G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Momorangi Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Momorangi Campsite
Valid Reviews
76 Valid Reviews
The Momorangi Campsite experience has a total of 76 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 76 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 28 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite valid reviews is 85.00% and is based on 76 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
25 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 76 valid reviews, the experience has 25 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 25 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
44% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite face-to-face reviews is 81.60% and is based on 25 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
97.11%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvie K | 10/10 | 64 days | 100% |
| jo | 10/10 | 217 days | 98% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 247 days | 97% |
| Hamish | 10/10 | 306 days | 95% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 306 days | 95% |
| Shaun | 10/10 | 306 days | 95% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 306 days | 95% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 368 days | 92% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 429 days | 90% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 734 days | 69% |
| Elke | 10/10 | 978 days | 46% |
| Peter | 8/10 | 1068 days | 37% |
| Robbie D | 10/10 | 1494 days | 11% |
| Ellen | 5/10 | 1647 days | 5% |
| Kristen | 5/10 | 1708 days | 4% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 1708 days | 6% |
| Brenda | 3/10 | 1798 days | 3% |
| Lex | 10/10 | 1829 days | 5% |
| Hubber's | 10/10 | 1890 days | 5% |
| Cath | 6/10 | 2164 days | 4% |
| Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 2317 days | 4% |
| Tash & Laura | 7/10 | 2498 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 2529 days | 3% |
| Margie | 10/10 | 2560 days | 3% |
| Hazel | 10/10 | 2590 days | 3% |
| Helen Bond | 9/10 | 2894 days | 3% |
| battman | 10/10 | 2925 days | 3% |
| Blu Ice | 7/10 | 2943 days | 3% |
| Roger | 7/10 | 3155 days | 2% |
| Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 3194 days | 2% |
| Amanda Collins | 5/10 | 3350 days | 1% |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 3394 days | 2% |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 3446 days | 2% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 3503 days | 2% |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 3505 days | 2% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3506 days | 2% |
| W Donovan | 9/10 | 3542 days | 2% |
| Javier Schneider | 10/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
| christine Bierre | 9/10 | 3565 days | 1% |
| Gilles Andrieu | 9/10 | 3575 days | 1% |
| Tomáš Bžatek | 8/10 | 3901 days | 1% |
| Sarrob Sarrob | 10/10 | 3931 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 8/10 | 3959 days | 1% |
| Claude Nobs | 9/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| misstassie | 4/10 | 3990 days | 0% |
| Inge van Noorf | 10/10 | 4018 days | 1% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 4307 days | 0% |
| Cornelia Witte | 9/10 | 4307 days | 0% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 4320 days | 0% |
| Mike Majnik | 9/10 | 4320 days | 0% |
| Helen King | 9/10 | 4477 days | 1% |
| S M | 9/10 | 4720 days | 1% |
| Darren Abbott | 9/10 | 4744 days | 1% |
| Leo | 9/10 | 4755 days | 1% |
| Keith Helen | 10/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
| Lucy Wilde | 6/10 | 5029 days | 1% |
| Jochem Snyders | 8/10 | 5029 days | 1% |
| Colin Philpott | 8/10 | 5048 days | 1% |
| aliluvsprada | 10/10 | 5178 days | 1% |
| angillie | 3/10 | 5361 days | 0% |
| Astrid N | 8/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
| Mark Walker | 8/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Jim & Suzy Ducker | 7/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| Alan Jeffery | 8/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
| LandJ | 8/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
| Agnes McMillan | 8/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
| Tim Pfahlert | 8/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 8/10 | 5412 days | 1% |
| Michael Duckert | 8/10 | 5414 days | 1% |
| Chris Chasemore | 9/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
| Luisa | 9/10 | 5758 days | 1% |
| S Millet | 8/10 | 5763 days | 1% |
| Susanne Santer | 8/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Ruth Kinder | 9/10 | 5908 days | 1% |
| Andrew Smith | 7/10 | 6097 days | 1% |
| Pat | 4/10 | 6137 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Momorangi Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.24% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.