Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
287 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 294 reviews. There are 287 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 287 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 102 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 92 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 52 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.04% and is based on 287 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 287 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.54%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tayla | 10/10 | 141 days | 100% |
| Haydyn Bevis | 7/10 | 172 days | 93% |
| Malcolm Luscombe | 10/10 | 200 days | 99% |
| Hugo Chacon | 10/10 | 200 days | 99% |
| Bonnie Creek | 4/10 | 231 days | 64% |
| Kari Flanagan | 10/10 | 231 days | 98% |
| Ann Albon | 10/10 | 262 days | 97% |
| Ann | 2/10 | 292 days | 44% |
| Hui Yu Chan | 10/10 | 384 days | 93% |
| PERERA Bruno | 10/10 | 415 days | 91% |
| Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 565 days | 81% |
| Fredrik | 9/10 | 596 days | 80% |
| Jen Mac | 10/10 | 810 days | 63% |
| Cherish | 10/10 | 841 days | 60% |
| Taylor | 10/10 | 871 days | 57% |
| Fabienne | 10/10 | 902 days | 54% |
| Shawn A | 10/10 | 931 days | 51% |
| Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 931 days | 50% |
| Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 962 days | 48% |
| Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 1054 days | 39% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1054 days | 39% |
| Paulo | 7/10 | 1084 days | 34% |
| Molly M | 10/10 | 1176 days | 29% |
| L&P | 8/10 | 1207 days | 27% |
| Alley | 10/10 | 1207 days | 27% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 1237 days | 25% |
| Niff | 10/10 | 1268 days | 23% |
| Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 1296 days | 21% |
| Steffi V. | 10/10 | 1296 days | 21% |
| Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 1327 days | 19% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 1358 days | 18% |
| Mabel | 8/10 | 1388 days | 16% |
| Corrine | 10/10 | 1388 days | 16% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 1388 days | 16% |
| Eilis | 10/10 | 1419 days | 15% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 1419 days | 15% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 1419 days | 14% |
| Fiona | 9/10 | 1449 days | 13% |
| Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 1449 days | 13% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1480 days | 12% |
| Gotze | 9/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
| J Brown | 10/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
| Zara | 10/10 | 1998 days | 5% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2026 days | 4% |
| Teesh K | 10/10 | 2118 days | 4% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 2241 days | 4% |
| Robert Adler | 10/10 | 2363 days | 4% |
| Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 2392 days | 2% |
| Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 2515 days | 4% |
| Andrew | 10/10 | 2545 days | 4% |
| Guru | 9/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
| Carolina | 10/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
| Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2668 days | 3% |
| Liz | 8/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2698 days | 1% |
| kim thomas | 10/10 | 2729 days | 3% |
| TP&MM | 9/10 | 2729 days | 3% |
| Brigitta | 7/10 | 2757 days | 3% |
| Michael S | 9/10 | 2757 days | 3% |
| Phil | 7/10 | 2819 days | 3% |
| Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2819 days | 1% |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2849 days | 3% |
| Jolanda | 8/10 | 2880 days | 3% |
| Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2880 days | 3% |
| Cynthia | 10/10 | 2880 days | 3% |
| Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2943 days | 3% |
| Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 3063 days | 3% |
| Tati Moron | 10/10 | 3067 days | 3% |
| Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 3094 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 3094 days | 2% |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 3122 days | 2% |
| Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 3149 days | 2% |
| Katrina | 9/10 | 3152 days | 2% |
| Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 3166 days | 2% |
| Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 3274 days | 2% |
| Duncan | 9/10 | 3382 days | 2% |
| Grace White | 10/10 | 3415 days | 2% |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 3504 days | 2% |
| Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3507 days | 2% |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 3516 days | 2% |
| Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3576 days | 1% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 3609 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3756 days | 1% |
| Betti | 10/10 | 3776 days | 1% |
| Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3810 days | 1% |
| S Black | 7/10 | 3823 days | 1% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3835 days | 1% |
| Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3870 days | 1% |
| Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3884 days | 1% |
| Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3956 days | 1% |
| Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 4002 days | 1% |
| Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 4088 days | 0% |
| Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 4189 days | 0% |
| Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 4229 days | 0% |
| Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 4239 days | 0% |
| Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 4249 days | 0% |
| Die Mehles | 7/10 | 4250 days | 0% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4555 days | 1% |
| Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4556 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4604 days | 1% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4606 days | 1% |
| Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4614 days | 1% |
| Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4621 days | 1% |
| GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
| K. H. | 10/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
| ozelmer | 6/10 | 4736 days | 1% |
| Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4889 days | 1% |
| Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4907 days | 1% |
| battum 80 | 3/10 | 4920 days | 0% |
| Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4948 days | 1% |
| Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4948 days | 1% |
| Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4962 days | 1% |
| Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
| John | 9/10 | 5003 days | 1% |
| C Schaap | 9/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
| roos wubben | 9/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
| Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
| Ton Franke | 8/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
| Dagette | 9/10 | 5071 days | 1% |
| Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 5101 days | 1% |
| Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 5101 days | 1% |
| sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 5193 days | 1% |
| MeganG | 9/10 | 5224 days | 1% |
| HelenKate | 10/10 | 5224 days | 1% |
| Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 5250 days | 1% |
| Robin Sable | 9/10 | 5266 days | 1% |
| Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 5274 days | 1% |
| Carole Carter | 8/10 | 5277 days | 1% |
| Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 5279 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 5281 days | 1% |
| J Jmal | 10/10 | 5281 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 8/10 | 5282 days | 1% |
| nztintin | 10/10 | 5285 days | 1% |
| Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 5288 days | 1% |
| Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
| Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
| B Sluis | 9/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
| Howell Davies | 9/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
| Elaine | 10/10 | 5295 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 9/10 | 5295 days | 1% |
| Stam | 7/10 | 5296 days | 1% |
| Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 5296 days | 1% |
| Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 5298 days | 1% |
| Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 5299 days | 1% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 5299 days | 1% |
| Houter | 9/10 | 5299 days | 1% |
| David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 5300 days | 1% |
| Janse | 6/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
| Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 5308 days | 1% |
| Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 5308 days | 1% |
| Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 5309 days | 1% |
| Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 5310 days | 1% |
| Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 5310 days | 1% |
| Gerhard | 9/10 | 5312 days | 1% |
| Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 5313 days | 1% |
| Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 5313 days | 1% |
| Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 5327 days | 1% |
| deJong | 10/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5603 days | 1% |
| Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5603 days | 1% |
| Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5623 days | 1% |
| Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5628 days | 1% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5633 days | 1% |
| Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5633 days | 1% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5633 days | 1% |
| Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5633 days | 1% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 5634 days | 1% |
| Gema | 8/10 | 5634 days | 1% |
| Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5635 days | 1% |
| Berger | 10/10 | 5635 days | 1% |
| Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5635 days | 1% |
| Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
| Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5637 days | 1% |
| Ven | 9/10 | 5637 days | 1% |
| Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5637 days | 1% |
| John Duffy | 10/10 | 5637 days | 1% |
| Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5638 days | 1% |
| Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5641 days | 1% |
| Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5641 days | 1% |
| Max | 10/10 | 5642 days | 1% |
| Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5642 days | 1% |
| Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5642 days | 1% |
| Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5642 days | 1% |
| Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5642 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5642 days | 1% |
| Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5645 days | 1% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5645 days | 1% |
| Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5645 days | 1% |
| Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5645 days | 1% |
| Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5645 days | 1% |
| E C Frans | 6/10 | 5649 days | 1% |
| Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5649 days | 1% |
| Raith | 9/10 | 5650 days | 1% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5658 days | 1% |
| Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5660 days | 1% |
| Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5662 days | 1% |
| Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5663 days | 1% |
| Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5664 days | 1% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5667 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5670 days | 1% |
| Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5671 days | 0% |
| Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5672 days | 1% |
| Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5673 days | 1% |
| Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5675 days | 1% |
| Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5676 days | 1% |
| Jochen | 9/10 | 5677 days | 1% |
| hendrik king | 7/10 | 5710 days | 1% |
| dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5741 days | 1% |
| Montys | 10/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
| Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5929 days | 1% |
| Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5933 days | 1% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5934 days | 1% |
| Lomas | 10/10 | 5946 days | 1% |
| Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5948 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 5985 days | 1% |
| Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5991 days | 1% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 5991 days | 1% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5993 days | 1% |
| Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5998 days | 1% |
| Russ Turner | 10/10 | 6002 days | 1% |
| Polil | 8/10 | 6002 days | 1% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 6002 days | 1% |
| markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 6003 days | 1% |
| Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 6004 days | 1% |
| Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 6004 days | 1% |
| Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 6004 days | 1% |
| P.C Kool | 9/10 | 6011 days | 1% |
| Rod C | 7/10 | 6014 days | 1% |
| Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 6017 days | 0% |
| Giaque | 5/10 | 6022 days | 1% |
| Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 7/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 6029 days | 1% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 6036 days | 1% |
| Lewis | 9/10 | 6037 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 6038 days | 1% |
| Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 6040 days | 1% |
| Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 6041 days | 1% |
| Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 6041 days | 1% |
| John Winter | 8/10 | 6041 days | 1% |
| Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 6043 days | 1% |
| grobster | 6/10 | 6044 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 6044 days | 1% |
| Jessica | 8/10 | 6049 days | 1% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 6050 days | 1% |
| Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 6057 days | 1% |
| E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 6058 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 6061 days | 1% |
| Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 6061 days | 1% |
| Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 6075 days | 1% |
| marcusba | 9/10 | 6087 days | 1% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6094 days | 1% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6099 days | 1% |
| carsteng | 9/10 | 6100 days | 1% |
| Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 6114 days | 1% |
| Alan Riley | 8/10 | 6118 days | 1% |
| Ann Riley | 10/10 | 6118 days | 1% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 6118 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 8/10 | 6118 days | 1% |
| Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 6118 days | 1% |
| X Neils | 9/10 | 6128 days | 1% |
| andyge | 9/10 | 6136 days | 1% |
| Cheryl | 9/10 | 6136 days | 1% |
| bondd | 10/10 | 6215 days | 1% |
| harryb | 10/10 | 6215 days | 1% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6232 days | 1% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 6261 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 6320 days | 1% |
| PamB | 9/10 | 6338 days | 1% |
| marianneb | 8/10 | 6350 days | 1% |
| Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 6350 days | 1% |
| SonjaG | 9/10 | 6367 days | 1% |
| JaninaF | 10/10 | 6368 days | 1% |
| Loethke | 9/10 | 6368 days | 1% |
| Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 6370 days | 1% |
| GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 6383 days | 1% |
| JetteG | 8/10 | 6384 days | 1% |
| VolkerS | 9/10 | 6384 days | 1% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 6385 days | 1% |
| Richard | 10/10 | 6391 days | 1% |
| Terry | 9/10 | 6397 days | 1% |
| john west | 10/10 | 6418 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.38% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 109 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 116 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 113 | -1.34% |
| 114 | -1.36% |
| 115 | -1.37% |
| 116 | -1.38% |
| 117 | -1.39% |
| 118 | -1.40% |
| 119 | -1.42% |
| … | … |
1.12% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.