Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tōtaranui Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Tōtaranui Campground
Valid Reviews
91 Valid Reviews
The Tōtaranui Campground experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 91 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 91 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 32 |
|
35% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.92% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tōtaranui Campground valid reviews is 86.92% and is based on 91 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
53 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 91 valid reviews, the experience has 53 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 13 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.02% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tōtaranui Campground face-to-face reviews is 83.02% and is based on 53 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
88.88%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ailsa McIntosh | 9/10 | 69 days | 100% |
| Sol | 8/10 | 100 days | 99% |
| Sylvie K | 10/10 | 161 days | 100% |
| Max | 6/10 | 403 days | 79% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 403 days | 92% |
| Adel | 9/10 | 465 days | 88% |
| Henry | 9/10 | 953 days | 48% |
| Dani | 10/10 | 1075 days | 38% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1318 days | 20% |
| Emer | 9/10 | 1410 days | 15% |
| Emma Utgaard | 10/10 | 1591 days | 8% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 1864 days | 5% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 1895 days | 5% |
| Kysha | 10/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 2292 days | 4% |
| Paul Smith | 9/10 | 2595 days | 3% |
| Sally Hodgson | 10/10 | 2997 days | 3% |
| Millka Pietikainen | 10/10 | 3002 days | 3% |
| Jan Hiltermann | 9/10 | 3030 days | 3% |
| Arslan Ahmad | 10/10 | 3307 days | 2% |
| Adrian Soldati | 10/10 | 3351 days | 2% |
| Clavel | 8/10 | 3419 days | 2% |
| Romain Richardot | 8/10 | 3419 days | 2% |
| Rosanne van Dooren | 10/10 | 3456 days | 2% |
| Lynn Pateron | 10/10 | 3492 days | 2% |
| Chloe Cox | 9/10 | 3537 days | 2% |
| Daniel Pietzsch | 10/10 | 3658 days | 1% |
| Lizzie Sitton | 9/10 | 3690 days | 1% |
| David Sitton | 8/10 | 3690 days | 1% |
| Wout van Dijk | 9/10 | 3778 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 3779 days | 1% |
| Marty Dayle | 8/10 | 3843 days | 1% |
| K C Costonis | 10/10 | 3966 days | 1% |
| Yann Le Gac | 10/10 | 3966 days | 1% |
| Jan Suoboda | 7/10 | 4248 days | 0% |
| tim winders | 8/10 | 4301 days | 0% |
| Anna Grafenstein | 7/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Adam | 10/10 | 4385 days | 1% |
| Petra Albrchtoval | 10/10 | 4385 days | 1% |
| Philip Schumann | 10/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
| Nina Helmling | 6/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
| Steffen | 7/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
| Radana Dlouha | 6/10 | 4399 days | 1% |
| Vaclav | 8/10 | 4399 days | 1% |
| Bernhard Fulterer | 5/10 | 4409 days | 1% |
| Tobias Gehring | 9/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
| Felix Brettner | 9/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
| Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
| Max Stein | 8/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
| Sally Schist | 10/10 | 4416 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 4417 days | 1% |
| Mike Majnik | 10/10 | 4417 days | 1% |
| Victor Puigserver | 10/10 | 4417 days | 1% |
| Jason MacLeod | 9/10 | 4421 days | 1% |
| Carina Borho | 9/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Markus Spitzmueller | 9/10 | 4428 days | 1% |
| Julia Bonisch | 6/10 | 4436 days | 1% |
| Rupert | 8/10 | 4447 days | 1% |
| Jonathan | 10/10 | 4544 days | 1% |
| Sven Woelk | 8/10 | 4722 days | 1% |
| Annika Schmidt | 10/10 | 4732 days | 1% |
| Patrick Stoeit | 9/10 | 4732 days | 1% |
| Ann Furlong | 7/10 | 4752 days | 1% |
| Kadyan | 9/10 | 4758 days | 1% |
| Francis Ruige | 10/10 | 4762 days | 1% |
| Bev Stott | 8/10 | 4764 days | 1% |
| Tony and Helene | 3/10 | 4766 days | 1% |
| Arno Leleu | 9/10 | 4767 days | 1% |
| Nadine and Jan | 9/10 | 4830 days | 1% |
| Lotte Uneken | 7/10 | 4860 days | 1% |
| AnnaM | 10/10 | 4909 days | 1% |
| Roeland Driessen | 10/10 | 5183 days | 1% |
| Robert Voelkl | 10/10 | 5220 days | 1% |
| Curry | 9/10 | 5226 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 7/10 | 5472 days | 1% |
| Karsten Tannhauser | 7/10 | 5472 days | 1% |
| Bette Eh | 10/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
| Daryl | 10/10 | 5482 days | 1% |
| Grumbach | 8/10 | 5492 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
| looklight | 10/10 | 5854 days | 1% |
| Rosie NZ | 9/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
| Mike Kirchner | 8/10 | 5878 days | 1% |
| Fred Dagg | 7/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
| greenbo | 8/10 | 5913 days | 1% |
| foucherm | 9/10 | 5937 days | 1% |
| Jansen | 6/10 | 5948 days | 1% |
| Clem | 9/10 | 6071 days | 1% |
| Raewyn | 9/10 | 6185 days | 1% |
| JennekeK | 8/10 | 6200 days | 1% |
| Mike Howe | 8/10 | 6219 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tōtaranui Campground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.16% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.