Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
277 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 283 reviews. There are 277 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 277 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
34% |
9/10 | 92 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 52 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.18% and is based on 277 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 277 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.93%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 78 days | 99% |
Fredrik | 9/10 | 109 days | 100% |
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 323 days | 96% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 354 days | 94% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 384 days | 93% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 415 days | 92% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 444 days | 90% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 444 days | 88% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 475 days | 89% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 567 days | 83% |
Chris | 8/10 | 567 days | 81% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 597 days | 75% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 689 days | 74% |
L&P | 8/10 | 720 days | 70% |
Alley | 10/10 | 720 days | 72% |
Josh | 9/10 | 750 days | 68% |
Niff | 10/10 | 781 days | 66% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 809 days | 64% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 809 days | 64% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 840 days | 61% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 871 days | 58% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 901 days | 53% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 901 days | 54% |
Evan | 10/10 | 901 days | 54% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 932 days | 51% |
Emily | 10/10 | 932 days | 51% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 932 days | 50% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 962 days | 48% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 962 days | 48% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 993 days | 45% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1389 days | 16% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1389 days | 16% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1511 days | 11% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1539 days | 9% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1631 days | 7% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1754 days | 5% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1905 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 2028 days | 4% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 2058 days | 4% |
Guru | 9/10 | 2089 days | 4% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 2089 days | 4% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2181 days | 4% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2211 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2270 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2270 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2332 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2332 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2362 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2393 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2393 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2393 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2456 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2580 days | 3% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2635 days | 3% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2662 days | 3% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2666 days | 3% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2679 days | 3% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2788 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2895 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2928 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 3017 days | 2% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3020 days | 2% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 3029 days | 2% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3089 days | 2% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3123 days | 2% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3289 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3323 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3337 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3348 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3383 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3469 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3515 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3601 days | 1% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3703 days | 1% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3742 days | 1% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3752 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3762 days | 1% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3854 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4068 days | 0% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4069 days | 0% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4117 days | 0% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4119 days | 0% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4127 days | 0% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4134 days | 0% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4158 days | 0% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4158 days | 0% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4249 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4420 days | 1% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4433 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4461 days | 1% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4461 days | 1% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4475 days | 1% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4492 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 4516 days | 1% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4534 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4539 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4539 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4539 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4584 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4614 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4614 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4706 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4737 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4737 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4763 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4779 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4790 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4792 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4795 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4798 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4801 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4808 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4808 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4809 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4809 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4811 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4812 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4812 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4812 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4813 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4814 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4821 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4821 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4822 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4823 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4823 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4825 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4826 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4826 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4838 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4838 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4840 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4893 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5149 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5151 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5154 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5154 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5155 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5155 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5155 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5155 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5155 days | 0% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5155 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5162 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5162 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5163 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5171 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5173 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5175 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5176 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5177 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5180 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5183 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5184 days | 0% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5185 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5186 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5188 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5189 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5190 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5223 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5254 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5315 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5315 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5442 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5446 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5447 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5459 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5461 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5498 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5506 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5515 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5515 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5515 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5516 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5527 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5530 days | 0% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5535 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5538 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5538 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5542 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5549 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5550 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5551 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5553 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5556 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5557 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5557 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5562 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5563 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5571 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5574 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5574 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5588 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5600 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5607 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5612 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5613 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5627 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5641 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5649 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5649 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5728 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5728 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5745 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5774 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5833 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5851 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5880 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5881 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5881 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5896 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5897 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5897 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5898 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5910 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5931 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.24% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 69 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 74 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
71 | -1.19% |
72 | -1.21% |
73 | -1.23% |
74 | -1.24% |
75 | -1.26% |
76 | -1.28% |
77 | -1.29% |
… | … |
0.78% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.