Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Robin Hood Bay Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Robin Hood Bay Campsite
Valid Reviews
50 Valid Reviews
The Robin Hood Bay Campsite experience has a total of 50 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
20% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
80.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Robin Hood Bay Campsite valid reviews is 80.60% and is based on 50 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
27 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 50 valid reviews, the experience has 27 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 27 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
37% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.70% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Robin Hood Bay Campsite face-to-face reviews is 83.70% and is based on 27 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
63.86%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Turp | 1/10 | 60 days | 72.58 | 100% | |
| Aisling | 8/10 | 639 days | 36.05 | 50% | |
| NZroadtrippers | 10/10 | 731 days | 26.0 | 36% | |
| Michelle D | 10/10 | 914 days | 10.19 | 14% | |
| Alyson Reid | 7/10 | 1014 days | 5.5 | 8% | |
| Catherine Hunter | 8/10 | 1025 days | 5.49 | 8% | |
| Lizzy Cobeldick | 7/10 | 1026 days | 5.24 | 7% | |
| Michael Talbot | 8/10 | 1101 days | 4.74 | 7% | |
| Niels Bellaar | 9/10 | 1381 days | 4.44 | 6% | |
| Jonas | 8/10 | 1444 days |  |
4.1 | 6% |
| Lisa | 8/10 | 1444 days | |
4.1 | 6% |
| Chas Bronson | 9/10 | 1444 days | |
4.32 | 6% |
| Joanne Butfield | 7/10 | 1603 days | 3.65 | 5% | |
| Chadd Holland | 10/10 | 1677 days | 3.86 | 5% | |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 6/10 | 1681 days | 3.2 | 4% | |
| Rodrigo | 9/10 | 1694 days | |
3.83 | 5% |
| Staffan Johansson | 7/10 | 1717 days | 3.44 | 5% | |
| Naelan Le Borgue | 8/10 | 2062 days | |
2.95 | 4% |
| Claude Nobs | 10/10 | 2119 days | 3.0 | 4% | |
| Raita | 7/10 | 2163 days | |
2.65 | 4% |
| Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 9/10 | 2314 days | 2.61 | 4% | |
| Doreen Gendel | 10/10 | 2416 days | |
2.41 | 3% |
| Erik Nestlez | 10/10 | 2420 days | |
2.41 | 3% |
| Romina De Hill | 8/10 | 2435 days | |
2.26 | 3% |
| Tom Hill | 9/10 | 2435 days | |
2.38 | 3% |
| Kathi | 7/10 | 2437 days | |
2.16 | 3% |
| Jessica Wagner | 9/10 | 2440 days | |
2.37 | 3% |
| Gordon Thomas | 8/10 | 2440 days | |
2.25 | 3% |
| Phillip | 10/10 | 2455 days | |
2.34 | 3% |
| Luca Maria Willensrock | 4/10 | 2459 days | |
1.84 | 3% |
| arnaud paquet | 5/10 | 2527 days | 1.78 | 2% | |
| Emma K | 8/10 | 2588 days | 1.97 | 3% | |
| Andrew Potratz | 5/10 | 2588 days | 1.68 | 2% | |
| Pei | 7/10 | 2740 days | 1.62 | 2% | |
| Patrick Stoeit | 7/10 | 2776 days | |
1.56 | 2% |
| Janina Hoffmann | 8/10 | 2797 days | |
1.59 | 2% |
| Florian | 8/10 | 2802 days | 1.58 | 2% | |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 2806 days | |
1.65 | 2% |
| Lea Bulle | 8/10 | 2806 days | |
1.57 | 2% |
| Valentina Fuchs | 10/10 | 2806 days | |
1.65 | 2% |
| Fabian | 9/10 | 2806 days | |
1.65 | 2% |
| Jonas Herrmann | 9/10 | 2806 days | |
1.65 | 2% |
| Pink | 8/10 | 2835 days | |
1.52 | 2% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 2861 days | 1.54 | 2% | |
| auré bis | 7/10 | 2892 days | 1.35 | 2% | |
| Lucie | 10/10 | 2897 days | |
1.47 | 2% |
| gareth williams | 10/10 | 2982 days | 1.31 | 2% | |
| Laura Smith | 8/10 | 3209 days | |
0.82 | 1% |
| Ilse & Thys | 8/10 | 3516 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Sarah Smith | 7/10 | 4014 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Robin Hood Bay Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
64%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.