Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
277 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 283 reviews. There are 277 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 277 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
34% |
9/10 | 92 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 52 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.18% and is based on 277 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 277 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.94%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 64 days | 99% |
Fredrik | 9/10 | 95 days | 100% |
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 309 days | 96% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 340 days | 95% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 370 days | 94% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 401 days | 92% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 430 days | 91% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 430 days | 89% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 461 days | 89% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 553 days | 84% |
Chris | 8/10 | 553 days | 82% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 583 days | 76% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 675 days | 75% |
L&P | 8/10 | 706 days | 71% |
Alley | 10/10 | 706 days | 73% |
Josh | 9/10 | 736 days | 69% |
Niff | 10/10 | 767 days | 67% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 795 days | 65% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 795 days | 65% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 826 days | 62% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 857 days | 59% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 887 days | 55% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 887 days | 56% |
Evan | 10/10 | 887 days | 56% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 918 days | 53% |
Emily | 10/10 | 918 days | 53% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 918 days | 52% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 948 days | 49% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 948 days | 49% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 979 days | 46% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1375 days | 16% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1375 days | 17% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1497 days | 11% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1525 days | 10% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1617 days | 7% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1740 days | 5% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1862 days | 5% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1891 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 2014 days | 4% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 2044 days | 4% |
Guru | 9/10 | 2075 days | 4% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 2075 days | 4% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2167 days | 4% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2197 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2197 days | 3% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2197 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2228 days | 4% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2228 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2256 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2256 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2318 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2318 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2348 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2379 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2379 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2379 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2442 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2562 days | 3% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2566 days | 3% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2593 days | 3% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2593 days | 3% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2621 days | 3% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2648 days | 3% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2652 days | 3% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2665 days | 3% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2774 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2914 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 3003 days | 2% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3006 days | 2% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 3015 days | 2% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3075 days | 2% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3109 days | 2% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3255 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3275 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3309 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3323 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3334 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3369 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3383 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3455 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3501 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3587 days | 1% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3689 days | 1% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3728 days | 1% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3738 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3748 days | 1% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3749 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3840 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4054 days | 0% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4055 days | 0% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4103 days | 0% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4105 days | 0% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4113 days | 0% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4120 days | 0% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4144 days | 0% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4144 days | 0% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4235 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4388 days | 1% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4406 days | 1% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4419 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4447 days | 1% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4447 days | 1% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4461 days | 1% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4478 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 4502 days | 1% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4520 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4525 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4525 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4525 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4570 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4600 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4600 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4692 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4723 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4723 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4749 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4765 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4773 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4776 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4780 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4780 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4781 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4784 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4793 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4793 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4793 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4793 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4795 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4795 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4797 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4798 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4798 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4798 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4800 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4808 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4809 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4809 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4811 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4812 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4812 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4824 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4824 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4826 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4879 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5102 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5102 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5122 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5127 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5135 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5140 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5140 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5141 days | 0% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5149 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5157 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5159 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5161 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5162 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5163 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5166 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5169 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5170 days | 0% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5171 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5172 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5174 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5175 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5176 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5209 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5240 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5428 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5432 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5433 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5445 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5447 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5484 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5492 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5497 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5501 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5501 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5501 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5502 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5503 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5503 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5503 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5510 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5516 days | 0% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5521 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5528 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5535 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5536 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5537 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5539 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5540 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5540 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5540 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5542 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5543 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5543 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5548 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5549 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5556 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5557 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5560 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5560 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5574 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5586 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5593 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5598 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5599 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5613 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5617 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5617 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5617 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5617 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5617 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5627 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5635 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5635 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5714 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5714 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5731 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5760 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5837 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5849 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5849 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5866 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5869 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5882 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5884 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5890 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5896 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5917 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.09% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 61 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 60 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
57 | -1.04% |
58 | -1.06% |
59 | -1.08% |
60 | -1.09% |
61 | -1.11% |
62 | -1.13% |
63 | -1.15% |
… | … |
0.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.