G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Momorangi Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
80 Valid Reviews
The Momorangi Campsite experience has a total of 80 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
84.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite valid reviews is 84.00% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
25 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 25 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 25 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
44% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite face-to-face reviews is 81.60% and is based on 25 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
91.88%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin | 10/10 | 59 days | 100% |
| Clement | 8/10 | 59 days | 98% |
| Stefani Vizzi | 1/10 | 121 days | 40% |
| cirefice bernard | 7/10 | 151 days | 92% |
| Sylvie K | 10/10 | 182 days | 98% |
| jo | 10/10 | 335 days | 94% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 365 days | 93% |
| Hamish | 10/10 | 424 days | 90% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 424 days | 90% |
| Shaun | 10/10 | 424 days | 90% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 424 days | 90% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 486 days | 87% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 547 days | 83% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 852 days | 58% |
| Elke | 10/10 | 1096 days | 35% |
| Peter | 8/10 | 1186 days | 28% |
| Robbie D | 10/10 | 1612 days | 7% |
| Ellen | 5/10 | 1765 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 5/10 | 1826 days | 3% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 1826 days | 5% |
| Brenda | 3/10 | 1916 days | 2% |
| Lex | 10/10 | 1947 days | 4% |
| Hubber's | 10/10 | 2008 days | 4% |
| Cath | 6/10 | 2282 days | 3% |
| Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 2435 days | 3% |
| Tash & Laura | 7/10 | 2616 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 2647 days | 3% |
| Margie | 10/10 | 2678 days | 3% |
| Hazel | 10/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
| Helen Bond | 9/10 | 3012 days | 2% |
| battman | 10/10 | 3042 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 7/10 | 3061 days | 2% |
| Roger | 7/10 | 3273 days | 2% |
| Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 3312 days | 2% |
| Amanda Collins | 5/10 | 3468 days | 1% |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 3512 days | 1% |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 3564 days | 1% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 3621 days | 1% |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 3623 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3624 days | 1% |
| W Donovan | 9/10 | 3660 days | 1% |
| Javier Schneider | 10/10 | 3669 days | 1% |
| christine Bierre | 9/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| Gilles Andrieu | 9/10 | 3693 days | 1% |
| Tomáš Bžatek | 8/10 | 4019 days | 0% |
| Sarrob Sarrob | 10/10 | 4048 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 8/10 | 4077 days | 0% |
| Claude Nobs | 9/10 | 4096 days | 0% |
| misstassie | 4/10 | 4107 days | 0% |
| Inge van Noorf | 10/10 | 4136 days | 0% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 4425 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Witte | 9/10 | 4425 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 4438 days | 1% |
| Mike Majnik | 9/10 | 4438 days | 1% |
| Helen King | 9/10 | 4595 days | 1% |
| S M | 9/10 | 4838 days | 1% |
| Darren Abbott | 9/10 | 4862 days | 1% |
| Leo | 9/10 | 4873 days | 1% |
| Keith Helen | 10/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
| Lucy Wilde | 6/10 | 5147 days | 0% |
| Jochem Snyders | 8/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
| Colin Philpott | 8/10 | 5166 days | 1% |
| aliluvsprada | 10/10 | 5296 days | 1% |
| angillie | 3/10 | 5479 days | 0% |
| Astrid N | 8/10 | 5497 days | 1% |
| Mark Walker | 8/10 | 5498 days | 1% |
| Jim & Suzy Ducker | 7/10 | 5503 days | 0% |
| Alan Jeffery | 8/10 | 5506 days | 1% |
| LandJ | 8/10 | 5510 days | 1% |
| Agnes McMillan | 8/10 | 5522 days | 1% |
| Tim Pfahlert | 8/10 | 5526 days | 1% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 8/10 | 5530 days | 1% |
| Michael Duckert | 8/10 | 5532 days | 1% |
| Chris Chasemore | 9/10 | 5534 days | 1% |
| Luisa | 9/10 | 5876 days | 1% |
| S Millet | 8/10 | 5881 days | 1% |
| Susanne Santer | 8/10 | 5973 days | 1% |
| Ruth Kinder | 9/10 | 6026 days | 1% |
| Andrew Smith | 7/10 | 6215 days | 0% |
| Pat | 4/10 | 6255 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Momorangi Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.