G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
287 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 294 reviews. There are 287 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 287 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 102 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 92 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 52 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.04% and is based on 287 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 287 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.35%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tayla | 10/10 | 202 days | 100% |
| Haydyn Bevis | 7/10 | 233 days | 92% |
| Malcolm Luscombe | 10/10 | 261 days | 98% |
| Hugo Chacon | 10/10 | 261 days | 98% |
| Bonnie Creek | 4/10 | 292 days | 64% |
| Kari Flanagan | 10/10 | 292 days | 97% |
| Ann Albon | 10/10 | 323 days | 96% |
| Ann | 2/10 | 353 days | 43% |
| Hui Yu Chan | 10/10 | 445 days | 91% |
| PERERA Bruno | 10/10 | 476 days | 89% |
| Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 626 days | 78% |
| Fredrik | 9/10 | 657 days | 76% |
| Jen Mac | 10/10 | 871 days | 58% |
| Cherish | 10/10 | 902 days | 55% |
| Taylor | 10/10 | 932 days | 52% |
| Fabienne | 10/10 | 963 days | 48% |
| Shawn A | 10/10 | 992 days | 46% |
| Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 992 days | 45% |
| Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 1023 days | 43% |
| Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 1115 days | 34% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1115 days | 34% |
| Paulo | 7/10 | 1145 days | 30% |
| Molly M | 10/10 | 1237 days | 25% |
| L&P | 8/10 | 1268 days | 23% |
| Alley | 10/10 | 1268 days | 23% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 1298 days | 21% |
| Niff | 10/10 | 1329 days | 19% |
| Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 1357 days | 18% |
| Steffi V. | 10/10 | 1357 days | 18% |
| Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 1388 days | 16% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 1419 days | 15% |
| Mabel | 8/10 | 1449 days | 13% |
| Corrine | 10/10 | 1449 days | 13% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 1449 days | 13% |
| Eilis | 10/10 | 1480 days | 12% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 1480 days | 12% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 1480 days | 12% |
| Fiona | 9/10 | 1510 days | 11% |
| Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 1510 days | 11% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1541 days | 10% |
| Gotze | 9/10 | 1937 days | 5% |
| J Brown | 10/10 | 1937 days | 5% |
| Zara | 10/10 | 2059 days | 5% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2087 days | 4% |
| Teesh K | 10/10 | 2179 days | 4% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 2302 days | 4% |
| Robert Adler | 10/10 | 2424 days | 4% |
| Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 2453 days | 1% |
| Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
| Andrew | 10/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Guru | 9/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Carolina | 10/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2729 days | 3% |
| Liz | 8/10 | 2759 days | 3% |
| Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2759 days | 3% |
| Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2759 days | 1% |
| kim thomas | 10/10 | 2790 days | 3% |
| TP&MM | 9/10 | 2790 days | 3% |
| Brigitta | 7/10 | 2818 days | 3% |
| Michael S | 9/10 | 2818 days | 3% |
| Phil | 7/10 | 2880 days | 3% |
| Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2880 days | 1% |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2910 days | 3% |
| Jolanda | 8/10 | 2941 days | 3% |
| Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2941 days | 3% |
| Cynthia | 10/10 | 2941 days | 3% |
| Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 3004 days | 3% |
| Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 3124 days | 2% |
| Tati Moron | 10/10 | 3128 days | 2% |
| Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 3155 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 3155 days | 2% |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 3183 days | 2% |
| Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 3210 days | 2% |
| Katrina | 9/10 | 3213 days | 2% |
| Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 3227 days | 2% |
| Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 3335 days | 2% |
| Duncan | 9/10 | 3443 days | 2% |
| Grace White | 10/10 | 3476 days | 2% |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 3565 days | 1% |
| Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3568 days | 1% |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 3577 days | 1% |
| Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3637 days | 1% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3817 days | 1% |
| Betti | 10/10 | 3837 days | 1% |
| Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3871 days | 0% |
| S Black | 7/10 | 3884 days | 1% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3896 days | 1% |
| Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3931 days | 1% |
| Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3945 days | 1% |
| Paul Frost | 9/10 | 4017 days | 1% |
| Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 4063 days | 1% |
| Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 4149 days | 0% |
| Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 4250 days | 0% |
| Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 4290 days | 0% |
| Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 4310 days | 0% |
| Die Mehles | 7/10 | 4311 days | 0% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4616 days | 1% |
| Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4617 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
| Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
| Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4682 days | 1% |
| GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4706 days | 1% |
| K. H. | 10/10 | 4706 days | 1% |
| ozelmer | 6/10 | 4797 days | 1% |
| Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4950 days | 1% |
| Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4968 days | 1% |
| battum 80 | 3/10 | 4981 days | 0% |
| Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 5009 days | 1% |
| Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 5009 days | 1% |
| Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 5023 days | 1% |
| Lis Bon | 7/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
| John | 9/10 | 5064 days | 1% |
| C Schaap | 9/10 | 5082 days | 1% |
| roos wubben | 9/10 | 5087 days | 1% |
| Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 5087 days | 1% |
| Ton Franke | 8/10 | 5087 days | 1% |
| Dagette | 9/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
| Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 5162 days | 1% |
| Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 5162 days | 1% |
| sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 5254 days | 1% |
| MeganG | 9/10 | 5285 days | 1% |
| HelenKate | 10/10 | 5285 days | 1% |
| Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 5311 days | 1% |
| Robin Sable | 9/10 | 5327 days | 1% |
| Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
| Carole Carter | 8/10 | 5338 days | 1% |
| Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 5340 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 5342 days | 1% |
| J Jmal | 10/10 | 5342 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 8/10 | 5343 days | 1% |
| nztintin | 10/10 | 5346 days | 1% |
| Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 5349 days | 1% |
| Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 5355 days | 1% |
| Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 5355 days | 1% |
| B Sluis | 9/10 | 5355 days | 1% |
| Howell Davies | 9/10 | 5355 days | 1% |
| Elaine | 10/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 9/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
| Stam | 7/10 | 5357 days | 1% |
| Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 5357 days | 1% |
| Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 5359 days | 1% |
| Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 5360 days | 1% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 5360 days | 1% |
| Houter | 9/10 | 5360 days | 1% |
| David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 5361 days | 1% |
| Janse | 6/10 | 5362 days | 1% |
| Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 5369 days | 1% |
| Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 5369 days | 1% |
| Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 5370 days | 1% |
| Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 5371 days | 1% |
| Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 5371 days | 1% |
| Gerhard | 9/10 | 5373 days | 1% |
| Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 5374 days | 1% |
| Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 5374 days | 1% |
| Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
| deJong | 10/10 | 5441 days | 1% |
| Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5664 days | 1% |
| Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5664 days | 1% |
| Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5684 days | 1% |
| Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5689 days | 1% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
| Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
| Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
| Gema | 8/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
| Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5696 days | 1% |
| Berger | 10/10 | 5696 days | 1% |
| Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5696 days | 1% |
| Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5697 days | 1% |
| Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5698 days | 1% |
| Ven | 9/10 | 5698 days | 1% |
| Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5698 days | 1% |
| John Duffy | 10/10 | 5698 days | 1% |
| Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5699 days | 1% |
| Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5702 days | 1% |
| Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5702 days | 1% |
| Max | 10/10 | 5703 days | 1% |
| Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5703 days | 1% |
| Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5703 days | 1% |
| Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5703 days | 1% |
| Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5703 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5703 days | 1% |
| Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5706 days | 1% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5706 days | 1% |
| Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5706 days | 1% |
| Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5706 days | 1% |
| Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5706 days | 1% |
| E C Frans | 6/10 | 5710 days | 1% |
| Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5710 days | 1% |
| Raith | 9/10 | 5711 days | 1% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5719 days | 1% |
| Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5721 days | 1% |
| Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5723 days | 1% |
| Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5724 days | 1% |
| Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5725 days | 1% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5728 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5731 days | 1% |
| Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5732 days | 0% |
| Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5733 days | 1% |
| Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5734 days | 1% |
| Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5736 days | 1% |
| Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5737 days | 1% |
| Jochen | 9/10 | 5738 days | 1% |
| hendrik king | 7/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
| Montys | 10/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5990 days | 1% |
| Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5994 days | 1% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5995 days | 1% |
| Lomas | 10/10 | 6007 days | 1% |
| Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 6009 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 6046 days | 1% |
| Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 6052 days | 1% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 6052 days | 1% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 6054 days | 1% |
| Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 6059 days | 1% |
| Russ Turner | 10/10 | 6063 days | 1% |
| Polil | 8/10 | 6063 days | 1% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 6063 days | 1% |
| markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 6064 days | 1% |
| Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 6065 days | 1% |
| Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 6065 days | 1% |
| Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 6065 days | 1% |
| P.C Kool | 9/10 | 6072 days | 1% |
| Rod C | 7/10 | 6075 days | 1% |
| Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 6078 days | 0% |
| Giaque | 5/10 | 6083 days | 1% |
| Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 7/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 6090 days | 1% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 6097 days | 1% |
| Lewis | 9/10 | 6098 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 6099 days | 1% |
| Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 6101 days | 1% |
| Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 6102 days | 1% |
| Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 6102 days | 1% |
| John Winter | 8/10 | 6102 days | 1% |
| Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 6104 days | 1% |
| grobster | 6/10 | 6105 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 6105 days | 1% |
| Jessica | 8/10 | 6110 days | 1% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 6111 days | 1% |
| Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 6118 days | 1% |
| E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 6119 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 6122 days | 1% |
| Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 6122 days | 1% |
| Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 6136 days | 1% |
| marcusba | 9/10 | 6148 days | 1% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6155 days | 1% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6160 days | 1% |
| carsteng | 9/10 | 6161 days | 1% |
| Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 6175 days | 1% |
| Alan Riley | 8/10 | 6179 days | 1% |
| Ann Riley | 10/10 | 6179 days | 1% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 6179 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 8/10 | 6179 days | 1% |
| Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 6179 days | 1% |
| X Neils | 9/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| andyge | 9/10 | 6197 days | 1% |
| Cheryl | 9/10 | 6197 days | 1% |
| bondd | 10/10 | 6276 days | 1% |
| harryb | 10/10 | 6276 days | 1% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6293 days | 1% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 6322 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 6381 days | 1% |
| PamB | 9/10 | 6399 days | 1% |
| marianneb | 8/10 | 6411 days | 1% |
| Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 6411 days | 1% |
| SonjaG | 9/10 | 6428 days | 1% |
| JaninaF | 10/10 | 6429 days | 1% |
| Loethke | 9/10 | 6429 days | 1% |
| Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 6431 days | 1% |
| GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 6444 days | 1% |
| JetteG | 8/10 | 6445 days | 1% |
| VolkerS | 9/10 | 6445 days | 1% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 6446 days | 1% |
| Richard | 10/10 | 6452 days | 1% |
| Terry | 9/10 | 6458 days | 1% |
| john west | 10/10 | 6479 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.24% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 177 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 174 | -3.18% |
| 175 | -3.20% |
| 176 | -3.22% |
| 177 | -3.24% |
| 178 | -3.26% |
| 179 | -3.27% |
| 180 | -3.29% |
| … | … |
1.44% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.