Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Hans Bay.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Hans Bay

Valid Reviews

29 Valid Reviews

The Hans Bay experience has a total of 29 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 29 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
31%
9/10 10
34%
8/10 7
24%
7/10 1
3%
6/10 1
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
3%

86.21% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hans Bay valid reviews is 86.21% and is based on 29 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

4 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 29 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 0
0%
9/10 3
75%
8/10 1
25%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

87.50% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hans Bay face-to-face reviews is 87.50% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

86.14%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
CptRexKramer 7/10 248 days 97%
Angelina Janus 9/10 338 days 100%
tasman travels 10/10 673 days 80%
Ju 6/10 1038 days 37%
Emma B 9/10 1069 days 40%
Julia 10/10 1100 days 38%
AMR 10/10 1434 days 15%
Jax 10/10 1679 days 6%
K&KRahimi 9/10 2226 days 4%
andrew 1/10 2318 days 2%
Jae-Marie Edwards 10/10 2440 days 4%
Raphaele 10/10 2561 days 4%
Stephen Lindsay 8/10 2775 days 3%
Matt 9/10 2805 days 3%
Luis Vigil Vidal 9/10 2878 days 2%
Pascale Delos 8/10 2895 days 3%
Katrina 10/10 2926 days 3%
Jarod 8/10 2956 days 3%
Lucy Oury 9/10 3157 days 2%
Aisling Burke 10/10 3167 days 2%
Rob & Colleen Elwood 9/10 3170 days 2%
David Brici 9/10 3207 days 2%
W Donovan 8/10 3511 days 2%
Rob Manson 9/10 3601 days 1%
Jean marc Daubenfeld 10/10 3622 days 1%
Pauline Gibson 8/10 4020 days 0%
mcp hm 8/10 4266 days 0%
AusCampa 8/10 4601 days 1%
Carolin Ranner 9/10 5394 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Hans Bay does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.61% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

88%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.