G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
83 Valid Reviews
The Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite experience has a total of 84 reviews. There are 83 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 83 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 29 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
84.10% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite valid reviews is 84.10% and is based on 83 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
16 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 83 valid reviews, the experience has 16 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 16 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
31% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.13% and is based on 16 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.58%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lea | 2/10 | 161 days | 47% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 8/10 | 220 days | 100% |
| Mitch and Emma | 8/10 | 282 days | 98% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 312 days | 97% |
| Jane | 8/10 | 677 days | 76% |
| Bart | 8/10 | 677 days | 76% |
| K M | 8/10 | 708 days | 73% |
| Stephane | 10/10 | 738 days | 72% |
| Tiffndoll | 8/10 | 922 days | 53% |
| Jesse Leake | 7/10 | 951 days | 47% |
| test | 10/10 | 982 days | 48% |
| Marie Perret | 9/10 | 1074 days | 39% |
| Kelsie | 10/10 | 1135 days | 34% |
| Jodie Muller | 9/10 | 1227 days | 26% |
| Campingkea | 8/10 | 1257 days | 24% |
| MMM | 10/10 | 1288 days | 22% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 1288 days | 22% |
| Julia | 7/10 | 1347 days | 17% |
| Julia | 8/10 | 1378 days | 17% |
| Alberto | 9/10 | 1408 days | 15% |
| Amber | 9/10 | 2046 days | 5% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 2108 days | 4% |
| JM | 10/10 | 2383 days | 4% |
| Stefano | 8/10 | 2412 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 8/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
| Jae-Marie Edwards | 9/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Renee | 8/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 2777 days | 3% |
| James | 8/10 | 2839 days | 3% |
| Tjitze Weststrate | 8/10 | 2839 days | 3% |
| Lilia | 2/10 | 2869 days | 1% |
| Kiri Edwards | 9/10 | 2961 days | 3% |
| Sezz bella | 1/10 | 3053 days | 1% |
| Clobby | 6/10 | 3114 days | 2% |
| Sanne Heil | 8/10 | 3204 days | 2% |
| Pirita Latja | 9/10 | 3233 days | 2% |
| Jarod | 10/10 | 3233 days | 2% |
| Katy Coutts | 8/10 | 3373 days | 2% |
| Lucy Oury | 8/10 | 3435 days | 2% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3447 days | 2% |
| Cathy Mead | 9/10 | 3471 days | 2% |
| Fabio Flepp | 10/10 | 3485 days | 2% |
| Kelly Roxanne | 7/10 | 3506 days | 2% |
| Sue Horstra | 10/10 | 3575 days | 2% |
| Marvin Galano | 10/10 | 3659 days | 1% |
| Eric Pollard | 9/10 | 3665 days | 1% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 3782 days | 1% |
| Peter Barker | 10/10 | 3830 days | 1% |
| Helena Bond | 9/10 | 3849 days | 1% |
| Gabor Kabacs | 9/10 | 3855 days | 1% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3861 days | 1% |
| Jean marc Daubenfeld | 8/10 | 3900 days | 1% |
| Sarah Dial | 10/10 | 3903 days | 1% |
| Mike Humphries | 8/10 | 3905 days | 1% |
| Avery Wong | 10/10 | 3924 days | 1% |
| D'Arcy King | 10/10 | 3968 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 8/10 | 4170 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 9/10 | 4178 days | 0% |
| Vanessa | 10/10 | 4200 days | 0% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 4200 days | 0% |
| Sebastian Sanne | 9/10 | 4248 days | 0% |
| Maggie Tobar | 6/10 | 4254 days | 0% |
| Antoine Vernay | 8/10 | 4305 days | 0% |
| Gloria Hanke | 7/10 | 4554 days | 1% |
| Guido Dust | 7/10 | 4554 days | 1% |
| Markus Eckert | 9/10 | 4571 days | 1% |
| Sara Williams | 8/10 | 4630 days | 1% |
| catherine welsh | 8/10 | 4634 days | 1% |
| Jane Stevens | 10/10 | 4634 days | 1% |
| Andrea Beck | 9/10 | 4634 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Alt | 8/10 | 4637 days | 1% |
| Julia Ahrend | 10/10 | 4637 days | 1% |
| Jade Fleming | 6/10 | 4695 days | 1% |
| Richard Evans | 9/10 | 4726 days | 1% |
| Pei | 8/10 | 4879 days | 1% |
| Emily Meek | 8/10 | 4909 days | 1% |
| Florian | 9/10 | 4909 days | 1% |
| Katharina | 8/10 | 4927 days | 1% |
| Fabian | 9/10 | 4927 days | 1% |
| Judith & John Bishop | 9/10 | 5274 days | 1% |
| Michael Long | 9/10 | 5664 days | 1% |
| Ann-Kathrin Auditor | 10/10 | 5665 days | 1% |
| Lukas Blaauw | 9/10 | 6023 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.58% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.