G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Aussie Bay Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
64 Valid Reviews
The Aussie Bay Campsite experience has a total of 64 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 64 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
11% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
78.28% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Aussie Bay Campsite valid reviews is 78.28% and is based on 64 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
21 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 64 valid reviews, the experience has 21 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 21 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
14% |
| 8/10 | 8 |
|
38% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
24% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
77.62% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Aussie Bay Campsite face-to-face reviews is 77.62% and is based on 21 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
85.47%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laurie | 9/10 | 95 days | 100% |
| Karl | 9/10 | 279 days | 96% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 307 days | 95% |
| Mk | 9/10 | 338 days | 94% |
| Pensioners on tour | 10/10 | 338 days | 95% |
| JD | 9/10 | 338 days | 94% |
| Adel | 9/10 | 369 days | 93% |
| Stephane | 7/10 | 460 days | 83% |
| Katie | 7/10 | 796 days | 60% |
| Benjamin | 9/10 | 826 days | 61% |
| Zuzana | 8/10 | 918 days | 52% |
| Lauren | 8/10 | 1010 days | 43% |
| Philippe Billuart | 5/10 | 1010 days | 33% |
| Milou | 9/10 | 1069 days | 38% |
| Campertramper | 9/10 | 1526 days | 10% |
| Criss | 9/10 | 1556 days | 9% |
| Hakan | 9/10 | 1768 days | 5% |
| Valg | 6/10 | 1768 days | 4% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1860 days | 5% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 2013 days | 5% |
| Jamie Morrison | 9/10 | 2044 days | 5% |
| Kysha | 10/10 | 2105 days | 4% |
| Antoine | 8/10 | 2105 days | 4% |
| Sean McLaren | 10/10 | 2134 days | 4% |
| Niven | 7/10 | 2134 days | 4% |
| Allen | 9/10 | 2318 days | 4% |
| ScoutnIndi | 9/10 | 2379 days | 4% |
| Andy Bond | 7/10 | 2524 days | 3% |
| Grizzly Girl | 5/10 | 2622 days | 3% |
| Rachel Mudge | 8/10 | 2856 days | 3% |
| Oceane Imber | 6/10 | 2890 days | 2% |
| Tom Meulders | 6/10 | 2908 days | 2% |
| Lukas and Katka | 8/10 | 2957 days | 3% |
| Aisling Burke | 5/10 | 3167 days | 2% |
| deborah cooper | 9/10 | 3200 days | 2% |
| Hollie Procter | 5/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
| Erin Stafferton | 7/10 | 3450 days | 2% |
| Tanja Laube | 9/10 | 3553 days | 2% |
| Helena Bond | 5/10 | 3565 days | 1% |
| Sona | 9/10 | 3930 days | 1% |
| bzh974 | 6/10 | 4021 days | 1% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 8/10 | 4051 days | 1% |
| Ryan Lieston | 8/10 | 4266 days | 0% |
| Manuela | 6/10 | 4266 days | 0% |
| Franz Birkefeld | 8/10 | 4276 days | 0% |
| Hirsch Svenja | 10/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Mahr Svenja | 9/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Jessie Sabine | 7/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
| Matthew Trezise | 7/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
| Debora Grusler | 7/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
| Laura Pleumeekers | 8/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
| Ray Smith | 9/10 | 4387 days | 1% |
| Lieven De Vlaminck | 9/10 | 4661 days | 1% |
| Tina | 8/10 | 4668 days | 1% |
| Tanja and Pascal | 10/10 | 4692 days | 1% |
| Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 9/10 | 4752 days | 1% |
| sidcupjon | 5/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
| Ralf Glaser | 8/10 | 5044 days | 1% |
| Ilse & Thys | 6/10 | 5376 days | 1% |
| Fred | 8/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
| Sanne & Senne | 8/10 | 5761 days | 1% |
| Bas van Schagen | 7/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| JennekeK | 7/10 | 6104 days | 1% |
| MichaelS1 | 5/10 | 6108 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Aussie Bay Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.73% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.