Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
277 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 283 reviews. There are 277 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 277 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
34% |
9/10 | 92 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 52 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.18% and is based on 277 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 277 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.95%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 61 days | 99% |
Fredrik | 9/10 | 92 days | 100% |
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 306 days | 96% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 337 days | 95% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 367 days | 94% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 398 days | 92% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 427 days | 91% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 427 days | 89% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 458 days | 89% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 550 days | 84% |
Chris | 8/10 | 550 days | 82% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 580 days | 76% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 672 days | 75% |
L&P | 8/10 | 703 days | 71% |
Alley | 10/10 | 703 days | 73% |
Josh | 9/10 | 733 days | 70% |
Niff | 10/10 | 764 days | 68% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 792 days | 65% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 792 days | 65% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 823 days | 62% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 854 days | 59% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 884 days | 55% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 884 days | 56% |
Evan | 10/10 | 884 days | 56% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 915 days | 53% |
Emily | 10/10 | 915 days | 53% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 915 days | 52% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 945 days | 49% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 945 days | 50% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 976 days | 47% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1372 days | 17% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1372 days | 17% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1494 days | 11% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1522 days | 10% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1614 days | 7% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1737 days | 5% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1859 days | 5% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1888 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 2011 days | 4% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 2041 days | 4% |
Guru | 9/10 | 2072 days | 4% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 2072 days | 4% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2164 days | 4% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2194 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2194 days | 3% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2194 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2225 days | 4% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2225 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2253 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2253 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2315 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2315 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2345 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2376 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2376 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2376 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2439 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2559 days | 3% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2563 days | 3% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2590 days | 3% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2590 days | 3% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2618 days | 3% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2645 days | 3% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2649 days | 3% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2662 days | 3% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2771 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2878 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2911 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 3000 days | 2% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3003 days | 2% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 3012 days | 2% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3072 days | 2% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3106 days | 2% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3252 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3272 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3306 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3320 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3366 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3380 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3452 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3498 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3584 days | 1% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3686 days | 1% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3725 days | 1% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3735 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3745 days | 1% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3746 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3837 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4051 days | 0% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4052 days | 0% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4100 days | 0% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4102 days | 0% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4110 days | 0% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4117 days | 0% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4141 days | 0% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4141 days | 0% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4232 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4385 days | 1% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4416 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4444 days | 1% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4444 days | 1% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4458 days | 1% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4475 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 4499 days | 1% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4517 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4567 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4597 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4597 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4689 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4720 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4720 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4762 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4773 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4775 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4777 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4777 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4781 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4784 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4790 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4790 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4790 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4790 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4791 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4791 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4792 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4792 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4795 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4795 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4795 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4796 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4797 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4804 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4804 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4805 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4806 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4806 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4808 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4809 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4809 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4821 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4821 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4823 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4876 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5099 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5099 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5124 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5130 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 5130 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5138 days | 0% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5154 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5156 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5159 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5160 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5163 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5166 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5167 days | 0% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5168 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5169 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5171 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5172 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5173 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5206 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5237 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5298 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5298 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5429 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5430 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5442 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5444 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5489 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5494 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5498 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5498 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5498 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5499 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5500 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5500 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5500 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5507 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5510 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5513 days | 0% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5518 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5521 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5521 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5525 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5532 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5533 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5534 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5536 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5537 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5537 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5537 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5539 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5540 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5540 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5545 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5546 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5553 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5557 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5557 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5571 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5583 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5590 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5595 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5596 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5624 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5632 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5632 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5711 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5711 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5728 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5757 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5816 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5834 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5846 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5846 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5864 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5864 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5866 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5879 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5880 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5880 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5881 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5887 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5893 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5914 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 61 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 57 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
54 | -1.00% |
55 | -1.02% |
56 | -1.04% |
57 | -1.05% |
58 | -1.07% |
59 | -1.09% |
60 | -1.11% |
… | … |
0.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.