G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
275 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 281 reviews. There are 275 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 275 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
35% |
9/10 | 91 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.20% and is based on 275 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 275 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.71%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 187 days | 100% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 218 days | 99% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 248 days | 98% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 279 days | 98% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 308 days | 97% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 308 days | 95% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 339 days | 95% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 431 days | 91% |
Chris | 8/10 | 431 days | 89% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 461 days | 83% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 553 days | 84% |
L&P | 8/10 | 584 days | 81% |
Alley | 10/10 | 584 days | 82% |
Josh | 9/10 | 614 days | 79% |
Niff | 10/10 | 645 days | 78% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 673 days | 76% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 673 days | 76% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 704 days | 73% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 735 days | 71% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 765 days | 67% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 765 days | 68% |
Evan | 10/10 | 765 days | 68% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 796 days | 65% |
Emily | 10/10 | 796 days | 65% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 796 days | 64% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 826 days | 62% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 826 days | 62% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 857 days | 59% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1253 days | 24% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1253 days | 24% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1375 days | 17% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1403 days | 15% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1495 days | 11% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1618 days | 7% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1740 days | 5% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1769 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 1892 days | 5% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 1922 days | 5% |
Guru | 9/10 | 1953 days | 5% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 1953 days | 5% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2045 days | 5% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2075 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2075 days | 4% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2075 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2106 days | 4% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2106 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2134 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2134 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2196 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2320 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2440 days | 4% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2444 days | 4% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2499 days | 4% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2526 days | 4% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2530 days | 4% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2543 days | 4% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2652 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2759 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2792 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 2884 days | 3% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 2893 days | 3% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 2953 days | 3% |
Chris | 9/10 | 2987 days | 3% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3133 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3153 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3187 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3212 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3247 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3261 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3333 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3379 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3465 days | 2% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3567 days | 2% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3606 days | 2% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3627 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 3932 days | 1% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 3933 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 3981 days | 1% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 3983 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 3991 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 3998 days | 1% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4022 days | 1% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4022 days | 1% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4113 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4266 days | 0% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4284 days | 0% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4297 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4356 days | 0% |
John | 9/10 | 4380 days | 1% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4398 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4448 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4478 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4478 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4570 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4601 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4601 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4627 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4651 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4656 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4659 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4678 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4685 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4685 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4687 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4687 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4689 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4690 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4690 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4702 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4702 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4704 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4757 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 4980 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 4980 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5010 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5010 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5010 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5010 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5011 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 5011 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5012 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 5012 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5012 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5013 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5014 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5014 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5014 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5014 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5015 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5018 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5018 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5022 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5022 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5022 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5022 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5022 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5037 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5041 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5044 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5047 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5048 days | 1% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5049 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5050 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5052 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5053 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5054 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5087 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5118 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5179 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5179 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5306 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5310 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5311 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5323 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5362 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5368 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5368 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5370 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5375 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5381 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5381 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5381 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5391 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5394 days | 1% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5399 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5413 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5414 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5418 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5418 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5418 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5420 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5426 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5427 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5435 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5452 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5464 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5471 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5476 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5477 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5505 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5609 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5638 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5697 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5715 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5727 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5727 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5744 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5745 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5745 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5747 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5760 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5761 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5761 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5762 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5768 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5774 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5795 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.01% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 148 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
145 | -2.95% |
146 | -2.97% |
147 | -2.99% |
148 | -3.01% |
149 | -3.03% |
150 | -3.05% |
151 | -3.08% |
… | … |
0.91% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.