Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Momorangi Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
80 Valid Reviews
The Momorangi Campsite experience has a total of 80 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
84.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite valid reviews is 84.00% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
25 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 25 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 25 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
44% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite face-to-face reviews is 81.60% and is based on 25 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
91.82%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin | 10/10 | 99 days | 100% |
| Clement | 8/10 | 99 days | 98% |
| Stefani Vizzi | 1/10 | 161 days | 40% |
| cirefice bernard | 7/10 | 191 days | 92% |
| Sylvie K | 10/10 | 222 days | 98% |
| jo | 10/10 | 375 days | 92% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 405 days | 91% |
| Hamish | 10/10 | 464 days | 88% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 464 days | 88% |
| Shaun | 10/10 | 464 days | 88% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 464 days | 88% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 526 days | 85% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 587 days | 81% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 892 days | 54% |
| Elke | 10/10 | 1136 days | 32% |
| Peter | 8/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Robbie D | 10/10 | 1652 days | 6% |
| Ellen | 5/10 | 1805 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 5/10 | 1866 days | 3% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 1866 days | 5% |
| Brenda | 3/10 | 1956 days | 2% |
| Lex | 10/10 | 1987 days | 4% |
| Hubber's | 10/10 | 2048 days | 4% |
| Cath | 6/10 | 2322 days | 3% |
| Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 2475 days | 3% |
| Tash & Laura | 7/10 | 2656 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 2687 days | 3% |
| Margie | 10/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Hazel | 10/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
| Helen Bond | 9/10 | 3052 days | 2% |
| battman | 10/10 | 3083 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 7/10 | 3101 days | 2% |
| Roger | 7/10 | 3313 days | 2% |
| Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Amanda Collins | 5/10 | 3508 days | 1% |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 3552 days | 1% |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 3604 days | 1% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 3661 days | 1% |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 3663 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3664 days | 1% |
| W Donovan | 9/10 | 3700 days | 1% |
| Javier Schneider | 10/10 | 3709 days | 1% |
| christine Bierre | 9/10 | 3723 days | 1% |
| Gilles Andrieu | 9/10 | 3733 days | 1% |
| Tomáš Bžatek | 8/10 | 4059 days | 0% |
| Sarrob Sarrob | 10/10 | 4089 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 8/10 | 4117 days | 0% |
| Claude Nobs | 9/10 | 4136 days | 0% |
| misstassie | 4/10 | 4148 days | 0% |
| Inge van Noorf | 10/10 | 4176 days | 0% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 4465 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Witte | 9/10 | 4465 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 4478 days | 1% |
| Mike Majnik | 9/10 | 4478 days | 1% |
| Helen King | 9/10 | 4635 days | 1% |
| S M | 9/10 | 4878 days | 1% |
| Darren Abbott | 9/10 | 4902 days | 1% |
| Leo | 9/10 | 4913 days | 1% |
| Keith Helen | 10/10 | 5184 days | 1% |
| Lucy Wilde | 6/10 | 5187 days | 0% |
| Jochem Snyders | 8/10 | 5187 days | 1% |
| Colin Philpott | 8/10 | 5206 days | 1% |
| aliluvsprada | 10/10 | 5336 days | 1% |
| angillie | 3/10 | 5519 days | 0% |
| Astrid N | 8/10 | 5537 days | 1% |
| Mark Walker | 8/10 | 5538 days | 1% |
| Jim & Suzy Ducker | 7/10 | 5543 days | 1% |
| Alan Jeffery | 8/10 | 5546 days | 1% |
| LandJ | 8/10 | 5550 days | 1% |
| Agnes McMillan | 8/10 | 5562 days | 1% |
| Tim Pfahlert | 8/10 | 5566 days | 1% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 8/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
| Michael Duckert | 8/10 | 5572 days | 1% |
| Chris Chasemore | 9/10 | 5574 days | 1% |
| Luisa | 9/10 | 5916 days | 1% |
| S Millet | 8/10 | 5921 days | 1% |
| Susanne Santer | 8/10 | 6013 days | 1% |
| Ruth Kinder | 9/10 | 6066 days | 1% |
| Andrew Smith | 7/10 | 6255 days | 1% |
| Pat | 4/10 | 6295 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Momorangi Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.77% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.