Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Momorangi Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
80 Valid Reviews
The Momorangi Campsite experience has a total of 80 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
84.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite valid reviews is 84.00% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
25 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 25 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 25 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
44% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Momorangi Campsite face-to-face reviews is 81.60% and is based on 25 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
91.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin | 10/10 | 199 days | 100% |
| Clement | 8/10 | 199 days | 98% |
| Stefani Vizzi | 1/10 | 261 days | 40% |
| cirefice bernard | 7/10 | 291 days | 91% |
| Sylvie K | 10/10 | 322 days | 96% |
| jo | 10/10 | 475 days | 89% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 505 days | 87% |
| Hamish | 10/10 | 564 days | 84% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 564 days | 84% |
| Shaun | 10/10 | 564 days | 84% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 564 days | 84% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 626 days | 79% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 687 days | 75% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 992 days | 45% |
| Elke | 10/10 | 1236 days | 25% |
| Peter | 8/10 | 1326 days | 19% |
| Robbie D | 10/10 | 1752 days | 5% |
| Ellen | 5/10 | 1905 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 5/10 | 1966 days | 4% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 1966 days | 5% |
| Brenda | 3/10 | 2056 days | 2% |
| Lex | 10/10 | 2087 days | 4% |
| Hubber's | 10/10 | 2148 days | 4% |
| Cath | 6/10 | 2422 days | 3% |
| Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Tash & Laura | 7/10 | 2756 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 2787 days | 3% |
| Margie | 10/10 | 2818 days | 3% |
| Hazel | 10/10 | 2848 days | 3% |
| Helen Bond | 9/10 | 3152 days | 2% |
| battman | 10/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 7/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
| Roger | 7/10 | 3413 days | 2% |
| Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 3452 days | 2% |
| Amanda Collins | 5/10 | 3608 days | 1% |
| Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 3652 days | 1% |
| Cameron Page | 10/10 | 3704 days | 1% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 3761 days | 1% |
| York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3764 days | 1% |
| W Donovan | 9/10 | 3800 days | 1% |
| Javier Schneider | 10/10 | 3809 days | 1% |
| christine Bierre | 9/10 | 3822 days | 1% |
| Gilles Andrieu | 9/10 | 3833 days | 1% |
| Tomáš Bžatek | 8/10 | 4159 days | 0% |
| Sarrob Sarrob | 10/10 | 4188 days | 0% |
| Dave Ruijter | 8/10 | 4217 days | 0% |
| Claude Nobs | 9/10 | 4236 days | 0% |
| misstassie | 4/10 | 4247 days | 0% |
| Inge van Noorf | 10/10 | 4276 days | 0% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Witte | 9/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 4578 days | 1% |
| Mike Majnik | 9/10 | 4578 days | 1% |
| Helen King | 9/10 | 4735 days | 1% |
| S M | 9/10 | 4978 days | 1% |
| Darren Abbott | 9/10 | 5002 days | 1% |
| Leo | 9/10 | 5013 days | 1% |
| Keith Helen | 10/10 | 5284 days | 1% |
| Lucy Wilde | 6/10 | 5287 days | 1% |
| Jochem Snyders | 8/10 | 5287 days | 1% |
| Colin Philpott | 8/10 | 5306 days | 1% |
| aliluvsprada | 10/10 | 5436 days | 1% |
| angillie | 3/10 | 5619 days | 0% |
| Astrid N | 8/10 | 5637 days | 1% |
| Mark Walker | 8/10 | 5638 days | 1% |
| Jim & Suzy Ducker | 7/10 | 5643 days | 1% |
| Alan Jeffery | 8/10 | 5646 days | 1% |
| LandJ | 8/10 | 5650 days | 1% |
| Agnes McMillan | 8/10 | 5662 days | 1% |
| Tim Pfahlert | 8/10 | 5666 days | 1% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 8/10 | 5670 days | 1% |
| Michael Duckert | 8/10 | 5672 days | 1% |
| Chris Chasemore | 9/10 | 5674 days | 1% |
| Luisa | 9/10 | 6016 days | 1% |
| S Millet | 8/10 | 6021 days | 1% |
| Susanne Santer | 8/10 | 6113 days | 1% |
| Ruth Kinder | 9/10 | 6166 days | 1% |
| Andrew Smith | 7/10 | 6355 days | 1% |
| Pat | 4/10 | 6395 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Momorangi Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.79% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.