Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
287 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 294 reviews. There are 287 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 287 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 102 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 92 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 52 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.04% and is based on 287 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 287 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.67%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tayla | 10/10 | 101 days | 100% |
| Haydyn Bevis | 7/10 | 132 days | 93% |
| Malcolm Luscombe | 10/10 | 160 days | 99% |
| Hugo Chacon | 10/10 | 160 days | 99% |
| Bonnie Creek | 4/10 | 191 days | 64% |
| Kari Flanagan | 10/10 | 191 days | 98% |
| Ann Albon | 10/10 | 222 days | 98% |
| Ann | 2/10 | 252 days | 44% |
| Hui Yu Chan | 10/10 | 344 days | 94% |
| PERERA Bruno | 10/10 | 375 days | 93% |
| Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 525 days | 83% |
| Fredrik | 9/10 | 556 days | 82% |
| Jen Mac | 10/10 | 770 days | 67% |
| Cherish | 10/10 | 801 days | 64% |
| Taylor | 10/10 | 831 days | 61% |
| Fabienne | 10/10 | 862 days | 58% |
| Shawn A | 10/10 | 891 days | 55% |
| Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 891 days | 54% |
| Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 922 days | 52% |
| Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 1014 days | 43% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1014 days | 42% |
| Paulo | 7/10 | 1044 days | 37% |
| Molly M | 10/10 | 1136 days | 32% |
| L&P | 8/10 | 1167 days | 29% |
| Alley | 10/10 | 1167 days | 30% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 1197 days | 27% |
| Niff | 10/10 | 1228 days | 25% |
| Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 1256 days | 23% |
| Steffi V. | 10/10 | 1256 days | 23% |
| Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 1287 days | 22% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 1318 days | 20% |
| Mabel | 8/10 | 1348 days | 18% |
| Corrine | 10/10 | 1348 days | 18% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 1348 days | 18% |
| Eilis | 10/10 | 1379 days | 16% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 1379 days | 16% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 1379 days | 16% |
| Fiona | 9/10 | 1409 days | 15% |
| Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 1409 days | 15% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1440 days | 13% |
| Gotze | 9/10 | 1836 days | 5% |
| J Brown | 10/10 | 1836 days | 5% |
| Zara | 10/10 | 1958 days | 5% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 1986 days | 4% |
| Teesh K | 10/10 | 2078 days | 4% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Robert Adler | 10/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
| Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 2352 days | 1% |
| Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 2475 days | 4% |
| Andrew | 10/10 | 2505 days | 4% |
| Guru | 9/10 | 2536 days | 3% |
| Carolina | 10/10 | 2536 days | 3% |
| Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2628 days | 3% |
| Liz | 8/10 | 2658 days | 3% |
| Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2658 days | 3% |
| Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2658 days | 1% |
| kim thomas | 10/10 | 2689 days | 3% |
| TP&MM | 9/10 | 2689 days | 3% |
| Brigitta | 7/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| Michael S | 9/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| Phil | 7/10 | 2779 days | 3% |
| Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2779 days | 1% |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2809 days | 3% |
| Jolanda | 8/10 | 2840 days | 3% |
| Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2840 days | 3% |
| Cynthia | 10/10 | 2840 days | 3% |
| Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2903 days | 3% |
| Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 3023 days | 3% |
| Tati Moron | 10/10 | 3027 days | 3% |
| Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 3054 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 3054 days | 2% |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 3082 days | 2% |
| Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 3109 days | 2% |
| Katrina | 9/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
| Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 3126 days | 2% |
| Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 3234 days | 2% |
| Duncan | 9/10 | 3342 days | 2% |
| Grace White | 10/10 | 3375 days | 2% |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 3464 days | 2% |
| Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3467 days | 2% |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 3476 days | 2% |
| Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3536 days | 1% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 3569 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3716 days | 1% |
| Betti | 10/10 | 3736 days | 1% |
| Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3770 days | 1% |
| S Black | 7/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3795 days | 1% |
| Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3830 days | 1% |
| Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3844 days | 1% |
| Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3916 days | 1% |
| Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3962 days | 1% |
| Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 4048 days | 1% |
| Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 4149 days | 0% |
| Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 4189 days | 0% |
| Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 4199 days | 0% |
| Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 4209 days | 0% |
| Die Mehles | 7/10 | 4210 days | 0% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4515 days | 1% |
| Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4516 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4564 days | 1% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4566 days | 1% |
| Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4574 days | 1% |
| Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4581 days | 1% |
| GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4605 days | 1% |
| K. H. | 10/10 | 4605 days | 1% |
| ozelmer | 6/10 | 4696 days | 1% |
| Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4849 days | 1% |
| Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4867 days | 1% |
| battum 80 | 3/10 | 4880 days | 0% |
| Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4908 days | 1% |
| Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4908 days | 1% |
| Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4922 days | 1% |
| Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4939 days | 1% |
| John | 9/10 | 4963 days | 1% |
| C Schaap | 9/10 | 4981 days | 1% |
| roos wubben | 9/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
| Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
| Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
| Dagette | 9/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
| Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 5061 days | 1% |
| Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 5061 days | 1% |
| sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 5153 days | 1% |
| MeganG | 9/10 | 5184 days | 1% |
| HelenKate | 10/10 | 5184 days | 1% |
| Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 5210 days | 1% |
| Robin Sable | 9/10 | 5226 days | 1% |
| Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 5234 days | 1% |
| Carole Carter | 8/10 | 5237 days | 1% |
| Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 5239 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 5241 days | 1% |
| J Jmal | 10/10 | 5241 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 8/10 | 5242 days | 1% |
| nztintin | 10/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 5248 days | 1% |
| Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 5254 days | 1% |
| Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 5254 days | 1% |
| B Sluis | 9/10 | 5254 days | 1% |
| Howell Davies | 9/10 | 5254 days | 1% |
| Elaine | 10/10 | 5255 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 9/10 | 5255 days | 1% |
| Stam | 7/10 | 5256 days | 1% |
| Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 5256 days | 1% |
| Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 5258 days | 1% |
| Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 5259 days | 1% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 5259 days | 1% |
| Houter | 9/10 | 5259 days | 1% |
| David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 5260 days | 1% |
| Janse | 6/10 | 5261 days | 1% |
| Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 5268 days | 1% |
| Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 5268 days | 1% |
| Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 5269 days | 1% |
| Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 5270 days | 1% |
| Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 5270 days | 1% |
| Gerhard | 9/10 | 5272 days | 1% |
| Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 5273 days | 1% |
| Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 5273 days | 1% |
| Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 5285 days | 1% |
| Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 5285 days | 1% |
| Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 5287 days | 1% |
| deJong | 10/10 | 5340 days | 1% |
| Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5563 days | 1% |
| Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5563 days | 1% |
| Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5583 days | 1% |
| Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5588 days | 1% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5593 days | 1% |
| Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5593 days | 1% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5593 days | 1% |
| Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5593 days | 1% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 5594 days | 1% |
| Gema | 8/10 | 5594 days | 1% |
| Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5595 days | 1% |
| Berger | 10/10 | 5595 days | 1% |
| Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5595 days | 1% |
| Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5596 days | 1% |
| Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5597 days | 1% |
| Ven | 9/10 | 5597 days | 1% |
| Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5597 days | 1% |
| John Duffy | 10/10 | 5597 days | 1% |
| Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5598 days | 1% |
| Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5601 days | 1% |
| Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5601 days | 1% |
| Max | 10/10 | 5602 days | 1% |
| Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5602 days | 1% |
| Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5602 days | 1% |
| Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5602 days | 1% |
| Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5602 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5602 days | 1% |
| Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
| Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
| Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
| Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
| E C Frans | 6/10 | 5609 days | 1% |
| Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5609 days | 1% |
| Raith | 9/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
| Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5620 days | 1% |
| Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5622 days | 1% |
| Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5623 days | 1% |
| Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5624 days | 1% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5627 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5630 days | 1% |
| Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5631 days | 0% |
| Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5632 days | 1% |
| Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5633 days | 1% |
| Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5635 days | 1% |
| Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
| Jochen | 9/10 | 5637 days | 1% |
| hendrik king | 7/10 | 5670 days | 1% |
| dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5701 days | 1% |
| Montys | 10/10 | 5762 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5762 days | 1% |
| Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5889 days | 1% |
| Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5893 days | 1% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5894 days | 1% |
| Lomas | 10/10 | 5906 days | 1% |
| Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5908 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 5945 days | 1% |
| Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5951 days | 1% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 5951 days | 1% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5953 days | 1% |
| Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5958 days | 1% |
| Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5962 days | 1% |
| Polil | 8/10 | 5962 days | 1% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5962 days | 1% |
| markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5964 days | 1% |
| Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5964 days | 1% |
| Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5964 days | 1% |
| P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5971 days | 1% |
| Rod C | 7/10 | 5974 days | 1% |
| Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5977 days | 0% |
| Giaque | 5/10 | 5982 days | 1% |
| Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5985 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5985 days | 1% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5989 days | 1% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 5996 days | 1% |
| Lewis | 9/10 | 5997 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 5998 days | 1% |
| Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 6000 days | 1% |
| Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 6001 days | 1% |
| Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 6001 days | 1% |
| John Winter | 8/10 | 6001 days | 1% |
| Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 6003 days | 1% |
| grobster | 6/10 | 6004 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 6004 days | 1% |
| Jessica | 8/10 | 6009 days | 1% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 6010 days | 1% |
| Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 6017 days | 1% |
| E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 6018 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 6021 days | 1% |
| Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 6021 days | 1% |
| Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 6035 days | 1% |
| marcusba | 9/10 | 6047 days | 1% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6054 days | 1% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6059 days | 1% |
| carsteng | 9/10 | 6060 days | 1% |
| Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 6074 days | 1% |
| Alan Riley | 8/10 | 6078 days | 1% |
| Ann Riley | 10/10 | 6078 days | 1% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 6078 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 8/10 | 6078 days | 1% |
| Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 6078 days | 1% |
| X Neils | 9/10 | 6088 days | 1% |
| andyge | 9/10 | 6096 days | 1% |
| Cheryl | 9/10 | 6096 days | 1% |
| bondd | 10/10 | 6175 days | 1% |
| harryb | 10/10 | 6175 days | 1% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6192 days | 1% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 6221 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 6280 days | 1% |
| PamB | 9/10 | 6298 days | 1% |
| marianneb | 8/10 | 6310 days | 1% |
| Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 6310 days | 1% |
| SonjaG | 9/10 | 6327 days | 1% |
| JaninaF | 10/10 | 6328 days | 1% |
| Loethke | 9/10 | 6328 days | 1% |
| Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 6343 days | 1% |
| JetteG | 8/10 | 6344 days | 1% |
| VolkerS | 9/10 | 6344 days | 1% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 6345 days | 1% |
| Richard | 10/10 | 6351 days | 1% |
| Terry | 9/10 | 6357 days | 1% |
| john west | 10/10 | 6378 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.76% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 76 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 73 | -0.73% |
| 74 | -0.74% |
| 75 | -0.75% |
| 76 | -0.76% |
| 77 | -0.77% |
| 78 | -0.78% |
| 79 | -0.79% |
| … | … |
1.01% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.