Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Momorangi Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
80 Valid Reviews
The Momorangi Campsite experience has a total of 80 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
84.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite valid reviews is 84.00% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
25 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 25 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 25 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
44% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite face-to-face reviews is 81.60% and is based on 25 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
91.78%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin | 10/10 | 119 days | 100% |
| Clement | 8/10 | 119 days | 98% |
| Stefani Vizzi | 1/10 | 181 days | 40% |
| cirefice bernard | 7/10 | 211 days | 91% |
| Sylvie K | 10/10 | 242 days | 97% |
| jo | 10/10 | 395 days | 92% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 425 days | 90% |
| Hamish | 10/10 | 484 days | 87% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 484 days | 87% |
| Shaun | 10/10 | 484 days | 87% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 484 days | 87% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 546 days | 84% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 607 days | 80% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 912 days | 52% |
| Elke | 10/10 | 1156 days | 31% |
| Peter | 8/10 | 1246 days | 24% |
| Robbie D | 10/10 | 1672 days | 6% |
| Ellen | 5/10 | 1825 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 5/10 | 1886 days | 3% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 1886 days | 5% |
| Brenda | 3/10 | 1976 days | 2% |
| Lex | 10/10 | 2007 days | 4% |
| Hubber's | 10/10 | 2068 days | 4% |
| Cath | 6/10 | 2342 days | 3% |
| Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 2495 days | 3% |
| Tash & Laura | 7/10 | 2676 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 2707 days | 3% |
| Margie | 10/10 | 2738 days | 3% |
| Hazel | 10/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Helen Bond | 9/10 | 3072 days | 2% |
| battman | 10/10 | 3102 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 7/10 | 3121 days | 2% |
| Roger | 7/10 | 3333 days | 2% |
| Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 3372 days | 2% |
| Amanda Collins | 5/10 | 3528 days | 1% |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 3572 days | 1% |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 3624 days | 1% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 3681 days | 1% |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 3683 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3684 days | 1% |
| W Donovan | 9/10 | 3720 days | 1% |
| Javier Schneider | 10/10 | 3729 days | 1% |
| christine Bierre | 9/10 | 3742 days | 1% |
| Gilles Andrieu | 9/10 | 3753 days | 1% |
| Tomáš Bžatek | 8/10 | 4079 days | 0% |
| Sarrob Sarrob | 10/10 | 4108 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 8/10 | 4137 days | 0% |
| Claude Nobs | 9/10 | 4156 days | 0% |
| misstassie | 4/10 | 4167 days | 0% |
| Inge van Noorf | 10/10 | 4196 days | 0% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 4485 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Witte | 9/10 | 4485 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 4498 days | 1% |
| Mike Majnik | 9/10 | 4498 days | 1% |
| Helen King | 9/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
| S M | 9/10 | 4898 days | 1% |
| Darren Abbott | 9/10 | 4922 days | 1% |
| Leo | 9/10 | 4933 days | 1% |
| Keith Helen | 10/10 | 5204 days | 1% |
| Lucy Wilde | 6/10 | 5207 days | 0% |
| Jochem Snyders | 8/10 | 5207 days | 1% |
| Colin Philpott | 8/10 | 5226 days | 1% |
| aliluvsprada | 10/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
| angillie | 3/10 | 5539 days | 0% |
| Astrid N | 8/10 | 5557 days | 1% |
| Mark Walker | 8/10 | 5558 days | 1% |
| Jim & Suzy Ducker | 7/10 | 5563 days | 1% |
| Alan Jeffery | 8/10 | 5566 days | 1% |
| LandJ | 8/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
| Agnes McMillan | 8/10 | 5582 days | 1% |
| Tim Pfahlert | 8/10 | 5586 days | 1% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 8/10 | 5590 days | 1% |
| Michael Duckert | 8/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
| Chris Chasemore | 9/10 | 5594 days | 1% |
| Luisa | 9/10 | 5936 days | 1% |
| S Millet | 8/10 | 5941 days | 1% |
| Susanne Santer | 8/10 | 6033 days | 1% |
| Ruth Kinder | 9/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| Andrew Smith | 7/10 | 6275 days | 1% |
| Pat | 4/10 | 6315 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Momorangi Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.77% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.