 | 475 days | 61.03 | 64% | |
| Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 586 days |  |
46.05 | 48% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 594 days | 44.77 | 47% | |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 661 days | 34.85 | 37% | |
| Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 666 days | 32.46 | 34% | |
| Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 684 days | 31.77 | 33% | |
| Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 806 days | 15.13 | 16% | |
| Roger | 9/10 | 856 days | 14.05 | 15% | |
| Alison Harway | 10/10 | 874 days | 12.74 | 13% | |
| Di Bennett | 10/10 | 876 days | 12.6 | 13% | |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 921 days | |
9.8 | 10% |
| Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 928 days | 9.42 | 10% | |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 944 days | 8.61 | 9% | |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 945 days | 8.57 | 9% | |
| vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 958 days | 7.97 | 8% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 959 days | 7.93 | 8% | |
| Martine Baars | 7/10 | 964 days | 7.02 | 7% | |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 990 days | 6.75 | 7% | |
| Bob | 9/10 | 995 days | |
6.58 | 7% |
| Peter Moore | 10/10 | 1001 days | 6.4 | 7% | |
| Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 1051 days | 5.31 | 6% | |
| Chris | 10/10 | 1051 days | 5.31 | 6% | |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 1081 days | 5.03 | 5% | |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 1198 days | 4.84 | 5% | |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 1257 days | 4.75 | 5% | |
| Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 1271 days | 4.73 | 5% | |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 1276 days | 4.72 | 5% | |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 1288 days | 4.47 | 5% | |
| Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 1292 days | 4.7 | 5% | |
| Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 1294 days | |
4.7 | 5% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 1295 days | 4.7 | 5% | |
| Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 1325 days | 4.65 | 5% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 1363 days | 4.59 | 5% | |
| Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 1372 days | 4.17 | 4% | |
| Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 1659 days | 4.14 | 4% | |
| Vincent S. | 10/10 | 1659 days | 4.14 | 4% | |
| Evelyn | 8/10 | 1659 days | 3.93 | 4% | |
| Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 1663 days | 4.14 | 4% | |
| Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 1689 days | 4.1 | 4% | |
| Alex Leo | 9/10 | 1698 days | 4.08 | 4% | |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 1709 days | 3.7 | 4% | |
| oren schnabel | 10/10 | 1721 days | 4.05 | 4% | |
| Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 1722 days | |
4.05 | 4% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 1812 days | 3.91 | 4% | |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 1969 days | |
3.49 | 4% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 1970 days | |
3.34 | 4% |
| Robert Erni | 9/10 | 1975 days | |
3.66 | 4% |
| Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 1975 days | |
3.66 | 4% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 1975 days | |
3.66 | 4% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 2006 days | |
3.43 | 4% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 2025 days | 3.58 | 4% | |
| Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 2045 days | |
3.55 | 4% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 2045 days | |
3.55 | 4% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 2052 days | |
3.54 | 4% |
| Marine | 9/10 | 2053 days | |
3.54 | 4% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 2061 days | |
3.53 | 4% |
| mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 2087 days | 3.49 | 4% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 2148 days | 3.4 | 4% | |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 2148 days | 3.4 | 4% | |
| Jen | 7/10 | 2178 days | 3.05 | 3% | |
| kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 2331 days | 2.96 | 3% | |
| Friederike | 10/10 | 2346 days | |
3.1 | 3% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 2349 days | |
2.81 | 3% |
| Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 2362 days | |
3.07 | 3% |
| Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 2368 days | |
3.06 | 3% |
| Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 2372 days | |
3.06 | 3% |
| Francis Runge | 9/10 | 2376 days | |
3.05 | 3% |
| William Notcutt | 8/10 | 2421 days | 2.83 | 3% | |
| David | 10/10 | 2421 days | 2.98 | 3% | |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 2443 days | |
2.8 | 3% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 2455 days | 2.93 | 3% | |
| Jacquemard | 8/10 | 2457 days | |
2.78 | 3% |
| Jenben | 9/10 | 2482 days | 2.89 | 3% | |
| Bandzior | 10/10 | 2513 days | 2.84 | 3% | |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 2712 days | |
2.54 | 3% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 2712 days | |
2.54 | 3% |
| Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 2723 days | |
2.52 | 3% |
| Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 2731 days | |
2.51 | 3% |
| Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 2733 days | |
2.51 | 3% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 2734 days | |
2.51 | 3% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 2736 days | |
2.5 | 3% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 2741 days | |
2.49 | 3% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 2754 days | |
2.35 | 2% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 2756 days | 2.35 | 2% | |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 2787 days | 2.42 | 3% | |
| cassie | 9/10 | 3062 days | 2.01 | 2% | |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 3070 days | |
1.99 | 2% |
| Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 3076 days | |
1.89 | 2% |
| Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 3084 days | |
1.97 | 2% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 3086 days | |
1.97 | 2% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 3091 days | |
1.96 | 2% |
| Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 3098 days | |
1.95 | 2% |
| Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 3098 days | |
1.95 | 2% |
| claudian | 10/10 | 3427 days | |
1.45 | 2% |
| Thomas K | 10/10 | 3467 days | |
1.39 | 1% |
| Jules | 9/10 | 3483 days | |
1.37 | 1% |
| Joel K | 8/10 | 3484 days | |
1.3 | 1% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 3789 days | |
0.85 | 1% |
| MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 3808 days | |
0.83 | 1% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 5678 days | 0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.