Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite
Valid Reviews
83 Valid Reviews
The Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite experience has a total of 84 reviews. There are 83 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 83 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 29 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
84.10% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite valid reviews is 84.10% and is based on 83 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
16 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 83 valid reviews, the experience has 16 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 16 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
31% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.13% and is based on 16 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
82.04%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lea | 2/10 | 80 days | 47% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 8/10 | 139 days | 100% |
| Mitch and Emma | 8/10 | 201 days | 99% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 231 days | 98% |
| Jane | 8/10 | 596 days | 81% |
| Bart | 8/10 | 596 days | 81% |
| K M | 8/10 | 627 days | 78% |
| Stephane | 10/10 | 657 days | 78% |
| Tiffndoll | 8/10 | 841 days | 60% |
| Jesse Leake | 7/10 | 870 days | 54% |
| test | 10/10 | 901 days | 55% |
| Marie Perret | 9/10 | 993 days | 45% |
| Kelsie | 10/10 | 1054 days | 40% |
| Jodie Muller | 9/10 | 1146 days | 32% |
| Campingkea | 8/10 | 1176 days | 29% |
| MMM | 10/10 | 1207 days | 27% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 1207 days | 27% |
| Julia | 7/10 | 1266 days | 22% |
| Julia | 8/10 | 1297 days | 21% |
| Alberto | 9/10 | 1327 days | 19% |
| Amber | 9/10 | 1965 days | 5% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 2027 days | 4% |
| JM | 10/10 | 2302 days | 4% |
| Stefano | 8/10 | 2331 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 8/10 | 2423 days | 4% |
| Jae-Marie Edwards | 9/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Renee | 8/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 2696 days | 3% |
| James | 8/10 | 2758 days | 3% |
| Tjitze Weststrate | 8/10 | 2758 days | 3% |
| Lilia | 2/10 | 2788 days | 1% |
| Kiri Edwards | 9/10 | 2880 days | 3% |
| Sezz bella | 1/10 | 2972 days | 1% |
| Clobby | 6/10 | 3033 days | 2% |
| Sanne Heil | 8/10 | 3123 days | 2% |
| Pirita Latja | 9/10 | 3153 days | 2% |
| Jarod | 10/10 | 3153 days | 2% |
| Katy Coutts | 8/10 | 3292 days | 2% |
| Lucy Oury | 8/10 | 3354 days | 2% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3367 days | 2% |
| Cathy Mead | 9/10 | 3390 days | 2% |
| Fabio Flepp | 10/10 | 3404 days | 2% |
| Kelly Roxanne | 7/10 | 3426 days | 1% |
| Sue Horstra | 10/10 | 3494 days | 1% |
| Marvin Galano | 10/10 | 3579 days | 1% |
| Eric Pollard | 9/10 | 3584 days | 1% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 3701 days | 1% |
| Peter Barker | 10/10 | 3749 days | 1% |
| Helena Bond | 9/10 | 3768 days | 1% |
| Gabor Kabacs | 9/10 | 3774 days | 1% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3780 days | 1% |
| Jean marc Daubenfeld | 8/10 | 3819 days | 1% |
| Sarah Dial | 10/10 | 3823 days | 1% |
| Mike Humphries | 8/10 | 3824 days | 1% |
| Avery Wong | 10/10 | 3843 days | 1% |
| D'Arcy King | 10/10 | 3887 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 8/10 | 4089 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 9/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
| Vanessa | 10/10 | 4119 days | 0% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 4119 days | 0% |
| Sebastian Sanne | 9/10 | 4167 days | 0% |
| Maggie Tobar | 6/10 | 4173 days | 0% |
| Antoine Vernay | 8/10 | 4224 days | 0% |
| Gloria Hanke | 7/10 | 4473 days | 0% |
| Guido Dust | 7/10 | 4473 days | 0% |
| Markus Eckert | 9/10 | 4490 days | 0% |
| Sara Williams | 8/10 | 4549 days | 0% |
| catherine welsh | 8/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| Jane Stevens | 10/10 | 4553 days | 0% |
| Andrea Beck | 9/10 | 4553 days | 0% |
| Rebecca Alt | 8/10 | 4556 days | 0% |
| Julia Ahrend | 10/10 | 4556 days | 0% |
| Jade Fleming | 6/10 | 4614 days | 1% |
| Richard Evans | 9/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
| Pei | 8/10 | 4798 days | 1% |
| Emily Meek | 8/10 | 4828 days | 1% |
| Florian | 9/10 | 4828 days | 1% |
| Katharina | 8/10 | 4846 days | 0% |
| Fabian | 9/10 | 4846 days | 0% |
| Judith & John Bishop | 9/10 | 5193 days | 1% |
| Michael Long | 9/10 | 5583 days | 0% |
| Ann-Kathrin Auditor | 10/10 | 5584 days | 0% |
| Lukas Blaauw | 9/10 | 5942 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Pearson (Moana Rua) Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.47% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.