Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moke Lake Campsite
Valid Reviews
114 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 117 reviews. There are 114 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 114 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 54 |
|
47% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.75% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.75% and is based on 114 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 114 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
94.84%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren | 10/10 | 28 days | 99.88 | 100% | |
| Ashleigh Lim | 10/10 | 28 days | 99.88 | 100% | |
| Ju | 9/10 | 57 days | 99.49 | 100% | |
| Skyeandjoe | 10/10 | 88 days | 98.77 | 99% | |
| Dee Keys | 10/10 | 88 days | 98.77 | 99% | |
| Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 149 days | 96.48 | 97% | |
| Will M | 10/10 | 179 days | 94.92 | 95% | |
| Mirandah | 10/10 | 394 days | 75.4 | 75% | |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 422 days | 68.19 | 68% | |
| Kath Cox | 10/10 | 453 days | 67.48 | 68% | |
| Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 484 days | 62.88 | 63% | |
| Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 513 days | 58.3 | 58% | |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 514 days | 55.23 | 55% | |
| Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 514 days | 58.14 | 58% | |
| Yotakahron | 8/10 | 698 days | 28.48 | 29% | |
| Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 809 days |  |
17.96 | 18% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 817 days | 17.25 | 17% | |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 884 days | 12.05 | 12% | |
| Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 889 days | 11.14 | 11% | |
| Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 11% | |
| Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 1029 days | 4.72 | 5% | |
| Roger | 9/10 | 1079 days | 5.04 | 5% | |
| Alison Harway | 10/10 | 1097 days | 5.0 | 5% | |
| Di Bennett | 10/10 | 1099 days | 4.99 | 5% | |
| Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 1144 days | |
4.9 | 5% |
| Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 1151 days | 4.89 | 5% | |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 1167 days | 4.86 | 5% | |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 1168 days | 4.86 | 5% | |
| vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 1181 days | 4.83 | 5% | |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 1182 days | 4.83 | 5% | |
| Martine Baars | 7/10 | 1187 days | 4.39 | 4% | |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 1213 days | 4.77 | 5% | |
| Bob | 9/10 | 1218 days | |
4.76 | 5% |
| Peter Moore | 10/10 | 1224 days | 4.75 | 5% | |
| Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 1274 days | 4.65 | 5% | |
| Chris | 10/10 | 1274 days | 4.65 | 5% | |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 1304 days | 4.59 | 5% | |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 1421 days | 4.36 | 4% | |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 1480 days | 4.25 | 4% | |
| Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 1494 days | 4.22 | 4% | |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 1499 days | 4.21 | 4% | |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 1511 days | 3.98 | 4% | |
| Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 1515 days | 4.18 | 4% | |
| Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 1517 days | |
4.17 | 4% |
| Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 1518 days | 4.17 | 4% | |
| Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 1548 days | 4.11 | 4% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 1586 days | 4.04 | 4% | |
| Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 1595 days | 3.66 | 4% | |
| Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 1882 days | 3.46 | 3% | |
| Vincent S. | 10/10 | 1882 days | 3.46 | 3% | |
| Evelyn | 8/10 | 1882 days | 3.29 | 3% | |
| Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 1886 days | 3.45 | 3% | |
| Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 1912 days | 3.4 | 3% | |
| Alex Leo | 9/10 | 1921 days | 3.38 | 3% | |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 1932 days | 3.06 | 3% | |
| oren schnabel | 10/10 | 1944 days | 3.34 | 3% | |
| Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 1945 days | |
3.34 | 3% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 2035 days | 3.16 | 3% | |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 2192 days | |
2.71 | 3% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 2193 days | |
2.59 | 3% |
| Robert Erni | 9/10 | 2198 days | |
2.84 | 3% |
| Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 2198 days | |
2.84 | 3% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 2198 days | |
2.84 | 3% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 2229 days | |
2.64 | 3% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 2248 days | 2.74 | 3% | |
| Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 2268 days | |
2.7 | 3% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 2268 days | |
2.7 | 3% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 2275 days | |
2.69 | 3% |
| Marine | 9/10 | 2276 days | |
2.69 | 3% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 2284 days | |
2.67 | 3% |
| mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 2310 days | 2.62 | 3% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 2371 days | 2.5 | 3% | |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 2371 days | 2.5 | 3% | |
| Jen | 7/10 | 2401 days | 2.22 | 2% | |
| kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 2554 days | 2.04 | 2% | |
| Friederike | 10/10 | 2569 days | |
2.12 | 2% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 2572 days | |
1.92 | 2% |
| Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 2585 days | |
2.08 | 2% |
| Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 2591 days | |
2.07 | 2% |
| Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 2595 days | |
2.06 | 2% |
| Francis Runge | 9/10 | 2599 days | |
2.06 | 2% |
| William Notcutt | 8/10 | 2644 days | 1.87 | 2% | |
| David | 10/10 | 2644 days | 1.97 | 2% | |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 2666 days | |
1.83 | 2% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 2678 days | 1.9 | 2% | |
| Jacquemard | 8/10 | 2680 days | |
1.8 | 2% |
| Jenben | 9/10 | 2705 days | 1.85 | 2% | |
| Bandzior | 10/10 | 2736 days | 1.79 | 2% | |
| Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 2935 days | |
1.4 | 1% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 2935 days | |
1.4 | 1% |
| Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 2946 days | |
1.38 | 1% |
| Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 2954 days | |
1.36 | 1% |
| Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 2956 days | |
1.36 | 1% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 2957 days | |
1.36 | 1% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 2959 days | |
1.35 | 1% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 2964 days | |
1.34 | 1% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 2977 days | |
1.25 | 1% |
| sidcupjon | 8/10 | 2979 days | 1.25 | 1% | |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 3010 days | 1.25 | 1% | |
| cassie | 9/10 | 3285 days | 0.71 | 1% | |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 3293 days | |
0.7 | 1% |
| Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 3299 days | |
0.65 | 1% |
| Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 3307 days | |
0.67 | 1% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 3309 days | |
0.67 | 1% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 3314 days | |
0.66 | 1% |
| Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 3321 days | |
0.64 | 1% |
| Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 3321 days | |
0.64 | 1% |
| claudian | 10/10 | 3650 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Thomas K | 10/10 | 3690 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jules | 9/10 | 3706 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Joel K | 8/10 | 3707 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nathalie | 8/10 | 4012 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 4031 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 5901 days | 0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
95%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.