G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
287 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 294 reviews. There are 287 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 287 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 102 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 92 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 52 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.04% and is based on 287 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 287 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.41%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tayla | 10/10 | 182 days | 100% |
| Haydyn Bevis | 7/10 | 213 days | 92% |
| Malcolm Luscombe | 10/10 | 241 days | 99% |
| Hugo Chacon | 10/10 | 241 days | 99% |
| Bonnie Creek | 4/10 | 272 days | 64% |
| Kari Flanagan | 10/10 | 272 days | 98% |
| Ann Albon | 10/10 | 303 days | 97% |
| Ann | 2/10 | 333 days | 43% |
| Hui Yu Chan | 10/10 | 424 days | 91% |
| PERERA Bruno | 10/10 | 455 days | 90% |
| Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 606 days | 79% |
| Fredrik | 9/10 | 637 days | 78% |
| Jen Mac | 10/10 | 850 days | 60% |
| Cherish | 10/10 | 881 days | 57% |
| Taylor | 10/10 | 912 days | 53% |
| Fabienne | 10/10 | 943 days | 50% |
| Shawn A | 10/10 | 972 days | 47% |
| Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 972 days | 46% |
| Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 1003 days | 44% |
| Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 1095 days | 36% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1095 days | 35% |
| Paulo | 7/10 | 1124 days | 31% |
| Molly M | 10/10 | 1216 days | 27% |
| L&P | 8/10 | 1247 days | 24% |
| Alley | 10/10 | 1247 days | 24% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 1278 days | 22% |
| Niff | 10/10 | 1309 days | 20% |
| Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 1337 days | 19% |
| Steffi V. | 10/10 | 1337 days | 19% |
| Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 1368 days | 17% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 1399 days | 16% |
| Mabel | 8/10 | 1429 days | 14% |
| Corrine | 10/10 | 1429 days | 14% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 1429 days | 14% |
| Eilis | 10/10 | 1460 days | 13% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 1460 days | 13% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 1460 days | 12% |
| Fiona | 9/10 | 1489 days | 11% |
| Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 1489 days | 12% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1520 days | 10% |
| Gotze | 9/10 | 1916 days | 5% |
| J Brown | 10/10 | 1916 days | 5% |
| Zara | 10/10 | 2039 days | 5% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2067 days | 4% |
| Teesh K | 10/10 | 2159 days | 4% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 2281 days | 4% |
| Robert Adler | 10/10 | 2404 days | 4% |
| Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 2433 days | 1% |
| Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 2556 days | 3% |
| Andrew | 10/10 | 2585 days | 3% |
| Guru | 9/10 | 2616 days | 3% |
| Carolina | 10/10 | 2616 days | 3% |
| Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
| Liz | 8/10 | 2739 days | 3% |
| Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2739 days | 3% |
| Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2739 days | 1% |
| kim thomas | 10/10 | 2770 days | 3% |
| TP&MM | 9/10 | 2770 days | 3% |
| Brigitta | 7/10 | 2798 days | 3% |
| Michael S | 9/10 | 2798 days | 3% |
| Phil | 7/10 | 2860 days | 3% |
| Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2860 days | 1% |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2890 days | 3% |
| Jolanda | 8/10 | 2921 days | 3% |
| Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2921 days | 3% |
| Cynthia | 10/10 | 2921 days | 3% |
| Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2983 days | 3% |
| Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 3104 days | 2% |
| Tati Moron | 10/10 | 3108 days | 2% |
| Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 3135 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 3135 days | 2% |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 3163 days | 2% |
| Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 3190 days | 2% |
| Katrina | 9/10 | 3193 days | 2% |
| Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 3207 days | 2% |
| Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
| Duncan | 9/10 | 3422 days | 2% |
| Grace White | 10/10 | 3455 days | 2% |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 3545 days | 1% |
| Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3548 days | 1% |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 3557 days | 1% |
| Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3617 days | 1% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 3650 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3796 days | 1% |
| Betti | 10/10 | 3816 days | 1% |
| Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3851 days | 0% |
| S Black | 7/10 | 3864 days | 1% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3876 days | 1% |
| Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3911 days | 1% |
| Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3925 days | 1% |
| Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3997 days | 1% |
| Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 4042 days | 1% |
| Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 4128 days | 0% |
| Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 4230 days | 0% |
| Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 4270 days | 0% |
| Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 4280 days | 0% |
| Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 4290 days | 0% |
| Die Mehles | 7/10 | 4291 days | 0% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
| Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4596 days | 1% |
| Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4597 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4647 days | 1% |
| Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
| Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
| K. H. | 10/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
| ozelmer | 6/10 | 4776 days | 1% |
| Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4930 days | 1% |
| Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4948 days | 1% |
| battum 80 | 3/10 | 4961 days | 0% |
| Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
| Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
| Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 5003 days | 1% |
| Lis Bon | 7/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| John | 9/10 | 5044 days | 1% |
| C Schaap | 9/10 | 5062 days | 1% |
| roos wubben | 9/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
| Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
| Ton Franke | 8/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
| Dagette | 9/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
| Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
| Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
| sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 5233 days | 1% |
| MeganG | 9/10 | 5264 days | 1% |
| HelenKate | 10/10 | 5264 days | 1% |
| Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 5290 days | 1% |
| Robin Sable | 9/10 | 5307 days | 1% |
| Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 5315 days | 1% |
| Carole Carter | 8/10 | 5318 days | 1% |
| Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 5320 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 5322 days | 1% |
| J Jmal | 10/10 | 5322 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 8/10 | 5323 days | 1% |
| nztintin | 10/10 | 5326 days | 1% |
| Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 5329 days | 1% |
| Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
| Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
| B Sluis | 9/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
| Howell Davies | 9/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
| Elaine | 10/10 | 5336 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 9/10 | 5336 days | 1% |
| Stam | 7/10 | 5337 days | 1% |
| Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 5337 days | 1% |
| Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 5339 days | 1% |
| Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 5340 days | 1% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 5340 days | 1% |
| Houter | 9/10 | 5340 days | 1% |
| David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 5341 days | 1% |
| Janse | 6/10 | 5342 days | 1% |
| Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 5349 days | 1% |
| Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 5349 days | 1% |
| Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 5350 days | 1% |
| Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 5351 days | 1% |
| Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 5351 days | 1% |
| Gerhard | 9/10 | 5353 days | 1% |
| Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 5354 days | 1% |
| Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 5354 days | 1% |
| Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 5366 days | 1% |
| Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 5366 days | 1% |
| Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 5368 days | 1% |
| deJong | 10/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
| Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5643 days | 1% |
| Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5643 days | 1% |
| Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5664 days | 1% |
| Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5669 days | 1% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5674 days | 1% |
| Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5674 days | 1% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5674 days | 1% |
| Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5674 days | 1% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 5675 days | 1% |
| Gema | 8/10 | 5675 days | 1% |
| Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5676 days | 1% |
| Berger | 10/10 | 5676 days | 1% |
| Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5676 days | 1% |
| Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5677 days | 1% |
| Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5678 days | 1% |
| Ven | 9/10 | 5678 days | 1% |
| Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5678 days | 1% |
| John Duffy | 10/10 | 5678 days | 1% |
| Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5679 days | 1% |
| Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5682 days | 1% |
| Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5682 days | 1% |
| Max | 10/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
| Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
| Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
| Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
| Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
| Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5686 days | 1% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5686 days | 1% |
| Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5686 days | 1% |
| Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5686 days | 1% |
| Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5686 days | 1% |
| E C Frans | 6/10 | 5690 days | 1% |
| Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5690 days | 1% |
| Raith | 9/10 | 5691 days | 1% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5699 days | 1% |
| Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5701 days | 1% |
| Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5703 days | 1% |
| Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5704 days | 1% |
| Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5705 days | 1% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5708 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5711 days | 1% |
| Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5712 days | 0% |
| Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5713 days | 1% |
| Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5714 days | 1% |
| Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5716 days | 1% |
| Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5717 days | 1% |
| Jochen | 9/10 | 5718 days | 1% |
| hendrik king | 7/10 | 5751 days | 1% |
| dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5782 days | 1% |
| Montys | 10/10 | 5843 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5843 days | 1% |
| Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5969 days | 1% |
| Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5973 days | 1% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5974 days | 1% |
| Lomas | 10/10 | 5986 days | 1% |
| Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5988 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 6026 days | 1% |
| Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 6032 days | 1% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 6032 days | 1% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 6034 days | 1% |
| Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 6039 days | 1% |
| Russ Turner | 10/10 | 6043 days | 1% |
| Polil | 8/10 | 6043 days | 1% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 6043 days | 1% |
| markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 6044 days | 1% |
| Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 6045 days | 1% |
| Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 6045 days | 1% |
| Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 6045 days | 1% |
| P.C Kool | 9/10 | 6052 days | 1% |
| Rod C | 7/10 | 6055 days | 1% |
| Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 6058 days | 0% |
| Giaque | 5/10 | 6063 days | 1% |
| Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 6066 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 7/10 | 6066 days | 1% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 6070 days | 1% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 6077 days | 1% |
| Lewis | 9/10 | 6078 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 6079 days | 1% |
| Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 6081 days | 1% |
| Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 6082 days | 1% |
| Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 6082 days | 1% |
| John Winter | 8/10 | 6082 days | 1% |
| Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 6084 days | 1% |
| grobster | 6/10 | 6085 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 6085 days | 1% |
| Jessica | 8/10 | 6090 days | 1% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 6091 days | 1% |
| Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 6098 days | 1% |
| E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 6099 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 6102 days | 1% |
| Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 6102 days | 1% |
| Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| marcusba | 9/10 | 6128 days | 1% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6135 days | 1% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6140 days | 1% |
| carsteng | 9/10 | 6141 days | 1% |
| Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 6155 days | 1% |
| Alan Riley | 8/10 | 6159 days | 1% |
| Ann Riley | 10/10 | 6159 days | 1% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 6159 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 8/10 | 6159 days | 1% |
| Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 6159 days | 1% |
| X Neils | 9/10 | 6169 days | 1% |
| andyge | 9/10 | 6177 days | 1% |
| Cheryl | 9/10 | 6177 days | 1% |
| bondd | 10/10 | 6255 days | 1% |
| harryb | 10/10 | 6255 days | 1% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6272 days | 1% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 6301 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 6360 days | 1% |
| PamB | 9/10 | 6378 days | 1% |
| marianneb | 8/10 | 6391 days | 1% |
| Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 6391 days | 1% |
| SonjaG | 9/10 | 6408 days | 1% |
| JaninaF | 10/10 | 6409 days | 1% |
| Loethke | 9/10 | 6409 days | 1% |
| Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 6411 days | 1% |
| GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 6424 days | 1% |
| JetteG | 8/10 | 6425 days | 1% |
| VolkerS | 9/10 | 6425 days | 1% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 6426 days | 1% |
| Richard | 10/10 | 6432 days | 1% |
| Terry | 9/10 | 6438 days | 1% |
| john west | 10/10 | 6459 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.55% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 68 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 157 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 154 | -2.50% |
| 155 | -2.52% |
| 156 | -2.54% |
| 157 | -2.55% |
| 158 | -2.57% |
| 159 | -2.58% |
| 160 | -2.60% |
| … | … |
1.31% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.